2025 年半年度权益分派实施公告 公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假记载、误导 性陈述或者重大遗漏。 江苏张家港农村商业银行股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"本公司"）2025 年半年度权益分派方案已获 2025 年 9 月 12 日召开的公司 2025 年第一次临时股 东大会审议通过，现将权益分派事宜公告如下： 一、股东大会审议通过利润分配方案情况 1、2025 年 9 月 12 日，公司 2025 年第一次临时股东大会审议通过了《关于 2025 年中期利润分配方案的议案》：以未来实施分配方案时股权登记日的总股 本为基数，向全体股东每 10 股派发现金红利 1.0 元（含税），以公司现有总股 本 2,444,344,974 股为基数测算，预计派发现金红利 244,434,497.4 元（含税）， 本年度不以公积金转增股本，不送红股。截至未来分配方案实施时的股权登记日， 若本行总股本存在变动，本行将以股权登记日的总股本为基数，按照分配比例不 变的原则进行权益分派； 2、本次实施的分配方案与股东大会审议通过的分配方案是一致的； 3、本次实施分配方案距离股东大会审议通过的时间未超过 ...

Market Overview - The rural commercial bank sector experienced a decline of 1.16% on September 30, with the Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3882.78, up 0.52%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13526.51, up 0.35% [1] Individual Stock Performance - The closing prices and changes for key rural commercial banks are as follows: - Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank: 6.59, -0.15% - Jiangsu Rural Bank: 4.97, -1.00% - Wuxi Bank: 5.88, -1.01% - Zijin Bank: 2.80, -1.06% - Zhangjiagang Bank: 4.30, -1.15% - Ruifeng Bank: 5.31, -1.30% - Jiangyin Bank: 4.45, -1.55% - Qingnong Bank: 3.11, -1.58% - Changshu Bank: 6.84, -1.58% - Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank: 8.18, -1.68% [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The rural commercial bank sector saw a net outflow of 1.93 million yuan from main funds, while speculative funds had a net inflow of 38.39 million yuan, and retail investors experienced a net outflow of 36.46 million yuan [1] - Detailed capital flow for individual banks includes: - Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank: Main funds net inflow of 38.13 million yuan, retail net outflow of 62.35 million yuan - Wuxi Bank: Main funds net inflow of 7.45 million yuan, retail net outflow of 6.08 million yuan - Jiangsu Rural Bank: Main funds net inflow of 3.52 million yuan, retail net outflow of 0.29 million yuan - Ruifeng Bank: Main funds net inflow of 1.14 million yuan, retail net outflow of 2.89 million yuan - Jiangyin Bank: Main funds net inflow of 0.52 million yuan, retail net outflow of 0.55 million yuan - Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank: Main funds net inflow of 0.13 million yuan, retail net inflow of 0.12 million yuan - Zhangjiagang Bank: Main funds net outflow of 10.63 million yuan, retail net inflow of 2.61 million yuan - Zijin Bank: Main funds net outflow of 11.13 million yuan, retail net inflow of 4.80 million yuan - Qingnong Bank: Main funds net outflow of 13.84 million yuan, retail net inflow of 9.58 million yuan - Changshu Bank: Main funds net outflow of 17.22 million yuan, retail net inflow of 22.50 million yuan [2]

Market Performance - The rural commercial bank sector increased by 0.94% on September 29, with Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3862.53, up 0.9%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13479.43, up 2.05% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank (601077) closed at 6.60, with a rise of 2.17% and a trading volume of 995,000 shares, amounting to a transaction value of 654 million [1] - Other notable performers include Ruifeng Bank (601528) with a 1.13% increase, Wuxi Bank (600908) with a 1.02% increase, and Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank (601825) with a 0.73% increase [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The rural commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 66.4588 million from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 22.9898 million [1] - Specific stocks like Qingnong Bank (002958) had a net inflow of 9.1251 million from institutional investors, while Su Nong Bank (603323) had a net inflow of 613.43 million [2] Detailed Capital Flow for Selected Stocks - Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank had a significant net outflow of 50.7024 million from institutional investors, but a net inflow of 54.2507 million from retail investors [2] - Common trends show that while some banks like Zhangjiagang Bank (002839) attracted retail inflows, others like Changshu Bank (601128) faced substantial outflows from institutional investors [2]

