新股炒作
Search documents
A股:新股再现上市首日涨10几倍,股民:弱势行情无疑!
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-22 02:52
当整个A股市场陷入回调阴霾、投资者情绪低迷之际,新股板块却上演了一出令人瞠目结舌的"逆袭大戏"。刚刚登陆资本市场的大鹏工业(N大鹏)犹如一 匹脱缰黑马,在万马齐喑中强势突围,点燃了沉寂已久的打新热情。 值得注意的是,盟固利诞生于大盘持续疲软的背景下,而如今大鹏工业的爆发,再次出现在市场整体回调的节点。这种"逆势起飞"的共性,令不少经验丰富 的老股民心生疑虑:难道越是行情低迷,新股就越容易上演疯狂?抑或只是短期情绪与资金博弈下的偶然现象? 无论如何,大鹏工业的首秀无疑给当前沉闷的市场注入了一剂强心针。它既是对打新策略有效性的又一次验证,也提醒投资者:在高波动的新股世界里,机 遇与风险始终并存。盲目追高可能深陷泥潭,理性布局方能笑到最后。这场资本狂欢虽已落幕,但它留下的思考,仍在继续发酵。 这只新股的发行价仅为9元,看似平平无奇,但上市首日的表现却堪称惊艳。开盘即以35.09元高开,涨幅高达289.9%,令所有中签者瞬间收获一份丰厚 的"打新红包"。然而,这仅仅是序幕——真正让市场沸腾的高潮还在后头。 早盘阶段,部分投资者见股价迅速拉升,选择落袋为安,早早卖出股票。可谁也没料到,这只是风暴前的宁静。随着交易推进, ...
惨!每天都创新低,低开低走,上市7天下跌7天,已经跌了45点
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-17 17:08
这只新股上市首日开盘价就是最高价,全天低走跌幅28%,收出一根大阴线。 发行价46.68元,收盘仅比发行价高51%,中签者一签盈利只剩1200元。 年内新股首日中签户盈利比较普遍,多的有盈利十几万的,少的也有几万,但盈利 这么少的新股实属罕见。 | 第六个交易日,涨跌幅限制变为10%,投资者期待股价能有所表现。 | | | --- | --- | | 更让人揪心的是,这只股票的下跌之路才刚刚开始。 次日它低开后勉强上涨3.26%,给中签者一线希望。 走跌3.92%,第五天还是低开低走跌1.68%。 至此,不设涨跌幅限制的五个交易日结束,中签没有卖的投资者一签盈利已下降到750元。 | 但第三天就低开低走跌4.48%,第四天继续低开低 | 结果等来的是低开低走,而且跌得更狠,单日跌幅达4.92%,股价跌到62元。 第七天,下跌趋势依旧,盘中跌幅1.5%左右,股价已跌至61元。 许多基金经理对这种现象感到困惑。 一位化名曾智的基金经理感慨:"第一天涨好几倍,这些资金也不知道是哪里来的,明明知道后面会被套,还持续去拉 股价,我也挺震惊的。 "另一位基金经理陈平认为,这与新股流通盘较小有关——在流通盘较小的情况下,买 ...
惨!上市6天下跌6天,一次都不反弹,股民:这辈子还能解套吗?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-13 17:05
"这辈子还能解套吗? "一位股民在股票论坛发出绝望的提问。 他口中的这只股票,上市6天连续下跌,首日追高者浮亏已超45%。 更残酷的是,根据Wind数据统计,今年A股上市的48只新股中,若投资者在上市首日以收盘价买入并长期持有,七成以上将面临亏损,最高亏损幅度达 47%。 股价腰斩后仍高估一倍 即便经历暴跌,许多新股的估值仍远高于行业合理水平。 前述汽车零部件企业市盈率61倍,高出行业均值一倍多。 红四方在腰斩后市盈率仍达86倍,而行 业平均仅15倍。 有基金经理测算,若按20倍市盈率估算,其合理股价应在21元左右,但当前股价仍达81元。 这场看似疯狂的"上市即巅峰"戏码,已成为A股新股的常态。 一场精心设计的"围猎游戏" 2024年11月26日,化肥企业红四方登陆A股。 发行价仅7.98元的它,首日涨幅一度飙升至2255%,盘中最高触及188元。 但狂欢仅持续了一天。 次日,股价腰斩49.7%,收于81元。 类似的剧情在2024年反复上演:长联科技上市次日冲高至689元后暴跌86%;强邦新材从245元跌至48元,跌幅81%;盟固利首日暴涨35倍后,从202元阴跌 至15元,跌幅93%。 这些新股背后存在共性 ...
