10月27日，美国右翼保守派媒体《华盛顿时报》刊登了哈德逊研究所中国中心主任余茂春的文章（以下 简称"余文"），称"中国'统一台湾'的口号是骗局"。10月29日，台湾《自由时报》马上跟进报道该文主 要观点，意图展示民进党当局"倚美谋独"政策得到美方支持。细读余文，发现其列出的"十大理由"错漏 百出、不足为驳，但鉴于很多台湾及美国民众深陷"信息茧房"，极易被此类似是而非观点所迷惑，笔者 仍然愿意对其观点进行反驳。 余文称，"台湾从未属于中华人民共和国"，"台湾在政治、法律和军事上始终不受中共控制"，这是老调 重弹，赖清德在讲不下去的"团结十讲"中就是这么说的。建议余茂春认真读一下今年7月23日《人民日 报》所刊登的中国人民大学王英津教授的文章，其中明确讲清了中华人民共和国政府在不同时期以政治 或军事、直接或间接、肯定或否定等方式，对台湾地区行使着代表权或管辖权等内容的主权权力；也讲 清楚了法理和事实的关系，即"1949年中华人民共和国完成了对中华民国的政府继承，从法理上看，自 此以后台湾当局没有任何资格再对台湾地区实施管辖。但从现实角度看，由于两岸长期军事对峙和政治 对立，台湾当局仍以先前'中华民国'的名义对台 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal implications and potential consequences for Shen Boyang, a pro-independence figure in Taiwan, following the Chongqing Public Security Bureau's decision to investigate him for allegedly splitting the country. It emphasizes the historical significance of cross-strait unification and the personal choices Shen faces regarding his stance on independence [2][6][10]. Legal Proceedings - The Chongqing Public Security Bureau has officially initiated an investigation against Shen Boyang for suspected crimes of splitting the country, which has caused significant reactions across the Taiwan Strait [2][4]. - The legal process against Shen has begun, and he may face lifelong accountability for his actions as a pro-independence advocate [4][6]. - Shen's potential legal consequences are tied to his lifespan, with an average male life expectancy in Taiwan being approximately 77 years, suggesting he could live for another 34 years [6][9]. Potential Sentences - If convicted, Shen could face severe penalties, including the possibility of the death penalty, depending on the nature of his actions and the evidence presented [7][9]. - The charges against him include both the crime of splitting the country and inciting such actions, with the former carrying heavier penalties [8][9]. Legal Principles - The principle of leniency and severity in legal enforcement applies to the treatment of pro-independence figures, acknowledging the complex historical and social factors surrounding the independence movement in Taiwan [10][11]. - Recent guidelines from mainland authorities outline conditions under which leniency may be granted to pro-independence figures, emphasizing the importance of voluntary confession and renunciation of independence activities [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - The granddaughter of martyr Zhu Feng, Zhu Rongrang, expresses her longing for Taiwan and hopes for cross-strait reunification, emphasizing the cultural and historical ties between the mainland and Taiwan [1][2]. Group 1: Cultural and Historical Context - The recent airing of the drama "Silent Glory" has increased awareness among people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait about the historical sacrifices made by martyrs like Wu Shi, Chen Baochang, Nie Xi, and Zhu Feng [1]. - Zhu Rongrang highlights that the connection between the mainland and Taiwan is rooted in a shared 5,000-year cultural heritage that cannot be severed [1]. Group 2: Public Sentiment and Future Aspirations - Zhu Rongrang notes that many Taiwanese youth have shown emotional responses by visiting martyr graves, indicating a subconscious desire for reunification [1]. - She envisions a future where travel between the mainland and Taiwan becomes as convenient as domestic travel within China, symbolizing a closer relationship [1]. Group 3: Historical Significance and Unity - Zhu Rongrang references the establishment of the first Taiwan Liberation Memorial Day on October 25, which commemorates the joint efforts of Chinese people in 1945 to repel Japanese invaders, reinforcing Taiwan's status as an inseparable part of China [2]. - She asserts that the sacrifices made by the martyrs transcend political affiliations and that advancing national reunification is the best way to honor their legacy [2].

