格隆汇8月26日丨金通灵（维权）(300091.SZ)公布2025年半年度报告，上半年公司实现营业收入3.70亿 元，同比下降48.70%；归属于上市公司股东的净利润-2.02亿元；归属于上市公司股东的扣除非经常性 损益的净利润-1.60亿元；基本每股收益-0.1359元。 ...

2025 年 1-6 月非经营性资金占用及其他关联资金往来情况汇总表 | 非 | 经 | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 其他应收 | 营 | 南通金通灵环保设备有限公司 | 控股子公司 | 49.06 | 11.66 | 60.72 | 资金往来 | 款 | 性 | | | | 往 | 来 | | | | | | | | | | | | 非 | 经 | | | | | | | | | | | | 其他应收 | 营 | 江苏金通灵储能科技有限公司 | 控股子公司 | 1,555.06 | 41.50 | 43.91 | 40.00 | 1,600.47 | 资金往来 | 款 | 性 | | 往 | 来 | | | | | | | | | | | | 非 | 经 | | | | | | | | | | | | 其他应收 | 营 | 上海运能能源科技有限公司 | 控股子公司 | 51,775.80 | 1,974.51 | 346.44 | 5,533.4 ...

金通灵科技集团股份有限公司 第六届监事会第十次会议决议公告 本公司及监事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记 载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、监事会会议召开情况 1、金通灵科技集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第六届监事会第十次会 议（以下简称"本次会议"）通知及相关资料于 2025 年 8 月 15 日以电子通讯方式 送达全体监事。 证券代码：300091 证券简称：金通灵 公告编号：2025-032 4、本次会议由监事会主席吴建主持。 5、本次会议的召集、召开和表决程序符合《中华人民共和国公司法》等法律法 规以及《公司章程》的规定，合法有效。 二、监事会会议审议情况 经与会监事认真审议并以记名投票表决方式通过如下决议： （一）审议通过《关于<2025 年半年度报告>及其摘要的议案》 经审议，监事会认为：董事会编制和审核公司《2025 年半年度报告》及其摘要 的程序符合法律、行政法规、中国证券监督管理委员会和深圳证券交易所的规定， 报告内容真实、准确、完整地反映了公司的实际情况，不存在任何虚假记载、误导 性陈述或者重大遗漏。 2、本次会议于 2025 年 8 月 25 日以现场的方式在 ...

本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、董事会会议召开情况 1、金通灵科技集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第六届董事会第十二次 会议（以下简称"本次会议"）通知及相关资料于 2025 年 8 月 15 日以电子通讯方 式送达全体董事。 2、本次会议于 2025 年 8 月 25 日以现场与通讯相结合的方式在江苏省南通市崇 川区钟秀中路 135 号公司七楼会议室召开。 3、本次会议应到董事 8 人，实到董事 8 人，其中马娟以通讯表决方式出席会议。 公司监事、高级管理人员列席了本次会议。 证券代码：300091 证券简称：金通灵 公告编号：2025-031 金通灵科技集团股份有限公司 第六届董事会第十二次会议决议公告 4、本次会议由董事长张建华主持。 5、本次会议的召集、召开和表决程序符合《中华人民共和国公司法》等法律法 规以及《公司章程》的规定，合法有效。 2025 年 8 月 26 日 具体内容详见中国证监会指定创业板信息披露网站。 表决结果：同意 8 票、反对 0 票、弃权 0 票。 特此公告。 金通灵科技集团股份有限公司董事会 二、董事会 ...

金通灵科技集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告全文 金通灵科技集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告 2025-030 2025 年 8 月 1 金通灵科技集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告全文 第一节 重要提示、目录和释义 公司董事会、监事会及董事、监事、高级管理人员保证半年度报告内容 的真实、准确、完整，不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并承担 个别和连带的法律责任。 公司负责人申志刚、主管会计工作负责人王宁及会计机构负责人(会计主 管人员)王宁声明：保证本半年度报告中财务报告的真实、准确、完整。 所有董事均已出席了审议本次半年报的董事会会议。 本报告中涉及未来计划或规划等前瞻性陈述的，均不构成本公司对投资 者的实质承诺，投资者及相关人士均应对此保持足够的风险认识，并且应当 理解计划、预测与承诺之间的差异。敬请投资者注意阅读，注意投资风险。 | | | 金通灵科技集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告全文 备查文件目录 一、载有公司负责人、主管会计工作负责人、会计机构负责人签名并盖章的 财务报表。 二、报告期内在中国证监会指定网站上公开披露过的所有公司文件的正本及 公告的原稿。 公司在 ...

