证券代码：300489 证券简称：光智科技 公告编号：2025-058 光智科技股份有限公司 第五届监事会第二十四次会议决议公告 本公司及监事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、会议召开情况 1.光智科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第五届监事会第二十四次会议通知 已于 2025 年 7 月 21 日以电子邮件的形式送达各位监事。 2.会议于 2025 年 7 月 28 日以现场和通讯相结合的方式在公司会议室召开。 3.本次会议应参与表决监事 3 名，实际参与表决监事 3 名。其中肖溢、彭伟校以通 讯表决方式出席会议。 4.会议由监事会主席肖溢女士主持。 5.本次会议的召开和表决程序符合《中华人民共和国公司法》等法律法规和《公司 章程》的有关规定。 二、会议审议情况 （一）审议通过了《关于公司〈2025 年半年度报告〉及其摘要的议案》 经审核，监事会认为董事会编制和审核公司《2025 年半年度报告》及其摘要的程序 符合法律、行政法规和中国证监会的相关规定，报告内容真实、准确、完整地反映了公 司 2025 年上半年的财务状况和经营成果，不存在任何虚假记载、 ...

证券代码：300489 证券简称：光智科技 公告编号：2025-057 光智科技股份有限公司 第五届董事会第二十八次会议决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 一、董事会会议召开情况 1.光智科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第五届董事会第二十八次会议通知 已于 2025 年 7 月 21 日以电子邮件的形式送达各位董事。 2.会议于 2025 年 7 月 28 日以现场和通讯相结合的方式在公司会议室召开。 3.本次会议应参与表决董事 6 名，实际参与表决董事 6 名。其中以通讯表决方式出 席会议董事 5 名，分别为侯振富、朱世彬、童培云、朱日宏、孙建军。 4.会议由董事长侯振富先生主持，公司监事、高级管理人员列席了会议。 5.本次会议的召开和表决程序符合《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称《公司法》） 等法律法规和《公司章程》的有关规定。 公司《2025 年半年度报告》及其摘要编制的程序和内容符合法律、行政法规、中国 证监会和深圳证券交易所的相关规定，报告内容真实、准确、完整，不存在任何虚假记 载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 本议案在提交董事 ...

格隆汇7月29日｜光智科技公告，2025年上半年营业收入10.2亿元，同比增长78.20%；净利润2399.88万 元，同比增长167.77%。公司计划不派发现金红利，不送红股，不以公积金转增股本。 ...

人民财讯7月29日电，光智科技（300489）7月29日晚间披露半年度报告，公司2025年上半年实现营业收 入为10.2亿元，同比增长78.2%；实现归母净利润2399.88万元，同比扭亏；基本每股收益0.17元。2025 年上半年，公司精准锚定发展方向，在战略布局、产品研发、市场拓展等多维度的积极作为，产品供应 能力全面升级，各类产品市场表现优秀，共同推进业绩实现稳健增长。 ...

光智科技公告，2025年上半年营业收入10.2亿元，同比增长78.20%。净利润2399.88万元，同比增长 167.77%。公司计划不派发现金红利，不送红股，不以公积金转增股本。 ...

光智科技股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告全文 光智科技股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告 2025-060 2025 年 7 月 1 光智科技股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告全文 第一节 重要提示、目录和释义 公司董事会、监事会及董事、监事、高级管理人员保证半年度报告内容 的真实、准确、完整，不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并承担 个别和连带的法律责任。 公司负责人朱世彬、主管会计工作负责人蒋桂冬及会计机构负责人(会计 主管人员)王玮玮声明：保证本半年度报告中财务报告的真实、准确、完整。 所有董事均已出席了审议本次半年报的董事会会议。 本报告如涉及未来计划等前瞻性陈述，均不构成公司对投资者的实质承诺， 投资者及相关人士均应当对此保持足够的风险认识，并且应当理解计划、预 测与承诺之间的差异。 本公司特别提醒投资者关注公司可能存在的下述风险：宏观经济与行业政 策变化风险、汇率波动风险、原材料价格波动风险。详见本报告"第三节 管 理层讨论与分析"之"十、公司面临的风险和应对措施"，敬请投资者关注 相关内容，并注意投资风险。 公司计划不派发现金红利，不送红股，不以公积金转增股本。 2 | 目录 | ...

