Core Viewpoint - Longxin Zhongke has successfully delivered the 9A1000 chip for tape-out by the end of September, and the development of the 3B6600 chip is progressing normally [2] Group 1 - Longxin Zhongke confirmed the delivery of the 9A1000 chip on September 30 [2] - The research and development of the 3B6600 chip is ongoing and proceeding as planned [2]

Group 1 - The company has confirmed that the new GPU 9A1000 has been delivered for tape-out at the end of September [1] - The development of the 3B6600 is proceeding normally according to the company's response [1]

12月12日，龙芯中科大宗交易成交10.28万股，成交额1494.71万元，占当日总成交额的0.85%，成交价 145.4元，较市场收盘价145.4元持平。 | 交易日期 | 证券調移 | 证券代码 | | | 成交价(元) 成交金额(万元) 成交量( *) 买入营业部 | | 类出营业部 | 是否为专场 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2025-12-12 | 龙芯中科 | 688047 | 145.4 | 1139.19 | 7.83 | 机构专用 | និង និងប្រទេស | 图 | | 2025-12-12 | 龙芯中科 | 688047 | 145.4 | 355.52 | 2.45 | 机构专用 | ី​​ | Ka | ...

Group 1 - The World Bank has raised its economic growth forecast for China in 2025, attributing this to more proactive fiscal policies and moderately loose monetary policies that support domestic consumption and investment [1] - The diversification of China's export markets is expected to enhance export resilience, with future economic growth increasingly relying on domestic demand [1] - The head of the World Bank's China office emphasized that structural reforms and a more predictable business environment will boost confidence and lay the foundation for resilient and sustainable growth [1] Group 2 - The Shanghai 180 Index (000010) includes 180 large-cap, liquid securities from the Shanghai stock market, reflecting the overall performance of core listed companies [2] - As of November 28, 2025, the top ten weighted stocks in the Shanghai 180 Index account for 26.13% of the index, with notable companies including Kweichow Moutai (600519) and Zijin Mining (601899) [2] - The Shanghai 180 ETF (530280) closely tracks the Shanghai 180 Index, with various connection funds available for investors [2]

Group 1 - The GPU index experienced a decline of 2% during intraday trading on December 5 [1] - Among the constituent stocks, Jingjia Micro fell by 3.48%, Chipone decreased by 2.95%, Haiguang Information dropped by 2.78%, Loongson Technology declined by 2.18%, and Cambricon Technologies fell by 2.12% [1]

Core Viewpoint - The court ruling in favor of Longxin Technology against Shanghai Chip United highlights the increasing importance of brand image and legal rights protection among domestic semiconductor companies in China [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Longxin Technology was awarded 450,000 yuan in damages and a public apology from Shanghai Chip United after a court ruling [1]. - The case originated from a lawsuit filed by Longxin Technology in March 2021, seeking clarification and damages for false statements made by Shanghai Chip United [1][2]. - The final ruling was upheld by the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court, dismissing the appeal from Shanghai Chip United [2]. Group 2: Company Overview - Longxin Technology specializes in general-purpose processor design with its own instruction set architecture, LoongArch [2]. - The company has consistently focused on independent research and development, mastering core technologies in CPU instruction systems, processor IP cores, and operating systems [2]. Group 3: Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of the year, Longxin Technology reported revenue of 351 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 13.94%, while experiencing a net loss of 394 million yuan [2]. - The company anticipates a concentrated revenue recognition from new orders in the fourth quarter, with expectations for significant growth in various business segments [3]. - Longxin Technology aims for a 30% annual revenue growth target, with a trigger value set at 24% for its stock incentive plan [3].

Core Viewpoint - The court has issued a final ruling in favor of Longxin Technology Co., Ltd., ordering Shanghai Chip United Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. to pay 450,000 yuan in damages and publish an apology on its website for ten consecutive days, which will not negatively impact the company's operations or financial results [1][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Background - Longxin Technology filed a civil lawsuit against Shanghai Chip United on March 2, 2021, seeking clarification, an apology, and compensation for economic losses due to false statements [2]. - The case was accepted by the Beijing Internet Court on July 29, 2021, with the case number (2021) Jing 0491 Min Chu 29334 [2]. Group 2: Court Rulings - On July 23, 2025, the Beijing Internet Court ruled that Shanghai Chip United must publish an apology and pay Longxin Technology 450,000 yuan within ten days [2][3]. - The court also stated that if the payment obligation is not fulfilled, the defendant would incur double interest on the delayed payment [3]. - On November 28, 2025, the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court upheld the original ruling, dismissing the appeal from Shanghai Chip United [4]. Group 3: Financial Impact - The final ruling confirms that the lawsuit will not affect Longxin Technology's normal operations or financial performance, and the company will handle the accounting in accordance with legal regulations and accounting standards [1][4].

