公平竞争审查
Search documents
完善长效治理机制整治“内卷式”竞争
Zheng Quan Ri Bao· 2026-01-09 22:52
在平台经济方面,《互联网平台反垄断合规指引(征求意见稿)》支持和引导平台企业加强反垄断合规 管理,对新型垄断风险作出明确提示,赋能平台企业更好识别防范垄断风险,保护市场公平竞争,促进 平台企业创新和健康发展。 在外卖领域,《外卖平台服务管理基本要求》规定了外卖平台服务管理的总体要求,包括商户管理、价 格行为、配送员权益保障、消费者权益保护,以及投诉、申诉及处置等要求,提升服务质量,减少无序 竞争。 本报记者 寇佳丽 1月9日,国家市场监督管理总局(以下简称"市场监管总局")召开2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞争十大制 度建设成果专题新闻发布会。 会上,市场监管总局竞争协调司副司长赵春雷表示,"内卷式"竞争是一种低价、低质、低水平竞争,不 仅扰乱市场信号、降低市场资源配置效率,侵蚀企业长期竞争力,更影响产业结构优化升级与高质量发 展。为贯彻党中央、国务院关于综合整治"内卷式"竞争的重大决策部署,市场监管总局坚持问题导向、 结果导向、目标导向,于2025年制定、发布了一批针对性、操作性强的制度标准,系统构建了覆盖全 面、衔接有序的规则体系,着力完善长效治理机制,引导企业从同质化低效能竞争转向高质量高水平竞 争。 具 ...
一图读懂2025年综合整治“内卷式”竞争十大制度建设成果
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-09 11:29
国读懂 2025年综合整治"内卷式"竞争十大制度建设成 "内卷式"竞争是一种低价、低质、低水平 争,不仅扰乱市场信号、降低市场资源配置 率,侵蚀企业长期竞争力,更影响产业结构优 升级与高质量发展。市场监管总局于2025年 定、发布了一批针对性、操作性强的制度标准 系统构建了覆盖全面、衔接有序的规则体系, 力完善长效治理机制,引导企业从同质化低效 竞争转向高质量高水平竞争。 新修订的反不正当竞争法 进一步完善商业诋毁行为的认定规则,将平台 经营者强迫平台内经营者以低于成本的价格销 售商品、滥用平台规则实施虚假交易等典型 "内卷式" 恶性竞争行为纳入规制范围,为综 合整治"内卷式"竞争提供有利依据。 《强制注销公司登记制度实施办法》 通过规范强制注销公司登记程序,有序清理失 信主体,通过畅通市场退出渠道,有效提高市 场退出质量和效率,推动提升经营主体发展质 量。 to leil Park of the see 124 完美甲首余例头批小公/ ri 督促和指导各地区、各部门对拟出台的涉及产 业发展、招商引资、政府采购、招标投标等方 面的政策措施落实公平竞争审查责任,防止违 规出台政策措施干预市场公平竞争。 《关于提 ...
综合整治“内卷式”竞争 2025年市场监管领域制度建设成果丰硕
Xin Hua She· 2026-01-09 09:01
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the comprehensive rectification of "involution-style" competition in the market regulation sector, with significant achievements expected by 2025 in areas such as anti-unfair competition, platform governance, and standard leadership [1][2] - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has introduced a series of targeted and operational institutional standards to delineate the boundaries of corporate behavior and legal red lines in competition, while also allowing ample space for corporate innovation and development [1] - The implementation of the "Fair Competition Review Implementation Measures" encourages local governments and departments to ensure fair competition in policies related to industrial development, investment attraction, and government procurement, preventing the introduction of policies that disrupt market fairness [1][2] Group 2 - To address issues like "subsidy wars" among internet platforms, the SAMR has issued the "Basic Requirements for Delivery Platform Service Management" [2] - The SAMR aims to streamline the market exit mechanism to eliminate "zombie companies" that distort market signals and disrupt competition, with the "Mandatory Company Deregistration Implementation Measures" clearly defining the conditions and procedures for forced deregistration [2] - The SAMR has deployed 167 national standard projects in key industries such as new energy vehicles, lithium batteries, and photovoltaic sectors to promote quality upgrades and ensure safety standards [3]
上海住建委推进公平竞争审查 助力统一大市场
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2026-01-08 10:41
1月8日,上海市住房城乡建设管理委二级巡视员沈红华在市政府新闻发布会上表示,将落实《上海市加 快打造国际一流营商环境行动方案》,推进三方面工作:健全公平竞争审查机制,在政策文件和招标编 制中落实审查要求;加强异常低价识别处置,防止"内卷式"竞争;规范工程招标代理行为,开展招标代 理机构信息登记工作。此举旨在打造公平公正市场竞争环境,助力上海建设统一大市场。 (原标题:上海住建委推进公平竞争审查 助力统一大市场) ...
