特朗普11月16日称想与马杜罗谈谈后，马杜罗17日发文称国家主权"不可转让"，同时谴责帝国主义试图 通过制造恐惧与动荡来破坏国家稳定。近期美国总统特朗普多次威胁对委内瑞拉发动地面打击。报道称 美国在加勒比海地区的军事部署已达到30多年来最大规模。特朗普16日表示可能与马杜罗对话看看情况 如何发展，但不排除任何可能性，并称马杜罗"也想谈谈"。 ...

委内瑞拉总统马杜罗当地时间11月17日在其社交媒体表示，国家主权"不可转让"，且属于人民。马杜罗 指出，政府正推动一种"全面、包容、覆盖广泛"的新型治理模式，涵盖政治、经济、社会、文化、安全 及军事等多个领域。 马杜罗呼吁人民以更广阔的视角参与国家事务，指出这一模式既非党派化，也不具排他性，而是以"觉 悟、光明与真理"为基础，让所有人参与国家建设。 同时，马杜罗谴责帝国主义试图通过制造恐惧与动荡来破坏国家稳定。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 马杜罗表示，在军队、人民与警察力量的共同努力下，委内瑞拉持续克服挑战、坚定维护国家主权，面 对任何威胁，国家都将继续前行。 近期，美国总统特朗普多次威胁对委内瑞拉发动地面打击，并授权美国中央情报局在委内瑞拉开展秘密 行动，美国在加勒比海地区的军事部署已达到30多年来最大规模。有消息称，特朗普已就美国可能对委 内瑞拉境内目标采取的军事行动作出了决定。不过当地时间11月16日晚，特朗普对媒体表示，"可能会 与委内瑞拉总统马杜罗对话，看看情况如何发展"，并称委内瑞拉"也想谈谈"。 ...

对此，厄瓜多尔国内有一种观点认为，国家正面临严重暴力危机，需要借助美国为主的外国军事力 量共同打击贩毒、武器贩运和跨国有组织犯罪。 新华社基多11月16日电 题：厄瓜多尔为何对外国军事基地说"不" 新华社记者廖思维 厄瓜多尔全国选举委员会16日晚公布的初步计票结果显示，厄瓜多尔民众在当天举行的宪法公投 中，反对设立外国军事基地。 分析人士指出，公投结果表明大多数厄民众认为设立外国军事基地有损厄国家主权，且可能进一步 激化地区紧张局势。 拒绝重设美军基地 厄瓜多尔当天就是否允许设立外国军事基地等4个问题举行公投。厄全国选举委员会已对超过95% 的选票进行初步统计，结果显示超过60%的选民不支持取消宪法中禁止外国在厄瓜多尔设立或使用军事 基地的规定，支持者不足40%，结果已无法逆转。 厄瓜多尔总统诺沃亚表示，公投结果体现了民意，政府将尊重人民选择，并继续以现有手段坚定推 进国家安全与治理承诺。 2024年年初以来，厄瓜多尔多地恶性犯罪高发，帮派暴力升级，政府数次实施紧急状态和宵禁等措 施，但治安状况未见好转。厄内政部数据显示，2025年前9个月，全国共发生6797起故意杀人案，与 2024年同期相比增长36.76 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating military tensions between the United States and Venezuela, highlighting the deployment of U.S. military assets and Venezuela's defensive measures in response to perceived threats [2][4][5]. Military Deployment - The U.S. military is utilizing MQ-9 Reaper drones, F-35 fighter jets, and AC-130J gunships near the Venezuelan coast to target suspected drug trafficking vessels, indicating a readiness for potential military action against Venezuela [2][4]. - Since September, the U.S. has conducted 19 airstrikes, destroying 20 vessels and killing 76 individuals involved in drug trafficking operations [4]. Venezuela's Response - Venezuela's military has conducted significant exercises, including the "Independence 200 Plan," and has successfully shot down an unauthorized aircraft attempting to enter its airspace [7][8]. - The Venezuelan military claims to have destroyed 24 illegal aircraft this year, emphasizing its commitment to maintaining national sovereignty and security [8]. Political Context - The U.S. Senate's recent rejection of a ban on military action against Venezuela has effectively provided a legal green light for potential strikes, raising concerns about regional stability and humanitarian crises [5]. - Venezuela is seeking assistance from countries like Russia to bolster its defense capabilities, including upgrading radar and missile systems [5]. International Relations - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied reports of the UK halting intelligence sharing regarding drug trafficking vessels, asserting that U.S. military actions remain unaffected [11]. - The UK's decision to pause intelligence sharing reflects growing concerns about the legality of U.S. military operations in Latin America, indicating a potential rift between the U.S. and its closest allies [11].

Core Viewpoint - The deployment of the USS Ford aircraft carrier strike group by the U.S. Navy in the Caribbean is aimed at combating drug trafficking and weakening transnational criminal organizations, amidst rising tensions with Venezuela, which is conducting military exercises in response [1][3][4]. Military Deployment - The USS Ford aircraft carrier strike group has arrived in the Southern Command area, marking a significant increase in U.S. military presence in the Caribbean, with over 15,000 personnel deployed, the largest scale in decades [4][6]. - Since September 2, the U.S. military has sunk 19 vessels suspected of drug trafficking in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific, resulting in at least 76 deaths [3]. Venezuela's Response - Venezuela's military is conducting exercises to enhance command, control, and communication capabilities in response to perceived external threats, with the defense minister stating that the country is prepared to defend itself [8][9][11]. - Venezuelan President Maduro signed a law aimed at maintaining national sovereignty and independence, emphasizing the country's readiness to resist any actions that threaten its sovereignty [10][13]. International Reactions - The U.S. military actions in the Caribbean have faced criticism from multiple countries, including the UK and Colombia, which have suspended intelligence sharing with the U.S. due to concerns over legality and potential complicity in military actions [15][21][23]. - Russian and French officials have condemned U.S. actions as violations of international law, with calls for investigations into the legality of U.S. military operations [17][19][20]. Strategic Implications - Analysts suggest that the U.S. is prepared for military action against Venezuela, especially following the Senate's rejection of a ban on military intervention, which could lead to significant regional instability and humanitarian crises [24][26].

