记者丨崔文静 编辑丨姜诗蔷 视频丨许婷婷 又一例上市公司财务造假案迎来监管重拳。 2025年10月10日，证监会正式对*ST元成（元成环境股份有限公司）作出行政处罚事先告知，揭开这家 公司连续三年系统性财务造假的黑幕。 根据调查结果，*ST元成在2020年至2022年期间，累计虚增营业收入高达2.09亿元，虚增利润总额5046 万元。更严重的是，公司在2022年非公开发行股票文件中，直接引用了这些虚假财务数据，构成欺诈发 行。 为此，*ST元成及其主要责任人员收到了巨额罚单：上市公司主体被处以3745.46万元罚款；5名责任人 员合计被罚4200万元，其中实际控制人、董事长祝昌个人独揽2800万元罚款，并被采取10年证券市场禁 入措施。 证监会同时明确表示，对可能涉及的犯罪线索将移送公安机关处理。 此案还标志着*ST元成成为2025年以来第13家触及重大违法强制退市指标的上市公司。上交所对其依法 启动退市程序。 业内专家指出，近期重大违法退市案例增多，并非因为造假公司数量增加，而是源于退市新规的重大调 整。新规不仅明确了"连续三年及以上造假即坚决出清"的要求，还适度下调了"造假金额+造假比例"的 退市门槛，使 ...

从"戴星"原因上来看，尽管各家所触及的退市指标各有不同，但绝大部分公司都是因业绩与财务而陷入困境。 据悉，在财务类退市指标当中，沪深主板公司连续两年净利润为负且营业收入低于3亿元，将被实施退市风险警示，第三年仍不达标则强制退市；科创板和 创业板公司连续两年净利润为负且营业收入低于1亿元，或者连续两年净资产为负，将被实施退市风险警示，第二年仍未改善则强制退市；北交所公司连续 两年扣非净利润为负且营业收入低于5000万元，将被实施退市风险警示，第二年仍未改善则强制退市。 根据数据，83家主板上市公司中有55家在近一个年度审计中营收低于3亿元；有6家公司面临依法重整或破产清算；构成欺诈发行、财务造假、严重失信、重 大信息违规披露的公司有6家；近一个年度审计中净资产为负的公司有12家；无法出具审计报告的公司有4家。 | 代码 | 名称 | 日期 | of the property and a local be and 原因 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 600193. SH 600892. SH | *ST 创兴 *ST 大晟 | 2025-05-06 2025-05-06 | 营业收入 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Juewei Foods, has been penalized for failing to recognize revenue from franchise store renovation, leading to understated annual reports from 2017 to 2021, resulting in a significant financial and reputational crisis [1][3][5]. Financial Violations - Juewei Foods did not include revenue from franchise store renovations in its financial statements from 2017 to 2021, leading to an understatement of revenue by approximately 724 million yuan [4][5]. - The revenue understatement represented 5.48%, 3.79%, 2.20%, 2.39%, and 1.64% of the reported annual revenue for the respective years [4]. Regulatory Actions - The company received an administrative penalty notice from the Hunan Securities Regulatory Bureau, resulting in a fine of 4 million yuan for the company and additional fines for key executives [5][11]. - Following the penalty, Juewei Foods' stock will be marked with a risk warning, changing its name to "ST Juewei" starting September 23, 2025 [1][5]. Operational Challenges - Juewei Foods is experiencing a significant decline in performance, with a 15.57% drop in revenue to 2.82 billion yuan in the first half of 2025 and a 40.71% decrease in net profit [7]. - The company has also seen a reduction in the number of operational stores, dropping from 15,950 at the end of 2023 to approximately 10,838 by September 3, 2025, indicating a closure of over 5,000 stores [8]. Industry Context - The broader snack food industry, particularly the marinated food sector, is facing intensified competition and a slowdown in market growth, with companies adopting aggressive pricing strategies to maintain market share [10][11]. - Consumer preferences are shifting towards healthier options, putting additional pressure on traditional marinated food products, which are often high in salt and oil [10]. Lessons for the Industry - The situation with Juewei Foods serves as a cautionary tale for the industry, emphasizing the importance of compliance and transparent financial practices to maintain investor trust and navigate competitive pressures [11][15]. - Companies in the marinated food sector must focus on operational integrity and adapt to changing consumer trends to ensure sustainable growth [15].

记者丨崔文静 编辑丨巫燕玲 2025年又一家上市公司因严重财务造假走向退市。 9月12日晚，*ST东通（北京东方通科技股份有限公司）公告收到证监会《行政处罚事先告知书》（以下简称《告知书》）， 因2019年至2022 年连续四年虚构业务、虚增收入4.32亿元，虚增利润3.14亿元，被处以2.29亿元高额罚款。公司实际控制人、时任董事长黄永军被罚2650万元 并采取10年市场禁入 。 值得注意的是，该公司2022年定向增发还引用了虚假财务数据，构成欺诈发行，成为压垮公司的最后一根稻草。 证监会明确表示，本案可能 涉及的犯罪线索将"应移尽移"至公安机关，"退市不免责"的监管信号十分清晰 。 *ST东通是2025年以来第12家触及重大违法退市的上市公司，数量创历史新高 。除7家公司已完成退市外，另有5家已进入退市流程。这一变化 并非因造假公司增多，而是源于退市新规对财务造假退市标准的调整——连续三年及以上造假即坚决出清，且金额和比例门槛进一步下调。 监管机构正以"零容忍"态度严厉打击财务造假，坚决杜绝"一退了之"，进一步强化了退市不是终点，问责才是关键的监管理念。 4年造假被罚2 . 2 9亿 老板市场禁入1 0年 ...