Investment Rating - The industry is rated as "Outperform the Market" [2][3] Core Viewpoints - The stability of asset quality in the banking sector is attributed to the gradual clearing of non-performing loans across various sectors over the past 15 years, which has mitigated the impact on bank financial statements [1][2] - Banks have proactively adjusted their loan structures to reduce risk exposure, particularly by decreasing the proportion of loans to sectors experiencing rising non-performing loans [1][2] - The impact of non-performing loans on profit statements has been minimized due to banks' preemptive provisioning strategies, which have allowed for smoother profit reporting [1][2] - Non-credit areas of non-performing assets have also been cleared or are at a minimal level, contributing to the overall stability of bank risk profiles [1][2] Summary by Sections Non-Performing Loan Exposure and Clearing - The banking sector has experienced a 15-year process of risk resolution, with non-performing loans being gradually exposed and cleared [12] - The manufacturing and retail sectors have seen significant reductions in non-performing loans, achieving a return to levels similar to those seen in 2010 [26][30] Real Estate Sector - The real estate sector's non-performing loan ratio peaked in 2023 but has since shown signs of recovery, although it remains elevated [35][37] - The overall impact of real estate risks on bank loan portfolios is limited due to the relatively small proportion of real estate loans compared to total loans [37][38] City Investment Loans - The non-performing loan ratio for city investment loans has been declining since 2023, aided by debt reduction efforts [41][44] Retail Loans - Retail loan categories, including personal housing loans and credit card loans, are currently experiencing rising non-performing rates, indicating ongoing risk exposure [50][53] Other Loan Categories - Other loan categories, such as utilities and miscellaneous public loans, have minimal impact on overall bank risk due to their low non-performing rates [60][63] Loan Structure Adjustments - Banks have actively adjusted their loan structures in response to risk exposures, shifting focus towards lower-risk personal loans [66][68] Provisioning Strategies - Banks have utilized provisioning to smooth profit impacts from non-performing loans, with historical data indicating a capacity to release significant net profits from existing provisions [81][82] Investment Recommendations - The report suggests focusing on banks with strong asset quality and low provisioning pressure, such as Chengdu Bank and Changsha Bank, while also recommending cyclical stocks like Ningbo Bank and Changshu Bank for potential recovery [105]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a recommendation for the banking industry [3] Core Insights - The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the asset-liability structure and interest margin changes of 42 A-share listed banks during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, highlighting a shift towards corporate loans on the asset side and a stronger retail focus on the liability side [12][14] - The asset-liability structure indicates a significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, rising from 57.02% to 63.22% from the end of 2020 to mid-2025, while the proportion of demand deposits decreased from 41.94% to 30% [12][14] - The report notes a decline in both asset yield and interest margin, with the yield on interest-earning assets dropping from 4.43% to 3.32% and the net interest margin decreasing from 2.23% to 1.53% during the same period [14][15] Summary by Sections Overall Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin Changes - The asset-liability structure shows an increase in loan-to-earning asset ratio from 54.19% to 56.49%, with corporate loans making up a larger share of total loans [14][15] - The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased significantly, with the loan yield falling from 5.34% to 3.82% [15] - The net interest margin for listed banks remains higher than that of commercial banks, despite a decline [14][15] Changes in Each Banking Sector's Asset-Liability Structure and Interest Margin - City commercial banks experienced a more significant increase in the proportion of corporate loans, with their interest margin narrowing less compared to other banks [18] - The report highlights that the proportion of deposits in interest-bearing liabilities for state-owned banks decreased, while it increased for rural commercial banks [18] - The decline in interest-bearing liabilities' cost rate was most pronounced in city commercial banks, leading to a smaller reduction in their interest margin [18]

Market Overview - On September 26, the rural commercial bank sector declined by 0.74% compared to the previous trading day, with XD Hu Nong leading the decline [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3828.11, down 0.65%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13209.0, down 1.76% [1] Individual Stock Performance - The following stocks in the rural commercial bank sector showed varying performance: - Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank (601077) closed at 6.46, up 2.38% with a trading volume of 730,200 shares [1] - Wuxi Bank (600908) closed at 5.88, up 0.68% with a trading volume of 127,700 shares [1] - Su Nong Bank (603323) closed at 5.02, up 0.60% with a trading volume of 167,700 shares [1] - Zhangjiagang Bank (002839) closed at 4.32, up 0.47% with a trading volume of 193,000 shares [1] - Ruifeng Bank (601528) closed at 5.32, up 0.38% with a trading volume of 95,700 shares [1] - Other banks like Jiangyin Bank (002807) and Changshu Bank (601128) showed minor fluctuations [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The rural commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 30.21 million yuan from institutional investors and 22.38 million yuan from retail investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 52.59 million yuan [1] - Specific capital flows for individual banks include: - Changshu Bank (601128) had a net inflow of 8.26 million yuan from institutional investors but a net outflow of 34.30 million yuan from retail investors [2] - Zijin Bank (601860) saw a net inflow of 7.99 million yuan from institutional investors [2] - Other banks like Su Nong Bank (603323) and Zhangjiagang Bank (002839) experienced significant net outflows from institutional investors [2]

