Workflow
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan
icon
Search documents
以有力政治监督为高质量发展清障护航
政治监督是督促全党坚持党中央集中统一领导的有力举措,必须做到党中央重大决策部署到哪里,政治 监督就跟进到哪里。作为党内监督和国家监察专责机关,纪检监察机关的首要职责、第一职责是监督, 最根本的是加强政治监督。黑龙江省七台河市纪委监委坚持把政治监督融入大局、以政治监督服务大 局,以有力监督推动全市各级党组织和广大党员干部统一思想、统一意志、统一行动,步调一致向前 进。 强化政治担当,推进政治监督精准有效。组织各县(区)及部门深度剖析本地区、部门及领域贯彻党中 央决策部署情况,结合实际工作,精准筛选政治监督项目。建立定期沟通机制,纪检监察机关实时掌握 被监督单位履职情况,确保监督项目落地落实。推动政治监督与审查调查紧密融合,在查办案件时优先 处理涉及违反政治纪律和政治规矩的问题线索,将严明政治纪律和政治规矩贯穿于审查调查全过程,以 实际行动维护政治生态的风清气正。根据日常监督检查和审查调查中发现的问题线索,聚焦"三重一 大"事项集体决策、项目建设等权力运行关键环节和重点领域,制定"一对一"《政治监督提示单》,精 准发现问题,早提醒、早发现,将问题解决在萌芽状态。 扛起政治责任,推进政治监督常态长效。聚焦"两个维护 ...
推动委托谈话走深走实
以"一图一指引"为对照规范谈话过程。余杭区纪委监委制定《委托谈话工作指引"树状图"》和《委托谈 话场景应用规范指引》,列明委托谈话具体注意事项,作出规范指引。"一图"列明工作清单。采用"树 状图"的形式,以委托谈话前、谈话中、谈话后为主线,聚焦"何时谈""怎么谈""谈出什么效果",明确 在开展委托谈话的不同阶段需要注意的12项工作清单。如,明确委托谈话前需与纪检监察机关问题线索 承办部门充分沟通了解线索情况、确定谈话时间地点和谈话记录人等,确保谈前准备充分。"五类场 景"做好示范指引。针对在谈话中可能会遇到的"被谈话人存在畏惧心理,担心处理不愿说,被谈话人心 理压力大"等不同谈话场景,提出应对处置方式,并对谈话过程中可能遇到的问题,作出规范指引。 以效果为导向提升谈话质效。坚持问题导向、效果导向,实施一案一跟踪、一案一指导、一案一总结, 着力提升委托谈话的针对性和实效性。提升"以谈促警"的教育效果。如,针对反映某社区干部可能存在 干预工程问题,委托该社区党委书记开展谈话。经谈话了解,该社区干部的配偶曾在其未进入社区工作 前承包过该社区某小微工程。社区党委书记对其谈话的同时进行警示提醒,要求在今后工作中严格遵守 ...
准确定性对群众反映强烈问题消极处理的行为
Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of implementing the Central Eight Regulations to strengthen the party's governance and maintain public trust, while acknowledging the persistent issues of formalism and bureaucratism among party members and officials [1] - A case study involving a party member, Fan, highlights the failure to enforce environmental regulations despite multiple complaints from the public regarding pollution from a local sand washing factory, illustrating a lack of accountability and effective action [2][3] - There are differing opinions on how to classify Fan's actions, with one view suggesting a violation of work discipline and another advocating for a classification of formalism and bureaucratism due to neglecting public interests [3][4] Group 2 - The distinction between violations of public discipline and work discipline is crucial, as public discipline directly relates to the party's connection with the people and the protection of their interests [4][5] - The criteria for determining violations of public discipline include the nature of the work, subjective awareness of the issues, objective performance, and the impact on public sentiment and interests [5][6] - Fan's behavior is characterized as formalism and bureaucratism, as he failed to take substantive action in response to public complaints, reflecting a distorted sense of responsibility and a lack of genuine engagement with community concerns [6][7]
以案明纪释法丨利用职权迫使他人接受有偿代理服务构成何罪
Core Viewpoint - The case involves a public official and a private company owner colluding to force businesses to pay for a service that should be free, leading to charges of bribery, money laundering, and abuse of power [2][5][15]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - The public official, identified as the head of A Maritime Bureau, sought to have a private company, controlled by a close associate, handle a new port's electronic data interchange (EDI) declaration services, which are typically free [2][3]. Actions Taken - The official organized a meeting to designate the private company as the EDI agent and pressured other businesses to pay for this service, threatening to deny their EDI applications if they did not comply [3][9]. Financial Transactions - From December 2021 to March 2024, the private company collected over 4.9 million yuan in fees, with the official receiving over 2 million yuan in kickbacks, which were then laundered through various financial maneuvers [3][10]. Divergent Opinions on Legal Classification - Three opinions emerged regarding the classification of the actions: 1. The first opinion suggests the actions constitute forced trading [5]. 2. The second opinion argues for classification as bribery, emphasizing the coercive nature of the actions [6]. 3. The third opinion supports the second but also includes money laundering due to the subsequent financial transactions aimed at concealing the source of the funds [6][11]. Legal Analysis - The actions of the public official and the private company owner are seen as a clear case of bribery, as they exploited the official's position to extract payments for a service that should be free [8][10]. - The laundering of the proceeds through investments and fictitious loan agreements indicates a deliberate attempt to obscure the origins of the illicit funds, fulfilling the criteria for money laundering [11][14]. Abuse of Power - The public official's actions not only violated legal standards but also severely damaged the reputation of the public institution, leading to widespread complaints and media coverage, which constitutes abuse of power [15][16].
