由于涉及*ST立方财务造假案，中兴财光华会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）（以下简称"中兴财光华"）被证监会同步追责，并遭到A股客户接连解约。12月 13日，*ST创兴（600193）披露公告称，鉴于2024年度审计机构聘期已满，公司拟改聘政旦志远（深圳）会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）（以下简称"政旦 志远"）担任公司2025年度财务报告和内部控制的审计机构。经北京商报记者统计，11月29日—12月13日，A股市场已有*ST创兴、国民技术等超30家公司宣 布"弃用"中兴财光华。截至目前，中兴财光华还是23股上市公司的审计机构，暂无IPO客户。 *ST创兴在内多股"换所" 据同花顺iFinD，11月29日以来，中兴财光华连遭汉邦高科、ST汇洲、珠海中富等32家上市公司"弃用"。其中，12月13日，包括*ST创兴、华控赛格、德展 健康在内的13家上市公司发布了拟变更会计师事务所的公告。 | 序号 | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 证券代码 | | ▽ 证券名称 | 7 2 | 审计单位 「报告期] 2024年报 [地域类别] 境内 | | | 1 | ...

近日，江苏证监局对永拓会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）（以下简称"永拓所"）在鸿达兴业、恒久科 技、科林环保三家上市公司审计执业过程中未勤勉尽责违法行为一并作出行政处罚。这是2019年《证券 法》修订以来，首次禁止审计机构从事证券服务业务，彰显了监管部门对资本市场违法违规行为"零容 忍"的鲜明态度，释放出严打财务造假、净化市场生态的强烈信号。 二是立体追责打破侥幸心理。监管部门将依法严肃追究中介机构及从业人员违法责任，切实提高违法成 本，有力督促其发挥资本市场"看门人"作用。除行政处罚外，相关违法行为涉及犯罪的，也将按程序依 法移送公安机关追究刑事责任。支持人民法院开展对相关证券虚假陈述责任纠纷案件的审判工作。 三是制度完善筑牢防线根基。2025年4月，监管部门修订印发《会计师事务所从事证券服务业务备案管 理办法》，强化事前准入审查与事后监管联动。通过建立诚信档案、完善分类监管等措施，推动中介机 构从"被动合规"向"主动尽责"转变。 中介机构的执业质量关乎投资者切身利益和资本市场健康发展。此次对永拓所的重罚，不仅宣示了监管 部门维护市场"三公"原则的坚定决心，也揭示了正在构建完善的三重机制：一是强化"不敢违"的震 ...

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has initiated an investigation into First Capital Securities' subsidiary, Yichuang Investment Bank, for alleged negligence in its supervisory duties related to the 2019 convertible bond project of Hongda Xingye, which has since been delisted [1][2][7]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation stems from Yichuang Investment Bank's involvement in the 2019 convertible bond project of Hongda Xingye, where it allegedly failed to diligently supervise the issuance process [2][4]. - Hongda Xingye was delisted in March 2024 due to severe financial fraud and regulatory violations, including unauthorized changes to the use of raised funds amounting to 1.691 billion yuan and inflated profits totaling 4.078 billion yuan from 2020 to 2023 [1][5][7]. - The CSRC's investigation reflects a broader regulatory trend of holding intermediary institutions accountable for their roles in financial misconduct [7]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Despite the ongoing investigation, First Capital Securities reported a revenue of 2.985 billion yuan for the first three quarters of 2025, marking a year-on-year increase of 24.32%, with a net profit of 771 million yuan, up 20.21% [2][3]. - In the investment banking segment, Yichuang Investment Bank generated revenue of 197 million yuan, a 15.13% increase year-on-year, accounting for 6.60% of the company's total revenue [2]. Group 3: Future Business Focus - Yichuang Investment Bank is focusing on initial public offerings (IPOs) on the Beijing Stock Exchange, having successfully submitted one IPO application in the first half of 2025, with two additional projects under review as of June 2025 [3]. - The impact of the ongoing investigation on Yichuang Investment Bank's current operations, particularly its IPO activities, remains to be seen [3].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing an unprecedented wave of delistings due to major violations, with a record number of companies forced to delist as regulatory scrutiny intensifies [1][6][10] Group 1: Delisting Trends - As of October 15, 2023, 13 companies have triggered mandatory delisting indicators due to major violations, marking a historical high [6][10] - Among these, 8 companies have already been delisted, including notable cases like Zhuolang Technology and Dongfang Group [6][10] - The delisting wave has highlighted the role of investment banks as gatekeepers, with 11 brokerage firms involved in the delisted companies [1][6] Group 2: Investment Banks' Responsibilities - Many problematic companies frequently changed their investment banks during periods of financial misconduct, complicating accountability [2][10] - Most involved investment banks issued "no objection" or "no issues found" reports during the supervision period, raising questions about their diligence [2][10] - The regulatory environment is pushing investment banks to reassess their responsibilities and improve their oversight practices [2][15] Group 3: Case Studies of Violations - ST Dongtong, involved in financial fraud from 2019 to 2022, had its investment bank, First Capital, implicated in fraudulent activities during a stock issuance [8][12] - Guohua Securities was the only firm to issue a risk warning regarding Jiuyou Co., while others remained silent despite ongoing fraud investigations [12][13] - Highong Data had the longest duration of fraud (2015-2023) and changed investment banks multiple times, indicating a pattern of evasion [10][11] Group 4: Regulatory Impact on Investment Banks - The shift towards stricter regulations has led to increased scrutiny of investment banks' roles, with many now enhancing their due diligence processes [15] - Investment banks are reportedly increasing their manpower and resources dedicated to ongoing supervision, reflecting a shift in focus due to regulatory pressures [15]

Core Viewpoint - Guodu Securities is embroiled in a significant bond default dispute involving a claim of 475 million yuan from Wukuang International Trust due to the default of the "20 Fusheng 01" bond issued by Fujian Fusheng Group [1][3][4] Financial Performance - Guodu Securities reported a revenue of 749 million yuan for the first half of the year, a year-on-year decrease of 4.42%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 358 million yuan, down 8.1% [1][10] - In contrast, Zheshang Securities, which has recently become the controlling shareholder of Guodu Securities, achieved a net profit of 1.149 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 46.49%, but its revenue fell by 23.66% [10] Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit filed by Wukuang Trust claims that Guodu Securities, as the lead underwriter, failed to fulfill its due diligence obligations, leading to the bond default [3][6] - The court has accepted the case, but no hearing has been scheduled yet [4] - Legal experts suggest that Guodu Securities may bear 10% to 30% of the liability based on past similar cases, with the possibility of a full compensation being low due to the absence of fraud allegations against the firm [2][7][8] Industry Context - The bond default case is part of a broader trend of increasing bond defaults in the real estate sector, which has been under significant financial strain [4][6] - The regulatory environment has become stricter for intermediary institutions, with recent cases establishing precedents for liability in bond issuance [6][8] Business Segments - Guodu Securities' business lines showed mixed results, with brokerage income increasing by 6.73% to 125 million yuan, while proprietary trading and investment banking revenues fell significantly [11] - The firm is also facing additional lawsuits related to contract disputes and alleged false statements in bond underwriting, which could further impact its financial standing and reputation [11]