昊创瑞通:新股炒作“阳谋”与投资安全策略
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-27 23:16
Core Insights - The article analyzes the phenomenon of initial public offering (IPO) speculation in the A-share market, likening it to selling spoiled fruit at a high price, where new stocks are often "dressed up" to hide flaws and exaggerate strengths [1] - Original shareholders push for high valuations during IPOs for financing, while retail investors are drawn to the "profit-making effect" of new stocks despite knowing the high pricing logic [1] - The structure of share distribution, such as in the case of Haocreator Ruitong with 79.04% of shares being restricted, allows institutions to easily manipulate stock prices through a "pump and dump" strategy [1] Summary by Sections IPO Speculation Dynamics - New stocks are often subject to initial speculation, with significant profit potential in the early stages due to the absence of price limits and the T+1 trading system, which stimulates investor interest [1] - The current rules tacitly allow for initial speculation, which can attract funds to support real economy financing [1] Historical Context and Future Implications - Historical data indicates that most heavily speculated new stocks tend to revert to their true value within a year [1] - Changes in the Shanghai Composite Index's compilation rules in 2020 adjusted the inclusion timing of new stocks from 11 months post-listing to one year, reflecting a shift in how new stock performance is evaluated [1] Investment Strategies - Retail investors are advised to sell on the first day of trading for new stocks as a profit strategy and to avoid participating in the speculation of newly listed stocks, suggesting a wait-and-see approach for one to two years before considering investment [1]
恶炒新股,亏损公司,上市首日竟暴涨428%!新股批量隐藏巨大风险
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-12 21:24
Group 1: Retail Investors' Struggles - Retail investors in the A-share market often become victims of high-risk new stock offerings, leading to significant financial losses [2] - For instance, Longlian Technology's stock price surged from an opening price of 61.92 yuan to a peak of 102 yuan, but ultimately closed at 79.85 yuan, revealing a harsh reality where institutions sold off shares while retail investors bought at inflated prices [2] - Similar patterns were observed in other stocks like Tongguan Mining, which saw its market value evaporate by 60% within 72 hours, highlighting the risks of blindly chasing high prices [2] Group 2: Profit Chain Among Underwriters, Speculators, and Institutions - The new stock frenzy is driven by a profit chain involving underwriters, speculators, and institutions, with underwriters playing a crucial role in promoting stocks while downplaying risks [3] - A significant 75% of new stock circulation is allocated to institutional investors, leaving only 25% for retail investors, which exacerbates the disadvantage for the latter [3] - Speculators utilize strategies like "pump and dump," leading to extreme volatility and significant losses for retail investors [3] Group 3: Systemic Issues in the Market - The A-share market faces systemic issues such as low-priced offerings and low circulation ratios, which create traps for retail investors [4] - For example, the circulation ratio for Hong Sifang was only 16%, allowing speculators to manipulate stock prices with relatively small amounts of capital [4] - The ineffective delisting mechanism has resulted in a low annual delisting rate of only 0.1%, allowing poor-performing companies to persist in the market [4] Group 4: Market Consequences - Excessive speculation in new stocks has led to severe resource misallocation, with significant capital tied up in initial public offerings (IPOs) while the secondary market suffers [5] - Historical data shows that the A-share market has experienced prolonged bear markets, with the average duration of bear markets being 3.7 times longer than bull markets over the past decade [5] - The trend of new stock financing has reached 63% of total financing in the A-share market, while only three companies have been delisted, indicating a skewed market dynamic [5] Group 5: Regulatory Failures - The A-share market suffers from regulatory failures that allow speculative behavior to thrive, resulting in retail investors being exploited [6] - Instances of misleading information in prospectuses and inadequate enforcement of regulations have been noted, leading to significant stock price drops following negative news [6] - There is a pressing need for improved regulatory measures to protect investor rights and prevent similar market tragedies in the future [6]
从120到45!悍高上市6天跌5天,进场者无一幸免
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-07 23:50
