公开资料显示，纳百川前身为纳百川控股有限公司，曾用名泰顺纳百川汽车配件有限公司，由瑞安籍温 商陈荣贤于2007年10月创办。出生于1969年9月的他，在中国人民大学MBA结业，早年曾在瑞安市担任 某鞋厂厂长、服装厂销售经理、汽配公司总经理等职。 纳百川主要从事新能源汽车动力电池热管理、燃油汽车动力系统热管理及储能电池热管理相关产品的研 发、生产和销售，主要产品包括电池液冷板、电池集成箱体、燃油汽车发动机散热器、加热器暖风等。 纳百川IPO于2023年9月获受理，次月进入问询阶段，历经数次财务资料更新，耗时近两年于8月28日上 会获得通过，并于9月2日进入提交注册阶段。此次上市，该公司拟募资7.29亿元，将用于年产360万台 套水冷板生产项目（一期）等。 上市首日大涨近700%，闲不住的资金猛炒新股！ 12月23日，A股三大股指冲高回落，题材股炒作周期退潮，高位妖股纷纷大幅回撤，而闲不住的资金一 头扎进新股中疯狂爆炒，沐曦集成上市当天疯狂一幕再次在A股上演。 今日汽配企业纳百川正式登陆创业板，纳百川高开165.13%报60元/股，随后一直70元/股上下浮动，不 过午后在A股三大股指下行后，无处可去的资金开始爆炒 ...

"以为是财富神话，没想到是血泪陷阱！" 上市刚满一年，股价从巅峰360.23元跌至如今33元左右，累计跌幅超90%，无数高位追入的散户被深度套牢，哀 嚎一片。这只曾被爆炒的文化传媒股成了"割韭菜"重灾区，有散户表示：这哪是来上市的，这是来割韭菜的吧！ 那么这是哪只股票？公司主要是做什么的？公司业绩怎么样？保荐机构是哪家？我们一起来看看！ 这只股票就是301551无线传媒！ 无线传媒并非无名之辈，作为河北省IPTV集成播控服务的独家运营商，它手握河北广播电视台授权，垄断着当地近1500万户家庭的大屏视听服务，业务 覆盖直播、影视点播、教育、游戏等多元内容，还通过三大电信运营商推行业务品牌。 通过无线传媒的财务数据可以看到，公司2021-2024年，营收分别为6.721亿元、6.537亿元、6.463亿元和6.133亿元；净利润分别为3.557亿元、2.911亿元、 2.839亿元和2.615亿元，可以看到公司这几年的营收是一年比一年低，净利润也是跟下台阶一样，一年比一年低，2024年净利润同比下降7.89%！ 业绩"增收不增利"藏隐忧，高估值泡沫一戳就破 | 2021 年报 | 2022 年报 | 2023 年 ...

2025年11月，无线传媒的股价徘徊在37元附近。 这个数字对一年前以360元冲进去的股民来说，像一把钝刀子，每天都在割心。 2024年9月，这家公司以9.4元发行价登陆创业板，4天内飙升至360.23元，暴涨37倍。 中一签的股民最高赚到17.5万元，市场沸腾着"财富自由"的狂欢。 但狂欢仅持续了4天。 2024年10月9日，股价单日暴跌64.48%，从此一路向下，一年内跌去90%。 如果在360元高点买入10万元，现在账户只剩不到1万元。 更残酷的是，所有在上市后进场的散户无一例外全部被套牢。 50亿解禁洪峰，一天蒸发20亿市值 2025年9月26日，无线传媒上市一周年纪念日成了股东的套现狂欢和散户的噩梦。 1.17亿股限售股解禁，占公司总股本29.17%，按前一日收盘价计算，解禁 市值超过50亿元。 这批解禁股相当于原流通股的3倍以上，市场供给瞬间暴增。 解禁当日，股价盘中暴跌13%，收盘跌10.82%，市值一天蒸发20亿元。 公司工作人员对此表示"对股东正常合规的交易无特别约束力"，唯一能做的只是"建议股东延长卖出周期"。 但建议显然未能缓解恐慌。 解禁涉及12家股东，包括内蒙古中财金控、河北旅投股权 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the dramatic rise and subsequent fall of a newly listed stock, illustrating the risks associated with speculative trading in the stock market, particularly for retail investors. Group 1: Stock Performance - A newly listed stock surged from an initial price of 9.4 yuan to a peak of 360.23 yuan, representing an increase of over 28 times, before plummeting by 91% within a year [3][5] - After reaching a high of 360 yuan, the stock experienced a significant drop of 64% in a single day, leading to substantial losses for investors [5][21] - The stock's price fell to around 34 yuan after a prolonged decline, indicating a lack of buying interest and low trading volume [5][12] Group 2: Investor Behavior - Retail investors often chase short-term gains, neglecting the inherent risks, which can lead to significant financial losses [9][21] - The disparity in costs between original shareholders and retail investors creates an uneven playing field, with original shareholders having a much lower cost basis [10][12] - Many retail investors are now hesitant to engage in new stock trading due to the high risks associated with initial public offerings (IPOs) [10][18] Group 3: Market Dynamics - The article notes that over 30% of new stocks listed in 2024 have fallen below their issue price within a year, with about 10% experiencing declines of over 50% [9][18] - The stock's trading volume has drastically decreased, with daily trading amounts dropping from billions to less than ten million yuan, indicating a lack of liquidity [12][17] - Institutional investors have been selling off their positions, while retail investors are left holding the bag, leading to a market dynamic where institutions exit and retail investors are stuck [17][21] Group 4: Company Fundamentals - The company in question has a modest annual profit of over 200 million yuan, which does not justify its previous high valuation [7][10] - Despite the stock's significant decline, its dynamic price-to-earnings ratio remains high at 51 times, compared to industry leaders with ratios between 20-30 times [7][10] - The company faces challenges from stricter regulations in the cultural media industry, which may hinder its future growth prospects [17]