Core Viewpoint - The call for cross-strait dialogue by Su Chi, Honorary Chairman of the Taipei Forum Foundation, emphasizes the need for Taiwanese political parties to unite in facing unprecedented changes, suggesting that collaboration is the only way forward to avoid a "deadlock" in the current situation [1] Group 1 - Su Chi urges Taiwanese political parties to engage in dialogue to address the current crisis, describing it as a "once-in-a-century change" [1] - Chen Binhua, spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, asserts that the historical process of cross-strait unification is unstoppable and that "Taiwan independence" is a dead end [1] - The spokesperson emphasizes the importance of promoting cross-strait relations towards complete unification to ensure lasting peace in the Taiwan Strait and to create long-term benefits for the Chinese nation [1] Group 2 - Chen Binhua expresses willingness to engage in extensive democratic consultations with various Taiwanese parties and representatives on cross-strait relations and Taiwan's future, based on the principle of one China and opposition to "Taiwan independence" [1] - The spokesperson calls for Taiwanese political parties and individuals to recognize historical trends and uphold national integrity to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1] - The aim is to work together towards national rejuvenation and the unification of the motherland, creating a promising new situation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson emphasizes that the historical process of cross-strait unification is unstoppable and that "Taiwan independence" is a dead end, advocating for dialogue and cooperation among Taiwanese political parties to ensure peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [4][5]. Group 1 - The spokesperson, Chen Binhua, asserts that the only way to ensure lasting peace in the Taiwan Strait is to promote cross-strait relations towards complete unification with the motherland [4]. - The call for collaboration among various Taiwanese political parties and representatives is aimed at conducting extensive democratic consultations regarding cross-strait relations and Taiwan's future [5]. - The spokesperson expresses hope that all political parties and individuals in Taiwan will recognize the historical trend and uphold national righteousness to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [5].

Core Viewpoint - The annual memorial event for victims of Taiwan's White Terror in the 1950s emphasizes the importance of remembering history and striving for cross-strait unity and national rejuvenation [1][2]. Group 1: Event Overview - The memorial ceremony took place at the Taipei Martyrs' Shrine, attended by hundreds from various sectors to honor the martyrs who sacrificed during the White Terror [1]. - The theme of this year's autumn festival was "Remembering History, Honoring the Martyrs, Uniting Across the Strait, Revitalizing China" [1]. Group 2: Participants and Speeches - Notable attendees included Taiwan's Kuomintang Chairperson Zheng Liwen, who highlighted the need to remember historical lessons and promote cross-strait reconciliation [2]. - A representative from Taiwan's political victims' mutual aid association emphasized the importance of remembering the martyrs' sacrifices and continuing the pursuit of national unity and rejuvenation [1]. Group 3: Activities and Tributes - The ceremony included moments of silence, flower offerings, and recitations of poetry and songs to honor the martyrs [2]. - A large banner reading "People's Loyal Souls" was displayed at the memorial site, symbolizing the collective remembrance of the victims [2].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of National Defense emphasizes that pursuing "Taiwan independence" through military means is futile, and true peace for Taiwan can only be achieved by abandoning separatist ambitions and aligning with the historical trend of cross-strait unification [1] Group 1: Military Posture and Statements - The spokesperson commented on Taiwan's recent military activities, specifically the induction ceremony of M1A2T tanks, suggesting that such displays are merely attempts by Taiwan's leadership to bolster morale and mislead the public [1] - The spokesperson asserts that the determination and capability of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity cannot be challenged by Taiwan's military displays of U.S. weaponry [1] Group 2: Political Implications - The spokesperson warns Taiwan's leadership, particularly Lai Ching-te, that the path of "using military means to pursue independence" is a dead end, and emphasizes the need to abandon separatist plots for the sake of genuine peace in Taiwan [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the political landscape in Taiwan following the appointment of Zheng Liwen as the chairperson of the Kuomintang (KMT), emphasizing the trend towards cross-strait unification and the importance of political dialogue to achieve this goal [2][8]. Summary by Sections Zheng Liwen's Leadership - Zheng Liwen officially took office as the chairperson of the KMT on November 1, with a four-year term ahead [2]. - She expressed her willingness to visit mainland China multiple times, even up to 100 visits, to promote peace across the Taiwan Strait [3][6]. Political Reactions - Reactions to Zheng's leadership are polarized, with supporters viewing her positively while opponents criticize her alignment with mainland policies [4]. - Notable absences from her inauguration included key figures from the KMT, indicating a potential divide within the party [4]. Media Engagement - A local journalist from Deutsche Welle engaged in a heated interview with Zheng, focusing on her intentions to visit mainland China and the implications of such visits [5][6]. - The interview highlighted the complexities of cross-strait relations and the necessity for ongoing dialogue to resolve historical differences [6]. Future Implications - The article suggests that the political climate in Taiwan is shifting, with a growing acceptance of dialogue with mainland China as a viable path forward [7][8]. - It posits that Zheng's success in fostering cross-strait relations could significantly impact the KMT's performance in upcoming elections, including the 2026 local elections and the 2028 presidential election [8][9]. Conclusion - The article concludes with anticipation regarding when Zheng Liwen will make her first visit to mainland China, indicating that her actions will be closely monitored as a reflection of her leadership and the KMT's future direction [10].

Core Viewpoint - Zheng Liwen officially assumed the position of chairperson of the Kuomintang (KMT) on November 1, with a four-year term ahead [1] Group 1: Political Stance and Relations - Zheng Liwen expressed her willingness to visit the mainland up to 100 times to promote cross-strait peace [2][4] - The KMT's internal dynamics show mixed reactions to Zheng's leadership, with some distancing themselves while others, like Taipei Mayor Jiang Wan'an, attended her inauguration [3] - The DPP continues to criticize Zheng, claiming her statements align too closely with the mainland's stance, which they argue diverges from mainstream Taiwanese opinion [3] Group 2: Cross-Strait Communication - Zheng believes that visiting the mainland is essential to resolve historical differences and build goodwill, emphasizing the complexity of this process [4] - The political landscape in Taiwan suggests that politicians advocating for cross-strait dialogue gain stability in their positions, as the trend towards unification is seen as inevitable [5] - The DPP's previous attempts to hinder cross-strait communication are viewed as ineffective against Zheng's approach, which allows her to engage with the mainland freely [5] Group 3: Future Prospects - Articles from Taiwanese media suggest that unification can be achieved through political negotiation, and they encourage Zheng to lead this process while maintaining Taiwanese values [6] - Zheng's success in fostering cross-strait relations is seen as crucial for the KMT's performance in upcoming elections, with the focus on her ability to navigate these relationships [7]

Group 1 - The core argument revolves around Taiwan's defense budget increase and military purchases from the U.S., which are criticized as being detrimental to the local economy and social welfare [2][3] - Taiwan's defense budget for the upcoming year is set at 3% of GDP, consuming one-third of the total budget, which will negatively impact education and healthcare sectors [2] - The procurement of military equipment, such as the M1A2T tanks and F-16V fighter jets, is portrayed as ineffective and a misuse of taxpayer money, with claims that these purchases do not genuinely enhance Taiwan's defense capabilities [2][3] Group 2 - The article highlights the disparity between Taiwan's military capabilities and the advanced military strength of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, emphasizing that Taiwan's defense efforts are inadequate [3] - It argues that the current geopolitical climate favors the unification of Taiwan with mainland China, suggesting that Taiwan's aggressive defense posture is misguided and ultimately futile [3] - The narrative suggests that Taiwan's leadership, particularly Lai Ching-te, is engaging in rhetoric that does not align with the reality of military power dynamics in the region [1][3]