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the dramatic decline in the stock price of Hanhigh Group, which fell from a peak of 120 yuan to 45.71 yuan in just six trading days, representing a staggering drop of 62% [2][10][14] - On the first day of trading, Hanhigh Group's stock opened at 47 yuan, surged by 300% to 120 yuan, but then plummeted to 80 yuan by the end of the day, resulting in significant losses for investors who bought at the peak [2][10] - The stock continued to decline over the following days, with a 24% drop on the second day and further losses on subsequent days, leading to widespread panic among investors [2][10] Group 2 - Hanhigh Group's financial data raises red flags, with reported revenue growth of 32% and net profit growth of 60%, contrasting sharply with a 4% decline in the overall home furnishing industry [3][6] - The company's gross profit margin of 35.8% significantly exceeds the industry average of 28%, while its R&D expenditure is only 3.9% of revenue, suggesting potential financial manipulation [3][6] - Accounts receivable turnover days increased from 45 to 78 days, indicating possible financial statement embellishment through premature contract signing [6][8] Group 3 - The governance structure of Hanhigh Group is concerning, with the controlling family holding 84% of shares and nearly 90% of voting rights, leading to frequent related-party transactions [6][8] - Allegations of mismanagement include long-standing defaults on employee benefits and a significant inventory backlog of 173 million yuan [8][11] - The company faces 14 pending lawsuits related to patent disputes and labor arbitration, raising concerns about its stability [11] Group 4 - The IPO market's tightening has led to unusual phenomena, with Hanhigh Group's stock being heavily speculated upon, attracting retail investors who ultimately faced significant losses [9][14] - The high concentration of lock-up shares (82%) poses a risk of large-scale sell-offs by major shareholders when restrictions lift in 2026, similar to past instances in the market [11][14] - The article emphasizes the need for investors to recognize warning signs of financial fraud, such as surging receivables, inflated inventory, and unrealistic profit margins [11][14]
悍高集团上市6天亏62%!从天堂到地狱就这么快,新股真成韭菜收割机
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-07 20:08
Group 1: Company Overview - Hanhigh Group, a traditional manufacturing company based in Guangdong, specializes in the research, production, and sales of home hardware products, including cabinet hinges and outdoor furniture [1] - The company's initial public offering (IPO) price was 15.43 yuan, with a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 11.86, indicating a relatively low valuation and suggesting limited profitability [1] Group 2: Market Performance - After its IPO, Hanhigh Group's stock price surged to a peak of 120 yuan within six days, representing a dramatic increase of 678%, before plummeting to 45 yuan, resulting in a market capitalization loss of over 60% [1][4] - The rapid price increase was not driven by ordinary retail investors but rather by orchestrated trading activities, indicating manipulation by capital players who aimed to profit from the volatility [4] Group 3: Market Dynamics - The current trend in new stock trading reflects a shift towards "quick in and out" strategies, with investors seeking immediate profits and exiting rapidly, as evidenced by Hanhigh Group's stock decline shortly after its peak [6] - The market environment has evolved, with investors becoming more rational and focusing on fundamental analysis rather than blindly following new stock trends, marking a departure from the previous "easy profit" mentality [7][8] Group 4: Investment Strategy - Investors are advised to avoid blindly chasing high-flying stocks and to pay close attention to the company's fundamentals, especially for traditional manufacturing firms like Hanhigh Group [9][11] - Long-term investors should remain cautious and wait for stock prices to stabilize at reasonable levels before making investment decisions, emphasizing the importance of a solid fundamental basis for any investment [11]
上市6天下跌5天,从120跌到45,进场的股民全部被套,无一幸免
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-07 07:06
Core Viewpoint - The recent performance of Hanhigh Group's stock highlights the volatility and risks associated with newly listed stocks, with a significant decline observed shortly after its initial surge [1][4][8] Company Overview - Hanhigh Group operates in the mechanical equipment and metal products industry, focusing on the research, design, production, and sales of home hardware and outdoor furniture [1] - The company was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange on July 30, with an initial offering price of 15.43 yuan and a total issuance of 40.01 million shares, raising a net amount of 510.6 million yuan [1] Stock Performance - The stock opened at 47.01 yuan, representing a 305% increase from the issuance price, and peaked at 120 yuan, marking a 678% rise during its first trading day [1] - However, the stock experienced a rapid decline, closing at 45.83 yuan on the sixth day, reflecting a total drop of 62% from its peak [4][8] Market Trends - The trend of new stocks experiencing initial surges followed by steep declines has become common, with investors often facing significant losses shortly after listing [8] - The current market environment has led to a scarcity of new stocks and low winning rates in initial public offerings, contributing to speculative trading behavior [1]