证券代码：300091 证券简称：金通灵 公告编号：2025-028 金通灵科技集团股份有限公司 2025 年 8 月 12 日，金通灵科技集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）收到江 苏省南通市崇川区人民法院（以下简称"崇川法院"或"本院"）出具的《函》（2024） 苏 0602 执 5407 号 ，获悉崇川法 院将 在京东司法拍 卖网 络平台（网址： http://sifa.jd.com/1210）上公开拍卖公司持股 5%以上的股东季伟所持有的 13,900,000 股，分 10 个标的包拍卖，每个标的包为 1,390,000 股。 本标的拟进行两次拍卖，当次拍卖流拍，进行下一次拍卖；当次拍卖成交或债 权人同意以物抵债，后续拍卖自动取消。第一次拍卖竞价时间 2025 年 9 月 29 日 10 时至 2025 年 9 月 30 日 10 时止；第二次拍卖竞价时间 2025 年 10 月 16 日 10 时至 2025 年 10 月 17 日 10 时止。该拍卖物详细信息及竞买人条件均在京东司法拍卖平台上公 示，有意竞买者请登录京东司法拍卖平台了解详情。现将相关情况公告如下： 一、股东股份将被司法拍卖的基本情 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a series of criminal investigations and penalties faced by various listed companies in China due to financial misconduct, including embezzlement, false financial reporting, and other violations of securities laws [2][3]. Group 1: ST Pava Case - ST Pava disclosed that its co-actual controller and director, Zhang Bao, is under criminal investigation for embezzlement, with a total of 191.34 million yuan misappropriated, of which only 30 million yuan has been returned as of July 26, 2025 [2]. - This incident marks ST Pava as the eighth listed company since July to have executives or actual controllers involved in criminal activities related to financial misconduct [3]. Group 2: Hongxiang Shares Case - Hongxiang Shares' actual controller, Yang Cheng, is under criminal investigation for financial misconduct, with previous penalties from the China Securities Regulatory Commission for false financial reporting from 2017 to 2022, including inflated revenues and profits [4][5]. - The company reported inflated revenues of 104.89 million yuan in 2017, 255.59 million yuan in 2018, and other significant amounts in subsequent years, leading to severe penalties [5][6]. Group 3: Liyuan Technology Case - Liyuan Technology's actual controller, Shen Wanzhong, received a criminal sentence for violating information disclosure laws, with inflated revenues reported in 2021 amounting to over 103.84 million yuan, constituting 24.71% of the disclosed revenue [6][7]. Group 4: Jintongling Case - Jintongling is facing criminal charges for providing false financial data over six consecutive years, with significant misreporting of losses as profits, leading to severe investor losses [8]. Group 5: ST Qibu Case - ST Qibu is under investigation for financial fraud, with allegations of profit inflation and false disclosures in bond issuance documents, leading to criminal charges against responsible personnel [9][10]. Group 6: ST Dongshi Case - ST Dongshi's actual controller, Xu Xiong, was sentenced for market manipulation, receiving a six-and-a-half-year prison term and a fine of 170 million yuan [11]. Group 7: Ruiskanda Case - Ruiskanda's executives are facing criminal charges for misleading disclosures, with inflated revenues reported in 2019 and 2020 amounting to 35.13 million yuan and 28.13 million yuan, respectively [12]. Group 8: Tuidi Jinguang Case - Tuidi Jinguang's executives were arrested for significant financial misreporting, with inflated profits reported in 2022, 2023, and 2024, amounting to 36.10 million yuan, 68.09 million yuan, and 15.38 million yuan, respectively [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The recent criminal accountability for financial fraud among listed companies reflects the effective implementation of the regulatory framework aimed at combating financial misconduct in the capital market [1][2][4]. Group 1: Criminal Accountability - In July, five listed companies disclosed that their actual controllers and executives faced criminal charges due to financial fraud, including measures taken by law enforcement and court actions [1][2]. - The actual controller of Zhejiang Haiyan Liyuan Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. received a one-year prison sentence (with a one-and-a-half-year probation) and a fine of 3.3 million yuan for violating information disclosure laws [2]. - The trend indicates a significant increase in criminal accountability, with a focus on primary offenders, particularly actual controllers and key executives [2][3]. Group 2: Multi-Dimensional Accountability - Companies are facing both criminal and civil liabilities, establishing a multi-dimensional accountability system that has become the norm [3][5]. - For instance, Jinzhou Port has faced 23 lawsuits related to securities fraud, amounting to 5.5392 million yuan in claims [3]. - This dual approach aims to deter fraud and protect investor rights, creating a governance loop that discourages fraudulent activities [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework and Governance - The regulatory environment has been strengthened since the issuance of comprehensive guidelines by multiple government agencies to enhance the accountability mechanisms against financial fraud [4][6]. - The focus is on ensuring that all responsible parties, including executives and even supply chain personnel, are held accountable, promoting a shift from mere compliance to substantive responsibility [5]. - Recommendations include improving legislative measures, expediting case processing, and expanding the scope of accountability to include intermediary institutions [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company Jin Tong Ling Technology Group Co., Ltd. has been accused of providing false financial data in annual reports for six consecutive years, leading to significant economic losses for investors, and is facing criminal charges for serious violations of information disclosure laws [1][2][6]. Group 1: Criminal Charges - Jin Tong Ling is facing criminal charges for providing false financial data in annual reports over six years, with four years reporting losses as profits, resulting in severe consequences for investors [2][6]. - Key individuals, including Ji Wei and Yuan Xue Li, are directly responsible and will be prosecuted for violating laws related to the disclosure of important information [2][6]. - The company is also charged with fraudulently issuing stocks by fabricating significant false content in stock issuance documents [2][6]. Group 2: Financial Misconduct - From 2017 to 2022, Jin Tong Ling inflated or deflated profits significantly, with inflated revenues of 501.42 million, 549.73 million, 68.93 million, and 15.31 million in respective years, and corresponding inflated profits of 146.48 million, 147.67 million, 73.99 million, and 43.33 million [10][11]. - The company faced penalties from the Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau, including a fine of 1.5 million for the company and fines for key individuals totaling 2.6 million [11]. Group 3: Financial Performance - Jin Tong Ling has reported consecutive losses from 2020 to 2024, with net profits of -49 million, -60 million, -361 million, -506 million, and -1.314 billion respectively [13]. - The company attributes the significant decline in performance to intensified market competition, changes in downstream customer operations, and impairment provisions for goodwill and receivables [13]. - In Q1 2025, the company reported a revenue of 121 million, a year-on-year decrease of 67.76%, and a net profit of -73 million, a decline of 197.51% [14].