Investment Rating - The industry rating is "Outperform the Market" [3][50]. Core Insights - Breakthroughs in electrolyzer technology have been observed, and the hydrogen heavy-duty truck sector is gradually maturing. The newly awarded electrolyzer projects are still primarily alkaline, but both PEM and AEM electrolyzer technologies have made significant advancements. It is recommended to pay attention to companies at the forefront of electrolyzer technology [2][40]. - The midstream sector is accelerating the development of hydrogen transportation and utilization, promoting the construction of hydrogen refueling stations. Companies with hydrogen transportation capabilities are recommended for attention [2][40]. - Transportation applications are leading the gradual maturation of the hydrogen fuel cell industry ecosystem, with a recommendation to focus on hydrogen vehicle companies related to heavy-duty trucks [2][40]. Industry Performance - As of July 4, 2025, the hydrogen energy index closed at 2135.09 points, with a weekly change of 1.03% and a year-to-date change of 20.16%. The hydrogen energy index ranked 53rd among the Shenwan secondary industry rankings this week, showing a significant decline [8][14]. - The TTM price-to-earnings ratio of the hydrogen energy index is 24.66 times, and the MRQ price-to-book ratio is 1.60 times as of July 4, 2025 [11][13]. Company Dynamics - The top five companies in the hydrogen energy sector by weekly increase are Xuedilong (31.74%), Kaimeteqi (27.46%), Shengdexintai (22.40%), Zhongcai Technology (20.71%), and Huaguang Huaneng (20.06%). The top three companies by weekly decrease are Guangzhi Technology (-15.82%), Taihe Technology (-9.40%), and Xinxunda (-9.13%) [14][16]. - This week, there were 9 awarded projects in the hydrogen energy sector, with 3 electrolyzer bidding projects totaling 520 MW and a total hydrogen production capacity of 104,000 Nm³/h [17][18]. Industry Dynamics - Significant developments include the approval of the first cross-province green hydrogen pipeline in Inner Mongolia and the launch of hydrogen two-wheelers in Dongguan. These initiatives are part of broader efforts to promote hydrogen energy as a strategic industry [35][36]. - Internationally, Morocco's large-scale green hydrogen project is making progress, and Uzbekistan's Tashkent green hydrogen project has successfully achieved hydrogen production [36][37].

Group 1: Termination of Major Asset Restructuring - The company decided to terminate the major asset restructuring after careful consideration due to changes in the external environment and failure to reach consensus on commercial terms with some counterparties [3][4]. - The termination of the restructuring will not have a significant adverse impact on the company's production, operations, or financial status [2][4]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Projections - In Q2 2023, the company reported a significant increase in revenue, with a year-on-year growth of 43.82% [5]. - The company aims for a revenue target of no less than 1.6 billion yuan or a net profit of no less than 80 million yuan for 2025, with a goal of reaching 2 billion yuan in revenue or 150 million yuan in net profit [8]. Group 3: Research and Development - The R&D expenses for 2023 reached 229.9 million yuan, accounting for 22.73% of revenue, focusing on enhancing infrared detector technology and market competitiveness [5]. - R&D expenses are fully expensed in 2023, with a projected decrease in 2024 due to optimized asset structure and increased revenue [5]. Group 4: Product Development and Market Position - The company is the largest supplier of infrared materials in China and the first to independently develop ultra-pure germanium single crystal materials [5][7]. - The company has developed various new products for outdoor handheld thermal imagers, industrial temperature measurement thermal imagers, and other applications, expanding its business growth [7][9]. Group 5: Industry Applications and Sales - The high-performance aluminum alloy materials are being applied in the nuclear industry, with significant order growth compared to the previous year [9]. - The overall sales of infrared downstream products have seen a notable increase, with a strong order reserve expected to support future revenue [9].

