新华社墨西哥城/北京1月4日电 题："唐罗主义"加速令拉美国家唇亡齿寒 新华社记者翟淑睿 陈瑶 吴昊 在美军突袭委内瑞拉并强行控制委总统马杜罗夫妇后，美国总统特朗普3日宣称，美国将"管理"委 内瑞拉。 分析人士认为，美国军事打击委内瑞拉并提出所谓"管理"计划，野蛮侵犯他国主权，本质上是加速 其"控制西半球"、掠夺当地资源的"唐罗主义"政策，对拉美和加勒比地区国家主权、安全与地区和平构 成严峻挑战，可能引发更广泛的地缘政治震荡。 美国"管理"实为掠夺控制 特朗普3日在记者会上说，美国将成立一个由外交和军事人员组成的工作小组"管理"委内瑞拉，直 到"能够进行安全、妥善和明智的过渡"。 阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯经济新闻网直言，特朗普政府所谓"管理"委内瑞拉、"重建"石油设施，不过 是一场"资源掠夺战"。 复旦大学拉美研究中心主任曹廷认为，以特朗普政府的一贯风格看，其战略目标或是在不进行长期 占领的情况下，通过在委扶植美方代理人，控制委境内石油命脉。 他还威胁称，美国"不怕"派出地面部队，如有必要，将对委发动规模更大的第二波打击。 多名专家认为，虽然目前具体方案仍不明朗，但美国所谓"管理"本质上就是想通过政治操控和资源 ...

更多资料加入知识星球:水木调研纪要 关注公众号:水木纪要 委内瑞拉问题解读 20260104 摘要 Q&A 美国为何选择此时对委内瑞拉采取行动? 美国选择此时采取行动有两个主要原因。从委内瑞拉内部来看,自 2020 年以来, 委内瑞拉逐步进行市场化改革和对外开放,其经济形势自疫情后逐渐好转。例如, 2024年9月时其原油目产量已接近 110 万桶,这对于一个石油经济体来说是重 要的经济复苏信号。此外,马杜罗于 2024年7月第三次连任总统,在国内获得 了一定程度的认可。如果再给委内瑞拉一年左右时间,其国内形势可能会进一步 好转,这将使得美国更难以干预。 从外部来看,美国在 2025年 12月初公布了 新版国家安全战略,将西半球作为首要目标。此次行动也是落实这一战略的重要 步骤。同时,美国当前面临国内政治极化和社会撕裂等问题,通过这种外部军事 行动可以转移国内矛盾,实现特朗普"让美国再次伟大"的口号。 委内瑞拉与美国之间的关系如何?历史上有哪些重要节点? 请问此次美国对委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的抓捕事件的具体情况是什么? 根据现有信息,此次抓捕事件发生在美东时间 2026年1月3日。特朗普宣布美 方成功实施了对委内瑞 ...

德国左翼党联合主席扬·范阿肯在其党派网站上表示，美国对委动武是"野蛮的国家恐怖主义行 径"。 德国社民党外交政策专家阿迪斯·艾哈迈托维奇表示，如果未经联合国授权就使用军事力量，公开 推翻别国政权，那么强权将日益取代法律，"这是国际秩序中一个非常危险的转变"。 德国哥廷根大学国际法专家凯·安博斯说，美国打击委内瑞拉显然是为了推翻其所反对的马杜罗政 府，获取委石油资源。 南非共产党发表声明说，美方这一"卑劣的强盗行径"破坏了拉美和加勒比地区的和平与稳定，并将 数以百万计民众的生命置于严重危险之中。 南非工会联合会发表声明说，美国的行为不是外交、不是执法，也不是"推动民主"，而是赤裸裸的 侵略、政权更迭战争和"帝国主义犯罪逻辑"。 新华社北京1月4日电 综合新华社驻外记者报道：美国3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发起大规模军事行动，突 袭委首都加拉加斯并抓走委总统马杜罗及其夫人。多国政党组织、政界人士和学者谴责美国以"缉毒"为 名采取军事行动，实则意在控制委内瑞拉资源。此举侵犯委内瑞拉主权，公然违反国际法，严重威胁到 拉丁美洲地区和平与安全。 据法国媒体报道，超过2000人3日晚在法国巴黎共和国广场举行抗议活动。左翼政党"不屈法 ...

当地时间1月3日，美军参谋长联席会议主席凯恩披露马杜罗被强行控制全过程。凯恩在新闻发布会上说，在委内瑞拉开展的军事行动是应司法部的要求而发 起的，这次代号为"绝对决心"的行动隐秘、精准。经过情报团队数月的"努力"，美方锁定马杜罗行踪，掌握其如何移动、居住地点、出行路线、饮食习惯、 着装偏好以及饲养的宠物等信息。 转自：人民日报客户端 当地时间3日凌晨，夜色中的委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯传出爆炸声。三个多小时后，美国总统特朗普宣布已经"抓获"委总统马杜罗及其夫人，并用飞机带离委 内瑞拉。当夜发生了什么？美国为何悍然入侵他国并强行控制他国元首？委内瑞拉局势将如何发展？ 惊魂三小时发生了什么？ 特朗普深夜下达突袭命令，实时观看马杜罗被控制 凯恩表示，美国总统特朗普在美国东部时间2日22时46分下达突袭命令，超过150架飞机从美军西半球海上和陆地20个基地起飞，包括轰炸机、战斗机、侦察 机、旋翼机等。执行"抓"马杜罗任务的直升机在飞行过程中，以约100英尺（约30米）的高度贴着海面飞行。 在突袭部队接近委内瑞拉海岸时，美军同步启动了多层作战支援，包括太空通信、网络通信以及其他跨部门协同机制。在接近加拉加斯时，美军发动打击， ...

