关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 上海久诚律师事务所股票索赔律师许峰提示，卓朗科技（600225，津信科5，代码400259）虚假陈述引 发的投资者索赔案还在持续推进中。（许峰律师专栏） 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 责任编辑：韦子蓉 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 前期许峰律师代理的卓朗科技投资者索赔案出现重要进展，在法院判决投资者胜诉后，投资者目前已经 收到法院判定的赔偿款项。许峰律师代理的首位卓朗科技投资者索赔已经获得胜诉以及获赔到位。许峰 律师团队同步还在继续推进后续案件的立案工作，还在继续接受其他投资者的索赔委托。 2024年12月25日晚，卓朗科技公告收到证监会《行政处罚决定书》，经查，2019年至2023年，卓朗科技 子公司天津卓朗科技发展有限公司虚构服务器、软件和系统集成服务销售业务，虚增收入和利润。 上述虚假销售业务导致卓朗科技2019年至2023年年度报告分别虚增营业 ...

受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 近日，备受关注的投资者诉天津卓朗信息科技股份有限公司（原简称：卓朗科技、退市卓朗，原证券代 码：600225）证券虚假陈述案又有新进展。 曾代理投资者告赢130余家上市公司并获赔的浙江裕丰律师事务所厉健律师表示，卓朗科技案索赔时效 尚未届满，我们已代理多批股民提交起诉材料。 案情回溯，2024年12月26日，卓朗科技发布《关于收到中国券监会<行政处罚决定书>的公告》。公告 显示，经查：一、卓朗科技定期报告存在虚假记载，2019 年至2023年，卓朗科技子公司天津卓朗科技 发展有限公司虚构服务器、软件和系统集成服务销售业务，虚增收入和利润。二、卓朗科技未按规定披 露对外担保，未在2019年至2020年年度报告中披露对外担保情况，导致卓朗科技2019年至2020年年度报 告存在重大遗漏。 根据最高人民法院虚假陈述司法解释，上市公司等因证券虚假陈述行为导致投资者权益受损，投资者可 以依法起诉索赔，索赔范 ...