五大连池:“三步走”模式激发民营经济有序发展
Zhong Guo Fa Zhan Wang· 2026-01-06 11:58
中国发展网讯 记者袁小峰报道 近年来,黑龙江五大连池市为持续优化营商环境、激发经营主体活力, 推动地方经济高质量发展,助力全国统一大市场建设,五大连池市市场监管局聚焦政策措施公平竞争审 查关键环节,创新推行起草机构自我审查、市监局组织会审、第三方评估法律意见"三步走"审查模式, 同步开展全市重要政策集中审查,从源头上防范排除、限制竞争行为。 该模式通过全流程量化管控,有效提升了政策的科学性与合法性,实现政策既符合市场规律、又坚守法 律红线,从根本上避免政策实施困境。数据显示,模式推行后,全市企业对营商环境的满意度达89%以 上,其中产业扶持政策获得感提升35%,市场准入便利度提升28%,近九成企业对市场公平竞争环境给 予积极评价,为民营经济高质量发展营造了稳定、公平、可预期的良好环境。 在多主体协同审查机制下,审查全面性与精准性得到双重保障。第一步,起草机构立足政策背景开展源 头排查,通过内部特定机构初审实现问题早发现、早整改。党的十八大以来,全市产业扶持、政府采 购、市场准入、工程项目招投标管理四大重点领域的663个项目,自我审查留痕率达100%,一次性通过 率从75%提升至100%。第二步,市监局依托监管 ...
“十四五”期间,广东省经营主体净增长648.6万户
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-30 17:06
Core Insights - Guangdong Province has seen a net increase of 6.486 million business entities during the 14th Five-Year Plan period, maintaining the highest total number of business entities, enterprises, private enterprises, and foreign-invested enterprises in the country [1][3]. Group 1: Business Environment and Regulations - The province has fully implemented the new Company Law and promoted "one-stop service" and "one license for all," allowing businesses to complete applications in one form within one day, effectively stimulating business vitality [3]. - Guangdong has pioneered the tax clearance "commitment system" and improved the market exit mechanism through the establishment of a system for the deregistration of businesses [3]. - The province has strengthened the rigid constraints of fair competition review and established a joint meeting system involving legislative bodies, achieving full coverage of fair competition review mechanisms at provincial, municipal, and county levels [3]. Group 2: Quality and Standards - The product quality compliance rate in Guangdong's manufacturing sector exceeds 94%, with initiatives for national standardization innovation and the implementation of a leading standards action to accelerate the construction of an advanced standards system [3]. - During the 14th Five-Year Plan period, Guangdong led or participated in the revision of 1,881 international standards, 11,600 national standards, and published 1,550 local standards, along with 2,324 new public measurement standards [3]. Group 3: Consumer Protection and Intellectual Property - The market supervision department has advanced consumer rights protection initiatives, including the formulation of the Guangdong Consumer Rights Protection Regulations and the implementation of the "Top Ten Actions for Safe Consumption," aimed at optimizing the consumer environment [4]. - The department handled 15.238 million consumer complaints, recovering economic losses of 3.66 billion yuan for consumers [4]. - Guangdong has addressed 20,000 intellectual property cases during the 14th Five-Year Plan period, with fines totaling 370 million yuan, and maintains the highest rankings in key indicators such as valid invention patents and PCT international patent applications [4].
《制止滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为规定》发布 一图读懂
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-12-26 17:34
近日,国家市场监督管理总局发布修订后的《制止滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为规定》,自2026年2月1日起施行。修订内容,一图读懂↓ 定》(国家市场监督管理总局令第 115号,以下简称《规定》)。 修订必要性 贯彻落实党的二十大和二十届三中、 四中全会精神的内存要求。 党的二十大和二十届三中、四中全 会对完善公平竞争等市场经济基础 制度、强化反垄断、坚决破除阻碍 全国统一大市场建设卡点堵点等提 出明确要求。 需要细化反垄断法有关法律责任 规定,强化执法权威,增强相关 规则可操作性,为滥用行政权力 排除、限制竞争执法更好服务大 局提供制度保障和有力支撑。 加强与公平竞争审查制度衔接,不断 完善事前事中事后监管的内容器 F 2 预防和制止滥用行政权力排除、限制 竞争行为需要将公平竞争审查和滥用 行政权力排除、限制竞争执法有机结 合,打好公平竞争监管执法组合拳。 近年来,以本地区的业绩、奖项荣 誉、缴纳税收社保等作为企业信用 评价加分项,并将信用评价结果应 用于招标投标活动,区别对待本外 地企业等新型干预市场竞争方式不 断演变,为反垄断执法机构准确认 定违法行为带来挑战。 需要通过完善《规定》相关规 则,及时回应滥用 ...