Market Overview - On September 25, the rural commercial bank sector declined by 1.62%, with Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3853.3, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13445.9, up 0.67% [1] Individual Stock Performance - The closing prices and changes for key rural commercial banks are as follows: - Hu Nong Commercial Bank: 8.62, down 0.58% - Qing Nong Commercial Bank: 3.14, down 0.95% - Su Nong Bank: 4.99, down 0.99% - Wuxi Bank: 5.84, down 1.02% - Rui Feng Bank: 5.30, down 1.12% - Zhangjiagang Bank: 4.30, down 1.15% - Jiangyin Bank: 4.50, down 1.32% - Zijin Bank: 2.81, down 1.75% - Changshu Bank: 6.96, down 2.11% - Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank: 6.31, down 3.52% [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The rural commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 3.11 million yuan from main funds, while speculative funds saw a net inflow of 5.88 million yuan, and retail investors had a net outflow of 2.77 million yuan [1] - Detailed capital flow for individual banks shows: - Jiangyin Bank: Main funds net inflow of 12.09 million yuan, retail net outflow of 14.79 million yuan - Wuxi Bank: Main funds net inflow of 11.99 million yuan, retail net outflow of 8.76 million yuan - Su Nong Bank: Main funds net inflow of 11.61 million yuan, retail net outflow of 8.11 million yuan - Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank: Main funds net outflow of 27.42 million yuan, retail net inflow of 34.26 million yuan - Zijin Bank: Main funds net outflow of 33.66 million yuan, retail net inflow of 16.64 million yuan [2]

Market Performance - The rural commercial bank sector increased by 1.75% on September 24, with Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3853.64, up 0.83%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13356.14, up 1.8% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank (601077) closed at 6.54, up 1.87% with a trading volume of 853,400 shares and a transaction value of 559 million [1] - Changshu Bank (601128) closed at 7.11, up 1.57% with a trading volume of 412,600 shares and a transaction value of 291 million [1] - Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank (601825) closed at 8.67, up 0.70% with a trading volume of 244,700 shares and a transaction value of 212 million [1] - Jiangyin Bank (002807) closed at 4.56, up 0.44% with a trading volume of 258,000 shares and a transaction value of 118 million [1] - Qingnong Commercial Bank (002958) closed at 3.17, down 0.31% with a trading volume of 435,000 shares and a transaction value of 138 million [1] Fund Flow Analysis - The rural commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 639,800 yuan from main funds, while retail funds saw a net inflow of 28.92 million yuan [1] - Individual stock fund flows showed that Changshu Bank had a main fund net inflow of 22.92 million yuan, while Yunnan Rural Commercial Bank had a net inflow of 9.09 million yuan from main funds [2] - Jiangyin Bank experienced a significant net outflow of 18.43 million yuan from main funds, indicating a potential concern among investors [2]

近日，张家港农商银行与张家港市民政局联合召开银发经济推进会，围绕产品创新、服务升级、资金监 管等核心议题展开讨论，明确以"政银联动+专业赋能"模式，为港城老年群体打造全维度养老服务生 态。 会上，张家港市民政局相关负责人提出，一是联合成立专项协调班子，双方相关负责人牵头，抽调业务 骨干组成工作专班，建立定期会商、任务分解、进度督办机制，统筹推进产品研发、服务落地、专区建 设等工作，确保资源高效分配、问题快速解决；二是引入专业第三方机构，借助其在养老产业研究、金 融服务设计等领域的专业优势，为合作提供数据支撑与方案优化建议，提升养老服务与金融产品的科学 性、适配性；三是开展专项金融服务调研，聚焦港城老年人风险偏好、养老产业金融需求等，通过问 卷、访谈等形式摸清需求，为后续定制化金融产品研发、服务模式创新提供精准依据。 张家港农商银行表示，将全面响应民政局工作部署，配合做好班子组建与调研工作，立足金融服务本 源，将适老理念融入网点运营与产品设计，打造"金融+养老"融合服务新场景，让老年人享受到更便 捷、更安心的金融服务。 会上，双方就未来具体合作进行深入探讨，合力推动张家港养老服务战略计划，为港城银发经济发展设 ...

Core Viewpoint - The mid-term dividend distribution among A-share listed banks is progressing, with several banks announcing their plans for 2025, indicating a positive trend in the banking sector's profitability and governance [1][4]. Group 1: Dividend Announcements - Recently, Hu Nong Commercial Bank and Changsha Bank announced their mid-term cash dividends, totaling 3.128 billion yuan, with Hu Nong distributing 2.324 billion yuan and Changsha distributing 804 million yuan [1][2]. - As of September 22, 17 banks have disclosed their mid-term profit distribution plans for 2025, with several banks, including Changsha Bank and Ningbo Bank, implementing mid-term dividends for the first time since their listings [1][4]. Group 2: Dividend Distribution Details - Hu Nong Commercial Bank's cash dividend is based on a total share capital of 9.644 billion shares, distributing 0.241 yuan per share, while Changsha Bank's distribution is based on 4.022 billion shares at 0.20 yuan per share [2]. - In September, three other banks, including Changshu Bank and Minsheng Bank, completed their mid-term dividend distributions, totaling 6.633 billion yuan [2]. Group 3: Dividend Ratios and Trends - The six major state-owned commercial banks have a cash dividend ratio of around 30%, with some city commercial banks and rural commercial banks exceeding this level [3]. - The expansion of mid-term dividends among listed banks reflects a recovery in bank performance, providing sufficient profit space for such distributions [4]. Group 4: Market Implications - Analysts suggest that mid-term dividends enhance predictability, boost investor confidence, and improve valuations, supported by the current strong performance of listed banks [4]. - The overall improvement in bank performance, driven by easing interest margin pressures and growth in non-interest income, is expected to sustain and potentially increase dividend distributions in the future [4][5].