（以下无正文） 司债券更名公告》之盖章页） 发行人：长城证券股份有限公司 年 月 日 （此页无正文，为《长城证券股份有限公司 2024 年面向专业投资者公开发行公 2025年2月27日，中国证券监督管理委员会以证监许可〔2025〕371号文同 意长城证券股份有限公司面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券。 由于债券分期发行，按照公司债券命名惯例，征得主管部门同意，本期债 券名称由"长城证券股份有限公司2024年面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券"变 更为 "长城证券股份有限公司2026年面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券（第一 期）"，分品种发行，品种一全称为长城证券股份有限公司2026年面向专业投资 者公开发行公司债券（第一期）（品种一），债券简称"26长城01"；品种二 全称为长城证券股份有限公司2026年面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券（第一 期）（品种二），债券简称"26长城02"。 本期债券名称变更不改变原签订的与本期公司债券发行相关的法律文件效 力，原签署的相关法律文件对更名后的公司债券继续具有法律效力。前述法律 文件包括但不限于：《长城证券股份有限公司2024年面向专业投资者公开发行 公司债券之受托管理协议》《长 ...

长城证券股份有限公司 2026 年面向专业投资者公开发行 公司债券（第一期） 信用评级报告 www.lhratings.com 1 联合〔2025〕11107 号 联合资信评估股份有限公司通过对长城证券股份有限公司及其 拟面向专业投资者公开发行的 2026 年公司债券（第一期）的信用状 况进行综合分析和评估，确定长城证券股份有限公司主体长期信用 等级为 AAA，长城证券股份有限公司 2026 年面向专业投资者公开 发行公司债券（第一期）信用等级为 AAA，评级展望为稳定。 信用评级报告 | 2 声 明 一、本报告是联合资信基于评级方法和评级程序得出的截至发表之日 的独立意见陈述，未受任何机构或个人影响。评级结论及相关分析为联合 资信基于相关信息和资料对评级对象所发表的前瞻性观点，而非对评级对 象的事实陈述或鉴证意见。联合资信有充分理由保证所出具的评级报告遵 循了真实、客观、公正的原则。鉴于信用评级工作特性及受客观条件影响， 本报告在资料信息获取、评级方法与模型、未来事项预测评估等方面存在 局限性。 二、本报告系联合资信接受长城证券股份有限公司（以下简称"该公 司"）委托所出具，除因本次评级事项联合资信与该公司 ...

长城证券股份有限公司 2026 年面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券 （第一期） 发行公告 发行人 主承销商、债券受托管理人 重 要 提 示 1、长城证券股份有限公司（以下简称"发行人"、"本公司"或"公司"）已 于 2025 年 2 月 27 日获得中国证券监督管理委员会证监许可〔2025〕371 号文注 册公开发行面值不超过 120 亿元的公司债券（以下简称"本次债券"）。 发行人本次债券采取分期发行的方式，"长城证券股份有限公司 2026 年面向 专业投资者公开发行公司债券（第一期）"（以下简称"本期债券"）为本次债券项 下的第六次发行，本期债券发行规模为不超过人民币 20 亿元（含 20 亿元）。 2、本期债券分为两个品种，品种一简称为"26 长城 01"，债券代码为 524616， 品种二简称为"26 长城 02"，债券代码为 524617。本期债券发行规模为不超过人 民币 20 亿元（含 20 亿元），每张面值为 100 元，发行数量不超过 2,000 万张， 发行价格为人民币 100 元/张。 3、根据《证券法》等相关规定，本期债券仅面向专业投资者中的机构投资 者发行，普通投资者和专业投资者中的个人 ...

长城证券股份有限公司 （住所：广东省深圳市福田区福田街道金田路 2026 号能源大厦南塔楼 10-19 层） 2026 年面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券（第 一期）募集说明书 签署日期： 年 月 日 发行人： 长城证券股份有限公司 主承销商： 国信证券股份有限公司 受托管理人： 国信证券股份有限公司 发行金额 不超过 20 亿元（含 20 亿元） 增信措施情况： 本期债券无担保 信用评级结果： 发行人主体信用等级 AAA，本期债券信用等级 AAA 信用评级机构： 联合资信评估股份有限公司 长城证券股份有限公司 面向专业投资者公开发行公司债券 募集说明书 声明 本公司将及时、公平地履行信息披露义务，本公司及其全体董事、高级管理 人员或履行同等职责的人员保证募集说明书信息披露的真实、准确、完整，不存 在虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 主承销商已对募集说明书进行了核查，确认不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述和 重大遗漏，并对其真实性、准确性和完整性承担相应的法律责任。 本公司承诺在本期债券发行环节，不直接或者间接认购自己发行的债券。债 券发行的利率或者价格应当以询价、协议定价等方式确定，本公司不会操纵发行 定价、暗箱操作 ...

