7月3日，永太科技（002326）披露公告称，公司及控股子公司邵武永太高新材料有限公司已分别向临海 市人民法院和邵武市人民法院提起民事诉讼，起诉广州天赐高新材料股份有限公司侵害其名誉权。涉案 的金额合计5751.93万元，目前，临海市人民法院和邵武市人民法院已立案受理。 根据公告，原告和被告均系电解液材料上市公司，都生产六氟磷酸锂等主流电解液材料，因经营范围类 似原被告双方存在直接的竞争关系。近几年来因汽车新能源市场剧烈波动，电解液材料板块竞争激烈。 被告为达到市场垄断打压竞争对手的目的多次利用媒体对原告实施商誉诋毁等侵权行为。原告认为，被 告在无明确事实依据的情况下两年间多次向公众散布原告侵犯其商业秘密的误导性信息，已严重损害原 告商业信誉和商品声誉给原告造成重大损失。 7月2日，被告突然发布了《广州天赐高新材料股份有限公司关于公司提起诉讼的公告》。公告中称，原 告是该案被告二，在该案中，本案被告要求本案原告销毁年产13.4万吨液体锂盐产业化项目中利用原告 (即本案被告)技术秘密建设的生产产线设备及生产工艺资料。同时，本案被告还在该案中诉请要求本案 原告："销毁承载原告(即本案被告)液体六氟磷酸锂生产工业化 ...

Core Viewpoint - The dispute between two major lithium battery material companies, Yongtai Technology and Tianci Materials, has escalated, with both parties filing lawsuits against each other over alleged defamation and infringement of commercial secrets [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions - Yongtai Technology and its subsidiary, Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials, have filed civil lawsuits against Tianci Materials for defamation, seeking compensation of 57.5193 million yuan and 1 yuan respectively [1]. - Tianci Materials has also initiated legal proceedings against Yongtai Technology and others, claiming that they illegally obtained and used its proprietary technology in their production processes [2]. Group 2: Allegations and Counterclaims - Yongtai Technology accuses Tianci Materials of spreading misleading information about its alleged infringement of commercial secrets over the past two years, which has severely damaged its reputation and caused significant financial losses [1]. - Tianci Materials claims that Yongtai Technology and its subsidiary used illegally obtained technology in their 134,000-ton liquid lithium salt project, and is seeking 887 million yuan in damages along with public apologies from the defendants [2]. Group 3: Project Status - Yongtai Technology's 134,000-ton liquid lithium salt project has completed equipment installation and is in trial production, although the company currently only produces solid lithium hexafluorophosphate and has not yet started selling the liquid lithium salt products involved in the dispute [2].

证券代码：002326 证券简称：永太科技 公告编号：2025-044 浙江永太科技股份有限公司 关于公司及子公司提起诉讼的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 浙江永太科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）及控股子公司邵武永太高 新材料有限公司（以下简称"永太高新"）就广州天赐高新材料股份有限公司（以 下简称"天赐材料"）侵害公司及控股子公司名誉权的行为分别向临海市人民法 院和邵武市人民法院提起民事诉讼。临海市人民法院和邵武市人民法院已于 2025 年 7 月 3 日立案受理，案号分别为（2025）浙 1082 民初 6373 号、（2025） 闽 0781 民初 2373 号。 二、案件基本情况 案件一：（2025）浙 1082 民初 6373 号 （一）案件当事人 重要内容提示： 1、案件所处的诉讼阶段：已立案尚未开庭审理。 2、公司及子公司所处的当事人地位：原告。 3、涉案的金额：合计人民币 57,519,291 元。 4、对公司损益产生的影响:本次诉讼案件尚未开庭审理，目前无法判断对公 司本期利润或期后利润的影响。公司将根据诉讼进展情况 ...

