Core Viewpoint - The case of Tianjin Zhuolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (delisted Zhuolang) highlights the capital market's zero tolerance for financial fraud, with a recent court ruling confirming the company's long-standing fraudulent activities and resulting in compensation to affected investors [1][3]. Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court announced the completion of the ruling and compensation execution for the securities fraud case involving delisted Zhuolang, with compensation paid to investors within seven months of the case being filed [1][3]. Fraudulent Activities - From 2019 to 2023, Zhuolang's subsidiary, Tianjin Zhuolang Technology Development Co., Ltd., engaged in systematic financial fraud by fabricating core business operations, leading to inflated revenues and profits [3][4]. - The fraudulent activities were primarily focused on two business segments: server and software/system integration services, involving fictitious procurement and sales to related companies without actual product flow [3][4]. Financial Impact - The scale of financial distortion was significant, with reported inflated revenues of 249 million, 489 million, 339 million, 656 million, and 82 million yuan over the years, representing up to 72.46% of disclosed revenues [4]. - The inflated profit totals for the same period were 249 million, 310 million, 339 million, 357 million, and 82 million yuan, with a maximum of 86.08% of disclosed profit totals [4]. Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) previously imposed administrative penalties on Zhuolang, including a fine of 10 million yuan, and the company was officially delisted on March 6, 2025, due to severe violations [4]. - The case utilized a demonstration litigation mechanism, providing a reference for similar cases and reinforcing the message that delisting does not equate to exemption from liability [4][5].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing an unprecedented wave of delistings due to major violations, with a record number of companies forced to delist as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [1][6][10] Group 1: Delisting Trends - As of October 15, 2023, 13 companies have triggered mandatory delisting indicators due to major violations, marking a historical high [6][10] - Among these, 8 companies have already been delisted, including notable cases like Zhuolang Technology and Dongfang Group [6][10] - The delisting wave has highlighted the role of investment banks as gatekeepers, with 11 brokerage firms involved in the delisted companies [1][6] Group 2: Investment Banks' Responsibilities - Many problematic companies frequently changed their investment banks during periods of financial misconduct, complicating accountability [2][10] - Most involved investment banks issued "no objection" or "no issues found" reports during the supervision period, raising questions about their diligence [2][10] - The regulatory environment is pushing investment banks to reassess their responsibilities and improve their oversight practices [2][15] Group 3: Case Studies of Violations - ST Dongtong, involved in financial fraud from 2019 to 2022, had its investment bank, First Capital, implicated in fraudulent activities during a stock issuance [8][12] - Guohua Securities was the only firm to issue a risk warning regarding Jiuyou Co., while others remained silent despite ongoing fraud investigations [12][13] - Highong Data had the longest duration of fraud (2015-2023) and changed investment banks multiple times, indicating a pattern of evasion [10][11] Group 4: Regulatory Impact on Investment Banks - The shift towards stricter regulations has led to increased scrutiny of investment banks' roles, with many now enhancing their due diligence processes [15] - Investment banks are reportedly increasing their manpower and resources dedicated to ongoing supervision, reflecting a shift in focus due to regulatory pressures [15]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing an unprecedented wave of delistings due to major violations, with a record number of companies forced to delist as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [1][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Environment - The new delisting regulations that came into effect at the beginning of the year have led to a historical high of 13 companies reaching the mandatory delisting criteria for major violations as of October 15 [1][5]. - The regulatory environment is becoming increasingly stringent, with the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) enforcing stricter oversight on financial fraud and other illegal activities [4][6]. Group 2: Role of Investment Banks - Eleven investment banks are under scrutiny for their roles in the delisted companies, with only two, First Capital and Wumart Securities, currently facing regulatory action [2][7]. - The complexity of the investment banks' responsibilities is highlighted by the fact that many of the involved companies frequently changed their advisory firms during periods of fraud [4][9]. Group 3: Case Studies of Delisted Companies - Notable cases include *ST Dongtong, which was involved in fraudulent activities from 2019 to 2022, leading to warnings issued to its sponsor, First Capital [7][8]. - Guandao Digital inflated its revenue by 1.465 billion yuan through fraudulent contracts and invoices, resulting in penalties for Wumart Securities, which served as its sponsor [8]. Group 4: Investment Banks' Due Diligence - Many investment banks provided "no objection" reports during the supervision periods of companies that were later found to have committed fraud, raising questions about their diligence [4][12]. - National Securities was the only firm to explicitly warn of risks associated with a client, indicating a lack of proactive risk management among other firms [12][13]. Group 5: Changes in Oversight Practices - Investment banks are reportedly increasing their efforts in due diligence, particularly during the ongoing supervision phases, in response to heightened regulatory scrutiny [15]. - Accounting firms are also enhancing their audit processes, adding independent review steps and increasing personnel to ensure thorough examinations [15].