值得注意的是，该公司2022年定向增发还引用了虚假财务数据，构成欺诈发行，成为压垮公司的最后一 根稻草。证监会明确表示，本案可能涉及的犯罪线索将"应移尽移"至公安机关，"退市不免责"的监管信 号十分清晰。 21世纪经济报道 记者 崔文静 北京报道 2025年又一家上市公司因严重财务造假走向退市。 9月12日晚，*ST东通（北京东方通科技股份有限公司）公告收到证监会《行政处罚事先告知书》（以 下简称《告知书》），因2019年至2022年连续四年虚构业务、虚增收入4.32亿元，虚增利润3.14亿元， 被处以2.29亿元高额罚款。公司实际控制人、时任董事长黄永军被罚2650万元并采取10年市场禁入。 *ST东通是2025年以来第12家触及重大违法退市的上市公司，数量创历史新高。除7家公司已完成退市 外，另有5家已进入退市流程。这一变化并非因造假公司增多，而是源于退市新规对财务造假退市标准 的调整——连续三年及以上造假即坚决出清，且金额和比例门槛进一步下调。 监管机构正以"零容忍"态度严厉打击财务造假，坚决杜绝"一退了之"，进一步强化了退市不是终点，问 责才是关键的监管理念。 4年造假被罚2.29亿，老板市场禁入10 ...

Core Viewpoint - The debate surrounding Yi Huiman's tenure highlights the duality of his impact on the A-share market, with criticisms focusing on excessive IPOs draining liquidity, while others emphasize the positive reforms such as the introduction of the registration system and new delisting rules that have made the market more accessible and healthier [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The new Securities Law introduced in late 2019 established a registration system, while the delisting rules published in 2021 mandated automatic delisting for non-compliant companies [2]. - The penalty for fraudulent listings was significantly increased from a maximum of 600,000 to double the amount raised through the fraudulent activities, which could lead to severe financial consequences for offending companies [2]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The historical issue of A-shares being a one-way market has led to many quality companies seeking listings abroad, while the previous lenient delisting rules allowed many poor-quality companies to remain listed [1][2]. - The backlog of companies waiting to go public has negatively impacted investors, but the overall quality of these companies is expected to benefit the A-share market in the long run [2]. Group 3: Case Study - Zijing Storage - Zijing Storage faced severe penalties for financial fraud, including inflating revenue and profits through fictitious sales contracts and other deceptive practices, resulting in a total fine of 90.71 million yuan for the company and its executives [6][16]. - The company’s fraudulent activities included inflating revenue by 43.5 million yuan in 2017, 111.46 million yuan in 2018, and 66.94 million yuan in the first half of 2019, with profit inflation percentages reaching as high as 150.21% in 2020 [7][8][9][13][14]. Group 4: Investor Compensation - The Zijing Storage case marked a significant milestone in A-share history with the introduction of a proactive compensation mechanism, allowing for early compensation to investors amounting to approximately 1.086 billion yuan [17][19]. - The case established new practices such as the administrative enforcement commitment system and representative litigation, which aim to protect investor rights and enhance regulatory efficiency [21][22][23].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant impact of Yi Huiman's tenure as the chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), highlighting both achievements and criticisms during his leadership, particularly in relation to IPOs and market stability [1][3]. Group 1: IPO Achievements - During Yi Huiman's tenure from January 2019 to February 2024, a total of 1,908 IPOs were issued, raising approximately 2.22 trillion yuan, averaging over 10 billion yuan per day [4][5]. - Yi's tenure saw new stock issuance numbers and fundraising amounts far exceeding those of the previous eight chairpersons, with his tenure accounting for 35.43% of total IPOs and 41.59% of total fundraising since 1990 [5]. - The implementation of the registration system for the Sci-Tech Innovation Board and the ChiNext Board was a key factor in the surge of new stock issuances [5][7]. Group 2: Market Challenges - Despite the increase in IPOs, the delisting mechanism did not keep pace, with only 151 companies delisted during Yi's tenure, which is less than 1/10 of the IPOs issued [5][6]. - Significant net selling by major shareholders occurred, with a total net reduction of approximately 2.27 trillion yuan during Yi's term, raising concerns about the impact on market stability [6][8]. Group 3: Regulatory Changes - Yi Huiman's term included the launch of the Sci-Tech Innovation Board in July 2019 and the expansion of the registration system to the ChiNext Board in August 2020 [7][8]. - Major reforms to the delisting system were implemented in late 2020, aimed at improving the regulatory framework [8][10]. - The introduction of new regulations to curb excessive share reductions by major shareholders was initiated in August 2023, indicating a shift towards more stringent market controls [11]. Group 4: Market Performance - The A-share market experienced 20 significant "defense battles" around the 3,000-point mark during Yi's tenure, reflecting ongoing volatility and investor sentiment challenges [12][13]. - The Shanghai Composite Index saw fluctuations, initially rising to 3,288 points but later falling below 3,000 points multiple times due to various economic pressures, including U.S.-China trade tensions [14][15]. - Despite the challenges, the market showed resilience, with a notable recovery towards the end of Yi's term, culminating in a rise above 3,800 points shortly after his investigation was announced [18][20].