永太科技：因名誉权纠纷 公司及子公司起诉天赐材料 智通财经7月3日电，永太科技(002326.SZ)公告称，永太科技及控股子公司邵武永太高新材料有限公司 因广州天赐高新材料股份有限公司侵害名誉权的行为，分别向临海市人民法院和邵武市人民法院提起民 事诉讼。临海市人民法院和邵武市人民法院已于2025年7月3日立案受理。涉案金额合计人民币5752万 元。案件尚未开庭审理，对公司本期利润或期后利润的影响存在不确定性。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal dispute between Tianqi Materials and Yongtai Technology regarding alleged trade secret infringement, with Tianqi seeking compensation of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Dispute Details - Tianqi Materials' subsidiary, Jiujiang Tianqi, has filed a lawsuit against twelve defendants, including Yongtai Technology, for trade secret infringement [1][3]. - The lawsuit claims that the defendants, particularly Li Sheng, who previously worked at Jiujiang Tianqi, used proprietary technology in Yongtai's production processes after leaving the company [3][4]. - Tianqi's demands include stopping the infringement, destroying related production equipment, and public apologies from the defendants [4]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The claimed compensation of 887 million yuan is significant for both companies, impacting their financial health [9]. - In 2024, Yongtai Technology reported a net loss of 478 million yuan, while Tianqi Materials achieved a net profit of 484 million yuan [10]. - As of Q1 2025, Yongtai's cash reserves were only 595 million yuan, with accounts receivable nearing 1.2 billion yuan, indicating potential financial strain from the lawsuit [10]. Group 3: Market Reaction - The stock market has reacted to the news, with Yongtai Technology's share price dropping by 1.94% to 12.16 yuan, while Tianqi Materials' share price increased by 4.18% to 18.95 yuan [10].

Core Viewpoint - The company Tian Ci Materials has filed a lawsuit against 12 defendants for commercial secret infringement, with the amount involved reaching RMB 88,825 million, highlighting the importance of intellectual property protection in the industry [3][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Tian Ci Materials' subsidiary, Jiujiang Tian Ci High-tech Materials Co., Ltd., initiated the lawsuit in response to the illegal acquisition and application of its liquid lithium hexafluorophosphate technology by former employee Li Sheng and others [3]. - The lawsuit requests the defendants to cease the infringement, destroy the infringing production line equipment and technical materials, and compensate for economic losses and legal fees [4]. - The company does not expect immediate negative impacts on its current financial results due to the lawsuit, but the potential effects on future profits remain uncertain [4]. Group 2: Industry Implications - The lawsuit underscores the critical nature of protecting commercial secrets as a core competitive advantage for companies in the industry [5]. - It serves as a reminder for other enterprises to enhance their confidentiality management systems to prevent unauthorized access and use of commercial secrets [5]. - The legal action reflects a stringent stance against commercial secret infringement, indicating that violations will face legal consequences [5].

Core Viewpoint - Tianqi Materials (SZ002709) is involved in a commercial secret infringement dispute, filing a civil lawsuit against multiple parties, including Yongtai Technology (SZ002326) and its subsidiary, for economic damages of 887 million yuan [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Tianqi Materials announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jiujiang Tianqi High-tech Materials Co., Ltd. (Jiujiang Tianqi), has filed a lawsuit with the Jiangxi Provincial High Court against 12 defendants, including Li Sheng and Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials Co., Ltd. [1] - The lawsuit stems from allegations that former employee Li Sheng leaked technical information to Shaowu Yongtai, which has been used in their production of liquid lithium salts [2][3]. - The lawsuit requests the defendants to cease infringing on Tianqi's technical secrets, destroy production line equipment, and collectively compensate for economic losses amounting to 887 million yuan [3]. Group 2: Company Statements - Tianqi Materials believes that the defendants have shown clear intent to infringe, with significant scale and benefits from the infringement [3]. - The company stated that the ongoing legal proceedings are not expected to have a direct negative impact on its current financial results, but the potential effects on future profits remain uncertain [3]. - Tianqi emphasized the uniqueness of its liquid lithium hexafluorophosphate technology and mentioned that it is gathering evidence for additional parties to be sued [3]. Group 3: Yongtai Technology's Response - Yongtai Technology acknowledged the lawsuit but stated that it has not received any legal documents related to the case [4]. - The company asserted its commitment to respecting intellectual property rights and emphasized that its production processes are based on completely independent intellectual property [4]. - Yongtai clarified that it currently only produces solid lithium hexafluorophosphate and has not engaged in the production or sale of the liquid variant involved in the lawsuit [4].

