Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalation of tensions between Russia and Ukraine, highlighting recent military actions and international responses, particularly from the United States regarding defense support for Ukraine. Group 1: Military Actions - On November 19, Ukrainian President Zelensky reported that Ukraine is urgently responding to large-scale attacks from Russia, which began on the night of November 18, involving over 470 attack drones and 48 missiles targeting more than 10 regions in Ukraine [3][4] - The attacks resulted in significant casualties, including 10 deaths and 37 injuries in the city of Chervonograd, where a residential building was hit [3] - Ukrainian military claimed to have launched 4 ATACMS missiles at civilian targets in Voronezh, Russia, which were intercepted by Russian air defense systems [4] Group 2: U.S. Support - On November 18, the U.S. approved a $105 million maintenance project for the Patriot air defense system at Ukraine's request, which is crucial for defending against Russian missile attacks [7][8] - This maintenance includes spare parts and services for the Patriot system, particularly upgrades to launch systems [7] - Since February 2022, U.S. military and financial aid to Ukraine has totaled $67 billion, with ongoing discussions about additional support [9] Group 3: Diplomatic Efforts - Zelensky is set to visit Turkey on November 19 to attempt to restart stalled peace negotiations with Russia, although Russia has stated it will not send representatives to the talks [11][12] - The Ukrainian side aims to involve the U.S. in the negotiation process to apply pressure on Russia [12]

Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration has lifted a key restriction on Ukraine's use of Western-supplied long-range missiles, allowing Ukraine to enhance its attacks on targets within Russia [1][3]. Group 1: Policy Changes - The policy adjustment aims to increase pressure on the Russian government to end the conflict with Ukraine, with expectations that Ukraine will use the "Storm Shadow" missiles for more cross-border attacks [3]. - Approval authority for such cross-border strikes has shifted from the U.S. Secretary of Defense to the U.S. European Command, led by General Alexus Grynkewich [4]. - Previously, the use of U.S. missiles or Western missiles relying on U.S. targeting data required approval from the Secretary of Defense, which has now been returned to the European Command [5]. Group 2: Military Actions - Ukrainian forces conducted a large-scale airstrike on a chemical plant in Russia's Bryansk region, using the "Storm Shadow" missiles to successfully hit a key facility for producing explosives and rocket fuel [3]. - The "Storm Shadow" missiles have a range exceeding 180 miles, which allows Ukraine to expand its attack capabilities against Russian targets [3][7]. Group 3: Diplomatic Context - The missile policy change coincides with Trump's earlier push for negotiations to pressure Russia, although he had previously considered providing Ukraine with longer-range "Tomahawk" missiles but later abandoned the idea [3][7]. - Trump expressed interest in meeting with Russian President Putin to discuss ending the conflict, but recent meetings have been postponed, indicating a lack of readiness for serious negotiations from both sides [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the potential for the U.S. to provide Ukraine with advanced long-range weaponry, including Tomahawk cruise missiles, amid ongoing discussions between Ukrainian President Zelensky and U.S. President Trump during the UN General Assembly [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. and Ukraine Relations - Zelensky requested the U.S. to supply long-range strike weapons, specifically Tomahawk missiles with a range exceeding 2000 kilometers, which could target key Russian locations [1]. - Trump expressed no opposition to Zelensky's request but did not make any immediate commitments [1]. - The Ukrainian officials plan to meet with U.S. defense leaders to discuss the issue of long-range weapons [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and Risks - The Biden administration previously rejected Ukraine's requests for Tomahawk missiles due to the potential risks of escalating the conflict [2]. - Analysts warn that granting Ukraine access to such weapons could further intensify the Russia-Ukraine conflict [2]. Group 3: Trump's Position and European Response - Trump's recent comments suggest a shift in his stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, indicating a desire to stop the conflict while criticizing Russia's military effectiveness [2]. - The EU is also taking steps to enhance its defense capabilities, including the establishment of a "drone wall" to monitor airspace violations [3]. - A leaked document reveals the EU's plan to provide Ukraine with up to €140 billion in interest-free loans using frozen Russian assets [3].

