Core Viewpoint - The training organized by the Tacheng Market Supervision Administration aims to enhance the capacity of policy-making agencies in fair competition review, addressing the challenges of unclear understanding and improper standards in grassroots review work [1] Group 1: Training Details - The training session involved 80 participants from 40 local units, focusing on the core principles of the Fair Competition Review Regulations [1] - Expert lecturers provided legal explanations and case analyses, clarifying the review scope, standards, and procedural norms [1] - The training effectively addressed ambiguities in review work, offering strong guidance for precise implementation [1] Group 2: Future Actions - Following the training, the Tacheng Market Supervision Administration plans to conduct spot checks on fair competition policy measures and engage third-party evaluations [1] - The initiative aims to deepen the implementation of the fair competition review system, fostering a fair and orderly market environment for high-quality economic development in Tacheng [1]

人民财讯9月22日电，中共国家市场监督管理总局党组发布关于二十届中央第三轮巡视整改进展情况的 通报，下一步，持续健全新业态新模式常态化监管制度，着力提升穿透式监管能力。加快编制《健全国 家标准体系实施方案》。持续推动《食品安全法》修订工作，坚决守牢食品安全底线。强化产品质量全 周期监管，保障人民群众生命财产安全。加快推进构建全国统一大市场，健全反垄断法律规则体系，完 善公平竞争审查制度。开展市场监管系统执法干部能力提升三年行动，制定《关于加强市场监管所所长 能力建设的意见》，按计划完成市场监管信息化工程，持续开展现有信息系统整合共享，全面提升市场 综合监管能力和水平。 ...

Group 1 - The training session aims to enhance the legal review capabilities of the provincial government system in Hainan, focusing on the requirements of building a law-based government [1] - The training program lasts for three days and addresses key areas such as legality review, trade compliance review, fair competition review, institutional integrity assessment, and social stability risk assessment [1] - The training combines specialized guidance, case studies, practical exchanges, and hands-on testing, featuring experts from various governmental departments [1] Group 2 - Nearly 200 participants attended the training, including responsible officials from provincial government departments, municipal government officials, and newly appointed legal advisors [1] - The training represents the first instance of joint training for legal review personnel and external legal advisors within the government system [1]

Core Viewpoint - Over the past five years, Beijing's market regulatory authority has focused on antitrust and unfair competition cases, resulting in the handling of 2,690 cases and imposing fines exceeding 200 million yuan [1] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Beijing market regulatory authority has established precise regulations in key areas and strengthened review mechanisms [1] - A total of 400 platform enterprises have been covered under the "one-on-one" compliance guidance mechanism [1] - The release of the "Beijing Antitrust Compliance Guidelines" addresses compliance reminders for seven industry sectors, including public utilities and raw materials [1] Group 2: Enforcement in Key Sectors - Increased regulatory efforts in essential sectors such as education, healthcare, and public utilities have been emphasized [1] - The first antitrust enforcement case in the pharmaceutical sector has been initiated, along with actions against monopolistic agreements in dental implant services, which are expected to reduce costs for the public by over 40% [1] Group 3: Regional Cooperation - The market regulatory departments of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei have signed a cooperation agreement for antitrust enforcement and fair competition review [1] - Unified review standards and mutual policy checks have been established, with 255 policy documents undergoing cross-checks for fair competition [1]

Core Insights - Over the past five years, Beijing's market regulatory authority has handled 2,690 antitrust and unfair competition cases, with fines exceeding 200 million yuan [1] - The authority has focused on key sectors, establishing compliance guidelines for platform economies and providing one-on-one compliance guidance for over 400 platform enterprises [1] - A comprehensive review mechanism has been developed, including the issuance of antitrust compliance guidelines tailored to Beijing's characteristics and enforcement priorities across seven industry sectors [1] Regulatory Developments - The establishment of a joint meeting system at both municipal and district levels to enhance regulatory collaboration [1] - Implementation of interim measures for fair competition review processes and the establishment of a scientific review mechanism [1] - Strengthened regulatory efforts in essential sectors such as education, healthcare, and public utilities, including the first antitrust enforcement case in the pharmaceutical sector [1] Collaborative Efforts - The signing of a cooperation agreement among the market regulatory authorities of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei to unify review standards and share resources [1] - A total of 255 policy documents have undergone cross-review for fair competition among the three regions [1] - Specific cases, such as the dental implant monopoly agreement, have led to significant cost reductions for consumers, estimated to lower expenses by over 40% [1]

"要求建设单位交存物业保修金的规定不符合上位法的规定，增加了企业负担，应当予以纠正""规定申 请从事网约车经营的平台公司应当在本市设立分支机构，属于不合理、不必要的措施"……近年来，针 对维护公平竞争的市场环境，全国人大常委会法工委对法规、司法解释等依法开展备案审查，推动和督 促制定机关纠正处理各类规范性文件，助力市场竞争秩序持续优化。 修改交存物业保修金规定，减轻企业负担 "平等保护民营企业合法权益，优化营商环境，进而维护公平的市场竞争秩序，是近年来全国人大常委 会法工委开展备案审查工作的一项重要目标。"全国人大常委会法工委法规备案审查室主任严冬峰说。 7月30日召开的中共中央政治局会议指出："纵深推进全国统一大市场建设，推动市场竞争秩序持续优 化。" 阳光爬过塔吊顶端，钢铁脚手架分布在未封顶的楼体周围，穿着橙色工装的工人攥着安全带在架体间移 动…… "听说企业交物业保修金的规定要修改，这对我们民营企业，还有整个建筑行业，确实是极大的利 好！"在黑龙江一工地，某建设单位负责人艾某十分高兴。 什么是物业保修金？全国人大常委会法工委法规备案审查室处长张晓楠介绍，许多地方性法规中有建设 单位应当交存物业保修金的规 ...