卓朗科技2019年至2023年，卓朗科技子公司天津卓朗科技发展有限公司（以下简称卓朗发展）虚构服务器、软件和系统集成服务 销售业务，虚增收入和利润。2019年至2023年年度报告分别虚增营业收入24,915.28万元、48,912.89万元、33,861.50万元、 65,612.78万元、8,225.45万元，占各期对外披露营业收入的21.05%、45.19%、41.60%、72.46%、13.22%；分别虚增利润总额 24,915.28万元、30,989.93万元、33,861.50万元、35,713.19万元、8,225.45万元，占各期对外披露利润总额绝对值的33.81%、 7.68%、41.26%、86.08%、50.27%。 （二）卓朗科技未按规定披露对外担保 2019年9月19日，卓朗科技子公司天津恒泰汇金融资租赁有限公司（以下简称恒泰汇金）与天津农村商业银行股份有限公司河西支 行（以下简称天津农商行）签订抵押合同，约定恒泰汇金以名下27台涡轮风扇发动机为天津农商行对大新华航空有限公司的债权 （包括7.02亿元本金及利息等费用）提供担保。抵押物认定价值为4.91亿元，占2019年、2020年年末 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of Tianjin Zhuolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (delisted Zhuolang) highlights the capital market's zero tolerance for financial fraud, with a recent court ruling confirming the company's long-standing fraudulent activities and resulting in compensation to affected investors [1][3]. Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court announced the completion of the ruling and compensation execution for the securities fraud case involving delisted Zhuolang, with compensation paid to investors within seven months of the case being filed [1][3]. Fraudulent Activities - From 2019 to 2023, Zhuolang's subsidiary, Tianjin Zhuolang Technology Development Co., Ltd., engaged in systematic financial fraud by fabricating core business operations, leading to inflated revenues and profits [3][4]. - The fraudulent activities were primarily focused on two business segments: server and software/system integration services, involving fictitious procurement and sales to related companies without actual product flow [3][4]. Financial Impact - The scale of financial distortion was significant, with reported inflated revenues of 249 million, 489 million, 339 million, 656 million, and 82 million yuan over the years, representing up to 72.46% of disclosed revenues [4]. - The inflated profit totals for the same period were 249 million, 310 million, 339 million, 357 million, and 82 million yuan, with a maximum of 86.08% of disclosed profit totals [4]. Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) previously imposed administrative penalties on Zhuolang, including a fine of 10 million yuan, and the company was officially delisted on March 6, 2025, due to severe violations [4]. - The case utilized a demonstration litigation mechanism, providing a reference for similar cases and reinforcing the message that delisting does not equate to exemption from liability [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing an unprecedented wave of delistings due to major violations, with a record number of companies forced to delist as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [1][6][10] Group 1: Delisting Trends - As of October 15, 2023, 13 companies have triggered mandatory delisting indicators due to major violations, marking a historical high [6][10] - Among these, 8 companies have already been delisted, including notable cases like Zhuolang Technology and Dongfang Group [6][10] - The delisting wave has highlighted the role of investment banks as gatekeepers, with 11 brokerage firms involved in the delisted companies [1][6] Group 2: Investment Banks' Responsibilities - Many problematic companies frequently changed their investment banks during periods of financial misconduct, complicating accountability [2][10] - Most involved investment banks issued "no objection" or "no issues found" reports during the supervision period, raising questions about their diligence [2][10] - The regulatory environment is pushing investment banks to reassess their responsibilities and improve their oversight practices [2][15] Group 3: Case Studies of Violations - ST Dongtong, involved in financial fraud from 2019 to 2022, had its investment bank, First Capital, implicated in fraudulent activities during a stock issuance [8][12] - Guohua Securities was the only firm to issue a risk warning regarding Jiuyou Co., while others remained silent despite ongoing fraud investigations [12][13] - Highong Data had the longest duration of fraud (2015-2023) and changed investment banks multiple times, indicating a pattern of evasion [10][11] Group 4: Regulatory Impact on Investment Banks - The shift towards stricter regulations has led to increased scrutiny of investment banks' roles, with many now enhancing their due diligence processes [15] - Investment banks are reportedly increasing their manpower and resources dedicated to ongoing supervision, reflecting a shift in focus due to regulatory pressures [15]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing an unprecedented wave of delistings due to major violations, with a record number of companies forced to delist as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [1][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Environment - The new delisting regulations that came into effect at the beginning of the year have led to a historical high of 13 companies reaching the mandatory delisting criteria for major violations as of October 15 [1][5]. - The regulatory environment is becoming increasingly stringent, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) enforcing stricter oversight on financial fraud and other illegal activities [4][6]. Group 2: Role of Investment Banks - Eleven investment banks are under scrutiny for their roles in the delisted companies, with only two, First Capital and Wumart Securities, currently facing regulatory action [2][7]. - The complexity of the investment banks' responsibilities is highlighted by the fact that many of the involved companies frequently changed their advisory firms during periods of fraud [4][9]. Group 3: Case Studies of Delisted Companies - Notable cases include *ST Dongtong, which was involved in fraudulent activities from 2019 to 2022, leading to warnings issued to its sponsor, First Capital [7][8]. - Guandao Digital inflated its revenue by 1.465 billion yuan through fraudulent contracts and invoices, resulting in penalties for Wumart Securities, which served as its sponsor [8]. Group 4: Investment Banks' Due Diligence - Many investment banks provided "no objection" reports during the supervision periods of companies that were later found to have committed fraud, raising questions about their diligence [4][12]. - National Securities was the only firm to explicitly warn of risks associated with a client, indicating a lack of proactive risk management among other firms [12][13]. Group 5: Changes in Oversight Practices - Investment banks are reportedly increasing their efforts in due diligence, particularly during the ongoing supervision phases, in response to heightened regulatory scrutiny [15]. - Accounting firms are also enhancing their audit processes, adding independent review steps and increasing personnel to ensure thorough examinations [15].

