Core Viewpoint - China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) plans to acquire 100% equity of three gas storage facilities for a total consideration of 40.016 billion yuan [1] Group 1: Acquisition Details - The acquisition involves Xinjiang Gas Storage, Xiangguosi Gas Storage, and Liaohe Gas Storage, with respective investments of 9.995 billion yuan, 17.066 billion yuan, and 12.955 billion yuan [1] - The acquisitions will be executed through newly established joint ventures, with CNPC's wholly-owned subsidiary Taihu Company holding the majority stake [1] Group 2: Strategic Importance - Gas storage facilities are crucial in the natural gas production, transportation, storage, and sales process, serving as a tool for peak shaving and balancing production from gas fields [1] - The acquisition will add 10.97 billion cubic meters of working gas capacity, enhancing CNPC's ability to match gas storage with sales and optimize the overall efficiency of the natural gas industry chain [1] Group 3: Financial Performance - In the first half of the year, CNPC reported a revenue of 1.5 trillion yuan and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 84.01 billion yuan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The investigation revealed that a consumer was overcharged for fuel due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser, which led to a duplicate billing of 27.18 liters, resulting in a total charge of 67.96 liters instead of the actual 40.78 liters [4][9]. Group 1: Preliminary Situation - On August 9, a consumer reported a dispute at the Tianshan gas station after being charged for more fuel than the tank's capacity [3]. - The gas station sealed the involved fuel dispenser for further investigation, and the consumer received a preliminary compensation on August 12 [3]. - The local market supervision authority initiated an investigation after receiving the consumer's complaint and conducted a follow-up on August 20 [3]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The investigation confirmed that the consumer was indeed overcharged by 200 yuan due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser's software and hardware [4]. - The fuel dispenser was found to be compliant with measurement standards, and no tampering was detected [5][6]. - Staff at the gas station were not found to have engaged in any improper operational behavior during the transaction [7]. - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that its fuel tank capacity was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [8]. - Data analysis revealed that the fuel dispenser erroneously added the previous transaction's volume to the current one, leading to the overcharge [9]. Group 3: Next Steps - The market supervision authority will require the gas station to implement comprehensive corrective measures, publicly apologize to consumers, and improve service quality [10]. - There will be an emphasis on enhancing supervision and complaint mechanisms to better protect consumer rights [10].

Group 1: Overview of Industrial Development - The Huilai Port Industrial Park in Jieyang has rapidly developed into a hub for offshore wind power, featuring over 70-meter tall wind turbine jacket foundations, with nearly a thousand workers actively engaged in production [1] - The park has adopted an "one park, multiple zones" model, attracting major players in the offshore wind power industry, including a 48 billion yuan investment from State Power Investment Corporation [1][3] - The Dannan Sea Petrochemical Industrial Zone, with a 70.2 billion yuan investment from PetroChina, focuses on strengthening the petrochemical industry, becoming a key part of Guangdong's coastal petrochemical industry [1] Group 2: Emerging Industries - Jieyang is focusing on two emerging pillar industries: green petrochemicals and marine economy, supported by five advantageous industries including clothing, hardware, food processing, health, and logistics [3][5] - The Dannan Sea Petrochemical Industrial Zone aims to create a complete industrial chain from crude oil to high-value chemical products, with a projected output value of 127 billion yuan by 2024 [5] - The "super chain master" model is being implemented, with the Guangdong Petrochemical integrated refining and chemical project achieving an output value of approximately 260 billion yuan since its full production in 2023 [5] Group 3: Marine Economy Development - The Huilai Port Industrial Park serves as the main base for developing the marine economy, leveraging 112 kilometers of coastline and 1,329 square kilometers of marine resources [7] - The National Electric Power Investment Corporation plans to initiate a 3 million kilowatt wind power demonstration project this year, building on the existing 900,000 kilowatt offshore wind power capacity [7] - Jieyang is also developing modern marine ranching, with plans for a 153 square kilometer aquaculture zone and various projects to enhance marine product cultivation [8] Group 4: Traditional Industry Upgrades - Jieyang is enhancing traditional industries through the establishment of national-level high-tech zones and innovation platforms, aiming to support enterprises in transitioning to specialized and high-tech sectors [8] - The city has seen 1,120 enterprises achieve digital transformation, with a focus on creating specialized industrial parks and attracting investment projects totaling 35.6 billion yuan [8] Group 5: Urban and Rural Development - Jieyang is improving urban and rural environments through initiatives that enhance the aesthetic and functional aspects of towns and villages, with significant progress in infrastructure and community facilities [10][11] - The city has successfully created 20 model towns and 160 model villages, increasing collective economic income by approximately 36.6 million yuan annually [11]