学纪知纪明纪守纪丨严查严治违规收送礼品礼金问题
中央纪委国家监委网站 刘一霖 江苏省高邮市纪委监委深入开展违规收送礼品礼金问题专项治理,通过明察暗访、大数据筛查等方式深 挖隐形变异问题线索,推动作风建设常态化长效化。图为近日,该市纪检监察干部走访了解党政部门是 否存在公款购买烟酒产品情况。李昕霞 摄 特邀嘉宾 朱玉明 山东省济南市纪委分管日常工作的副书记、监委副主任 王 谷 江西省宜春市委常委,市纪委书记、监委主任 曾 俊 江苏省高邮市委常委,市纪委书记、监委主任 违规收送礼品礼金是典型的违反中央八项规定精神问题,看似"小事",实则破坏纪律规矩,往往成为滋 生腐败的温床。党的十八大以来,纠治违规收送礼品礼金作为落实中央八项规定精神的重要内容,取得 了哪些成效?现实中,违规收送礼品礼金问题有哪些主要类型?违反哪些纪法规定?如何综合施策、系 统治理违规收送礼品礼金问题?我们特邀纪检监察干部进行交流。 2012年12月,中共中央政治局会议审议通过了中央八项规定,在此时间节点之后党员干部、公职人员违 规收送礼品礼金的行为应定性为违反中央八项规定精神。之后,党中央、国务院和中央纪委、中央有关 部门陆续出台了一系列制度规定。2013年9月,中央纪委、中央党的群众路线教 ...
业务聚焦丨综合施策纠“四风”树新风
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the complexity of addressing the "Four Winds" issues, advocating for a systematic approach that integrates various strategies to enhance effectiveness in governance and reform [1][2][3] - The responsibility chain for addressing the "Four Winds" is tightened, ensuring comprehensive coverage in terms of content, targets, responsibilities, and institutional integration [1][2] - The focus is on the relationship between tackling "Four Winds" and establishing new norms, aiming for a clean government and transparent political environment [1][2] Group 2 - The integration of party discipline, ethics, and regulations is highlighted, with efforts to strengthen the central eight regulations and create a clean political atmosphere [2][3] - A total of 34 typical cases of "Four Winds" issues have been reported since 2024, creating a strong deterrent effect [2] - The establishment of a mechanism for simultaneous investigation of misconduct and corruption is emphasized, with significant actions taken against violations of central regulations [3][4] Group 3 - The transformation of institutional advantages into governance effectiveness is a key focus, with regular analysis of work style dynamics and the implementation of specific measures to uphold central regulations [3][4] - The development of new institutional frameworks aims to address challenges in work style construction, ensuring that successful practices are codified into effective regulations [4]
三堂会审丨帮亲属伪造职工身份参保骗取养老金如何定性
Core Points - The case involves Lin, a former official, who used his position to facilitate his wife's early retirement and pension collection through fraudulent means [2][5][15] - Lin's actions have been classified as embezzlement and bribery, leading to his conviction and sentencing [8][12][18] Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - Lin held multiple positions in B County, including Deputy Director of the Environmental Protection Bureau and Chairman of the Agricultural Development Company [3] - He engaged in a loan transaction with a contractor, resulting in a profit of 38.78 million yuan [3][4] Violations of Financial Laws - Lin was involved in creating a "slush fund" by fabricating labor contracts to siphon off 196,300 yuan [4][14] - He misappropriated funds for unauthorized employee bonuses and reimbursements [4][14] Embezzlement and Bribery - Lin's wife, Tao, sought to retire early by falsely claiming employment with the Agricultural Development Company, which Lin facilitated [5][15] - The company paid a total of 7,649.76 yuan for Tao's insurance, which was included in Lin's embezzlement total [6][18][20] - Lin received bribes totaling 1.245 million yuan from contractors during his tenure [6][8] Investigation and Legal Proceedings - The investigation began in March 