Core Viewpoint - Longxin Zhongke has won a defamation lawsuit against Shanghai Xinlianxin Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., with the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court upholding the original ruling that requires Shanghai Xinlianxin to issue a public apology and compensate Longxin Zhongke for economic losses [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Longxin Zhongke initiated a civil lawsuit against Shanghai Xinlianxin, seeking a clarification, apology, and compensation for economic losses due to false statements made by Shanghai Xinlianxin [3]. - The first-instance judgment by the Beijing Internet Court ordered Shanghai Xinlianxin to publish an apology on its website for ten consecutive days and to pay Longxin Zhongke 450,000 yuan in damages [3]. - The appeal by Shanghai Xinlianxin was rejected by the Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court, which confirmed the original court's findings and legal application [3]. Group 2: Company Position and Industry Context - Longxin Zhongke emphasized that the case is crucial for clarifying false statements and restoring its reputation, which is important for protecting the legitimate rights of the company and its partners [3]. - The company aims to foster a more regulated and orderly industry discourse environment and signals its commitment to legal rights protection and brand maintenance [3]. - The increase in defamation cases in the tech industry highlights the importance of judicial rulings in clarifying responsibilities and reinforcing compliance expectations, although litigation can incur time and resource costs [4]. Group 3: Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, Longxin Zhongke reported revenues of 351 million yuan and a net loss of 394 million yuan, indicating ongoing financial challenges [4]. - The company continues to invest in product research and ecosystem development while pursuing compliance and brand protection strategies [4]. - Future performance will depend on product competitiveness, ecosystem expansion, and market development progress, with investors advised to consider the actual impact of short-term litigation on the company's fundamentals [4].

证券代码：688047 证券简称：龙芯中科 公告编号：2025-043 龙芯中科技术股份有限公司 关于诉讼事项结果的公告 一、诉讼基本情况 龙芯中科于 2021 年 3 月 2 日向北京互联网法院提起《民事起诉状》。公司请 求北京互联网法院判令：上海芯联芯向龙芯中科及合作伙伴就其所述的不实内容 进行澄清、道歉、恢复名誉、消除影响并且赔偿龙芯中科经济损失。该案已于 2021 年 7 月 29 日完成立案受理，案号为（2021）京 0491 民初 29334 号。上述 诉讼事项详见公司 2022 年 6 月 21 日于上海证券交易所网站（www.sse.com.cn） 披露的《龙芯中科首次公开发行股票并在科创板上市招股说明书》中"第十一章 其他重要事项"之"三、（二）正在进行的诉讼事项"相关内容。 公司于 2025 年 7 月 23 日收到北京互联网法院出具的民事判决书。具体判决 如下： "一、自本判决生效之日起十日内，被告上海芯联芯智能科技有限公司在其 官网（www.cipunited.com）首页置顶位置连续十日发布致歉声明，以消除影响， 恢复原告龙芯中科技术股份有限公司名誉（致歉内容须经本院审核，如逾期不履 ...

Core Viewpoint - The court has upheld the first-instance ruling in favor of the company against Shanghai Xilianxin, requiring the latter to issue a public apology and compensate the company for economic losses totaling 450,000 yuan, along with bearing the case acceptance fee of 11,270 yuan [1] Group 1 - The company was the plaintiff in the first instance and the respondent in the second instance of the lawsuit against Shanghai Xilianxin [1] - The first-instance ruling mandated Shanghai Xilianxin to publish an apology on its official website for ten consecutive days to restore the company's reputation [1] - The second-instance court rejected Shanghai Xilianxin's appeal, maintaining the original judgment and requiring it to pay an additional case acceptance fee of 2,600 yuan [1] Group 2 - The final judgment is not expected to impact the company's normal production operations or financial performance [1]