Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - Zhejiang Yongtai Technology Co., Ltd. clarifies misinformation regarding the status of its patent for a lithium preparation method, asserting that the patent remains valid and the reported invalidation is incorrect [1]. Group 1: Patent Application Details - The company applied for a patent titled "A Preparation Method of Lithium Difluoro(oxalato)borate" on May 10, 2017, with application number CN201710325555.7 [1]. - The patent was published on August 18, 2017, under publication number CN107055493A, and was granted on February 26, 2019, with authorization number CN107055493B [1]. - As of the date of the announcement, the patent (number ZL201710325555.7) is still valid and has not been subject to the invalidation claims mentioned in the rumors [1].

本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 浙江永太科技股份有限公司 关于专利事项的说明公告 一、传闻简述 近日，浙江永太科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"永太科技"）关 注到有网络报道称：公司于2019年12月申请的一项名为"一种双氟磺酰亚胺锂的 制备方法"的发明专利（专利号：CN201911385107.X），被其他公司于2021年向国 家知识产权局主张专利无效，并于2022年被宣告部分无效，专利保护范围大幅缩 水。 二、关于专利事项的说明 经公司核实，前述网络报道提到的情况与公司实际情况不符，且在国家知识 产权局官网专利检索栏目未查询到该报道提及的发明专利号。为避免上述不实传 闻报道误导投资者，损害投资者利益，公司现予以澄清说明如下： 公司确向国家知识产权局申请了一项名为"一种双氟磺酰亚胺锂的制备方法" 的发明专利，申请日期为 2017 年 5 月 10 日，申请号：CN201710325555.7；申请 公布日为 2017 年 8 月 18 日，申请公布号为 CN107055493A；授权公告日为 2019 年 2 月 26 日，授权公告号为 ...

活动赞助/演讲/合作单位： 小哈换电/ 雅迪科技集团/台铃集团/新日股份/菜鸟集团/嘟嘟换电/司马出行/河豚换电/汇创新能源/中兴派能/孚能科技/保力新/创明新 能源/多氟多/博力威/睿恩新能源/诺达智慧/亿纬锂能/星恒电源/比克电池/鹏辉能源/时代瑞象/优旦科技/逸飞激光/盾创科技/博观科技/尚闻科技/威胜能源/兆科 动力/小安科技/先导智能/鑫晟达/精锐精密等 倒计时4天 2025第五届起点两轮车换电大会 暨轻型动力电池技术高峰论坛 活动主题： 换电之城 智慧两轮 主办单位： 起点锂电、起点钠电、起点两轮车及换电 活动时间： 2025年7月11日 活动地点： 深圳宝安登喜路国际酒店2楼国际厅 进入 7 月， 2 家锂电电解液企业就 " 技术侵权 " 一事对簿公堂，引起广泛关注。 7 月 2 日晚间，天赐材料公告称，全资子公司九江天赐作为原告，就商业秘密侵权纠纷案件向江西省高级人民法院提起民事诉讼，涉案被告为 另一上市公司永太科技、九江天赐前员工等 12 名相关方。 指控其侵犯商业秘密侵权纠纷，请求法院判令被告销毁年产 13.4 万吨液体锂盐产业化项目中利用原告技术秘密建设的生产产线设备及生产工艺 资料， ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal battle between Tianqi Materials and Yongtai Technology revolves around allegations of trade secret infringement and defamation, with both companies filing lawsuits against each other, leading to a total claim amount of 944 million yuan [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Actions - Tianqi Materials has filed a civil lawsuit against Yongtai Technology and 12 related parties for trade secret infringement, with the Jiangxi Provincial High People's Court accepting the case [1][2]. - Yongtai Technology has countered by suing Tianqi Materials for defamation, seeking compensation of 57.5193 million yuan, with the courts also accepting this case [1][4]. Group 2: Allegations and Claims - Tianqi Materials accuses Yongtai Technology of illegally obtaining its lithium hexafluorophosphate production technology through a former employee, who allegedly violated confidentiality agreements [2][3]. - Yongtai Technology claims that its production processes and technologies are independently developed and that Tianqi Materials is engaging in malicious litigation to undermine its reputation and market position [5][6]. Group 3: Industry Context - Both companies operate in the competitive electrolyte materials sector, producing lithium hexafluorophosphate, which is critical for battery production [4][5]. - The legal disputes are occurring against a backdrop of intense competition in the new energy automotive market, which has seen significant fluctuations [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal battle between Tianqi Materials and Yongtai Technology over trade secret infringement has escalated, with significant financial implications for both companies, amidst a backdrop of declining performance in the lithium battery materials market [1][9]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Tianqi Materials has filed a civil lawsuit against Yongtai Technology and 12 other defendants, claiming a total compensation of 887 million yuan for trade secret infringement related to lithium hexafluorophosphate technology [1][2]. - Yongtai Technology has denied the allegations and countersued for defamation, seeking 57.52 million yuan in damages, asserting that the technology in question was independently developed [4][5]. - The case has seen a criminal conviction against former employees for trade secret theft, with sentences including prison time and fines, but appeals are currently underway [3][6]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Yongtai Technology has reported consecutive losses over the past two years, with total revenues of 4.128 billion yuan in 2023 and 4.589 billion yuan in 2024, alongside net losses of 619.8 million yuan and 478.4 million yuan respectively [7]. - Tianqi Materials, while still profitable, has experienced significant revenue declines, reporting total revenues of 15.4 billion yuan in 2023 and 12.52 billion yuan in 2024, with net profits dropping by 66.92% and 74.4% respectively [7][8]. - Both companies are facing pressure from increased competition and fluctuating raw material prices, which could further impact their financial stability depending on the outcome of the legal dispute [8][9]. Group 3: Market Implications - The outcome of the litigation is expected to have a substantial impact on the market positions and future developments of both companies, as the lithium battery materials industry shifts from capacity expansion to technological competition [9]. - The case is seen as significant for establishing competitive rules within the emerging lithium battery sector, potentially reshaping industry standards and practices [9].

