致：香港交易及結算所有限公司 公司名稱: 創維集團有限公司 （於百慕達註冊成立之有限公司） FF301 股份發行人及根據《上市規則》第十九B章上市的香港預託證券發行人的證券變動月報表 截至月份: 2025年10月31日 狀態: 新提交 FF301 II. 已發行股份及/或庫存股份變動 呈交日期: 2025年11月3日 I. 法定/註冊股本變動 | 1. 股份分類 | 普通股 | 股份類別 | 不適用 | | 於香港聯交所上市 (註1) | | 是 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 00751 | 說明 | | | | | | | | | | 法定/註冊股份數目 | | | 面值 | | 法定/註冊股本 | | | 上月底結存 | | | 10,000,000,000 | HKD | | 0.1 HKD | | 1,000,000,000 | | 增加 / 減少 (-) | | | | | | HKD | | | | 本月底結存 | | | 10,000,000,000 | HKD | | 0.1 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the net inflow and outflow of funds for various companies in the Hong Kong stock market, indicating significant movements in investor sentiment and market dynamics [1][2][3] Net Inflow Summary - The top three companies with the highest net inflow of funds are Huahong Semiconductor (华虹半导体) with 388 million, Pop Mart (泡泡玛特) with 320 million, and Qingdao Beer (青岛啤酒股份) with 305 million [1][2] - The net inflow percentages for these companies are 8.15%, 7.92%, and 58.54% respectively, indicating strong investor interest, particularly in Qingdao Beer [2][3] Net Outflow Summary - The companies with the highest net outflow of funds include Alibaba-W (阿里巴巴-W) with -523 million, Southern Hang Seng Technology (南方恒生科技) with -429 million, and Tencent Holdings (腾讯控股) with -355 million [1][2] - The net outflow percentages for these companies are -3.89%, -4.86%, and -3.36% respectively, reflecting a negative sentiment among investors towards these stocks [2][3] Net Inflow Ratio Summary - The companies with the highest net inflow ratios are Shenzhen Expressway (深圳高速公路股份) at 68.48%, Anhui Wanshan Expressway (安徽皖通高速公路) at 64.22%, and Legend Holdings (联想控股) at 59.98% [1][3] - These ratios suggest a strong demand for shares in these companies relative to their trading volume [3] Net Outflow Ratio Summary - The companies with the highest net outflow ratios are Huadian International Power (华电国际电力股份) at -62.31%, CIMC Enric (中集安瑞科) at -54.98%, and Connoisseur-B (康诺亚-B) at -52.78% [1][3] - These figures indicate significant selling pressure and a lack of confidence among investors in these stocks [3]

Core Points - The seventh "Shenzhen Entrepreneur Day" was held to promote the spirit of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party, recognizing 60 individuals and 30 companies for their contributions to the non-public economy in Shenzhen [1] - Shenzhen has over 2.7 million private enterprises as of June 2025, maintaining its position as the "first city of private economy" in China [1] - The city has implemented a series of reforms to optimize its business environment, which has contributed to significant economic contributions from the private sector [1] Business Environment - Shenzhen's business environment has been continuously optimized, leading to a significant increase in vitality among enterprises [2] - The city has been recognized for four consecutive years as having the best business environment in China [1] - Private enterprises contribute approximately 40% of fixed asset investment, over 50% of tax revenue, nearly 60% of GDP, over 70% of import and export volume, and over 80% of technological innovation [1] Company Innovations - Companies like Skyworth have seen substantial growth in home appliance exports and are expanding into the photovoltaic industry, leveraging Shenzhen's advantages in new energy [2] - Shenzhen-based Pudutech has maintained over 25% of its revenue in R&D investment, ranking first in the global commercial service robot industry with over 23% market share [2][3] - The focus on technological innovation is emphasized by local business leaders, who are encouraged to invest in key technologies and industries to support Shenzhen's goal of reaching a GDP of 4 trillion [3] Awards and Recognition - The "Shenzhen Outstanding Builders of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" award was presented for the first time, highlighting the contributions of non-public economic figures [1][5] - A total of 30 companies received the "Shenzhen Contribution Award," recognizing their significant impact on the local economy [5][6]

