当地时间6月17日，国家主席习近平出席第二届中国—中亚峰会并作主旨发言时指出，两年来，中国同 中亚国家共建"一带一路"走深走实，贸易额增长35%，产业投资、绿色矿产、科技创新等合作积极推 进。这是共建"一带一路"推动国际社会合作共赢的生动缩影。10多年来，共建"一带一路"倡议在风云变 幻的国际格局中，穿越地理阻隔，跨越文化差异，赢得广泛认同与支持。 其次，共建"一带一路"倡议立足现实、因地制宜，精准回应各国发展需求。从基础设施建设到产业对 接，从教育医疗合作到数字经济技术交流，共建"一带一路"倡议在不同国家以不同方式、在不同领域持 续产出合作成果。在乌兹别克斯坦，中乌现代农业科技示范园促进了产业升级与民生改善；在老挝，中 老铁路激活了当地经济，切实提升沿线百姓福祉；在坦桑尼亚，中国援建的基奎特心脏病研究所已成为 东非地区首屈一指的心脏病诊疗中心，吸引多个国家患者就医。共建"一带一路"倡议坚持不强加、不照 搬、不另起炉灶的合作方式，充分尊重各国自主发展的路径和节奏，将发展主导权交给各国人民，树立 了国际合作的新典范。 此外，共建"一带一路"倡议始终坚持开放包容，积极对接非盟《2063年议程》、哈萨克斯坦"光明之 ...

新华社北京6月18日电（记者邵艺博、成欣）外交部发言人郭嘉昆18日表示，中方愿同中亚国家一道努 力，推动中国—中亚命运共同体建设走在前列，形成示范。 郭嘉昆说，6月17日，习近平主席在哈萨克斯坦首都阿斯塔纳出席第二届中国—中亚峰会并发表主旨发 言，全面回顾中国中亚合作的丰硕成果，创新提出"中国—中亚精神"，指出双方要"坚守彼此信赖、相 互支持的团结初心""优化务实高效、深度融合的合作布局""打造和平安宁、休戚与共的安全格局""拉紧 同心同德、相知相亲的人文纽带""维护公正合理、平等有序的国际秩序"。 郭嘉昆表示，峰会一大亮点是各方一致同意大力弘扬以"互尊、互信、互利、互助，以高质量发展推进 共同现代化"为基本内容的"中国—中亚精神"，推动世代友好合作。峰会重要成果之一是签署了永久睦 邻友好合作条约，树立了六国关系史上新的里程碑，也成为中国周边外交的创举。峰会明确了未来合作 重点，决定成立减贫、教育交流、荒漠化防治三大合作中心和贸易畅通合作平台，着力推进贸易畅通、 产业投资、互联互通、绿色矿产、农业现代化、人员往来六大优先合作方向，推动地区高质量发展，携 手迈向共同现代化。各方还发出一致声音，坚定捍卫多边主义， ...

与美国总统特朗普（右）合影的加拿大总理卡尼（reuters） 此次加拿大G7峰会仅发表了关于中东局势的联合声明以及重要矿产、AI等6个个别领域的行动 计划。并未提出对俄罗斯的进一步制裁。特朗普16日为应对中东局势，中途离开峰会返回美 国。G7的裂痕正在表面化…… 在加拿大召开的G7峰会于6月17日闭幕。此次峰会放弃了总括性的首脑宣言，仅发布了6个个 别领域的联合声明和行动计划。受中东局势紧张影响，美国总统特朗普在闭幕前返回美国。 峰会也并未提出对俄罗斯的进一步制裁，G7的裂痕正在表面化。 发布联合声明和行动计划等成果文件的是重要矿产、人工智能（AI）、量子、应对跨国压迫行 为、森林火灾和移民对策等6个领域。6月16日还发表了关于中东局势的联合声明。 关于重要矿产，写明"将与G7以外的伙伴合作，迅速采取措施维护经济安保和国家安全"。G7 成员国将携手完善纯电动汽车（EV）等不可或缺的矿产的采购体制。 特朗普从16日的讨论开始前起，就对以G7为中心的多边主义反复发出否定言论。他表示 2014年将俄罗斯排除在当时的G8框架之外是"巨大的错误"，针对中国加入G7框架也指出"并 不是坏主意"。 日本经济新闻（中文版：日 ...