这类ETF规模较去年末增长超两倍;多位基金经理卸任绩差产品丨天赐良基早参
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-06-16 01:35
Group 1: Company Changes - ICBC Credit Suisse Fund has completed a shareholding change, with UBS AG becoming a shareholder holding over 5% of the company, representing 20% of its registered capital [1] - The registered capital of ICBC Credit Suisse Fund remains unchanged, with ICBC still holding 80% of the shares [1] - The English abbreviation of the company has changed from "ICBCCS" to "ICBCUBS" effective June 13, 2025 [1] Group 2: Market Trends - The total scale of credit bond ETFs has reached 1669.87 billion yuan as of June 11, 2025, more than doubling since the end of last year [2] - Eight newly established benchmark credit bond ETFs have seen their total scale increase from 217.10 billion yuan to 817.91 billion yuan, a growth of over 2.7 times [2] - Several credit bond ETFs have joined the "100 billion club," indicating strong market interest and investment [2] Group 3: Fund Management Changes - Multiple fund managers have resigned from underperforming products, including Qu Yang from Qianhai Kaiyuan Fund, whose fund has seen a return of only 14.19% over more than 9 years [4] - Liu Ming, the general manager of Dongfang Alpha Fund, also resigned from a fund that has lost over 50% during his 4-year tenure [4] - Other notable resignations include senior managers from Penghua Fund and well-known economist Deng Haiqing from poorly performing products [4] Group 4: New Fund Issuance - As of June 12, 2025, there are eight funds related to the CSI A500 index currently in issuance [5][6] - New funds include the CSI A500 Index Enhanced Fund by CITIC Construction Investment Fund and the CSI A500 Enhanced Strategy ETF by Guolian An Fund, both launched in June 2025 [5][6] Group 5: Market Performance - On June 13, 2025, the market experienced a downturn, with the Shanghai Composite Index falling by 0.75% and the Shenzhen Component Index by 1.10% [8] - The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reached 1.47 trillion yuan, an increase of 195.5 billion yuan from the previous trading day [8] - The oil and gas sector showed strong performance, with several stocks hitting the daily limit, while automotive-related ETFs in the Hong Kong market faced declines [8]
基金经理:警惕新股首日炒作行情
Zhong Guo Zheng Quan Bao· 2025-06-12 20:48
Core Viewpoint - The recent trend of new stocks in the A-share market shows significant initial price surges, but many investors face losses shortly after due to high opening prices and subsequent declines [1][2][4]. Group 1: New Stock Performance - As of June 12, 2023, all 48 new stocks listed this year experienced price increases on their first day, with none facing a decline [2]. - Over 85% of new stocks doubled in price on their debut, with some surging over 600% [2]. - More than 70% of new stocks reached their peak price on the first day, indicating a pattern of high opening followed by declines [2][3]. Group 2: Investor Behavior - The number of investors participating in online subscriptions for new stocks has significantly increased, with 36 new stocks attracting over 10 million accounts [2]. - Many fund managers express confusion over the sources of capital driving these initial surges, suggesting a lack of understanding of market dynamics [3]. - A substantial portion of investors who bought stocks on the first day experienced losses, with over 70% of them facing declines if they held onto their shares until June 12 [3][4]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - The phenomenon of high opening prices followed by declines is attributed to speculative trading, which distorts the stock's reasonable valuation [4]. - Fund managers typically adopt a strategy of selling new stocks on the first day, reflecting a cautious approach to initial public offerings [4][5]. - The turnover rate for new stocks on their first day exceeds 60%, with nearly half surpassing 80%, indicating high trading activity [4]. Group 4: Institutional Participation - Public fund managers show a low level of participation in new stocks during their initial phase, often waiting for a period before conducting research [5]. - Less than 30% of the top ten shareholders in new stocks listed in the first quarter of 2023 were public institutions, highlighting a trend of individual investors dominating early investments [5].