Core Insights - The article highlights the challenges faced by newly established initiated funds, with 41 funds being liquidated this year due to failing to meet the minimum scale requirement of 200 million yuan [1][3][4] - Many initiated funds were created to chase market trends but have since underperformed, leading to investor withdrawals and subsequent liquidation [1][3] - The article emphasizes the need for fund companies to adopt a long-term investment perspective rather than relying on short-term market hype for fund establishment [1][6][7] Fund Liquidation Statistics - As of June 22, 2023, 41 out of 131 funds that were liquidated this year were initiated funds, particularly in sectors like new energy and pharmaceuticals [1][3] - The recent liquidation of the Shangyin New Energy Industry Selected Mixed Fund, established in April 2022, saw its net value drop to 0.45 yuan by February 2024 [1][2] - The Baoying New Energy Industry Mixed Fund, launched in May 2022, experienced a decline in net value from 1.19 yuan to 0.42 yuan before its liquidation in May 2023 [2] Characteristics of Initiated Funds - Initiated funds are characterized by a low entry threshold but face strict exit criteria, requiring a minimum scale of 200 million yuan within three years [3][6] - A significant number of initiated funds established in the second half of 2022 are at risk of liquidation, with 106 out of 196 funds having scales below 200 million yuan as of the first quarter of 2023 [3][6] - The article notes that many initiated funds are struggling to grow, with some having scales as low as a few hundred thousand yuan [3][6] Industry Trends and Recommendations - Despite the challenges, initiated funds remain a key strategy for fund companies, with 146 initiated funds established this year out of a total of 619 funds [6] - Fund companies are advised to be more cautious and strategic in launching initiated funds, focusing on long-term performance rather than short-term market trends [6][7] - Successful initiated funds, such as the Yongying Advanced Manufacturing Smart Selection Mixed Fund and the China Europe Era Pioneer Stock Fund, have demonstrated that strong performance is crucial for growth [6]

Core Viewpoint - Several funds have announced liquidation despite rising net values, particularly in the strong-performing pharmaceutical sector, due to failure to meet the required scale after three years [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Liquidation - Many initiated funds have faced liquidation as they failed to pass the "scale test" after three years, even if they had strong performance [2]. - As of June 15, the market was led by sectors like "new consumption" and innovative pharmaceuticals, with related thematic funds showing significant gains [3]. - For example, the Huazhong Innovation Pharmaceutical Fund had a net value increase of 22% by April 1, but had to liquidate due to a total scale of only 11 million yuan, far from the 200 million yuan threshold [4]. Group 2: Challenges of Initiated Funds - Initiated funds face significant challenges due to their low starting point for fundraising, which makes them more susceptible to market fluctuations [5]. - The automatic termination clause for initiated funds means that even with good performance, they must achieve rapid scale growth within three years to avoid liquidation [5]. - In contrast, regular public funds only need to maintain a net asset value of at least 5 million yuan for 60 consecutive days to avoid liquidation risk [5]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Fund Management - The market has seen accelerated rotation in recent years, leading to a cautious approach from investors regarding the sustainability of fund performance [6]. - High operational costs associated with smaller initiated funds can erode returns, making it difficult to attract new investments [7]. - Successful cases of initiated funds overcoming scale challenges highlight the necessity of strong performance and support from distribution channels [8][9]. Group 4: Success Stories - Some initiated funds have successfully scaled up, such as Yongying Advanced Manufacturing, which grew from 300 million yuan to 11.5 billion yuan due to strong performance in the robotics sector [8]. - Other successful examples include funds like China Europe Era Pioneer, which achieved a cumulative return of 112% since its inception [8]. - The competitive landscape for funds is intense, and achieving significant scale requires not only good performance but also strategic support and resources [9].

Group 1 - Several initiated funds have been liquidated this year despite having strong performance, primarily due to failing to meet the minimum asset size requirement after three years [1][2] - For example, the Huazhong Innovation Pharmaceutical Fund had a year-to-date net value increase of 22% but was forced to liquidate due to its size being only 11 million yuan, far below the 200 million yuan threshold [1] - Similarly, the Jinying Quality Consumption Fund, which held stocks like Tencent and Pop Mart, was liquidated on May 20 despite its holdings performing well [1] Group 2 - The Fuyong Medical Health Fund is at risk of termination if its size remains below 200 million yuan by June 2025, with its current size at approximately 13 million yuan [2] - Initiated funds face significant challenges in maintaining their size due to their lower fundraising thresholds and stricter exit mechanisms, which can lead to rapid liquidation in volatile markets [2][3] - Unlike regular public funds, which only need to maintain a net asset value of 5 million yuan for 60 consecutive days to avoid liquidation, initiated funds must achieve substantial growth within three years [3] Group 3 - The operational costs of initiated funds are often high due to their smaller management scale, which can erode returns and hinder the attraction of new capital [4] - Successful growth of initiated funds requires not only good performance but also strong support in terms of distribution channels and marketing resources [4] - Many initiated funds are created to train new talent or fill gaps in institutional channels, indicating that performance alone is insufficient for long-term survival [4]

Group 1 - The core concept of the article is to explain the characteristics and differences of initiating funds compared to regular funds [1][2] - Initiating funds are defined as funds where the fund manager uses company shareholder funds, proprietary funds, or funds from senior management to subscribe, with a minimum subscription amount of 10 million yuan and a holding period of no less than 3 years [2] - Unlike regular funds, initiating funds have lower establishment thresholds, not subject to the requirement of a total fundraising amount of at least 200 million yuan or a minimum of 200 fund holders [2][3] Group 2 - The development of initiating funds has seen a steady increase since their introduction by the China Securities Regulatory Commission in June 2012, with more than 30% of new funds established each year being initiating funds by 2023 and 2024 [4] - As of March 11, 2025, there are 2,162 initiating funds in the market, primarily consisting of bond, stock, and mixed funds, with stock funds mainly being passive index funds [7] - The total scale of initiating funds exceeded 3.1 trillion yuan by the end of 2024, accounting for approximately 9.5% of the total fund scale, indicating their significant role in the public fund sector [9]