欢迎扫描下方二维码关注： 入、退出条件; (五)其他限制或者变相限制市场 准入和退出的内容。 第九条 起草单位起草的政策措施，不得含 有下列限制商品、要素自由流动的内 容: (一) 限制外地或者进口商品、要 素进入本地市场，或者阻碍本地经营者 迁出, 商品、要素输出; (二) 排斥、限制、强制或者变相 强制外地经营者在本地投资经营或者设 立分支机构; (三) 排斥、限制或者变相限制外 地经营者参加本地政府采购、招标投 标; (四)对外地或者进口商品、要素 设置歧视性收费项目、收费标准、价格 或者补贴； (五)在资质标准、监管执法等方 面对外地经营者在本地投资经营设置歧 视性要求; (六) 其他限制商品、要素自由流 动的内容。 (一) 强制或者变相强制经营者实 施垄断行为，或者为经营者实施垄断行 为提供便利条件; (二)超越法定权限制定政府指导 价、政府定价,为特定经营者提供优惠 价格: (三)违法干预实行市场调节价的 商品、要素的价格水平; 第十条 起草单位起草的政策措施，没有法 律、行政法规依据或者未经国务院批 准，不得含有下列影响生产经营成本的 内容: (一) 给予特定经营者税收优惠; (二)给予特定经营 ...

Core Viewpoint - Yangzhou has been recognized as one of the first 20 grassroots contact points for fair competition review in China, marking it as the only unit in Jiangsu province to receive this honor, which highlights the city's commitment to optimizing the business environment and supporting the construction of a unified national market [1][2]. Group 1 - The Yangzhou Market Supervision Administration has integrated fair competition review into the city's efforts to enhance the business environment and support the national unified market, implementing innovative measures and comprehensive monitoring across all government levels [1][2]. - A structured framework has been established, including a local standard, a risk control list, a review method, and various industry norms, creating a multi-layered and comprehensive system of constraints [2]. - The city has introduced specific rules for the water industry and established a competition policy service station, along with a post-evaluation system for industrial policies to ensure effective implementation of fair competition reviews [2]. Group 2 - To ensure the effectiveness of the review process, Yangzhou employs a dual approach of rigid constraints and collaborative mechanisms, integrating fair competition review into high-quality development and legal governance assessment systems [2]. - The city has developed a list of actions to prevent undue market interference by policy-making agencies and has established a mechanism for reviewing new policies while cleaning up existing ones [2]. - An expert database for fair competition review has been created, enhancing information technology infrastructure to support a three-tiered guarantee system involving intelligent checks, manual reviews, and expert assistance [2][3]. Group 3 - Moving forward, Yangzhou aims to strengthen its work mechanisms, research key industry review rules, and enhance capacity-building actions, leveraging its recognition as a national grassroots contact point to provide replicable and promotable "Yangzhou experience" for fair competition review [3].

Group 1 - Since the beginning of the 14th Five-Year Plan, the number of new enterprises in China has increased by 19.999 million, and the number of individual businesses has increased by 33.946 million [2] - The enterprise credit index in China has risen from 128.6 in 2020 to 161.61 in the first half of 2025 [2] - The implementation of the "certificate separation" reform has established a unified market access negative list, facilitating a streamlined process for business registration [2] Group 2 - The introduction of the "Fair Competition Review Regulations" aims to regulate issues related to "malicious competition" in investment promotion and to impose strict institutional constraints [3] - The National Market Supervision Administration has intensified efforts to curb irrational competition, discovering and abolishing 4,218 policies that hinder the flow of resources [3] - The manufacturing quality competitiveness index has improved to 85.86, while the satisfaction rates for service quality have reached 81.33 and 81.62 respectively [3] Group 3 - The National Market Supervision Administration has strengthened food safety regulation, handling 2.2604 million food safety cases [4] - The drug and medical device regulatory reforms have led to a stable drug inspection pass rate of over 99.4% [4] - Six high-risk products are now under production license management, and 15 products are under mandatory product certification management [4]

Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the "Sichuan Province Fair Competition Review Measures" aims to prevent improper interference in market competition from policy measures, enhance the vitality of business entities, and promote a unified and orderly market system in Sichuan Province [1][3]. Summary by Sections Legislative Framework - The measures strictly adhere to national laws and regulations, including the "Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China" and the "Fair Competition Review Regulations," ensuring their effectiveness and authority within the legal framework [1]. Responsibilities and Principles - The measures establish the principle of "who formulates, who reviews" and "who formulates, who cleans up," assigning review responsibilities to various levels of government [1][2]. - County-level and above governments will incorporate fair competition reviews into evaluations of legal governance and business environment optimization [1]. Review Mechanism and Process - The review process requires self-review by the drafting unit for departmental policies, with multi-departmental policies reviewed by the leading unit, and government policies reviewed by market regulatory departments [2]. - A written conclusion must be made using the "Fair Competition Review Form," with a review timeframe of 5 to 15 working days [2]. Supervision and Enforcement - A series of supervisory measures have been established, including a reporting mechanism for any unit or individual to report policies that hinder fair competition [2]. - Market regulatory departments will conduct random checks and can issue reminders or initiate investigations for serious violations [2]. Highlights and Innovations - The measures encourage cross-regional and cross-departmental collaboration, particularly in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle, to promote unified market construction [2]. - Specific prohibitive clauses have been developed for five high-frequency areas to enhance practical review operations [2]. - A comprehensive supervision system is established, including a full chain of reporting, checks, reminders, discussions, and accountability [2].