Core Viewpoint - The new "National Nine Articles" emphasizes strict rectification of financial fraud and fund occupation, aiming to enhance corporate governance and mitigate risks of delisting [1][7]. Summary by Relevant Sections Regulatory Changes - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued opinions on strict enforcement of delisting systems, with stock exchanges revising delisting rules to include fund occupation as a reason for delisting [1][7]. - Since the implementation of the new delisting rules, a total of 8 companies have resolved fund occupation issues through various means, recovering over 8 billion yuan [7]. Company Cases - On August 18, 2023, two companies, ST Dongshi and *ST Huamei, announced the completion of their fund occupation rectification, allowing their stocks and convertible bonds to resume trading [2][5]. - ST Dongshi's controlling shareholder and related parties resolved a fund occupation of 3.87 billion yuan through compensation agreements and debt transfer with restructuring investors [4][3]. - *ST Huamei's controlling shareholder returned a total of 15.67 billion yuan, including interest, by transferring all shares and using dividend payments to settle the occupied funds [5][4]. Impact of New Regulations - The new delisting regulations have created a strong deterrent effect, prompting companies to clear large amounts of occupied funds before the deadline [6][2]. - The emphasis on timely rectification under the new rules has proven effective in urging controlling shareholders to repay debts [6][7]. Future Directions - The CSRC plans to enhance corporate governance rules and increase penalties for financial misconduct, aiming to strengthen the role of independent directors and encourage institutional investors to exercise their rights [8][9]. - Experts suggest a multi-faceted approach to further address fund occupation issues, including improving governance, monitoring fund flows, and enforcing stricter penalties for violations [9][8].

Group 1 - The new "National Nine Articles" emphasizes strict rectification of financial fraud and fund occupation in key areas [1][7] - Since the implementation of the new delisting rules, a total of 8 companies have resolved fund occupation issues, recovering over 8 billion yuan [1][7] - The new delisting regulations include fund occupation as a reason for delisting, aiming to address non-operational illegal fund occupation in the A-share market [2][6] Group 2 - ST Dongshi and *ST Huamei completed their fund occupation rectification, recovering a total of 19.54 billion yuan [2][4] - ST Dongshi's controlling shareholder used various methods, including debt compensation and equity transfer, to clear 3.87 billion yuan of non-operational fund occupation [3][4] - *ST Huamei's controlling shareholder repaid 15.67 billion yuan, including interest, through share transfer and dividend compensation [4][6] Group 3 - The new delisting rules have created a strong regulatory deterrent, prompting companies to clear large amounts of occupied funds before deadlines [6][8] - Regulatory authorities are committed to improving corporate governance rules and increasing penalties for illegal activities [8][9] - Suggestions for further addressing fund occupation issues include enhancing governance, monitoring fund flows, and implementing stricter approval processes for related transactions [9]

Core Viewpoint - The new "National Nine Articles" emphasizes strict rectification of financial fraud and fund occupation, with a focus on the implementation of delisting rules to address non-operational fund occupation issues in listed companies [1][5][6]. Summary by Relevant Sections Regulatory Changes - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued opinions on strict enforcement of delisting systems, with the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges revising delisting rules to include fund occupation as a delisting condition [1][6]. - Since the implementation of the new delisting rules, a total of 8 companies have resolved fund occupation issues through various means, recovering over 8 billion yuan [1][6]. Company Actions - On August 18, 2023, ST Dongshi and *ST Huamei announced the completion of their fund occupation rectification, allowing their stocks and convertible bonds to resume trading [1][4]. - ST Dongshi's controlling shareholder and related parties repaid 1.954 billion yuan through investor compensation and equity transfer [1][3]. - *ST Huamei's controlling shareholder repaid 1.567 billion yuan, including 110.593 million yuan through dividend compensation and 1.556 billion yuan from the sale of all shares [1][4]. Impact of New Regulations - The new delisting rules have created a strong regulatory deterrent, compelling companies to clear large amounts of occupied funds before the deadline [5][6]. - The cases of ST Dongshi and *ST Huamei demonstrate the effectiveness of the "strict delisting for non-compliance" policy in urging controlling shareholders to repay debts [5][6]. Future Directions - The CSRC plans to enhance corporate governance rules and increase penalties for financial misconduct, aiming to improve the effectiveness of independent directors and encourage institutional investors to exercise their rights [7][8]. - Experts suggest a multi-faceted approach to prevent fund occupation, including improving corporate governance, enhancing monitoring systems, and implementing strict penalties for actual controllers [8].