Core Viewpoint - The legal battle between Tianqi Materials and Yongtai Technology highlights the intensifying competition in the lithium battery materials industry, with both companies accusing each other of intellectual property infringement and defamation [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Disputes - Tianqi Materials has filed a civil lawsuit against 12 defendants, including Yongtai Technology, claiming a total of 887 million yuan for commercial secret infringement [1][2]. - In response, Yongtai Technology has initiated a defamation lawsuit against Tianqi Materials, seeking 57.52 million yuan in damages [1][3]. - The dispute centers around the technology for liquid lithium hexafluorophosphate, with both companies asserting their claims regarding the ownership and use of this technology [1][2]. Group 2: Company Background and Financial Performance - Both Tianqi Materials and Yongtai Technology are publicly listed companies that produce mainstream electrolyte materials, including lithium hexafluorophosphate, leading to direct competition [4]. - Tianqi Materials reported a revenue of 12.518 billion yuan for 2024, a year-on-year decline of 18.74%, and a net profit of 484 million yuan, down 74.4% [5]. - Yongtai Technology, while ending its revenue decline in 2024, still faced a net loss of 478 million yuan [5][6]. Group 3: Industry Context - The competition in the lithium battery materials sector has intensified due to fluctuations in the new energy vehicle market, leading to frequent intellectual property disputes [6]. - The price of lithium hexafluorophosphate has seen significant volatility, dropping to 84,000 yuan per ton in 2015 and rising to 590,000 yuan per ton in early 2022, before stabilizing at an average of 51,900 yuan per ton as of July 2 [6]. - The ongoing legal disputes reflect a broader trend in the new energy industry, where competition has shifted from capacity expansion to the defense of technological sovereignty and intellectual property rights [6].

Group 1 - Brother Technology expects a net profit of 60 million to 75 million yuan for the first half of 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 325% to 431.25% [1] - Zhonggang Luonai's shareholder plans to reduce its stake by 0.5%, amounting to no more than 562,500 shares [1] - Hesheng Silicon Industry's controlling shareholder intends to exchange up to 1% of its shares for ETF units, totaling no more than 11,822,100 shares [1][2] Group 2 - Suotong Development's actual controller plans to reduce its stake by up to 2.21%, equating to no more than 1,098,720 shares [2] - Funeng Technology's shareholder plans to reduce its stake by no more than 1%, totaling up to 12,221,000 shares [2][3] - Yuhua Development expects a net profit of 175 million to 225 million yuan for the first half of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 632% to 784% [4][5] Group 3 - Dingsheng Co. plans to reduce its stake by no more than 1.71%, equating to up to 726,430 shares [5] - Renle's stock has been terminated from listing, officially delisted on July 4, 2025 [6] - Weitang Industrial's controlling shareholder plans to reduce its stake by no more than 1.95%, totaling up to 340,000 shares [7] Group 4 - Yingfeng Environment's convertible bond may trigger a downward adjustment of the conversion price due to stock prices falling below 85% of the conversion price [8] - Jingye Da's actual controller plans to reduce its stake by no more than 3%, equating to up to 694,150 shares [10] - Yongtai Technology and its subsidiary are suing for 57.5193 million yuan in damages [11] Group 5 - *ST Meigu's subsidiary has been applied for bankruptcy liquidation [12] - Daoshi Technology plans to invest up to 165 million USD in a copper wet smelting project in the Democratic Republic of Congo [13] - Xinbo Co.'s actual controller plans to reduce its stake by no more than 1.54%, totaling up to 372,440 shares [14] Group 6 - Yunnan Energy Investment has obtained the development rights for a photovoltaic power generation project with a capacity of 20 MW [15] - Qinglong Pipe Industry's controlling shareholder plans to reduce its stake by no more than 3%, equating to up to 990,970 shares [15] - Yangjie Technology has terminated the share issuance and cash acquisition of Beite Electronics, opting for cash acquisition instead [16] Group 7 - Taijia Co.'s controlling shareholder plans to reduce its stake by no more than 3%, totaling up to 755,210 shares [17] - Songyang Resources has terminated the planning of a control change and will resume trading on July 4, 2025 [19]