Core Viewpoint - Skyworth Group reported a significant increase in revenue for the first half of 2025, but a substantial decline in net profit, raising questions about the underlying factors affecting profitability [3][4]. Group 1: Financial Performance - In the first half of 2025, Skyworth Group achieved operating revenue of 36.264 billion RMB, a 20.3% increase from 30.153 billion RMB in the same period last year [3]. - The net profit for the same period was only 125 million RMB, a dramatic decline of 67.45%, resulting in a net profit margin of 1.01%, significantly lower than Midea Group's net profit margin of 10.61% [3]. - For the entire year of 2024, Skyworth Group's total operating revenue was 65.013 billion RMB, a decrease of 5.8%, with net profit down 34.3% to 1.16 billion RMB [3]. Group 2: Business Segments - Skyworth Group operates four main business segments: smart home appliances, smart system technology, new energy, and modern services [3]. - In 2024, only the smart home appliance segment saw revenue growth of 9.2%, reaching 33.469 billion RMB, while the smart system technology and new energy segments experienced declines of 18.3% and 13.1%, respectively [3]. - The new energy segment rebounded significantly in the first half of 2025, with revenue reaching 13.801 billion RMB, a nearly 54% increase, contributing to 38% of total revenue [4]. Group 3: Market Challenges - The decline in net profit is attributed to the ongoing downturn in the domestic real estate market, which has negatively impacted the sales of major appliances [4]. - Additionally, the competitive market environment has led to a significant drop in the selling prices of smart terminal devices, resulting in decreased operating revenue and gross margins [4].

Core Insights - The performance of washing machines significantly impacts consumer experience, with a recent comparative study revealing that top brands vary widely in cleaning efficiency and energy consumption [1][2][4]. Group 1: Washing Machine Performance - A comparative test conducted by the China Consumers Association and Hangzhou Consumer Council evaluated 25 mainstream washing machines, revealing that only 1 out of 7 top-loading machines achieved a drum cleaning performance of 80% or higher [1][4]. - The average effective volume of front-loading washing machines was measured at 62.9L, while top-loading machines averaged 68.13L, indicating that top-loading machines generally offer more internal space [5][7]. - The cleaning performance of front-loading machines was superior, with an average cleaning value of 1.06 compared to 0.93 for top-loading machines [15][17]. Group 2: Energy Consumption - Many front-loading washing machines, including brands like Casarte and Samsung, approached the critical threshold of the first-level energy efficiency standard in terms of power consumption [1][4]. - The average measured power consumption for 16 front-loading machines was approximately 0.0927 kWh/(kg·cycle), while for 9 top-loading machines, it was about 0.0096 kWh/(kg·cycle) [9][11]. - Notably, LG's front-loading machine exhibited the lowest power consumption, significantly below the group average, indicating superior energy efficiency [9][11]. Group 3: Cleaning Agents and Oil Stain Removal - The study highlighted that front-loading machines generally performed better in removing oil stains, with most achieving cleaning values above 1.01, while only one top-loading machine exceeded this threshold [18][20]. - The cleaning performance of liquid detergents was also tested, with front-loading machines showing a higher average cleaning value compared to top-loading machines [15][17]. Group 4: Consumer Guidance - The study cautioned consumers against relying solely on advertised cleaning ratios, as these often reflect special testing conditions rather than typical usage scenarios [25]. - Recommendations included checking the effective washing capacity and energy efficiency ratings, as well as being aware of noise levels during the spin cycle [25].

