来源：雷湘平 美国AI这回彻底搞砸了，企业高管抱怨美政府：低估中国才是最大的败笔! 而美国这场对华科技围剿， 到底为何注定失败？ 这回美国人工智能研究公司（OpenAI）真是把事儿给办砸了！新模型刚一上线就被用户疯狂吐槽，气 得CEO奥尔特曼只能灰头土脸地公开认错，连说"彻底搞砸了"，忙不迭地把默认模型换回旧版。 【美企高管发出警告：美国低估了中国】 可谁都没想到，这道歉的话音还没落，就突然调转枪口开始大谈特谈"中国AI威胁论"，这甩锅技术简直 比他们家AI的智能水平还高。 奥尔特曼对着美国媒体一本正经地警告说，美国严重低估了中国AI发展的复杂性和严重性，这已经不 是简单的"你追我赶"比赛了，而是关系到全球治理格局的大问题。 好家伙，自己家新产品翻车了，第一时间不是好好检讨技术缺陷，反而急着把中国拉出来当挡箭牌，这 套路玩得也太溜了吧？ 明眼人都看得出来，这次新模型翻车纯粹是自身的技术判断失误。用户们纷纷抱怨回答速度变慢、语气 冷冰冰，还经常答非所问。 【美企渲染"中国AI威胁论"】 可奥尔特曼偏不老老实实承认错误，非要扯上地缘政治，把中国当成转移视线的"工具"。这种"自己不 行就怪中国"的套路，硅谷大佬们真 ...

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI's announcement of its model's performance at the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) has sparked controversy, with many officials and academics criticizing the timing and legitimacy of the claim, suggesting it undermines the focus on the participating youth [1][4][5]. Group 1: OpenAI's Announcement and Reactions - OpenAI claimed to have achieved a "gold medal" in the IMO, but this assertion is contested as they were not one of the AI companies officially collaborating with the IMO, and no official evaluators were involved in assessing their submissions [3][4]. - The IMO organizers expressed that AI companies should wait at least a week after the closing ceremony to announce results, emphasizing the need to prioritize the young participants [6][10]. - OpenAI's representative acknowledged that they did not contact the IMO officials beforehand and only informed one organizer, who requested a delay in the announcement [7][8]. Group 2: Comparison with Other AI Companies - In contrast to OpenAI's bold announcement, Google DeepMind chose to remain restrained, adhering to the IMO's guidelines and waiting for an appropriate time to release their results, despite potentially achieving similar success [12][13]. - DeepMind's adherence to the IMO's request highlights a stark difference in approach compared to OpenAI, raising questions about the ethical considerations in AI competition announcements [12][14]. Group 3: Implications for Academic Integrity - The situation has ignited a debate about academic integrity and commercial hype, with critics labeling OpenAI's actions as "rude and inappropriate" [4][6]. - The IMO's internal scoring guidelines, which are not publicly accessible, further complicate the legitimacy of OpenAI's claimed results, as no external evaluation based on these guidelines was conducted [14][15]. Group 4: IMO Results and Future Events - The Chinese team topped the IMO rankings with a total score of 231 points, achieving six gold medals, while the United States team followed with five golds and one silver [17][18]. - The next IMO will be hosted by Shanghai High School, which has a history of success in the competition, having won 18 gold medals overall [30].

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI has developed a new model that excels in creative writing, showcasing significant advancements in this area compared to previous AI capabilities [1][2]. Group 1 - The new model has demonstrated impressive performance in generating a long narrative based on a prompt about AI and sadness, indicating a breakthrough in creative writing [1]. - Historically, AI has not shown exceptional writing abilities, suggesting that this development marks a notable shift in the technology's potential [3]. - OpenAI's focus has primarily been on more structured fields like mathematics and programming, making this exploration into creative writing a significant expansion of its capabilities [1].