2026.01. 04 本文字数：2775，阅读时长大约4分钟 作者 | 第一财经 钱小岩 2026年开局才几天，就见证了冷战后美国在拉美展开的最大军事行动。 据新华社报道，美东时间1月2日22时46分，美国总统特朗普下令突袭委内瑞拉，超150架美军飞机 从西半球20个基地起飞，空袭委内瑞拉约3小时，抓走委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其夫人，1月3日晚 间，马杜罗夫妇就已送至纽约布鲁克林一处拘留中心。 国家元首一夜之间成为他国"阶下囚"，更让委内瑞拉百姓担心的是国家的未来。在马杜罗被掳走 后，委内瑞拉最高法院3日下令该国副总统兼石油部长罗德里格斯担任代理总统。不过特朗普则称， 美国将"管理"委内瑞拉直至实施"安全"过渡。委内瑞拉的前途依然未卜。 上海国际问题研究院外交政策研究所所长牛海彬向第一财经记者表示，虽然特朗普在3日强调了委内 瑞拉的石油资源的重要性，但突袭委内瑞拉还有其他政治和战略的考虑。特朗普试图将袭击与移民和 毒品问题做连接，以服务于国内政治需求；同时，这还是美国践行"特朗普版门罗主义"的关键一 步。 1月3日，在古巴首都哈瓦那，古共中央第一书记、古巴国家主席迪亚斯-卡内尔（前排右二）出席集会活动谴责美国军 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant military action taken by the U.S. against Venezuela, marking a pivotal moment in U.S.-Latin America relations under Trump's administration, which is characterized by a new version of the Monroe Doctrine referred to as "Trump's Monroeism" [1][8]. Group 1: Military Action and Political Implications - On January 2, 2026, President Trump ordered a military operation that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Maduro, with over 150 U.S. military aircraft involved in the operation [1]. - Following Maduro's capture, the Venezuelan Supreme Court appointed Vice President Rodriguez as acting president, but did not declare Maduro "absolutely absent," suggesting no immediate elections will be held [3][4]. - Trump stated that the U.S. would "manage" Venezuela until a "safe" transition could occur, indicating a long-term U.S. involvement in Venezuelan affairs [4]. Group 2: Economic Interests and Resource Control - Trump emphasized the importance of Venezuela's oil resources, indicating that U.S. oil companies would invest billions in Venezuelan energy infrastructure, aiming to extract wealth for both Venezuelans and the U.S. [6][8]. - The U.S. has been conducting military operations in the Caribbean under the guise of combating "drug terrorism," which has resulted in significant military deployments and actions against vessels [6]. Group 3: Historical Context and Regional Reactions - The article draws parallels between the current situation and past U.S. interventions in Latin America, highlighting a historical pattern of U.S. involvement in the region's politics [10]. - Neighboring countries, particularly Colombia and Chile, have expressed concerns over U.S. military actions, emphasizing the need for respect for national sovereignty and calling for diplomatic solutions to the crisis [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's assertion that "Monroe Doctrine" should now be referred to as "Trump Doctrine" following the U.S. military's forceful capture of Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife, indicating a shift in U.S. foreign policy towards Latin America [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Foreign Policy Shift - Trump claims that Venezuela's actions violate core U.S. diplomatic principles dating back over two centuries, suggesting a significant evolution from the original Monroe Doctrine to what he terms "Trump Doctrine" [1][3]. - The Monroe Doctrine, established in 1823, has historically been a cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy in Latin America, warning European nations against interference in the Americas, but has faced criticism for being used as a pretext for intervention [1][3]. Group 2: Policy Proposals and Strategic Focus - Trump has proposed several policy initiatives, including reclaiming control of the Panama Canal, acquiring Greenland, making Canada the 51st state, and prioritizing the Western Hemisphere in U.S. national security [2][4]. - The upcoming U.S. National Security Strategy, set to be released in December 2025, will base its stance on the Western Hemisphere on the Monroe Doctrine, aiming to "reaffirm and strengthen" this principle to restore U.S. hegemony [2][4]. Group 3: Implications of Actions - The Economist comments that the forceful capture of Maduro and the attempt to control Venezuela's oil resources represent an unusual manifestation of "Trump Doctrine," with the ultimate goal of asserting control over the Western Hemisphere [2][4]. - Alexander Gray, a former member of the National Security Council during Trump's first term, indicates that U.S. intervention in Venezuela signals a more aggressive approach towards Latin America [2][4].

