永太科技：因名誉权纠纷 公司及子公司起诉天赐材料 智通财经7月3日电，永太科技(002326.SZ)公告称，永太科技及控股子公司邵武永太高新材料有限公司 因广州天赐高新材料股份有限公司侵害名誉权的行为，分别向临海市人民法院和邵武市人民法院提起民 事诉讼。临海市人民法院和邵武市人民法院已于2025年7月3日立案受理。涉案金额合计人民币5752万 元。案件尚未开庭审理，对公司本期利润或期后利润的影响存在不确定性。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal dispute between Tianqi Materials and Yongtai Technology regarding alleged trade secret infringement, with Tianqi seeking compensation of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Dispute Details - Tianqi Materials' subsidiary, Jiujiang Tianqi, has filed a lawsuit against twelve defendants, including Yongtai Technology, for trade secret infringement [1][3]. - The lawsuit claims that the defendants, particularly Li Sheng, who previously worked at Jiujiang Tianqi, used proprietary technology in Yongtai's production processes after leaving the company [3][4]. - Tianqi's demands include stopping the infringement, destroying related production equipment, and public apologies from the defendants [4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The claimed compensation of 887 million yuan is significant for both companies, impacting their financial health [9]. - In 2024, Yongtai Technology reported a net loss of 478 million yuan, while Tianqi Materials achieved a net profit of 484 million yuan [10]. - As of Q1 2025, Yongtai's cash reserves were only 595 million yuan, with accounts receivable nearing 1.2 billion yuan, indicating potential financial strain from the lawsuit [10]. Group 3: Market Reaction - The stock market has reacted to the news, with Yongtai Technology's share price dropping by 1.94% to 12.16 yuan, while Tianqi Materials' share price increased by 4.18% to 18.95 yuan [10].

Core Viewpoint - The company Tian Ci Materials has filed a lawsuit against 12 defendants for commercial secret infringement, with the amount involved reaching RMB 88,825 million, highlighting the importance of intellectual property protection in the industry [3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Tian Ci Materials' subsidiary, Jiujiang Tian Ci High-tech Materials Co., Ltd., initiated the lawsuit in response to the illegal acquisition and application of its liquid lithium hexafluorophosphate technology by former employee Li Sheng and others [3]. - The lawsuit requests the defendants to cease the infringement, destroy the infringing production line equipment and technical materials, and compensate for economic losses and legal fees [4]. - The company does not expect immediate negative impacts on its current financial results due to the lawsuit, but the potential effects on future profits remain uncertain [4]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The lawsuit underscores the critical nature of protecting commercial secrets as a core competitive advantage for companies in the industry [5]. - It serves as a reminder for other enterprises to enhance their confidentiality management systems to prevent unauthorized access and use of commercial secrets [5]. - The legal action reflects a stringent stance against commercial secret infringement, indicating that violations will face legal consequences [5].

Core Viewpoint - Tianqi Materials (SZ002709) is involved in a commercial secret infringement dispute, filing a civil lawsuit against multiple parties, including Yongtai Technology (SZ002326) and its subsidiary, for economic damages of 887 million yuan [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Tianqi Materials announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jiujiang Tianqi High-tech Materials Co., Ltd. (Jiujiang Tianqi), has filed a lawsuit with the Jiangxi Provincial High Court against 12 defendants, including Li Sheng and Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials Co., Ltd. [1] - The lawsuit stems from allegations that former employee Li Sheng leaked technical information to Shaowu Yongtai, which has been used in their production of liquid lithium salts [2][3]. - The lawsuit requests the defendants to cease infringing on Tianqi's technical secrets, destroy production line equipment, and collectively compensate for economic losses amounting to 887 million yuan [3]. Group 2: Company Statements - Tianqi Materials believes that the defendants have shown clear intent to infringe, with significant scale and benefits from the infringement [3]. - The company stated that the ongoing legal proceedings are not expected to have a direct negative impact on its current financial results, but the potential effects on future profits remain uncertain [3]. - Tianqi emphasized the uniqueness of its liquid lithium hexafluorophosphate technology and mentioned that it is gathering evidence for additional parties to be sued [3]. Group 3: Yongtai Technology's Response - Yongtai Technology acknowledged the lawsuit but stated that it has not received any legal documents related to the case [4]. - The company asserted its commitment to respecting intellectual property rights and emphasized that its production processes are based on completely independent intellectual property [4]. - Yongtai clarified that it currently only produces solid lithium hexafluorophosphate and has not engaged in the production or sale of the liquid variant involved in the lawsuit [4].