1月5日，长城证券涨1.37%，成交额3.29亿元。两融数据显示，当日长城证券获融资买入额4191.59万 元，融资偿还4934.47万元，融资净买入-742.88万元。截至1月5日，长城证券融资融券余额合计14.51亿 元。 融资方面，长城证券当日融资买入4191.59万元。当前融资余额14.49亿元，占流通市值的3.89%，融资 余额超过近一年60%分位水平，处于较高位。 融券方面，长城证券1月5日融券偿还1.54万股，融券卖出1.88万股，按当日收盘价计算，卖出金额19.44 万元；融券余量13.69万股，融券余额141.55万元，低于近一年10%分位水平，处于低位。 截至12月19日，长城证券股东户数12.68万，较上期减少2.76%；人均流通股28403股，较上期增加 2.84%。2025年1月-9月，长城证券实现营业收入41.21亿元，同比增长44.61%；归母净利润19.31亿元， 同比增长75.83%。 分红方面，长城证券A股上市后累计派现34.36亿元。近三年，累计派现16.98亿元。 机构持仓方面，截止2025年9月30日，长城证券十大流通股东中，香港中央结算有限公司位居第四大流 通股东， ...

Group 1 - The "Golden Wisdom Award" aims to establish benchmarks for high-quality development, guiding listed companies to focus on their core businesses, continue innovation, and fulfill social responsibilities, thereby promoting capital to gather towards high-quality enterprises [2][8] - The award selection covered over 8,000 companies across A-shares, Hong Kong stocks, and Chinese concept stocks, ultimately recognizing nearly 200 award-winning companies [2][8] - The upcoming "14th Five-Year Plan" is expected to officially commence in 2026, with rapid developments in the internet, AI, and big data driving a new round of operational model changes in the financial industry [2][8] Group 2 - Great Wall Securities has initiated its new media business layout early, completing the initial setup of its new media account matrix in 2023, with the matrix taking shape in 2024 and new media operations scaling up [3][9] - By the end of the "13th Five-Year Plan" in 2025, Great Wall Securities' new media business will transition from foundational construction to refined operations, enhancing its market influence through efficient and in-depth financial content [3][9] - The company is committed to empowering retail business through new media, focusing on building an ETF ecosystem and creating a comprehensive media business ecosystem, including the "Jin Ge Club" new media brand and various popular financial columns [3][9] Group 3 - Great Wall Securities will continue to adhere to its strategic philosophy of "safety, leadership, and service," centering its new media business around customer needs and forming a comprehensive user service system through collaboration with its new media matrix platform and other initiatives [5][11]

Core Insights - The A-share market in 2025 closed positively, with major indices showing significant gains, and brokerage "golden stock" portfolios delivering impressive results [1] - The top ten brokerage golden stock portfolios achieved returns exceeding 50%, with the highest being Guoyuan Securities at 84.08% [1][5] Brokerage Performance - Guoyuan Securities led with a return of 84.08%, with its best stock being Zhongtung Gaoxin [2][5] - Northeast Securities ranked second with a return of 68.38%, highlighting its best stock as Wukuang Resources [2][6] - Other notable performers include Kaiyuan Securities (67.1%), Huaxin Securities (62.23%), and Dongxing Securities (61.98%) [2] Stock Selection Strategies - Guoyuan Securities focuses on selecting stocks based on China's new economic growth drivers and emerging industries, aiming to identify companies with strong fundamentals and market expectations [5] - Northeast Securities employs a collaborative approach with nearly 30 teams contributing to stock recommendations, emphasizing technology and cyclical sectors [6][7] - Dongguan Securities utilizes a systematic research framework that integrates macroeconomic analysis with industry insights to select high-quality stocks [8] Research Methodologies - Huazhong Securities emphasizes a dual approach, combining top-down macroeconomic analysis with bottom-up stock selection to identify high-potential sectors and individual stocks [9] - The overall performance of brokerage golden stock portfolios in 2025 significantly outperformed previous years, with the lowest return among the top 20 brokerages nearing 40% [5]

