证券代码：600360 证券简称：*ST 华微 公告编号：2025-042 公司在已实施完成的 2023 年年度权益分派工作中，将控股股东上海鹏盛科技实 业有限公司（以下简称"上海鹏盛"）的现金红利调整为由公司按照有关规定处置， 即其取得的现金股利由公司代管，作为应付股利视后续非经营性资金占用解决的情 况向其支付或由公司收回。 前期，结合公司自查整改工作专项小组核查的情况，公司已向控股股东、实际 控制人发函，要求控股股东、实际控制人及其他关联方采取现金清偿、红利抵债、 以资抵债等方式限期偿还占用公司的资金。控股股东已明确表示愿意积极配合落实 解决非经营性资金占用问题。 吉林华微电子股份有限公司关于被吉林证监局责令改正 及公司股票被实施退市风险警示并被继续实施其他风险警示 相关事项的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或 者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 公司于 2025 年 2 月 12 日收到中国证监会吉林监管局下发的《关于对吉林华微 电子股份有限公司、上海鹏盛科技实业有限公司采取责令改正措施的决定》（吉证 监决〔2025〕 ...

内容概况：中国半导体二极管行业正处于快速发展与转型升级的关键阶段。2024年，中国半导体二极管 行业市场规模为22.57亿美元，同比增长15.33%，主要得益于新能源汽车、5G通信、工业控制等下游应 用领域的强劲需求。技术层面，国内企业加速突破。第三代半导体材料（如碳化硅、氮化镓）的应用成 为焦点，推动二极管向高频、高效、耐高压方向发展。例如，SiC肖特基二极管已在电动汽车充电桩、 光伏逆变器等领域实现规模化应用。此外，光电集成领域取得创新，中国科学技术大学团队提出的三电 极光电二极管结构，通过场效应调控实现光通信带宽提升60%，为下一代高速光电芯片提供技术支撑。 相关上市企业：扬杰科技（300373）、苏州固锝（002079）、捷捷微电（300623）、华微电子 （600360）、华润微（688396）、士兰微（600460） 相关企业：江西铜业股份有限公司、中环半导体股份有限公司、北方华创科技集团股份有限公司、华海 诚科科技股份有限公司、华海清科股份有限公司、上海微电子装备（集团）股份有限公司、华为技术有 限公司、小米科技有限责任公司、比亚迪股份有限公司、小鹏汽车科技有限公司、有研半导体硅材料股 份公司、 ...

Meeting Overview - The annual shareholders' meeting of Chengdu Huamei Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. was held on May 30, 2025, at the company's conference room [2] - The meeting was convened by the board of directors and utilized a combination of on-site and online voting methods [2] - The meeting was presided over by Mr. Wang Ce, as the chairman was unable to attend [2] Attendance - All 7 current directors attended the meeting, along with all 3 current supervisors [3] - The board secretary, Ms. Li Chunyan, and other senior management personnel were also present [4] Resolutions Passed - The following resolutions were approved during the meeting: 1. 2024 Annual Board Work Report [5] 2. 2024 Annual Supervisory Board Work Report [5] 3. 2024 Annual Report and Summary [6] 4. 2024 Financial Settlement Report [6] 5. 2025 Financial Budget Report [6] 6. 2024 Profit Distribution Plan [6] 7. 2025 Expected Routine Related Transactions [6] 8. 2025 Director Remuneration [6] 9. 2025 Supervisor Remuneration [7] 10. Election of Non-Independent Directors [7] 11. Election of Independent Directors [7] Voting and Legal Compliance - All resolutions were ordinary resolutions and received more than half of the valid voting shares [8] - Related shareholders abstained from voting on certain resolutions to ensure fairness [8] - The meeting was witnessed by Beijing Zhonglun Law Firm, confirming that the procedures complied with relevant laws and regulations [9]

北京市中伦律师事务所 关于成都华微电子科技股份有限公司 | 法律意见书 | | --- | 二〇二五年五月 北京 • 上海 • 深圳 • 广州 • 武汉 • 成都 • 重庆 • 青 岛 • 杭州 • 南京 • 海口 • 东京 • 香港 • 伦敦 • 纽 约 • 洛杉矶 • 旧金山 • 阿拉木图 Beijing • Shanghai • Shenzhen • Guangzhou • Wuhan • Chengdu • Chongqing • Qingdao • Hangzhou • Nanjing • Haikou • Tokyo • Hong Kong • London • New York • Los Angeles • San Francisco • Almaty 北京市中伦律师事务所 关于成都华微电子科技股份有限公司 法律意见书 致：成都华微电子科技股份有限公司 北京市中伦律师事务所（以下简称"本所"）接受成都华微电子科技股份有 师事务所从事证券法律业务管理办法》等法律、法规和规范性文件的要求以及《成 都华微电子科技股份有限公司章程》（以下简称"《公司章程》 "），按照律师行业 公认的业务标准、道德规范 ...