Core Viewpoint - The company Jintongling Technology Group Co., Ltd. is facing serious legal issues due to allegations of financial fraud, including falsifying documents and manipulating financial data over six consecutive years, leading to significant investor losses [1][2]. Financial Fraud Details - Jintongling's fraudulent activities included inflating revenue by CNY 5.01 billion in 2017, CNY 5.5 billion in 2018, CNY 689.3 million in 2021, and CNY 153 million in 2022, with corresponding inflated profits of CNY 1.46 billion, CNY 1.48 billion, CNY 739.8 million, and CNY 433.2 million respectively [2]. - The company reported profits while actually incurring losses, with a total loss exceeding CNY 2.3 billion over five years from 2020 to 2024 [3]. Recent Financial Performance - In Q1 2025, Jintongling reported revenue of CNY 1.21 billion, a year-on-year decline of 67.76%, and a net loss of CNY 72.88 million, a 197.51% increase in losses compared to the previous year [4][5]. - The company's debt situation is critical, with overdue debts amounting to CNY 197 million, representing 28.95% of its latest audited net assets [5]. Corporate Governance and Ownership Changes - Jintongling underwent a change in control in 2018 when it was acquired by Nantong Industrial Holding Group, which was intended to provide financial relief but did not prevent ongoing fraudulent activities [6]. - The company has faced scrutiny regarding the effectiveness of regulatory oversight and the integrity of its financial disclosures [7]. Impact on Market and Future Prospects - The stock price has plummeted from a historical high of CNY 55.5 to a range of CNY 2 to CNY 3, reflecting a significant loss of investor confidence [9]. - The company is currently in a precarious position, with potential restructuring on the horizon; however, failure to successfully restructure could lead to bankruptcy and delisting [9].