Core Insights - The article discusses a comparative test conducted by the China Consumers Association and the Hangzhou Consumer Rights Protection Committee on various washing machines to guide consumers in making informed choices regarding energy-efficient appliances [1] Group 1: Test Overview - A total of 25 washing machines were tested, including 16 drum-type and 9 pulsator-type models from 21 different brands [1] - The testing focused on three main performance areas: usage performance, health and safety performance, and ease of use [1] Group 2: Performance Results - Most samples performed well in terms of energy consumption, cleaning effectiveness, noise during dehydration, and antibacterial performance (for drum-type machines) [1] - Significant differences were noted in the effective volume of washing drums, with some pulsator-type machines showing subpar drum cleaning performance [1] Group 3: Specific Findings - The effective volume of washing drums indicates the internal space available for washing; higher values allow for more laundry [2] - The best-performing drum-type machines had effective volumes of at least 66L, while the best pulsator-type machines had volumes of at least 70L [2] - Seven models demonstrated low energy consumption while achieving high cleaning ratios, indicating superior energy efficiency [2] Group 4: Cleaning and Wear Performance - The cleaning performance was assessed using liquid detergents, with over 50% of drum-type machines achieving a cleaning ratio of at least 1.10 [3] - The wear performance showed that some machines caused minimal damage to fabrics while maintaining high cleaning ratios [3] - Drum-type machines generally outperformed pulsator types in oil stain removal due to their heating capabilities [4] Group 5: Antibacterial Performance - Drum-type washing machines exhibited high antibacterial rates, with most achieving rates of 99.99% or higher [5] Group 6: Consumer Guidance - The China Consumers Association recommends consumers consider four key aspects when purchasing washing machines: capacity, energy efficiency, cleaning performance for specific stains, and noise levels during dehydration [6][7]

Core Viewpoint - Skyworth Group is focusing on long-term development by concentrating resources on core businesses, reducing related transactions, and avoiding competition within the industry [1] Transaction Details - Skyworth Digital, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Skyworth Group, plans to transfer 40% equity in Fengchi Electronics for 116 million RMB, corresponding to a registered capital of 4 million RMB [1] - Skyworth Group will inject 104 million RMB into Fengchi Electronics by contributing 100% equity of Shenzhen Anshida Technology Service Co., valued at a registered capital of 30 million RMB [1] - Shenzhen Skyworth Digital will waive its preemptive right to subscribe for the 115 million RMB capital increase in Fengchi Electronics [1] Ownership Changes - Prior to the transaction, Shenzhen Skyworth Digital held 84% of Fengchi Electronics; post-transaction, this stake is expected to decrease to 32.40%, with Fengchi Electronics no longer included in the consolidated financial statements [1] - After the transaction, Skyworth Group is expected to hold 55.82% of Fengchi Electronics [1]

Core Viewpoint - Skyworth Group (00751.HK) announced that its non-wholly owned subsidiary, Skyworth Digital (000810.SZ), reported a revenue of 6.456 billion RMB for the first three quarters of 2025, reflecting a year-on-year decline of 2.45%. The net profit attributable to shareholders decreased by 63.69% to 85.859 million RMB, with basic earnings per share at 0.0752 RMB [1]. Financial Performance - Revenue for the first three quarters of 2025 was 6.456 billion RMB, down 2.45% year-on-year [1] - Net profit attributable to shareholders was 85.859 million RMB, a significant decrease of 63.69% compared to the previous year [1] - Basic earnings per share stood at 0.0752 RMB [1]

Core Insights - Skyworth Group (00751) announced that its non-wholly owned subsidiary, Skyworth Digital (000810), achieved operating revenue of 6.456 billion RMB in the first three quarters of 2025, representing a year-on-year decline of 2.45% [1] - The net profit attributable to shareholders of the listed company was 85.859 million RMB, a significant year-on-year decrease of 63.69% [1] - The basic earnings per share stood at 0.0752 RMB [1]

香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其 準確性或完整性亦不發表任何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部分內容 而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責任。 承董事會命 創維集團有限公司 行政總裁 施馳 SKYWORTH GROUP LIMITED 創 維 集 團 有 限 公 司 香港，2025年10月24日 （於百慕達註冊成立之有限公司） （股份代號：00751） 海外監管公告 本公告乃根據香港聯合交易所有限公司證券上市規則第13.10B條而作出。 茲載列創維數字股份有限公司（一間在深圳證券交易所A股上市公司及為創維集 團有限公司（「本公司」））的一間非全資附屬公司，本公司間接持有其52.95%股 權）於深圳證券交易所網站刊登的《創維數字股份有限公司關於出售子公司股權 及放棄同比例增資權暨關聯交易的公告》（「該公告」），僅供參閱。 該公告已於深圳證券交易所的巨潮資訊網站上公佈（http://www.cninfo.com.cn）。 於本公告日期，本公司董事會由五名執行董事組成，分別為林勁先生（主席）、施馳先生（行政 總裁）、林衛平女士、吳启楠先生及林成財先生 ...