Core Viewpoint - The competition landscape among securities firms in the A-share IPO market has solidified with the successful listings of companies like Hengdongguang and Xinguoyi, marking the end of the 2025 A-share IPO season [1] Group 1: Overall Market Dynamics - Leading securities firms maintain a strong competitive edge, while smaller firms have made breakthroughs in niche segments. The top five firms account for nearly half of the total IPO projects in the market [2] - In 2025, the top five securities firms by IPO underwriting numbers are Guotai Haitong (19), CITIC Securities (17), CITIC Jianou (12), China Merchants Securities (10), and Huatai United (9) [3] Group 2: Differentiated Competition - The dual innovation board is a key platform for financing technology and emerging industries, raising a total of 633.71 billion yuan, which constitutes nearly half of the annual IPO fundraising total. This area is highly competitive among securities firms [4] - CITIC Securities leads the Sci-Tech Innovation Board with an underwriting scale of 168.95 billion yuan, capturing over 44% of the market share. Notable projects like Moore Threads contributed significantly to this figure [4] - The top five firms for the Sci-Tech Innovation Board in terms of underwriting numbers are CITIC Securities (7), CITIC Jianou (3), CICC (3), Huatai United (2), and others [5] - For the Growth Enterprise Market, Guotai Haitong and China Merchants Securities have a notable lead with 6 and 4 projects respectively, and underwriting amounts of 57.61 billion yuan and 45.46 billion yuan [6] Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The China Securities Association released the 2025 evaluation results for securities firms' investment banking business, indicating a focus on quality control and compliance. Twelve firms received an A rating, with five firms maintaining this rating for two consecutive years [9] - The dynamic optimization of the evaluation system reflects the ongoing trend of strict regulation and compliance in the securities industry [9] Group 4: Outlook for 2026 - The IPO market is expected to remain active in 2026, with a structural optimization characterized by stable volume and improved quality. The dual innovation sector is anticipated to see an expansion in financing and quality [10] - Hard technology companies in sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and biomedicine are expected to increase their presence in the capital market [10] - The competition among securities firms will intensify, focusing on serving technological innovation and industrial upgrades, with a continued evolution in the competitive landscape between leading firms and niche market leaders [10]

Core Insights - The China Securities Association released the rankings for securities firms in 2025, reflecting their performance in investment banking, financial advisory, and bond business quality [1][2] Group 1: Evaluation Results - A total of 93 securities firms were evaluated for their investment banking quality, with 12 classified as A, 66 as B, and 15 as C [2][5] - The A-rated firms include Dongwu Securities, Guojin Securities, Guotai Junan, Guotou Securities, Guoxin Securities, Huatai United, Ping An Securities, Changcheng Securities, China Merchants Securities, CICC, CITIC Securities, and Bank of China Securities [6][11] Group 2: Financial Advisory Evaluation - The financial advisory business evaluation included 30 firms, with 5 rated A, 19 rated B, and 6 rated C [6][7] - A-rated financial advisory firms are Huatai United, Galaxy Securities, CICC, CITIC Jianan, and CITIC Securities [7] Group 3: Bond Business Evaluation - The bond business evaluation involved 95 firms, resulting in 14 rated A, 62 rated B, and 19 rated C [10][11] - A-rated bond firms include Caixin Securities, Dongwu Securities, Guojin Securities, Guotai Junan, Guoxin Securities, Ping An Securities, and others [10] Group 4: Future Directions - The China Securities Association aims to guide firms to enhance their professional capabilities and service quality, shifting from price competition to value competition [11]

Core Insights - The annual evaluation results for the investment banking business in China reveal a shift in the competitive landscape, with non-traditional top firms making significant gains while established leaders face setbacks due to regulatory penalties [1][3][4] Group 1: Overall Evaluation Results - The China Securities Association published comprehensive evaluations covering investment banking, bond business, and financial advisory services for the year 2024, with 93 firms participating [3][5] - Among the evaluated firms, 12 were rated A-class, 66 B-class, and 15 C-class, representing 12.90%, 70.97%, and 16.13% of the total respectively [3] - Notably, half of the A-class firms are not traditional top revenue earners, indicating a diversification in the quality of investment banking services [1][3] Group 2: Bond Business Evaluation - The bond business evaluation included 95 firms, with 14 rated A-class, 62 B-class, and 19 C-class, corresponding to 14.74%, 65.26%, and 20.00% respectively [6] - Major firms like CITIC Securities and Huatai Securities, despite high underwriting volumes, did not achieve A-class ratings due to regulatory issues, while lower-ranked firms like Caixin Securities did [1][6][10] Group 3: Financial Advisory Services Evaluation - The financial advisory services evaluation was limited to 30 firms, with only 5 achieving A-class ratings, all of which are top-tier institutions [2][11] - The evaluation reflects a high concentration of resources among leading investment banks, with a significant disparity between A-class and lower-rated firms [2][12] - The evaluation criteria for financial advisory services differ from those for investment banking, focusing solely on M&A performance, which allows firms like CITIC Jinpu to excel despite lower overall ratings in other categories [12][13] Group 4: Regulatory Impact - Regulatory penalties have a substantial impact on the evaluation outcomes, with firms like CITIC Jinpu receiving multiple penalties that affected their ratings, while others like Shenwan Hongyuan faced scrutiny without major violations [4][5][9] - The evaluation process considers not only the performance during the evaluation period but also significant violations that occur afterward, indicating a long-term view on compliance [10] Group 5: Market Dynamics - The evaluations signal a shift in the investment banking landscape, where compliance and internal control quality are becoming more critical than mere scale, reshaping competition and market dynamics [2][3] - The concentration of top-tier firms in financial advisory services suggests a growing trend towards specialization and expertise in high-stakes areas like M&A [12][16]