Group 1 - Hoshine Silicon Industry's controlling shareholder plans to exchange part of the company's shares for ETF shares to support the ETF market and optimize the company's equity structure, with a maximum of 11.82 million shares, representing no more than 1% of the total share capital [1] - The move is seen as a positive signal reflecting the major shareholder's confidence in the company's long-term development, and the market will pay attention to the subsequent progress of the exchange and its impact on corporate governance [1] Group 2 - Yamaton announced that its stock price had deviated significantly, with a cumulative increase of over 20% in two consecutive trading days, prompting the company to clarify that recent media interviews did not disclose its production arrangements or performance forecasts [2] - The company emphasized that the interviews only covered industry dynamics and overseas investment strategies, aiming to stabilize market expectations and indicating that the stock price fluctuations may be due to market misinterpretation [2] Group 3 - Yongtai Technology and its subsidiary have filed civil lawsuits against Tianci Materials for defamation, with a total claim amount of 57.52 million yuan, and the cases have been accepted by the courts [3] - The legal action demonstrates the company's determination to protect its rights, although the impact on current and future profits remains uncertain as the cases have not yet gone to trial [3]

Industry News - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology emphasizes the need to regulate low-price disorderly competition in the photovoltaic industry, guiding companies to improve product quality and promote the orderly exit of backward production capacity for sustainable development [5] - The National Medical Products Administration has announced new measures to support the innovation and development of high-end medical devices, including guidance on the registration of products based on artificial intelligence and biomaterials [7] - The National Energy Administration held a meeting to emphasize the importance of resource survey pilot work for wind and photovoltaic power generation, aiming to enhance collaboration and accelerate progress [8] - The Ministry of Commerce is set to strengthen guidance on the export of second-hand vehicles, promoting healthy and orderly development in this sector [6] Company News - Hualing Steel announced that Xintai Life Insurance has acquired a stake in the company through the secondary market [9] - Vanke A has applied for a loan of no more than 6.249 billion yuan from Shenzhen Metro Group and extended part of its existing loans [10] - Aerospace Chengtong has restored its procurement qualifications for military material engineering services [11] - Haowang Bio announced that its HW130 injection has completed Phase I clinical trials [12] - Donghu High-tech is participating in the establishment of the Donggao Frontier Phase II Fund [13] - Nuotai Bio expects a year-on-year increase of 32% to 45% in net profit attributable to shareholders for the first half of the year, driven by significant growth in sales of peptide raw materials [14] - Wealth Trend's actual controller and chairman plans to reduce his holdings by no more than 3% of the company's shares [15] - Wankai New Materials announced that some production facilities will undergo maintenance, which is expected to significantly impact the company's overall performance [16] - Huaya Intelligent stated that it is engaged in the research and production of dry electrode rolling equipment systems for solid-state batteries [17] - Changling Hydraulic announced that its controlling shareholder is planning a change of control, leading to a suspension of its stock [18] - China Power Construction signed a contract for a mining and transportation project in Guinea worth approximately 5.063 billion yuan [19]

Core Viewpoint - Yongtai Technology has initiated legal action against Tianci Materials, claiming defamation and seeking compensation of 57.52 million yuan after Tianci accused Yongtai of infringing on its trade secrets [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Actions - Yongtai Technology and its subsidiary Shaowu Yongtai High-tech Materials Co., Ltd. have filed lawsuits against Tianci Materials, demanding a total compensation of 57.52 million yuan for defamation [1]. - The lawsuits were filed in response to Tianci Materials' claims regarding the illegal acquisition of its liquid lithium hexafluorophosphate technology by former employees [5]. Group 2: Company Responses - Yongtai Technology has stated that it only produces solid lithium hexafluorophosphate and has not engaged in the production or sale of the liquid variant involved in the dispute [5]. - The company asserts that it has not purchased any trade secrets from the former employee of Tianci and that the technology in question was developed independently [5]. Group 3: Allegations and Counterclaims - Tianci Materials has accused Yongtai Technology of using its illegally obtained technology in a project with an annual capacity of 134,000 tons of liquid lithium salt [5]. - Yongtai Technology claims that Tianci has repeatedly used media to defame the company and that these actions are intended to influence ongoing bidding processes, thereby attempting to eliminate competition [5].