Core Viewpoint - The company Tianqi Materials has initiated a lawsuit against Yongtai Technology for alleged trade secret infringement, with the case now accepted by the Jiangxi Provincial High People's Court, involving a claimed economic loss of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Tianqi Materials' subsidiary, Jiujiang Tianqi, is the plaintiff in the lawsuit against Yongtai Technology and its subsidiaries, alleging the misuse of proprietary technology in the production of lithium salt [1][3]. - The lawsuit seeks the destruction of production line equipment and process documentation used in Yongtai's 134,000-ton liquid lithium salt project, which is claimed to utilize Tianqi's trade secrets [1][5]. - Yongtai Technology has reported consecutive losses over the past two years, with a net profit of only 554 million yuan in 2022, which is less than the amount claimed in the lawsuit [1][3]. Group 2: Background and Implications - The lawsuit follows a previous criminal case where a former employee of Jiujiang Tianqi was found guilty of disclosing trade secrets to Yongtai Technology [3][4]. - The liquid lithium salt project by Yongtai Technology has a total investment of 793 million yuan, with 90% of the budget already spent, and is projected to generate annual revenues of 5.4 billion yuan and net profits of 670 million yuan once fully operational [5][6]. - Legal experts suggest that if the production line is found to infringe on trade secrets, it may face significant financial penalties, potentially impacting Yongtai's future operations and profitability [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal dispute between Tian Ci Materials and Yongtai Technology regarding alleged trade secret infringement related to lithium battery materials, highlighting the implications for both companies and the industry as a whole [2][3][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Tian Ci Materials has filed a civil lawsuit against Yongtai Technology and its joint venture, Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials, for trade secret infringement, which has been accepted by the Jiangxi Provincial High People's Court [2][3]. - The lawsuit includes seven claims, such as an immediate cessation of the infringement, destruction of production equipment utilizing the stolen technology, and a demand for compensation of 887 million yuan [4]. - The case involves 12 defendants, including individuals and companies, with allegations that a former employee of Tian Ci Materials conspired with others to illegally obtain proprietary technology [3][4]. Group 2: Background and Business Context - Tian Ci Materials specializes in the research, production, and sales of fine chemical new materials, particularly lithium-ion battery materials, including electrolytes and cathode materials [5]. - Yongtai Technology is involved in various sectors, including fluorine pharmaceuticals and new energy materials, and has established a presence in lithium battery materials, with a project aimed at producing 134,000 tons of lithium salt annually [5][6]. - The dispute centers around the product "lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide," a next-generation electrolyte material known for its superior electrochemical performance, which both companies are competing to supply [6]. Group 3: Company Responses - Yongtai Technology has publicly stated its commitment to respecting intellectual property rights and claims that its production processes are entirely self-developed, asserting that the lawsuit will not impact its core technologies [7]. - The company emphasizes its opposition to market monopolization and unfair competition, advocating for innovation and collaboration within the industry [7].

Group 1 - The China Securities Regulatory Commission emphasizes strengthening the A-share market's attractiveness and competitiveness through regulatory reforms and investor protection [2] - The macroeconomic resilience of China is recognized, with foreign assets becoming increasingly attractive amid global market fluctuations [3] - The real estate market shows a divergence in new and second-hand housing prices, with new homes experiencing a slight increase while second-hand homes continue to decline [4] Group 2 - The People's Bank of China introduces new regulations requiring cash transactions over 100,000 yuan for precious metals and gemstones to be reported, aiming to combat money laundering [5][6] - A new batch of Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas has been released, allowing 82 institutions to share a total of 30.8 billion USD, indicating a growing demand for overseas investments [7] - Tesla reports a 13.5% year-on-year decline in global vehicle deliveries for the second consecutive quarter, raising concerns about its market performance [13] Group 3 - The steel and photovoltaic sectors are initiating capacity reduction measures in response to "involution" competition, with major companies announcing collective production cuts [10] - Insurance companies are increasingly investing in high-dividend assets through OCI accounts to stabilize profits and adapt to a low-interest-rate environment [11][17] - The electric vehicle market sees significant growth, with Foton Motor reporting a 150.96% increase in new energy vehicle sales in the first half of the year [24]