Core Viewpoint - The recent debut of Dapeng Industrial on the A-share market has sparked renewed enthusiasm for new stock offerings, contrasting with the overall market downturn [1][5]. Group 1: Dapeng Industrial's Performance - Dapeng Industrial's initial offering price was 9 yuan, but it opened at 35.09 yuan, achieving a remarkable increase of 289.9% on its first day [1]. - The stock price peaked at 159 yuan during trading, representing an increase of nearly 17 times from the issue price, setting a new record for first-day performance of new stocks [1][3]. - The closing price was 118 yuan, still reflecting a gain of over 12 times from the initial offering price, despite a drop from the day's high [3]. Group 2: Market Context and Investor Sentiment - The surge in Dapeng Industrial's stock occurred amidst a broader market correction, similar to the previous case of Mengguli, which also saw significant gains during a weak market [5]. - This phenomenon raises questions among seasoned investors about whether new stocks are more likely to perform well in bearish markets or if such occurrences are merely coincidental [5]. - The event has reinvigorated interest in new stock investments, highlighting the effectiveness of new stock strategies while also serving as a reminder of the inherent risks involved [5].

这只新股上市首日开盘价就是最高价，全天低走跌幅28%，收出一根大阴线。 发行价46.68元，收盘仅比发行价高51%，中签者一签盈利只剩1200元。 年内新股首日中签户盈利比较普遍，多的有盈利十几万的，少的也有几万，但盈利 这么少的新股实属罕见。 | 第六个交易日，涨跌幅限制变为10%，投资者期待股价能有所表现。 | | | --- | --- | | 更让人揪心的是，这只股票的下跌之路才刚刚开始。 次日它低开后勉强上涨3.26%，给中签者一线希望。 走跌3.92%，第五天还是低开低走跌1.68%。 至此，不设涨跌幅限制的五个交易日结束，中签没有卖的投资者一签盈利已下降到750元。 | 但第三天就低开低走跌4.48%，第四天继续低开低 | 结果等来的是低开低走，而且跌得更狠，单日跌幅达4.92%，股价跌到62元。 第七天，下跌趋势依旧，盘中跌幅1.5%左右，股价已跌至61元。 许多基金经理对这种现象感到困惑。 一位化名曾智的基金经理感慨："第一天涨好几倍，这些资金也不知道是哪里来的，明明知道后面会被套，还持续去拉 股价，我也挺震惊的。 "另一位基金经理陈平认为，这与新股流通盘较小有关——在流通盘较小的情况下，买 ...

"这辈子还能解套吗？ "一位股民在股票论坛发出绝望的提问。 他口中的这只股票，上市6天连续下跌，首日追高者浮亏已超45%。 更残酷的是，根据Wind数据统计，今年A股上市的48只新股中，若投资者在上市首日以收盘价买入并长期持有，七成以上将面临亏损，最高亏损幅度达 47%。 股价腰斩后仍高估一倍 即便经历暴跌，许多新股的估值仍远高于行业合理水平。 前述汽车零部件企业市盈率61倍，高出行业均值一倍多。 红四方在腰斩后市盈率仍达86倍，而行 业平均仅15倍。 有基金经理测算，若按20倍市盈率估算，其合理股价应在21元左右，但当前股价仍达81元。 这场看似疯狂的"上市即巅峰"戏码，已成为A股新股的常态。 一场精心设计的"围猎游戏" 2024年11月26日，化肥企业红四方登陆A股。 发行价仅7.98元的它，首日涨幅一度飙升至2255%，盘中最高触及188元。 但狂欢仅持续了一天。 次日，股价腰斩49.7%，收于81元。 类似的剧情在2024年反复上演：长联科技上市次日冲高至689元后暴跌86%；强邦新材从245元跌至48元，跌幅81%；盟固利首日暴涨35倍后，从202元阴跌 至15元，跌幅93%。 这些新股背后存在共性 ...