经济一体化可以为小国带来真正的繁荣。 2025年5月23日，由全球化智库（CCG）主办的第十一届中国与全球化论坛在京举行。爱尔兰驻华大使欧博仁（H.E. Nicholas O'Brien）在以"多极世界中 的多边主义"为主题的大使圆桌上发表以下观点： 举一个例子：欧盟对来自全球最不发达国家的商品实行免关税政策，任何从这些国家出口到欧盟的产品都可以享受这一待遇。这项政策的目的非常明确 ——就是支持最不发达国家的发展。 我们也希望在更多层面，推动那些脆弱群体，特别是最不发达国家或正在转型的发展中国家的可持续发展。中国在脱贫方面已经取得了巨大的成就，这点 令人钦佩。 当然，我们现在面临一系列全球性挑战，关税就是其中之一。面对这些问题，欧盟的立场非常明确——我们支持可持续的解决方案、开放的经济体系、公 平与正义的贸易秩序。 我们相信基于规则的体系才是推动稳定发展的根本经验所在。展望未来，我们必须通过在谈判桌前达成共识来解决冲突和分歧。这是我们的信念。 谢谢大家。 本文依据嘉宾在由由全球化智库（CCG）与中国人民对外友好协会（CPAFFC）联合主办，当代中国与世界研究院（ACCWS）与中美交流基金会 （CUSEF）协办 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Governor of the People's Bank of China, Pan Gongsheng, emphasized the need for reform in international financial organizations to better reflect the status of emerging markets and developing countries in the global economy [1] Group 1: Governance Reform - There has been a long-term lack of substantial adjustment in the shares and voting rights of major international financial organizations like the IMF and World Bank, which does not align with the actual economic standing of emerging markets and developing countries [1] - The international community should be aware of the unilateral policies of certain member countries that interfere with the governance and operation of international financial organizations [1] - It is essential for international financial organizations to advance governance reforms that dynamically reflect the relative positions of member countries in the global economy, thereby enhancing the voice and representation of emerging markets and developing countries [1] Group 2: Economic Supervision and Globalization - In the context of high uncertainty in the global economy, international financial organizations should strengthen their economic supervision functions to objectively assess the risks faced by the global economy and individual countries [1] - There is a call for international financial organizations to actively guide countries to support economic globalization and the multilateral trade system [1] - Strengthening policy guidance among countries and enhancing macroeconomic policy coordination are crucial for maintaining the stability of the international financial system [1]

Group 1 - The term "China-US trade war" is deemed inaccurate, as it implies mutual responsibility, while it is actually a unilateral tariff war initiated by the US against global trade, with China opposing these measures [1] - The unilateral tariff measures by the US have negatively impacted international trade rules and the rule-based international trading system, particularly affecting smaller countries like Chile [1] - The US is attempting to coerce Chile into accepting unreasonable demands regarding key minerals and infrastructure, which could undermine Chile's sovereignty and economic development [2] Group 2 - China views international trade as a win-win scenario, asserting that there are no winners in a trade war, and emphasizes the need to counter unilateralism to maintain international fairness and justice [2] - Chile's economy is highly export-oriented, and maintaining a multilateral, open international trade system aligns with its national interests, as Chile has expressed opposition to US unilateral tariff measures [2] - There is a call for collaboration among China, Chile, and other countries to oppose unilateral tariff measures and coercive actions, promoting inclusive economic globalization and building a community with a shared future for humanity [2]

0:00 新华社北京6月17日电 题：走过十年，亚投行如何助推多边主义发展？ 新华社记者任军、高竹、谢晗 在全球的多边开发银行中，由中国倡议设立、57国共同创建的亚洲基础设施投资银行（亚投行）虽然年轻，但成果卓著。今年是亚投行成立 十周年，6月24日至26日，亚投行的最高决策和权力机构——理事会将召开第十届年会，系统回顾十年发展成果，并展望未来战略重点。 "十年是一个值得庆祝的时间点。"亚投行副行长兼秘书长陆书泽在接受新华社专访时表示，理事会年会是亚投行年度旗舰活动，本届年会将 以"互联助力发展，合作共创繁荣"为主题，预计近100个国家和地区的3500余名嘉宾将参会。 "此次年会上，我们会专门用虚拟现实技术展示亚投行投资的项目。"陆书泽介绍，截至目前，亚投行已批准318个项目，批准融资总额超600 亿美元，动员资本超2000亿美元，惠及38个亚洲域内与域外成员。 2015年12月成立，2016年1月开业运营，走过十年的亚投行一直以实际行动践行多边主义，通过聚焦加强基础设施互联互通，推动区域经济 一体化，提升民众生活水平。 陆书泽说，亚投行是一家以发展中国家为主体、发达国家广泛参与的新型多边开发机构，发展中国家 ...