Meeting Overview - The shareholders' meeting of Chengdu Huamei Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. was held on May 30, 2025, at the company's conference room in Chengdu [1]. - A total of 110 ordinary shareholders attended the meeting, representing 532,257,353 voting rights, which accounts for 83.5769% of the company's total voting rights [1]. Voting Results - All proposed resolutions were approved during the meeting, with the voting results showing overwhelming support from ordinary shareholders [1][2]. - The voting breakdown for one of the resolutions indicated that 532,076,682 votes (99.9660%) were in favor, while only 165,489 votes (0.0310%) were against, and 15,182 votes (0.0030%) were abstentions [1][2]. Attendance and Legal Compliance - The meeting was chaired by a director due to the absence of the chairman, and the procedures followed were in compliance with the Company Law and the company's articles of association [1]. - The presence of the board secretary and other senior management personnel was noted, ensuring that the meeting was conducted with proper oversight [1]. Legal Witness - The meeting was witnessed by lawyers Xu Kun and Xu Famin, confirming that the procedures and voting results were legally valid and in accordance with relevant laws and regulations [3].

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities in China are intensifying their scrutiny of the misuse of funds by listed companies, particularly focusing on the actions of major shareholders and actual controllers who exploit company resources for personal gain [1][2][3]. Regulatory Actions - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has introduced new rules requiring listed companies to promptly demand the return of misappropriated funds and disclose the reasons for such actions, their impact on the company, and the rectification plans [1][2]. - As of May 28, 2023, there have been 48 administrative measures or penalties against 37 companies related to fund misuse, including warnings, fines, and orders for correction [1][2]. Enforcement Against Major Shareholders - The regulatory bodies are targeting the "key minority," which includes major shareholders and executives who engage in fund misappropriation, with a focus on both direct and indirect methods of fund occupation [2][3]. - Specific cases, such as the reprimand of ST Dongshi for failing to return 106 million yuan of raised funds, illustrate the ongoing enforcement actions against individuals involved in fund misuse [2][3]. Accountability Mechanisms - The regulatory framework emphasizes that misappropriated funds must be returned, with strict deadlines for rectification and potential delisting for non-compliance [4][5]. - Companies are encouraged to utilize legal measures, such as lawsuits and asset freezes, to recover misappropriated funds, ensuring the protection of minority shareholders [5][6]. Independent Oversight - Independent directors are actively involved in urging management to recover misappropriated funds, as seen in the case of ST Changkang, where independent directors issued a reminder to address fund occupation issues [6]. - The China Securities Investor Services Center is promoting collective and derivative lawsuits to enhance investor protection and ensure accountability for fund misuse [6].

证券代码：600360 证券简称：*ST 华微 公告编号：2025-041 相关事项的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或 者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 吉林华微电子股份有限公司关于被吉林证监局责令改正 公司于 2025 年 2 月 12 日收到中国证监会吉林监管局下发的《关于对吉林华微 电子股份有限公司、上海鹏盛科技实业有限公司采取责令改正措施的决定》（吉证 监决〔2025〕4 号），根据《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》（2025 年 4 月修订） 第 9.4.1 条等相关规定，若公司未能按照责令改正要求在 6 个月内（2025 年 8 月 12 日前）清收 149,067.82 万元被占用资金，上交所将对公司股票实施停牌，停牌后两 个月内仍未完成整改的，上交所将对公司股票交易实施退市风险警示。具体内容详 见公司于 2025 年 2 月 13 日披露的《吉林华微电子股份有限公司关于收到中国证券 监督管理委员会吉林监管局 <行政监管措施决定书> 暨可能被实施退市风险警示的风 险提示性公告》（公告编号：2025-014）。 ...