【#中石油一分公司致歉#】#50升油箱加67.96升汽油调查结果# 中石油四川成都销售分公司2025年8月28 日发布情况说明：近日，有客户反映成都高新天山加油站"50升油箱被加了67.96升汽油"问题，引发社 会关注。我们对此事给客户带来不好的消费体验诚恳致歉，对社会各界的监督表示感谢。事发当日，我 公司在民警见证下立即封存涉事加油枪备查，并对该站其他加油机进行全面排查。积极与客户沟通、达 成谅解，认真配合市场监管部门调查。8月28日，高新区市场监督管理局发布情况通报指出，车主反映 被多收费的情况属实，其原因初步判定为加油机设备软硬件及信息交互故障而导致重复计费，未发现工 作人员存在异常操作行为。针对管理和服务方面存在的问题，我公司将严格落实市场监管部门工作要 求，切实整改，认真履行主体责任，持续加强设备管理，优化服务响应机制，强化员工培训，提升服务 质量，全力保障消费者合法权益。再次感谢社会各界关注和媒体监督。 （视频来源：环视频） ...

Core Viewpoint - A car owner reported being overcharged at a gas station in Chengdu, where a 50-liter fuel tank was charged for 67.96 liters of gasoline, leading to widespread attention and subsequent investigations [1][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The incident occurred on August 9, when the car owner filled up at the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) gas station, resulting in a dispute over the charge [4]. - The gas station initially refused to acknowledge the discrepancy, prompting the car owner to file complaints with multiple departments [1][4]. - Following the complaints, the gas station's fuel pump was sealed, and the owner received a refund three days later [1][4]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration confirmed the overcharging was valid, attributing it to a malfunction in the gas pump's software and hardware, which caused repeated billing [3][6]. - The gas pump in question had recorded 2,863 transactions since its last calibration on June 5, 2025, with only the disputed transaction showing data transmission errors [3][7]. - Investigations revealed that the actual amount of gasoline dispensed was 40.78 liters, while the system erroneously charged for 67.96 liters due to a data overlap from a previous transaction [7]. Group 3: Future Measures - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration will require CNPC to implement comprehensive reforms, publicly apologize to consumers, and enhance service quality [8]. - There will be an emphasis on improving supervision and complaint mechanisms to better protect consumer rights [8].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation confirmed that a car owner was overcharged for gasoline due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser, which resulted in a duplicate billing of 27.18 liters, leading to a total charge of 67.96 liters instead of the actual 40.78 liters filled [2][3]. Investigation Summary - The initial complaint was made on August 9, 2023, when the car owner reported a dispute at the Tianshan gas station, which was followed by a series of investigations and communications with regulatory authorities [1]. - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Bureau conducted a thorough investigation from August 20 to August 27, involving multiple expert institutions to assess the situation [2]. - The fuel dispenser's key components were found to be intact and compliant with regulations, with no evidence of tampering or intentional misconduct by the gas station staff [2][3]. - The investigation included tests on the vehicle's fuel tank capacity, confirming it was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications of 50 liters [3]. - The malfunction was traced back to a software and hardware issue in the fuel dispenser, which caused the erroneous billing [3]. Next Steps - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Bureau will require the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) to implement comprehensive corrective measures, publicly apologize to consumers, and improve service quality [3].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation revealed that a car owner was overcharged for fuel due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser, leading to a double charge of 200 yuan for a transaction that should have been 40.78 liters instead of 67.96 liters [1][2]. Group 1: Preliminary Situation - On August 9, a car owner reported a dispute at the Tianshan gas station after being charged for 67.96 liters of fuel for a 50-liter tank, prompting police involvement and subsequent investigation [1]. - The gas station sealed the involved fuel dispenser, and the local market supervision authority began an investigation after receiving a complaint on August 11 [1]. - The gas station provided initial compensation to the car owner, and follow-up communications confirmed the dispute was resolved by August 17 [1]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The investigation confirmed the car owner's complaint of being overcharged by 200 yuan, attributed to a software and hardware malfunction in the fuel dispenser [2]. - Key components of the fuel dispenser were found to be intact and compliant with measurement standards, with no evidence of tampering or intentional misconduct by the gas station staff [2]. - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that the fuel tank's capacity was consistent with its rated 50 liters, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [2]. - Data analysis revealed that the fuel dispenser erroneously added the previous transaction's volume to the current one, resulting in the overcharge [2]. Group 3: Next Steps - The market supervision authority will require the gas station to implement comprehensive corrective measures, publicly apologize to consumers, and improve service quality [3]. - There will be an emphasis on enhancing supervision and management, improving complaint mechanisms, and addressing public concerns to protect consumer rights [3].