中国反制美关税霸权，获全球认可 近期一份在12月29日发布的《中国国际形象全球调查报告》传递出令人深思的信号：国际社会对中国的观感持续向好，而对关税霸权 的批评则日益尖锐。 尤其值得注意的是，多个国家的民众将美国的关税战形容为"单边霸凌"，并对中方采取的对等反制表示支持。 这究竟是国际贸易秩序风向开始转变的征兆，还是国际社会对极端保护主义的一次集体反思？ 民意何以倒向"反霸凌"的那一边 这项覆盖46个国家、约5.17万样本的年度调查显示，全球公众对中国形象的认可度正稳步提升，对其政策理念的认同也在逐渐扩大。 报告发布当日，即获得多家权威媒体的同步转载，凸显出这一议题在当下的现实重要性。 从统计角度看，该调查样本广泛、方法专业，为讨论提供了扎实的数据基础。 与这份年度报告相呼应的是，多项针对关税议题的专项调查同样释放出清晰信号。 根据2025年2月至4月面向38个国家进行的一项民意调查，超过九成受访者对美国的关税霸凌行为表示反对，并且在38国中的37国，大 多数受访者支持中国采取的反制措施。 即便采取相对保守的估算，支持率仍高达六到七成，这足以说明一个趋势：全球舆论对单边加税行为的容忍度正在迅速降低。 为什么" ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around India's response to the U.S. imposing a 25% tariff on Indian imports, which has led to a reevaluation of India's international political and economic relationships [4][9] - The U.S. President Trump has criticized India's high tariffs and non-tariff barriers, claiming a significant trade deficit with India, which has resulted in increased tensions [4][11] - India has indicated plans to retaliate against U.S. tariffs by potentially increasing tariffs on U.S. goods, as stated by Indian officials, although these responses have not been confirmed by Prime Minister Modi [9][11] Group 2 - The economic implications for India are significant, as the country is heavily reliant on Russian oil imports at discounted prices, and the new tariffs could strain its economy further [9][12] - The BRICS nations, including China, Russia, India, and Brazil, are seen as a potential counterbalance to U.S. economic pressure, with India possibly reconsidering its alliance with the U.S. in favor of closer ties with these nations [11][12] - India's economic statistics, including GDP and per capita income, are questioned for their accuracy, suggesting that the country may not be as robust as it claims, which could impact its negotiating power [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the complex international political landscape and emphasizes the significant role of Professor Gao Zhikai in understanding and addressing India's position amidst global tensions, particularly regarding U.S. trade policies [1]. Group 1: International Relations - The relationships between countries are described as intricate, akin to a grand chess game, where strategic moves can have substantial implications [1]. - Professor Gao Zhikai's insights and diplomatic wisdom are noted for their ability to influence discussions and garner attention on international platforms [1]. Group 2: U.S. Trade Policies - The article discusses the theme of a debate focused on the Trump administration's strategy of imposing tariffs on countries that resist U.S. government demands [1]. - It is mentioned that the U.S. is leveraging its economic and political power to enforce compliance from other nations through tariffs [1]. Group 3: India's Position - India is portrayed as an emerging power seeking greater influence in international affairs while simultaneously facing significant pressure from the U.S. [1]. - The debate setting, titled "The Rise of New India," underscores India's growing assertiveness in the global arena despite external challenges [1].

Group 1 - Brazilian President Lula's strong response to the U.S. tariffs, particularly the 50% tariff on copper imports, highlights the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Brazil as part of a broader challenge to U.S. hegemony [1] - China's immediate reaction to the U.S. tariffs indicates a united front among BRICS nations, emphasizing the collective resistance against U.S. pressure [1][2] - The U.S. tariffs are seen as an attempt to reshape its domestic copper industry, but this strategy may face significant opposition from countries like China, Russia, and Brazil [1] Group 2 - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated its stance against the broadening of national security concepts and emphasized that trade wars yield no winners, signaling a potential strong counteraction to U.S. tariff policies [2] - In the context of Southeast Asia, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi positioned China as a reliable partner for ASEAN countries, proposing cooperation and stability amidst U.S. actions [4] - Wang Yi's commitment to sign the Southeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty underscores China's dedication to regional peace and serves as a challenge to U.S. nuclear policies [4] Group 3 - The collective response from countries like Brazil and China against U.S. tariffs reflects a growing sentiment among nations facing U.S. pressure, suggesting a potential shift in global alliances [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the recent trade negotiations between the United States and Vietnam, highlighting the significant impact of tariffs on Vietnam's economy and the broader global trade landscape. Group 1: Trade Negotiations and Tariffs - The U.S. has imposed tariffs on Vietnamese goods, with a drastic increase from 0% to 46% on exports such as clothing, toys, and small appliances, which could severely hinder Vietnam's economy that relies heavily on exports to the U.S. [2] - Vietnam's economy is heavily dependent on foreign trade, with exports accounting for nearly half of its GDP, and 30% of its exports going to the U.S. [2] - The U.S. is using Vietnam as a model for its trade negotiations with other countries, presenting the agreement as a new global trade standard [4] Group 2: Economic Consequences for Vietnam - The agreement reached by Vietnam to reduce tariffs from 46% to 20% is seen as a capitulation rather than a negotiation victory, as it may lead to long-term economic disadvantages [4] - The U.S. has introduced a 40% tax on transshipment goods, effectively blocking Chinese goods from entering the U.S. through Vietnam, which could disrupt Vietnam's emerging industries [4] - The potential for strict checks on the origin of transshipped goods poses a significant challenge for Vietnam, which lacks the necessary technology and experience to comply [4] Group 3: Broader Implications for Global Trade - The U.S. is leveraging Vietnam as a testing ground for its tariff policies, which could have ripple effects across ASEAN countries, raising concerns about being used as pawns in the trade conflict [5] - China's swift response to the U.S. tariffs, including imposing anti-dumping duties on steel products from several countries, indicates a strategic countermeasure to protect its interests [4][5] - The article suggests that the ongoing tariff fluctuations are a facade, with the underlying battle being over global supply chain influence and control [5]