2023, leading to Lin's detention and subsequent expulsion from the party and public office [7][8] - Lin was formally charged with embezzlement and bribery, resulting in a four-year prison sentence and a fine of 400,000 yuan [8][12] Legal Analysis - The classification of Lin's loan to the contractor as either a legitimate transaction or a form of bribery was debated, with the conclusion leaning towards it being a violation of ethical standards rather than outright bribery [10][12] - The fraudulent creation of labor contracts was analyzed under the lens of embezzlement, with Lin's intent to misappropriate public funds being a key factor [15][16][18]
纪委书记谈监督 | 持续健全基层监督体系
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to deepen the reform of grassroots supervision mechanisms, integrating disciplinary inspection with various forms of oversight [1] - The Hebei province's Handan City Jizhou County's Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervisory Committee focuses on party-led supervision, enhancing responsibility chains and promoting governance effectiveness [1][2] - In 2024, the county issued 144 reminders regarding "dual responsibilities" and 16 special reports on integrity, while promoting the establishment of 122 regulatory frameworks [1] Group 2 - The county's supervisory system is structured with clear responsibilities, divided into three areas and four grids, ensuring efficient collaboration and accountability [2] - Since 2024, over 50 cross-regional inspections have been conducted, identifying and addressing 420 issues, thereby strengthening the grassroots supervisory network [2] - A mentorship mechanism has been established to enhance the capabilities of local supervisory bodies, focusing on key areas such as case handling and supervision [2] Group 3 - The integration of various supervisory forms is crucial, with a focus on enhancing the role of anti-corruption coordination groups and establishing mechanisms for the transfer and handling of problem clues [3] - In 2024, 89 problem clues were transferred from functional departments, showcasing the effectiveness of joint anti-corruption efforts [3] - The establishment of a system for the integration of four types of supervision aims to improve oversight quality while reducing the burden on grassroots departments [3]
压实责任 督促整改推动增强村级党组织战斗力
中央纪委国家监委网站 刘远航 庄泉村的改变,源于丹徒区纪委监委对该村党总支原书记、村委会原主任戴某严重违纪违法案件的查 处。"戴某私自将村集体300余亩土地转让他人,其中100余亩被用于非法倾倒固体废物,造成集体资产 损失,导致严重的环境污染。"丹徒区纪委监委第八纪检监察室干部邓振兴介绍,戴某还带偏了其他村 干部,导致村民对村干部普遍不信任,村"两委"工作难以开展。该区纪委监委已对与戴某严重违纪违法 案件相关联的9名党员干部予以问责。 四川省通过因地制宜、分类推进对村巡察,打通全面从严治党"最后一公里"。该省资中县纪委监委充分 运用对村巡察成果,联合相关部门推动整顿提升13个软弱涣散村党组织,调整8名不胜任不尽职村级党 组织书记。蓬安县委巡察发现新园乡宽敞沟村"两委"班子年龄结构老化、力量配备不足、带动村民致富 能力不强等问题后,该县纪委监委推动优化村"两委"班子配备,村"两委"班子选优配强后,带领村民发 展"文君桃、相如李"特色产业5000余亩,带动每户年均增收5000余元,成为该县基层治理示范村。 目前,四川省已实现对村巡察工作全覆盖,聚焦人口数量多、集体经济体量大、矛盾纠纷突出、党组织 软弱涣散的重点村 ...
广东海事局:持续加强对海巡执法全过程监督
此前,广东海事局在调研中发现,海巡执法大队队长作为一线执法的"关键少数",其权力运行存在三大 监督难点,包括执法过程难追溯、"八小时外"难监管、廉政风险难预警。对此,广东海事局将加强海巡 执法大队队长全过程监督作为"一把手工程",以数字赋能监督,着力破解海巡执法小微权力运行监督难 题,构建起党组主抓、纪检组监督、科技支撑、基层落实的监督体系。 在广东海事局广州南沙海事处,新式5G执法记录仪可以实现执法过程实时监控、全程记录、随时调取 的全过程监督场景。今年以来,南沙海事处累计存储现场执法音视频1200余小时,全过程监督管理平台 能精准识别现场监管出具"立案调查"意见与行政处罚系统已立案的船舶比对率。据介绍,数据模型还可 以对执法过程、违章查处等执法全链条数据进行智能分析,对立案调查、处理跟踪不及时等廉政风险实 现预警预控,有效促进廉洁执法、规范执法。 在推动数智技术突破的同时,广东海事局注重制度创新协同推进,将监督成果固化为制度规范,形成监 督闭环,推动长效治理。出台《加强海巡执法大队队长全过程监督实施办法》,在160个海巡执法大队 落实精准监督。明确海巡执法大队队长"十不准",建立阳光执法工作模式,要求在工 ...