新修订的《制止滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为规定》将于明年2月实施
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-12-26 12:15
新华社北京12月26日电(记者赵文君)市场监管总局26日对外发布新修订的《制止滥用行政权力排 除、限制竞争行为规定》,自2026年2月1日起施行。 规定新增条款,明确被调查单位实施滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为,且存在拒不采纳市场监管 部门依法提出的公平竞争审查意见,经市场监管部门提醒敦促仍不停止实施滥用行政权力排除、限制竞 争行为,五年内曾因滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争行为被反垄断执法机构约谈或者调查处理,虚假整改 且实际未消除相关竞争限制等违法情节严重或者造成严重不良影响情形的,反垄断执法机构在制作行政 建议书时,一般应当一并提出对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员依法给予处分的建议,并可以 将行政建议书抄送监察机关,加大对相关人员的追责力度。 据介绍,近年来,以本地区业绩、奖项荣誉、缴纳税收社保等作为企业信用评价加分项,并将信用 评价结果应用于招标投标活动,区别对待本外地企业等新型干预市场竞争方式不断演变,对反垄断执法 机构准确认定违法行为带来挑战。同时,一些地方对执法约谈、行政建议适用情形把握不准等问题,也 需通过完善相关规则加以解决。 【纠错】 【责任编辑:施歌】 这一规定主要从强化责任追究和程序衔 ...
车辆购置价低于12万不配成为网约车?全国人大纠错地方规定
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-12-25 11:35
对网约车购置价设定12万元条件的准入条件,是否合法?12月22日,全国人民代表大会常务委员会法制 工作委员会关于2025年备案审查工作情况的报告提交十四届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十九次会议 审议,报告中一起对网约车经营车辆设置价格准入条件的纠错案例引发关注。 全国人大常委会法工委审查认为,规定对从事网约车经营的车辆设置价格准入条件,事实上排除了部分 价格低于这一准入条件但符合安全性能、服务品质的车辆车主平等参与市场活动、平等从事相关劳动的 权利,属于国务院《公平竞争审查条例》规定的设置不合理市场准入条件的情形。 有学者亦对此表示,对网约车经营车辆的准入门槛,设置歧视性的价格准入条件,属于不合理的限制, 违反了比例原则的要求。 对网约车设价格准入条件违背《公平竞争审查条例》 报告称,有的地方政府规范性文件规定,拟从事网约车经营的车辆,应当符合车辆初次注册登记时的实 际购置总价不低于12万元的条件。有公民对这一规定提出审查建议。 审查建议认为,上述规定超越权限减损公民法人权利增加其义务,网约车车辆价格限制与车辆安全性 能、服务品质之间缺乏充分关联,在具体适用过程中难以保证法律实效。 收到审查建议后,法工委向有 ...
民生领域反垄断执法专项行动成果宣介专题新闻发布会实录
Zhong Guo Zhi Liang Xin Wen Wang· 2025-12-17 08:44
Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has made significant progress in anti-monopoly enforcement in the livelihood sector over the past three years, focusing on protecting consumer rights and maintaining fair market competition [4][7]. Group 1: Major Achievements - SAMR has handled 35 cases of monopoly agreements and 25 cases of abuse of market dominance, with total fines amounting to 2.93 billion yuan [4][5]. - In the pharmaceutical sector, 12 major cases were addressed, resulting in fines exceeding 2.4 billion yuan, with price reductions for involved drugs exceeding 40%, and in some cases, up to 95% [5][9]. - The agency has completed 950 cases of business concentration in the livelihood sector, supporting mergers that enhance operational efficiency [4][25]. Group 2: Focus Areas - The enforcement actions have particularly targeted the pharmaceutical industry, with a high-pressure approach leading to significant penalties and a focus on key drugs affecting public health [9][12]. - In public utilities, 16 monopoly cases were addressed, with fines totaling 183 million yuan, aimed at correcting practices like bundled sales and limiting consumer choices [5][19]. - The platform economy has been under continuous scrutiny, with guidelines established to address new forms of monopoly risks, including algorithmic collusion and discriminatory practices [22][23]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework - SAMR has implemented several new regulations, including the revised Anti-Monopoly Law and various departmental rules to create a robust legal framework for fair competition [6][14]. - The agency has conducted 21 compliance training sessions, educating over 80,000 participants on anti-monopoly practices, particularly in the pharmaceutical and public utility sectors [6][10]. - A new compliance guideline for internet platforms has been drafted to address emerging monopoly risks, emphasizing the importance of transparency in algorithms and fair pricing practices [21][23]. Group 4: Future Directions - SAMR plans to continue strengthening anti-monopoly enforcement, particularly in the pharmaceutical sector, to ensure fair competition and protect consumer interests [12][25]. - The agency aims to enhance collaboration with other departments to improve information sharing and joint enforcement efforts against monopolistic practices [10][14]. - Future initiatives will focus on promoting compliance and preventing monopolistic behavior through proactive measures and public awareness campaigns [30][31].