Core Viewpoint - The failed restructuring of Guangzhi Technology has led to significant operational and cash flow pressures for the company, with its stock price plummeting from a peak of 115.55 yuan to 44.16 yuan, a decline of nearly 62% [1][2]. Group 1: Restructuring Details - Guangzhi Technology announced the termination of its asset restructuring with Xian Dao Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. due to "changes in the external environment" and "failure to reach agreement on certain commercial terms" [2]. - The restructuring was initially expected to enhance Guangzhi's market position, as Xian Dao was valued at 20 billion yuan while Guangzhi's market value was only around 3 billion yuan at the time of the announcement [2]. - Following the announcement of the restructuring, Guangzhi's stock price surged over 400%, but after the termination, it experienced a significant drop, including a limit down on June 30 [2][5]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Guangzhi Technology has reported negative net profits for four consecutive years, with a total loss exceeding 400 million yuan from 2021 to 2024 [3][4]. - The company's revenue grew from 129 million yuan in 2019 to 1.455 billion yuan in 2024, but the net profit attributable to the parent company remained negative during this period [3]. - The operating costs of Guangzhi increased significantly, with growth rates of 69.15%, 40.09%, 10.51%, and 27.78% from 2021 to 2024, outpacing revenue growth rates [4]. Group 3: Market Reaction and Shareholder Impact - Individual investors who bought shares before the restructuring announcement made substantial profits, while institutional investors who bought in at high prices faced losses as the stock price fell sharply [6]. - Notably, individual investors like Wang Xueping and Zhang Jianlong saw significant gains, with floating profits of approximately 128.7 million yuan and 85.89 million yuan, respectively, before exiting their positions [6]. - Institutional investors, including major firms like UBS and JPMorgan, entered the market during the price surge but subsequently sold off their holdings as the stock price declined, resulting in losses [6].

Core Viewpoint - The acquisition deal between Guangzhi Technology and Xian Dao Electronics has been terminated after nine months of negotiations due to disagreements on commercial terms and changes in the external environment, leading to significant stock price fluctuations for Guangzhi Technology [2][4][5]. Group 1: Acquisition Details - Guangzhi Technology announced the termination of the transaction to acquire 100% of Xian Dao Electronics and raise matching funds, citing changes in the external environment and lack of consensus on commercial terms with some transaction parties [2][4]. - Following the announcement of the acquisition in October 2022, Guangzhi Technology's stock price surged by over 400% within ten days, and nearly 20,000 new shareholders were added by May 2023 [2][6]. - The stock price dropped by 6.6% on June 30, 2023, after the termination of the deal, raising concerns for the new shareholders [2][6]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Valuation Concerns - The acquisition raised questions about the asset quality and high valuation of Xian Dao Electronics, especially as Guangzhi Technology's total assets were approximately 4.189 billion yuan, while its market value was around 3.1 billion yuan before the acquisition announcement [6][9]. - Xian Dao Electronics was valued at 21 billion yuan in 2024, despite a significant decline in net profit from 4.66 billion yuan in 2022 to 4.11 billion yuan in 2023, indicating a disparity between performance and valuation [8][9]. - The net profit margin for Xian Dao Electronics decreased from 21.3% in 2022 to 14.2% in 2023, despite revenue growth, highlighting concerns about the sustainability of its financial performance [8][9]. Group 3: Historical Context and Regulatory Environment - Xian Dao Electronics had previously attempted to go public but faced regulatory challenges due to uncertainties in its profitability, which contributed to skepticism regarding its valuation in the acquisition [10][11]. - The acquisition was characterized as a "quasi-backdoor listing" due to the same actual controller overseeing both companies, allowing the transaction to bypass stricter IPO standards [12]. - Guangzhi Technology's financial performance has been declining, with net profits dropping from 24 million yuan in 2020 to a loss of 241 million yuan in 2023, raising further concerns about the viability of the acquisition [12].