当天，墨西哥总统辛鲍姆与马克龙在首都墨西哥城国家宫共同举行新闻发布会。一名记者就美国总统特 朗普称所谓"贩毒船"上人员为"恐怖分子"以及美方近期相关军事行动向马克龙提问。马克龙说："法国 尊重每个国家的主权。正如我和辛鲍姆总统所说，打击毒贩是我们共同的任务。" 法国总统马克龙7日访问墨西哥。在被问及美国近期频频在拉美国家附近海域击沉所谓"贩毒船"时，马 克龙表示，打击贩毒必须尊重各国主权。 马克龙表示，法墨双方可携手打击贩毒，但在任何情况下，各国主权都必须得到绝对尊重。 法国媒体认为，马克龙这番话是对美方在加勒比海和东太平洋"反毒"行动的含蓄批评。 据美方通报，今年9月初以来，美军在加勒比海和东太平洋击沉的船只已达18艘，造成至少69人死亡。 这些行动在美国国内外引发争议和批评，一些联合国人权专家认为涉嫌"非法杀戮"。 （文章来源：新华社） ...

Core Points - The Peruvian Congress declared Mexican President López Obrador as an "unwelcome person" with a vote of 63 in favor, 34 against, and 2 abstentions, aiming to defend national sovereignty and express a firm diplomatic stance against foreign interference in Peru's internal affairs [1] - The Mexican Foreign Ministry rejected the Peruvian Congress's decision, stating it was based on false claims and emphasized that Mexico has never interfered in Peru's internal matters [1] - The diplomatic tension arose after Mexico granted political asylum to former Peruvian Prime Minister Betssy Chávez, leading to Peru severing diplomatic relations with Mexico [1] Summary by Sections Political Context - The declaration by the Peruvian Congress is a response to perceived foreign interference, specifically regarding the asylum granted to Betssy Chávez by Mexico [1] - The Mexican government maintains that its actions are legal and in accordance with international law, countering Peru's claims of interference [1] Diplomatic Relations - Following the asylum decision, Peru announced the severance of diplomatic relations with Mexico, which Mexico expressed regret over [1] - The Mexican Foreign Ministry's statement highlighted the legality of its actions and criticized Peru's unilateral decision as disproportionate [1]

Core Viewpoint - Malaysia's national sovereignty is assured and not bound by U.S. sanctions, despite criticism faced by Prime Minister Anwar for signing a trade agreement with the U.S. [1] Group 1: Government Position - Malaysia can make decisions freely based on its own laws, national policies, and interests, as stated by the Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry [3] - Former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has called for Anwar and his cabinet to resign, claiming the trade agreement makes Malaysia a vassal state of U.S. interests [3] Group 2: Trade Agreement Concerns - Several lawmakers have raised concerns that the agreement's terms allow Washington to impose new tariffs and allegedly pressure Malaysia to align with U.S. trade policies [4] - The Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry clarified that Malaysia will only act on issues involving shared economic or security interests with the U.S., and any actions will undergo consultation and cost-benefit analysis [4]

Core Points - The U.S. has imposed sanctions on Colombian President Petro and Venezuelan President Maduro, which both leaders have responded to strongly [1][4][5] - The U.S. military has increased its presence in the Caribbean, deploying the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group to enhance its capabilities against drug trafficking and transnational crime [1] Group 1: U.S. Sanctions - The U.S. Treasury Department has sanctioned Petro, his family, and Colombia's Interior Minister Armando Benedetti, freezing their assets and financial services in the U.S. [4] - Petro condemned the sanctions as a "paradox," stating that Colombia has been effective in combating drug trafficking for decades, yet faces U.S. sanctions [2][4] Group 2: Responses from Leaders - Petro has hired a U.S. lawyer for defense and emphasized the need to stand firm against U.S. actions, advocating for the rights and democracy of the Colombian people [2] - Maduro accused the U.S. of creating a new war and emphasized the need for peace and harmony in South America and the Caribbean [5][7] Group 3: Regional Reactions - Brazilian President Lula criticized the U.S. actions as violations of national sovereignty, stating that no country should infringe upon another's rights under the pretext of combating drug trafficking [9]

Group 1 - The article discusses the misperception of Chinese culture by Europeans, particularly regarding the concept of "face" and its implications in international relations [2][3][15] - The Dutch government's abrupt takeover of ASML's Dutch headquarters and the replacement of Chinese management is framed as a violation of international trade rules, highlighting the significance of ASML in the automotive semiconductor sector [6][8] - The immediate response from ASML's Chinese factory in Dongguan to restrict chip exports has caused panic in the European automotive industry, particularly affecting major players like Volkswagen [10][21] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that the Dutch government's actions are self-defeating, as their preemptive measures to secure technology have led to the very supply chain disruptions they sought to avoid [22][24] - It points out the contradictions within the EU's strategy regarding technological sovereignty, as they aim to reduce dependence on China while being unable to bear the costs of decoupling [22][27] - The crisis triggered by the semiconductor issue is seen as an opportunity for Europe to reassess its understanding of China, although current attitudes suggest a persistence in outdated thinking [26][29]