Group 1 - The lawsuit for investor compensation against Chuangyi Information (300366) has been officially filed in the Chongqing Financial Court, with the legal team continuing to accept claims from other investors [1] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued a notice of investigation to Chuangyi Information on March 28, 2025, for suspected violations of information disclosure laws [1] - Investors who purchased Chuangyi Information shares before March 29, 2025, and sold or held them after that date are eligible to initiate claims [1] Group 2 - The administrative penalty decision against Zhuolang Technology (600225) indicates that the company’s periodic reports contained false records, leading to inflated revenue and profits from 2019 to 2023 [2] - Zhuolang Technology's subsidiary, Tianjin Zhuolang Technology Development Co., Ltd., falsely reported sales of servers, software, and system integration services, resulting in inflated revenues of 249.15 million, 489.13 million, 338.61 million, 656.13 million, and 82.25 million yuan for the respective years, accounting for 21.05%, 45.19%, 41.60%, 72.46%, and 13.22% of reported revenues [2] - Investors who bought Zhuolang Technology shares between September 24, 2019, and March 15, 2024, and sold or held them after that date can also initiate claims [2]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing an accelerated pace of delisting, with a significant increase in companies being warned or forced to delist due to various regulatory standards and stricter enforcement of delisting policies [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Delisting Risks and Statistics - *ST Tianmao issued its fourth risk warning regarding potential delisting due to failure to disclose its 2024 annual report and 2025 quarterly report within the stipulated timeframe [1]. - As of August 7, 2023, 23 A-share companies have been delisted this year, with 8 due to trading-related delisting (e.g., stock price below par), 7 for compliance issues, and 3 for voluntary delisting [1][2]. - The number of delisted companies has significantly increased since 2019, with 212 companies delisted from 2019 to the present, surpassing the total from the previous 20 years [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Changes and Impact - The introduction of the "New National Nine Articles" in April 2022 has led to stricter enforcement of delisting standards, particularly for companies involved in serious violations [3][4]. - The revised stock listing rules have raised the revenue threshold for financial delisting from 1 billion to 3 billion yuan, indicating a tightening of financial health requirements for listed companies [4]. - As of now, 107 companies are under delisting risk warnings due to financial issues, and 118 companies face compliance-related delisting risks [4][5]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The trend towards a normalized delisting mechanism is expected to continue, with a focus on improving investor protection and eliminating the expectation of "shell value" [1][4]. - The new regulations are anticipated to accelerate the exit of loss-making companies from the capital market, thereby promoting structural reforms in the supply side of the economy [5].

Group 1 - Tianjin Zhuolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Delisted Zhuolang, stock code: 600225) has been penalized for false reporting in its annual reports from 2019 to 2023, failing to disclose external guarantees in a timely manner [1] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued an administrative penalty decision against the company for these false statements [1] - Key responsible individuals, including Zhang Kunyao and Dai Ying, have been identified for their roles in orchestrating and managing financial fraud during their tenure at the company [1] Group 2 - From 2019 to 2023, Zhuolang's subsidiary, Tianjin Zhuolang Technology Development Co., Ltd., fabricated sales of servers, software, and system integration services, leading to inflated revenue and profits [1] - The fraudulent transactions involved selling non-existent goods to related companies, creating a closed loop of funds without any real commercial substance [1] - The false sales activities resulted in significant misstatements in the annual reports of Delisted Zhuolang for the specified years [1] Group 3 - On March 27, 2025, Delisted Zhuolang announced two lawsuits filed by investors seeking compensation for losses, currently under review by the Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court [2] - Investors who purchased shares between September 21, 2019, and March 14, 2024, may be eligible to file claims for compensation, subject to court verification [2] - The company is providing support for investors through a dedicated financial consultation team to assist in recovering losses through legal channels [2]

Core Viewpoint - Tianjin Zhuolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhuolang Technology) is facing significant operational and financial challenges, including account freezes, executive resignations, and severe financial misconduct allegations, which have led to investor lawsuits and regulatory penalties [1][2][3] Financial Misconduct - Zhuolang Technology's annual reports from 2019 to 2023 have been severely distorted, with inflated operating revenue figures reaching 249.15 million, 489.13 million, 338.61 million, 656.13 million, and 82.25 million, representing 21.05%, 45.19%, 41.60%, 72.46%, and 13.22% of reported revenues respectively [2] - The inflated total profit figures were also alarming, amounting to 249.15 million, 309.90 million, 338.61 million, 357.13 million, and 82.25 million, constituting 33.81%, 7.68%, 41.26%, 86.08%, and 50.27% of reported profits respectively [2] Regulatory Issues - Zhuolang Technology has been penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission for false reporting, with findings indicating that its subsidiary fabricated sales of servers, software, and system integration services, creating a closed-loop funding mechanism with no real commercial substance [1][2] - The company failed to disclose significant external guarantees, including a 4.91 billion collateral agreement with Tianjin Rural Commercial Bank, which represented 71.89% and 14.82% of the audited net assets at the end of 2019 and 2020 respectively [3] Investor Actions - Following the regulatory penalties, investors have initiated lawsuits against Zhuolang Technology, seeking compensation for losses incurred from March 21, 2019, to March 14, 2024, with cases currently under review by the Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court [3]