Core Insights - The article analyzes the phenomenon of initial public offering (IPO) speculation in the A-share market, likening it to selling spoiled fruit at a high price, where new stocks are often "dressed up" to hide flaws and exaggerate strengths [1] - Original shareholders push for high valuations during IPOs for financing, while retail investors are drawn to the "profit-making effect" of new stocks despite knowing the high pricing logic [1] - The structure of share distribution, such as in the case of Haocreator Ruitong with 79.04% of shares being restricted, allows institutions to easily manipulate stock prices through a "pump and dump" strategy [1] Summary by Sections IPO Speculation Dynamics - New stocks are often subject to initial speculation, with significant profit potential in the early stages due to the absence of price limits and the T+1 trading system, which stimulates investor interest [1] - The current rules tacitly allow for initial speculation, which can attract funds to support real economy financing [1] Historical Context and Future Implications - Historical data indicates that most heavily speculated new stocks tend to revert to their true value within a year [1] - Changes in the Shanghai Composite Index's compilation rules in 2020 adjusted the inclusion timing of new stocks from 11 months post-listing to one year, reflecting a shift in how new stock performance is evaluated [1] Investment Strategies - Retail investors are advised to sell on the first day of trading for new stocks as a profit strategy and to avoid participating in the speculation of newly listed stocks, suggesting a wait-and-see approach for one to two years before considering investment [1]

Group 1: Retail Investors' Struggles - Retail investors in the A-share market often become victims of high-risk new stock offerings, leading to significant financial losses [2] - For instance, Longlian Technology's stock price surged from an opening price of 61.92 yuan to a peak of 102 yuan, but ultimately closed at 79.85 yuan, revealing a harsh reality where institutions sold off shares while retail investors bought at inflated prices [2] - Similar patterns were observed in other stocks like Tongguan Mining, which saw its market value evaporate by 60% within 72 hours, highlighting the risks of blindly chasing high prices [2] Group 2: Profit Chain Among Underwriters, Speculators, and Institutions - The new stock frenzy is driven by a profit chain involving underwriters, speculators, and institutions, with underwriters playing a crucial role in promoting stocks while downplaying risks [3] - A significant 75% of new stock circulation is allocated to institutional investors, leaving only 25% for retail investors, which exacerbates the disadvantage for the latter [3] - Speculators utilize strategies like "pump and dump," leading to extreme volatility and significant losses for retail investors [3] Group 3: Systemic Issues in the Market - The A-share market faces systemic issues such as low-priced offerings and low circulation ratios, which create traps for retail investors [4] - For example, the circulation ratio for Hong Sifang was only 16%, allowing speculators to manipulate stock prices with relatively small amounts of capital [4] - The ineffective delisting mechanism has resulted in a low annual delisting rate of only 0.1%, allowing poor-performing companies to persist in the market [4] Group 4: Market Consequences - Excessive speculation in new stocks has led to severe resource misallocation, with significant capital tied up in initial public offerings (IPOs) while the secondary market suffers [5] - Historical data shows that the A-share market has experienced prolonged bear markets, with the average duration of bear markets being 3.7 times longer than bull markets over the past decade [5] - The trend of new stock financing has reached 63% of total financing in the A-share market, while only three companies have been delisted, indicating a skewed market dynamic [5] Group 5: Regulatory Failures - The A-share market suffers from regulatory failures that allow speculative behavior to thrive, resulting in retail investors being exploited [6] - Instances of misleading information in prospectuses and inadequate enforcement of regulations have been noted, leading to significant stock price drops following negative news [6] - There is a pressing need for improved regulatory measures to protect investor rights and prevent similar market tragedies in the future [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the dramatic decline in the stock price of Hanhigh Group, which fell from a peak of 120 yuan to 45.71 yuan in just six trading days, representing a staggering drop of 62% [2][10][14] - On the first day of trading, Hanhigh Group's stock opened at 47 yuan, surged by 300% to 120 yuan, but then plummeted to 80 yuan by the end of the day, resulting in significant losses for investors who bought at the peak [2][10] - The stock continued to decline over the following days, with a 24% drop on the second day and further losses on subsequent days, leading to widespread panic among investors [2][10] Group 2 - Hanhigh Group's financial data raises red flags, with reported revenue growth of 32% and net profit growth of 60%, contrasting sharply with a 4% decline in the overall home furnishing industry [3][6] - The company's gross profit margin of 35.8% significantly exceeds the industry average of 28%, while its R&D expenditure is only 3.9% of revenue, suggesting potential financial manipulation [3][6] - Accounts receivable turnover days increased from 45 to 78 days, indicating possible financial statement embellishment through premature contract signing [6][8] Group 3 - The governance structure of Hanhigh Group is concerning, with the controlling family holding 84% of shares and nearly 90% of voting rights, leading to frequent related-party transactions [6][8] - Allegations of mismanagement include long-standing defaults on employee benefits and a significant inventory backlog of 173 million yuan [8][11] - The company faces 14 pending lawsuits related to patent disputes and labor arbitration, raising concerns about its stability [11] Group 4 - The IPO market's tightening has led to unusual phenomena, with Hanhigh Group's stock being heavily speculated upon, attracting retail investors who ultimately faced significant losses [9][14] - The high concentration of lock-up shares (82%) poses a risk of large-scale sell-offs by major shareholders when restrictions lift in 2026, similar to past instances in the market [11][14] - The article emphasizes the need for investors to recognize warning signs of financial fraud, such as surging receivables, inflated inventory, and unrealistic profit margins [11][14]