《华尔街日报》援引美国和欧洲高级官员的话报道，乌克兰官员将于下周前往华盛顿，同美国防部长赫 格塞思举行会谈。赫格塞思和国防部负责政策的副防长埃尔布里奇·科尔比负责审批乌方提出的使用美 制武器打击俄罗斯领土的请求。 自今年春末以来，美国防部一项高层审批程序阻止了乌方使用美制陆军战术导弹系统（ATACMS）打击 俄境内目标。其间，乌方至少有一次试图使用ATACMS打击俄境内目标，但遭美方拒绝。 白宫和五角大楼尚未就《华尔街日报》的报道作出回应。 美国《华尔街日报》26日报道说，据美国和乌克兰匿名官员透露，美国总统特朗普告诉乌克兰总统泽连 斯基，他对解除美国限制乌克兰使用美制远程打击武器袭击俄罗斯持开放态度，但并未对此作出承诺。 不反对、不承诺 特朗普23日在纽约联合国大会期间与泽连斯基举行会晤。美乌匿名官员透露，泽连斯基在会晤时向特朗 普请求获得更多远程导弹，并批准使用这类武器打击俄罗斯本土目标。特朗普回应称"他不反对这一想 法"，但并未承诺取消美国对此类攻击的禁令。 泽连斯基26日在接受美国阿克西奥斯新闻网站采访时透露，他在与特朗普会晤时请求获得"战斧"巡航导 弹，其最大射程超过2000公里。 特朗普23日在他 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Defense has implemented a high-level approval process that prevents Ukraine from using U.S.-made Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike targets within Russia since late spring of this year [1] - This approval process, established by Deputy Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby, has effectively overturned the previous policy under President Biden that allowed Ukraine to use ATACMS against Russian targets [2] - The current military situation between Russia and Ukraine remains unchanged, as stated by White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, emphasizing that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin is aligned with President Trump’s stance on the need to end the war [1] Group 2 - Trump criticized the Biden administration's policy of allowing Ukraine to strike Russian targets, calling it "stupid" and suggesting it escalates the conflict [2] - Despite Trump's recent statements suggesting Ukraine should attack Russia, U.S. officials indicate that there has been no change in policy regarding the approval process for Ukraine's use of long-range missile systems [2] - Ukraine has developed some domestic long-range weapons to target Russian sites, including drones aimed at attacking Russian oil refineries and aircraft, and is working on a new cruise missile named "Flamingo" expected to enter mass production by the end of this year or early next year [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant shift in former President Trump's stance on the Ukraine-Russia conflict, revealing his encouragement for Ukraine to strike deeper into Russian territory, including Moscow, if provided with long-range weapons [2][3]. Group 1: Trump's Position and Discussions - Trump privately urged Ukraine to enhance its military actions against Russia, indicating a departure from his previous commitment to reduce U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts [2]. - During a call with Ukrainian President Zelensky on July 4, Trump inquired if Ukraine could target Moscow with U.S. supplied long-range weapons, to which Zelensky affirmed the capability if provided with the necessary arms [2][3]. - The conversation reflects a growing desire among Ukraine's Western partners to supply long-range weapons that could bring the conflict to Russian territory [3]. Group 2: Military Aid and Weaponry - Following the Trump-Zelensky discussion, a potential list of weapons for Ukraine was shared during a meeting in Rome, which could allow the U.S. to bypass Congress's freeze on direct military aid by authorizing European allies to supply arms to Ukraine [3]. - Ukraine has requested long-range "Tomahawk" cruise missiles with a range of approximately 1,600 kilometers, but concerns about Ukraine's lack of restraint have been expressed by both Trump and Biden administrations [3][4]. - Trump announced a plan to provide Ukraine with "Patriot" air defense systems and intercept missiles, but did not disclose details on other weapon systems [3]. Group 3: Russian Response and Military Dynamics - Russia has threatened to attack Western targets in response to advanced weapon supplies to Ukraine, but has not yet acted on these threats [5]. - Following Ukraine's use of ATACMS to strike Russian territory, Putin indicated that the conflict has global implications and warned of potential retaliatory actions against countries supplying Ukraine with weapons [5]. - Washington has previously cautioned Ukraine against deep strikes into Russia, but these restrictions appear to be loosening as Ukraine employs domestically produced drones for attacks on Russian military targets [6].

Group 1 - The U.S. military is increasing its deployment in Northern Europe, sending a clear message to Russia despite concerns about NATO's effectiveness under the Trump administration [1][2] - The Nordic and Baltic regions have become central to U.S. war planning due to their strategic importance in controlling shipping routes, territory, and energy reserves [1] - The recent military exercises involving U.S. and U.K. forces alongside Nordic and Baltic nations aim to deter Russian aggression and strengthen alliances, particularly with new NATO members Finland and Sweden [2][3] Group 2 - Local officials emphasize that deepening U.S. relations should not undermine NATO cohesion, aiming to strengthen collective defense rather than create exclusive clubs [3] - Gotland Island is identified as a strategically significant location for deploying sensors and long-range weapon systems to control Baltic Sea operations [3][4] - The U.S. military's rapid deployment capabilities, demonstrated through recent exercises, highlight the importance of coordination among NATO allies in complex military operations [4][5]