Group 1 - Ganfeng Lithium has completed the acquisition of 100% equity in Mali Lithium, marking a significant step in its lithium resource layout in Africa [1] - The Goulamina lithium spodumene project, with an annual production capacity of 506,000 tons of lithium concentrate, has officially commenced production, indicating a transition to substantial output [1] - This acquisition strengthens Ganfeng Lithium's position in the global lithium market and lays a solid foundation for future growth, contributing to the stability of its global lithium supply chain [1] Group 2 - Tianci Materials' subsidiary has filed a lawsuit for trade secret infringement against several companies, with an expected economic loss of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [2] - The lawsuit is anticipated to have no direct negative impact on the company's current profits, but the case's outcome will be determined by the court [2] - The significant amount involved in the lawsuit may affect investor sentiment, and the market will closely monitor the case's progress and its long-term implications for the company [2] Group 3 - Fulian Precision has signed a cooperation framework agreement with Sichuan Development Longmang to establish a joint venture for high-pressure dense lithium iron phosphate cathode materials and precursor projects [3] - The joint venture aims to build a 100,000 tons/year high-pressure lithium iron phosphate project and a 100,000 tons/year lithium dihydrogen phosphate precursor project, enhancing Fulian Precision's capacity in the lithium battery materials sector [3] - This collaboration reinforces Fulian Precision's position in the core supply chain of new energy vehicle components and is expected to contribute to regional economic development [3]

本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 1、各方主体 九江天赐成立于2007年10月30日，拥有液体六氟磷酸锂生产工业化技术，为保护公司的商业秘密，九江 天赐建立了完善的保密管理制度和保密措施。 被告九李胜于2017年8月23日进入原告九江天赐工作，与九江天赐签订了《劳动合同》《商业保密、竞 业限制协议》等，于2021年5月20日从九江天赐离职。其在九江天赐工作期间先后担任电池生产部工艺 技术总监、总工程师等职务。为了获取非法利益，被告九李胜违反保密义务，伙同被告人七郑飞龙与被 告一浙江永太科技股份有限公司、被告三何人宝达成合作协议后，被告一至被告五将其通过收买的不正 当手段非法获取的原告液体六氟磷酸锂工艺技术资料运用于被告二邵武永太高新材料有限公司年产13.4 万吨液体锂盐产业化项目中。该项目由被告四王国超、被告五邵鸿鸣具体负责，并由被告十浙江美阳国 际工程设计有限公司进行项目产线设计，并由被告六上海桦置工程科技有限公司（该公司由郑飞龙、被 告八姜存华与何人宝成立，实控人为何人宝）承接项目部分。 特别提示： 3、涉案金额：预期经济损失人民币88,71 ...

Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Yongtai Technology Co., Ltd. is facing a civil lawsuit from Jiujiang Tianci High-tech Materials Co., Ltd. regarding a trade secret infringement dispute, but the company has not yet received any legal documents related to the case [1][2]. Group 1 - The lawsuit was filed against the company and its subsidiary, Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials Co., Ltd., in the Jiangxi Provincial High People's Court [1]. - The company emphasizes its commitment to respecting intellectual property rights and asserts that its production processes are fully independently developed [1][2]. - The potential lawsuit is not expected to impact the company's core technology and independent research capabilities [1]. Group 2 - The company currently only produces solid lithium hexafluorophosphate and has not engaged in the production or sale of the liquid variant involved in the lawsuit [2]. - The company cannot predict the impact of the lawsuit on its current or future financial performance until a court ruling is made [2]. - The company will closely monitor the situation and will actively respond to the lawsuit to protect its legal rights and maintain its reputation and shareholder interests [2].