Core Viewpoint - Iran possesses the necessary rationality to initiate diplomacy after punishing aggressors, indicating a potential shift towards negotiation if attacks from Israel and the United States cease [1] Group 1 - Iranian officials emphasize the importance of stopping attacks from Israel and the U.S. as a prerequisite for negotiations [1]

德国政府官员：（谈伊朗问题）我们知道美国也在致力于进行外交谈判。 ...

德国外交部长：伊朗需要与美国直接进行谈判。 ...

Group 1: Iran-Israel Conflict - Iran has evacuated three nuclear facilities prior to the attacks, with only the surface of the Fordow facility damaged and repairable [2] - The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has vowed to strike all U.S. interests in the Middle East, and a senior official stated that any action against Khamenei would eliminate the possibility of negotiations [2] - Israel's air force has conducted strikes on Iranian facilities, destroying two F-5 fighter jets and targeting locations in Yazd for the first time [2] Group 2: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. military used B-2 bombers and 14 massive bunker-busting bombs in the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities [2] - U.S. officials noted that Iran has the naval capability to block the Strait of Hormuz [2] - Satellite imagery indicated that Iran had reinforced the entrances to its nuclear facilities with dirt prior to the U.S. strikes [2] Group 3: Diplomatic Efforts - UK Prime Minister Starmer emphasized the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table for a diplomatic resolution [3] - The EU's foreign policy chief stated that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons and called for a return to negotiations [3] - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency stressed the urgency of returning to negotiations and allowing inspectors back into Iran's nuclear facilities [3] Group 4: Regional Tensions - The Houthis have announced plans to resume attacks on U.S. vessels [4] - Iranian state media has labeled U.S. citizens and military personnel as "legitimate targets" [4] Group 5: Economic and Political Implications - The Iranian National Resistance Council stated that Iran's nuclear program has cost trillions and resulted in countless deaths, calling for Khamenei's resignation [5] - The U.S. Vice President indicated that Trump concluded in mid-May that negotiations with Iran were unproductive and issued a final ultimatum [5] - Reports suggest that the U.S. is withdrawing more diplomatic personnel from Iraq [6]

Group 1 - The Iranian Foreign Minister stated that negotiations have been interrupted due to "aggression" from the United States, yet communication channels remain open through various intermediaries, particularly Oman [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Minister expresses a lack of trust in Western nations during negotiations, indicating that there are even more reasons for skepticism now. The minister emphasizes the importance of keeping diplomatic channels open but states that decisions regarding future diplomatic actions will depend on the cessation of what is termed "aggression" [1] Group 1 - The Iranian Foreign Minister has never trusted Western countries during negotiations [1] - There are increased reasons for distrust in current circumstances [1] - Diplomatic channels should always remain open, but no decisions on future diplomacy have been made yet [1] Group 2 - The minister calls for patience and suggests waiting for a response before deciding on diplomatic actions [1] - Future diplomatic actions will be contingent upon the end of what is referred to as "aggression" [1]

伊朗外长：要求伊朗重返外交谈判是毫无意义的。 ...

伊朗外长：谴责英国和欧盟敦促伊朗重返谈判的言论。 ...

欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯：我呼吁各方退一步，重返谈判桌。 ...

伊朗外交部长：只有停止侵略，并追究侵略者的责任，才有可能恢复外交谈判。 ...