Core Viewpoint - The company Tianqi Materials has initiated a lawsuit against Yongtai Technology for alleged trade secret infringement, with the case now accepted by the Jiangxi Provincial High People's Court, involving a claimed economic loss of 887 million yuan and legal fees of 1.15 million yuan [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Tianqi Materials' subsidiary, Jiujiang Tianqi, is the plaintiff in the lawsuit against Yongtai Technology and its subsidiaries, alleging the misuse of proprietary technology in the production of lithium salt [1][3]. - The lawsuit seeks the destruction of production line equipment and process documentation used in Yongtai's 134,000-ton liquid lithium salt project, which is claimed to utilize Tianqi's trade secrets [1][5]. - Yongtai Technology has reported consecutive losses over the past two years, with a net profit of only 554 million yuan in 2022, which is less than the amount claimed in the lawsuit [1][3]. Group 2: Background and Implications - The lawsuit follows a previous criminal case where a former employee of Jiujiang Tianqi was found guilty of disclosing trade secrets to Yongtai Technology [3][4]. - The liquid lithium salt project by Yongtai Technology has a total investment of 793 million yuan, with 90% of the budget already spent, and is projected to generate annual revenues of 5.4 billion yuan and net profits of 670 million yuan once fully operational [5][6]. - Legal experts suggest that if the production line is found to infringe on trade secrets, it may face significant financial penalties, potentially impacting Yongtai's future operations and profitability [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal dispute between Tian Ci Materials and Yongtai Technology regarding alleged trade secret infringement related to lithium battery materials, highlighting the implications for both companies and the industry as a whole [2][3][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Tian Ci Materials has filed a civil lawsuit against Yongtai Technology and its joint venture, Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials, for trade secret infringement, which has been accepted by the Jiangxi Provincial High People's Court [2][3]. - The lawsuit includes seven claims, such as an immediate cessation of the infringement, destruction of production equipment utilizing the stolen technology, and a demand for compensation of 887 million yuan [4]. - The case involves 12 defendants, including individuals and companies, with allegations that a former employee of Tian Ci Materials conspired with others to illegally obtain proprietary technology [3][4]. Group 2: Background and Business Context - Tian Ci Materials specializes in the research, production, and sales of fine chemical new materials, particularly lithium-ion battery materials, including electrolytes and cathode materials [5]. - Yongtai Technology is involved in various sectors, including fluorine pharmaceuticals and new energy materials, and has established a presence in lithium battery materials, with a project aimed at producing 134,000 tons of lithium salt annually [5][6]. - The dispute centers around the product "lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide," a next-generation electrolyte material known for its superior electrochemical performance, which both companies are competing to supply [6]. Group 3: Company Responses - Yongtai Technology has publicly stated its commitment to respecting intellectual property rights and claims that its production processes are entirely self-developed, asserting that the lawsuit will not impact its core technologies [7]. - The company emphasizes its opposition to market monopolization and unfair competition, advocating for innovation and collaboration within the industry [7].

Group 1 - The China Securities Regulatory Commission emphasizes strengthening the A-share market's attractiveness and competitiveness through regulatory reforms and investor protection [2] - The macroeconomic resilience of China is recognized, with foreign assets becoming increasingly attractive amid global market fluctuations [3] - The real estate market shows a divergence in new and second-hand housing prices, with new homes experiencing a slight increase while second-hand homes continue to decline [4] Group 2 - The People's Bank of China introduces new regulations requiring cash transactions over 100,000 yuan for precious metals and gemstones to be reported, aiming to combat money laundering [5][6] - A new batch of Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas has been released, allowing 82 institutions to share a total of 30.8 billion USD, indicating a growing demand for overseas investments [7] - Tesla reports a 13.5% year-on-year decline in global vehicle deliveries for the second consecutive quarter, raising concerns about its market performance [13] Group 3 - The steel and photovoltaic sectors are initiating capacity reduction measures in response to "involution" competition, with major companies announcing collective production cuts [10] - Insurance companies are increasingly investing in high-dividend assets through OCI accounts to stabilize profits and adapt to a low-interest-rate environment [11][17] - The electric vehicle market sees significant growth, with Foton Motor reporting a 150.96% increase in new energy vehicle sales in the first half of the year [24]