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation revealed that a car owner was overcharged for fuel due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser, which resulted in a double charge of 200 yuan for a transaction involving 67.96 liters of gasoline in a 50-liter tank [2][3][7]. Group 1: Preliminary Situation - On August 9, a dispute arose when the car owner reported being overcharged at the China Petroleum Gao Xin Tianshan gas station, leading to police involvement and subsequent investigation by market regulatory authorities [2]. - The gas station provided initial compensation on August 12, and the car owner confirmed the resolution of the dispute during a follow-up visit on August 17 [2]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The investigation confirmed the car owner's complaint of being overcharged by 200 yuan, attributed to a fault in the fuel dispenser's software and hardware, causing repeated billing [3]. - The fuel dispenser's key components were found to be intact and compliant with measurement standards, with no evidence of tampering or intentional inaccuracies [4]. - No abnormal operational behavior was detected from the gas station staff during the investigation [5]. - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that its fuel tank capacity was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [6]. - Data analysis revealed that the fuel dispenser erroneously added the previous transaction's volume to the current one, leading to the overcharge, with only this transaction showing anomalies since the last calibration [7]. Group 3: Next Steps - The regulatory authority will require the gas station to implement comprehensive corrective measures, publicly apologize to consumers, and enhance service quality [8]. - There will be an emphasis on improving supervision and complaint mechanisms to better protect consumer rights [8].

Group 1 - The core issue involves a complaint from a car owner regarding being charged for 67.96 liters of gasoline for a 50-liter fuel tank, leading to an investigation by the Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration [1][2] - The investigation confirmed that the car owner was overcharged by 200 yuan due to a malfunction in the fuel dispenser's software and hardware, which caused a duplicate billing [3][7] - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration will require the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) to implement comprehensive rectifications and publicly apologize to consumers [7] Group 2 - The fuel dispenser's key components were found to be intact and compliant with measurement standards, with no evidence of tampering or intentional inaccuracies [4] - Investigators did not find any abnormal operational behavior from the staff at the gas station during the incident [5] - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that its fuel tank capacity was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [6]

Group 1 - The incident involved a car owner who reported being charged for 67.96 liters of gasoline despite having a 50-liter fuel tank, leading to a consumer dispute at the Tianshan gas station [1][2] - The investigation confirmed that the car owner was overcharged by 200 yuan, attributed to a malfunction in the gas pump's software and hardware, causing duplicate billing [2][5] - The gas pump's key components were found to be intact and compliant with measurement standards, with no evidence of tampering or operational misconduct by the gas station staff [3][4] Group 2 - Tests conducted on the vehicle confirmed that its fuel tank capacity was consistent with the manufacturer's specifications, ruling out the possibility of an oversized tank [4] - The investigation revealed that the gas pump's system erroneously added the previous transaction's volume of 27.18 liters to the current transaction, resulting in the overcharge [5] - The Chengdu High-tech Zone Market Supervision Administration plans to enforce comprehensive rectifications at the gas station, including public apologies and improvements in service quality [5][6]