Group 1 - The lawsuit for investor compensation against Chuangyi Information (300366) has been officially filed in the Chongqing Financial Court, with the legal team continuing to accept claims from other investors [1] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued a notice of investigation to Chuangyi Information on March 28, 2025, for suspected violations of information disclosure laws [1] - Investors who purchased Chuangyi Information shares before March 29, 2025, and sold or held them after that date are eligible to initiate claims [1] Group 2 - The administrative penalty decision against Zhuolang Technology (600225) indicates that the company’s periodic reports contained false records, leading to inflated revenue and profits from 2019 to 2023 [2] - Zhuolang Technology's subsidiary, Tianjin Zhuolang Technology Development Co., Ltd., falsely reported sales of servers, software, and system integration services, resulting in inflated revenues of 249.15 million, 489.13 million, 338.61 million, 656.13 million, and 82.25 million yuan for the respective years, accounting for 21.05%, 45.19%, 41.60%, 72.46%, and 13.22% of reported revenues [2] - Investors who bought Zhuolang Technology shares between September 24, 2019, and March 15, 2024, and sold or held them after that date can also initiate claims [2]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing an accelerated pace of delisting, with a significant increase in companies being warned or forced to delist due to various regulatory standards and stricter enforcement of delisting policies [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Delisting Risks and Statistics - *ST Tianmao issued its fourth risk warning regarding potential delisting due to failure to disclose its 2024 annual report and 2025 quarterly report within the stipulated timeframe [1]. - As of August 7, 2023, 23 A-share companies have been delisted this year, with 8 due to trading-related delisting (e.g., stock price below par), 7 for compliance issues, and 3 for voluntary delisting [1][2]. - The number of delisted companies has significantly increased since 2019, with 212 companies delisted from 2019 to the present, surpassing the total from the previous 20 years [2]. Group 2: Regulatory Changes and Impact - The introduction of the "New National Nine Articles" in April 2022 has led to stricter enforcement of delisting standards, particularly for companies involved in serious violations [3][4]. - The revised stock listing rules have raised the revenue threshold for financial delisting from 1 billion to 3 billion yuan, indicating a tightening of financial health requirements for listed companies [4]. - As of now, 107 companies are under delisting risk warnings due to financial issues, and 118 companies face compliance-related delisting risks [4][5]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The trend towards a normalized delisting mechanism is expected to continue, with a focus on improving investor protection and eliminating the expectation of "shell value" [1][4]. - The new regulations are anticipated to accelerate the exit of loss-making companies from the capital market, thereby promoting structural reforms in the supply side of the economy [5].

Group 1 - Tianjin Zhuolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Delisted Zhuolang, stock code: 600225) has been penalized for false reporting in its annual reports from 2019 to 2023, failing to disclose external guarantees in a timely manner [1] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued an administrative penalty decision against the company for these false statements [1] - Key responsible individuals, including Zhang Kunyao and Dai Ying, have been identified for their roles in orchestrating and managing financial fraud during their tenure at the company [1] Group 2 - From 2019 to 2023, Zhuolang's subsidiary, Tianjin Zhuolang Technology Development Co., Ltd., fabricated sales of servers, software, and system integration services, leading to inflated revenue and profits [1] - The fraudulent transactions involved selling non-existent goods to related companies, creating a closed loop of funds without any real commercial substance [1] - The false sales activities resulted in significant misstatements in the annual reports of Delisted Zhuolang for the specified years [1] Group 3 - On March 27, 2025, Delisted Zhuolang announced two lawsuits filed by investors seeking compensation for losses, currently under review by the Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court [2] - Investors who purchased shares between September 21, 2019, and March 14, 2024, may be eligible to file claims for compensation, subject to court verification [2] - The company is providing support for investors through a dedicated financial consultation team to assist in recovering losses through legal channels [2]