证券代码：600360 证券简称：*ST 华微 公告编号：2025-041 吉林华微电子股份有限公司关于被吉林证监局责令改正 及公司股票被实施退市风险警示并被继续实施其他风险警示 相关事项的进展公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或 者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 公司于 2025 年 2 月 12 日收到中国证监会吉林监管局下发的《关于对吉林华微 电子股份有限公司、上海鹏盛科技实业有限公司采取责令改正措施的决定》（吉证 监决〔2025〕4 号），根据《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》（2025 年 4 月修订） 第 9.4.1 条等相关规定，若公司未能按照责令改正要求在 6 个月内（2025 年 8 月 12 日前）清收 149,067.82 万元被占用资金，上交所将对公司股票实施停牌，停牌后两 个月内仍未完成整改的，上交所将对公司股票交易实施退市风险警示。具体内容详 见公司于 2025 年 2 月 13 日披露的《吉林华微电子股份有限公司关于收到中国证券 监督管理委员会吉林监管局<行政监管措施决定书>暨可能被实施退市风险警示的风 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the regulatory crackdown on the misuse of funds by controlling shareholders of listed companies, highlighting the need for strict compliance and accountability in financial practices [1][3][5]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has mandated four companies, including ST Dongshi and ST Huami, to recover non-operational funds occupied by their controlling shareholders to protect the interests of the companies and minority shareholders [1]. - The new "National Nine Articles" stresses the serious rectification of financial fraud and fund occupation, with regulatory bodies intensifying their efforts against such behaviors [1][3]. - In 2024, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) will strictly combat 35 cases of fund occupation, maintaining a "zero tolerance" stance and increasing accountability for key individuals involved [3]. Group 2: Rectification and Compliance - The revised delisting rules in 2024 include provisions for companies that fail to rectify significant fund occupation issues, potentially leading to delisting [5]. - ST Xintong faced delisting risk due to its controlling shareholder's failure to resolve fund occupation within the designated timeframe, but managed to repay 568 million yuan in cash and 60.48 million yuan through equity compensation [5]. - Companies like ST Huami and ST Dongshi are under pressure to repay occupied funds within a specified correction period, or they will face delisting procedures [5]. Group 3: Accountability Post-Delisting - Companies that face delisting due to operational failures or financial irregularities are still required to repay any occupied funds, as the regulatory stance is that "delisting does not exempt from repayment obligations" [7]. - ST Yangguang's case illustrates that even after delisting, the company is urged to recover occupied funds, with ongoing legal actions against its controlling shareholder [7]. - ST Longyu has not repaid 868 million yuan of occupied funds, and the CSRC has initiated an investigation into the company [7]. Group 4: Investor Protection and Legal Actions - Companies are encouraged to take proactive measures to recover funds from controlling shareholders, with several firms already initiating lawsuits [9]. - Independent directors have played a crucial role in urging companies to conduct thorough checks on fund occupation issues and to ensure repayment from controlling shareholders [9]. - The investor protection center has successfully initiated a derivative lawsuit against ST Moden, resulting in a court ruling for the controlling shareholder to return 240 million yuan in occupied funds [9].

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities are intensifying efforts to address the issue of non-operational fund occupation by controlling shareholders of listed companies, emphasizing the need for timely repayment and accountability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has issued work letters to four companies, including ST Dongshi and ST Huamei, urging them to recover non-operational funds occupied by controlling shareholders [1]. - The new "National Nine Articles" highlights a strict approach to rectify financial fraud and fund occupation, with a focus on enhancing regulatory measures [1][2]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is taking a zero-tolerance stance against fund occupation, with significant penalties imposed on companies like ST Huamei, which faced fines totaling 42.8 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Rectification and Compliance - The revised delisting rules under the new "National Nine Articles" include provisions for companies that fail to rectify significant fund occupation issues within a specified timeframe, potentially leading to delisting [3]. - ST Xintong was subjected to delisting risk warnings due to its failure to resolve fund occupation issues within the designated six-month rectification period [3]. - Companies like ST Huamei and ST Dongshi are under pressure to repay occupied funds or face delisting procedures [3]. Group 3: Accountability Post-Delisting - Companies that face delisting due to operational failures or financial irregularities are still required to fulfill their repayment obligations for occupied funds [4]. - ST Yangguang, which encountered trading delisting, is being urged to recover occupied funds even after its delisting [4]. - The CSRC has initiated investigations into companies like ST Longyu, which reported significant fund occupation issues, emphasizing that delisting does not exempt them from repayment responsibilities [4]. Group 4: Investor Protection and Legal Actions - Companies are encouraged to take proactive measures to recover funds from controlling shareholders, with several firms already initiating lawsuits against them [5][6]. - Independent directors are playing a crucial role in monitoring and urging companies to address fund occupation issues [6]. - The investor protection center has successfully facilitated legal actions, such as the case against ST Moden, where the court ruled in favor of the company regarding fund recovery [6].