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Tajik President Rahmon emphasizes the strengthening of the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Tajikistan, focusing on practical cooperation and high-quality development of the China-Tajikistan community of shared destiny [1][2]. Group 1: Bilateral Cooperation - Both countries aim to implement the outcomes of Xi's previous state visit to Tajikistan, enhancing all-round cooperation and achieving more practical results [1]. - There is a commitment to expand bilateral trade and investment, accelerate transportation infrastructure projects, and improve connectivity [1]. - The establishment of cultural exchanges, such as the "China Cultural Day" in Tajikistan, is highlighted as a means to deepen mutual understanding [1][2]. Group 2: Security and Multilateral Cooperation - The two leaders agreed to strengthen law enforcement and security cooperation, particularly in combating the "three forces" (terrorism, extremism, and separatism) [1]. - Both sides share common interests in upholding multilateralism and defending international economic order, with a focus on enhancing coordination within multilateral mechanisms like the China-Central Asia cooperation [1][2]. - Tajikistan expresses its willingness to play a significant role in international climate governance, supported by China [1].

Core Points - The Chinese representative at the UN, Fu Cong, criticized unilateral coercive measures, stating they violate the principles of the UN Charter and undermine multilateralism and international rule of law [1] - Fu Cong emphasized that these measures prioritize domestic law over international law, infringe on the principle of sovereign equality, and disregard the authority of the UN Security Council [1] - He highlighted the negative impacts of unilateral measures on human rights, international trade, and global economic stability, exacerbating crises in food and energy and widening the gap between rich and poor [1] - Fu Cong accused a few Western countries of weaponizing unilateral measures, promoting a jungle law mentality, and called for their immediate and unconditional cancellation [1][2] International Response - The UN General Assembly passed a resolution designating December 4th as "International Day Against Unilateral Coercive Measures" following the debate on this issue [3]

Core Points - The second China-Central Asia Summit marks a new journey for cooperation in modernization and building a community with a shared future between China and Central Asian countries [1][2] - The summit aims to enhance mutual support and collaboration in the face of global challenges, reinforcing the commitment to mutual benefit and shared achievements [1][3] Strategic Choices - The deepening of China-Central Asia cooperation is described as a strategic choice that aligns with global trends and the aspirations of the people [2] - The establishment of the China-Central Asia mechanism five years ago and its elevation to a summit level in 2023 signifies a commitment to a shared future [2][3] Historical Context and Current Relations - The relationship between China and Central Asian countries has evolved over 30 years from friendly neighbors to strategic partners, culminating in a community of shared destiny [3] - The comprehensive strategic partnership is characterized by mutual support on core interests, showcasing a strong foundation of trust and friendship [3] Practical Cooperation - The cooperation between China and Central Asia is exemplified by agricultural exchanges and technological advancements, enhancing mutual benefits [4][5] - The trade volume between China and Central Asia is projected to reach a record $94.8 billion by 2024, indicating robust economic ties [5] Industrial Collaboration - China is a major source of investment in Central Asia, with over $30 billion invested, facilitating industrialization and local development [5][6] - Collaborative projects in renewable energy and agriculture are transforming local economies and enhancing self-sufficiency [5][6] Technological and Knowledge Sharing - China and Central Asia are focusing on sharing technological innovations and development experiences to bridge gaps in capabilities [6] - The cooperation model emphasizes practical outcomes, enhancing the quality of life for citizens through shared resources and mutual empowerment [6] Multilateral Cooperation and Global Governance - The China-Central Asia mechanism promotes multilateralism and opposes unilateralism, aiming to maintain a fair international order [7][8] - The countries are committed to upholding the principles of the United Nations and fostering a more just global governance system [8]