证券研究报告·宏观报告·宏观周报 元旦假期海外市场回顾 "意料之外，情理之中"的委内瑞拉事件 2026 年 01 月 04 日 ◼ 海外政治：美国发动特别军事行动逮捕委内瑞拉总统，短期内或利好原 油价格。当地时间 2026 年 1 月 3 日，美军对委内瑞拉首都卡拉卡斯及 周边多处地区实施了空袭。特朗普则在社交媒体上表示已经逮捕委内瑞 拉总统马杜罗及其妻子。随后在海湖庄园举行的新闻发布会上，特朗普 声称因马杜罗长期拒绝与美方合作，所以将其作为"逃犯"，实施本次 特别军事行动进行逮捕，未来将移交至纽约地区法院对其涉及的毒品恐 怖主义等一系列指控进行审判；特朗普同时表示未来将持续管理委内瑞 拉至政权平稳过渡，并引入美国大型石油公司对委内瑞拉石油资源进行 开发。从表面上看，本次特别"斩首"行动极大地超出市场对特朗普的 外交政策预期。一方面，这是自 1989 年美国入侵巴拿马后逮捕诺列加 以来，时隔 37 年再度通过军事手段直接抓捕他国最高领导人。另一方 面，由于美国宪法规定战争行动必须由国会授权，而特朗普本次"斩首" 并未提前通知国会，因此该行动未来可能被视为"对委内瑞拉宣战"， 从而面临"违宪"风险，招致民主党的 ...

Summary of Key Points from the Conference Call Industry or Company Involved - The discussion revolves around the foreign policy actions of the Trump administration in 2025, particularly focusing on military interventions and their implications for the United States and global relations [1][2][3]. Core Points and Arguments - **Military Actions and Controversies**: Trump ordered military actions in at least seven countries, leading to significant debate among supporters and critics regarding the motivations behind these actions, particularly in relation to U.S. interests versus those of allies like Israel [1][2][8]. - **Iran Bombing**: Trump became the first U.S. president to order bombings in Iran, targeting three key nuclear facilities, which raised questions about the legality and motivations of bypassing Congress [7][8]. - **Venezuela Military Deployments**: The administration's military presence in Venezuela has been described as unprecedented, with actions aimed at combating drug trafficking, raising concerns about whether these actions serve U.S. citizens or oil interests [2][12]. - **Syria and ISIS**: The U.S. continued operations against ISIS in Syria, but there were allegations that some attacks were against government forces rather than ISIS, complicating the narrative of U.S. military objectives [9][10]. - **Ukraine Conflict**: Trump’s approach to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war has been criticized for not exerting enough pressure on Ukraine to negotiate territorial concessions, despite the U.S. providing intelligence support against Russia [5][10]. - **Public Sentiment**: There is growing fatigue among U.S. taxpayers regarding ongoing military conflicts, with many calling for a reevaluation of U.S. involvement abroad [5][10]. Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content - **Casualties and Criticism**: The military actions have resulted in significant civilian casualties, with reports indicating over 250 deaths in certain operations, leading to international condemnation [6][11]. - **Long-term Goals in Venezuela**: The U.S. aims to see a regime change in Venezuela, which is rich in oil reserves, suggesting that economic interests may be a driving factor behind military actions [12][13]. - **Record Military Actions in Africa**: The Trump administration authorized a record number of military strikes in Africa, particularly against terrorist groups, indicating a shift in U.S. military focus [13]. - **Public Relations and Media Attention**: Some military actions, such as the Christmas Day strike in Nigeria, appear to be aimed at garnering media attention rather than achieving strategic military objectives [14]. Conclusion - Overall, the Trump administration's foreign policy in 2025 has been marked by aggressive military actions that have sparked significant debate regarding their motivations and implications for U.S. interests and global stability. The outlook for 2026 appears uncertain, with many analysts predicting continued challenges in foreign relations and military engagements [15].

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the ongoing dominance of imperialism, colonialism, and hegemony, particularly by the United States in Latin America, which has led to political instability and the undermining of national sovereignty [1][2] - The article discusses the historical context of U.S. interventions in Latin America, noting that the U.S. has orchestrated 41 regime changes in the region since the late 19th century, often under the guise of anti-terrorism and anti-drug efforts [1] - The recent actions against Venezuela's leadership are seen as a warning to other Latin American countries, signaling a return to a Monroe Doctrine-like approach under President Trump's administration, where the U.S. asserts its influence and control over the region [2][4] Group 2 - The U.S. aims to eliminate anti-American regimes in Latin America, using methods that serve to humiliate rather than simply remove leaders, thereby instilling fear among other nations [4] - The article emphasizes the strategic importance of Venezuela's oil and mineral resources, suggesting that U.S. control over these assets is crucial for its geopolitical strategy in the region [4] - The narrative indicates a broader trend of U.S. digital colonialism and imperialism, which is being reinforced by advancements in technology and digital networks, further entrenching U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere [4]