Core Viewpoint - Tianjin Zhuolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhuolang Technology) is facing significant operational and financial challenges, including account freezes, executive resignations, and severe financial misconduct allegations, which have led to investor lawsuits and regulatory penalties [1][2][3] Financial Misconduct - Zhuolang Technology's annual reports from 2019 to 2023 have been severely distorted, with inflated operating revenue figures reaching 249.15 million, 489.13 million, 338.61 million, 656.13 million, and 82.25 million, representing 21.05%, 45.19%, 41.60%, 72.46%, and 13.22% of reported revenues respectively [2] - The inflated total profit figures were also alarming, amounting to 249.15 million, 309.90 million, 338.61 million, 357.13 million, and 82.25 million, constituting 33.81%, 7.68%, 41.26%, 86.08%, and 50.27% of reported profits respectively [2] Regulatory Issues - Zhuolang Technology has been penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission for false reporting, with findings indicating that its subsidiary fabricated sales of servers, software, and system integration services, creating a closed-loop funding mechanism with no real commercial substance [1][2] - The company failed to disclose significant external guarantees, including a 4.91 billion collateral agreement with Tianjin Rural Commercial Bank, which represented 71.89% and 14.82% of the audited net assets at the end of 2019 and 2020 respectively [3] Investor Actions - Following the regulatory penalties, investors have initiated lawsuits against Zhuolang Technology, seeking compensation for losses incurred from March 21, 2019, to March 14, 2024, with cases currently under review by the Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court [3]

证券代码：600225 证券简称：退市卓朗 公告编号：2025-021 天津卓朗信息科技股份有限公司 股票终止上市暨摘牌的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 主办券商：天风证券股份有限公司。 公司股票终止上市后，将转入全国中小企业股份转让系统依托原证券公司 代办股份转让系统设立并代为管理的两网公司及退市公司板块挂牌转让。敬请广 大 投 资 者 关 注 主 办 券 商 后 续 披 露 在 全 国 中 小 企 业 股 份 转 让 系 统 （https://www.neeq.com.cn）的股份确权公告，尽快完成股份确权手续，并办理 加挂资金账户等交易结算手续。 天津卓朗信息科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2025 年 1 月 22 日收 到上海证券交易所出具的自律监管决定书《关于天津卓朗信息科技股份有限公司 股票终止上市的决定》（〔2025〕23 号），上海证券交易所决定终止公司股票上市。 第一节 终止上市股票的证券种类、简称、代码、终止上市决定日期 重要内容提示： 证券停复牌情况：适用 因公司股票终止上 ...

特别风险提示：截至 2025 年 2 月 26 日，公司及控股子公司累计对外担 保余额为 352,874.31 万元（不含本次担保业务），占公司 2023 年经审计归母净 资产的 167.22%，被担保人的 2023 年经审计的资产负债率低于 70%，敬请投资者 充分关注担保风险。 证券代码：600225 证券简称：退市卓朗 公告编号：2025-022 天津卓朗信息科技股份有限公司 关于全资子公司为公司融资业务提供担保的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示: 被担保人名称：天津卓朗信息科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）。 本次担保金额及已实际为其提供的担保余额：本次担保金额合计人民币 15,000 万元。截至 2025 年 2 月 26 日，公司控股子公司为公司提供担保余额为 54,790 万元（不含本次担保业务）。 一、担保情况概述 为满足业务发展需要，公司向天津市华盛房地产开发有限公司（以下简称"华 盛地产"）申请不超过 15,000 万元的借款，借款期限为 1 年。公司全资子公司天 津卓朗 ...

证券代码：600225 证券简称：退市卓朗 公告编号：2025-019 天津卓朗信息科技股份有限公司 关于公司股票进入退市整理期交易的 第八次风险提示公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示: 公司股票进入退市整理期交易的起始日为 2025 年 2 月 7 日，预计最后交 易日期为 2025 年 2 月 27 日。 退市整理期届满后 5 个交易日内，上海证券交易所将对公司股票予以摘 牌，公司股票终止上市。 3.涨跌幅限制：首个交易日无价格涨跌幅限制，此后每日涨跌幅限制为 10% 二、公司股票退市整理期交易起始日及交易期限 公司股票进入退市整理期的起始日为2025年2月7日，退市整理期为15个交易 日，如不考虑全天停牌因素，预计最后交易日期为2025年2月27日，如证券交易 日期出现调整，公司退市整理期最后交易日期随之顺延。如公司股票在退市整理 期内全天停牌的，停牌期间不计入退市整理期，预计的最后交易日期将顺延。全 天停牌天数累计不超过5个交易日。 退市整理期间，公司股票将在上海证券交易所风险警示板交易 ...