"对着甘地发誓，你说特朗普就是个骗子"？！这是发生在印度议会中的一幕。面对印度反对派领袖的指责，总理老莫迪尴尬不已，无法回应，只能"战术 性"喝水！虽然这是在讨论印巴军事冲突，但更揭示了，印度上下各方对于美国的不信任。 那么最新消息，美国对于印度的最新对等关税标准制定在25%，则更进一步让印度审视自己在国际政治关系和经济关系中何去何从？是同"骗子"美国一起 称兄道弟，还是同中俄巴西等国，一起大力发展金砖国家组织，组成"新三角"合力创造一个经贸全球新秩序呢？ 特朗普一边宣布印度是自己在亚洲最好的兄弟，而印度也自认为如此，为了关税，老莫迪还曾专程访问白宫，特朗普则回应"温暖"的拥抱，但是在实际行 动上，美国将从8月1日起，印度对美国商品的进口关税提升到25%，另外还将施加更多的惩罚措施。苹果公司在印度已经转移了全球20%的制造能力，将 成为此次关税的最大牺牲品。 特朗普认为"我们与印度之间贸易逆差巨大"，美国利益受到严重伤害，另外他也认为印度对美国商品关税税率太高，非关税壁垒又比其他任何国家都 要"繁重和讨厌"。当然印度也不听话，进口俄罗斯石油，参与金砖国家组织，还"一直以来都从俄罗斯购买绝大多数军事装备"。现在 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the complex international political landscape and emphasizes the significant role of Professor Gao Zhikai in understanding and addressing India's position amidst global tensions, particularly regarding U.S. trade policies [1]. Group 1: International Relations - The relationships between countries are described as intricate, akin to a grand chess game, where strategic moves can have substantial implications [1]. - Professor Gao Zhikai's insights and diplomatic wisdom are noted for their ability to influence discussions and garner attention on international platforms [1]. Group 2: U.S. Trade Policies - The article discusses the theme of a debate focused on the Trump administration's strategy of imposing tariffs on countries that resist U.S. government demands [1]. - It is mentioned that the U.S. is leveraging its economic and political power to enforce compliance from other nations through tariffs [1]. Group 3: India's Position - India is portrayed as an emerging power seeking greater influence in international affairs while simultaneously facing significant pressure from the U.S. [1]. - The debate setting, titled "The Rise of New India," underscores India's growing assertiveness in the global arena despite external challenges [1].

Group 1 - Brazilian President Lula's strong response to the U.S. tariffs, particularly the 50% tariff on copper imports, highlights the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Brazil as part of a broader challenge to U.S. hegemony [1] - China's immediate reaction to the U.S. tariffs indicates a united front among BRICS nations, emphasizing the collective resistance against U.S. pressure [1][2] - The U.S. tariffs are seen as an attempt to reshape its domestic copper industry, but this strategy may face significant opposition from countries like China, Russia, and Brazil [1] Group 2 - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated its stance against the broadening of national security concepts and emphasized that trade wars yield no winners, signaling a potential strong counteraction to U.S. tariff policies [2] - In the context of Southeast Asia, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi positioned China as a reliable partner for ASEAN countries, proposing cooperation and stability amidst U.S. actions [4] - Wang Yi's commitment to sign the Southeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty underscores China's dedication to regional peace and serves as a challenge to U.S. nuclear policies [4] Group 3 - The collective response from countries like Brazil and China against U.S. tariffs reflects a growing sentiment among nations facing U.S. pressure, suggesting a potential shift in global alliances [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the recent trade negotiations between the United States and Vietnam, highlighting the significant impact of tariffs on Vietnam's economy and the broader global trade landscape. Group 1: Trade Negotiations and Tariffs - The U.S. has imposed tariffs on Vietnamese goods, with a drastic increase from 0% to 46% on exports such as clothing, toys, and small appliances, which could severely hinder Vietnam's economy that relies heavily on exports to the U.S. [2] - Vietnam's economy is heavily dependent on foreign trade, with exports accounting for nearly half of its GDP, and 30% of its exports going to the U.S. [2] - The U.S. is using Vietnam as a model for its trade negotiations with other countries, presenting the agreement as a new global trade standard [4] Group 2: Economic Consequences for Vietnam - The agreement reached by Vietnam to reduce tariffs from 46% to 20% is seen as a capitulation rather than a negotiation victory, as it may lead to long-term economic disadvantages [4] - The U.S. has introduced a 40% tax on transshipment goods, effectively blocking Chinese goods from entering the U.S. through Vietnam, which could disrupt Vietnam's emerging industries [4] - The potential for strict checks on the origin of transshipped goods poses a significant challenge for Vietnam, which lacks the necessary technology and experience to comply [4] Group 3: Broader Implications for Global Trade - The U.S. is leveraging Vietnam as a testing ground for its tariff policies, which could have ripple effects across ASEAN countries, raising concerns about being used as pawns in the trade conflict [5] - China's swift response to the U.S. tariffs, including imposing anti-dumping duties on steel products from several countries, indicates a strategic countermeasure to protect its interests [4][5] - The article suggests that the ongoing tariff fluctuations are a facade, with the underlying battle being over global supply chain influence and control [5]