Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for strengthening the standardization, legalization, and normalization of disciplinary inspection and supervision work to enhance anti-corruption capabilities [1] - The establishment of case trial departments aims to enhance self-supervision within disciplinary inspection agencies, ensuring the quality of each case [2] - The importance of political supervision is highlighted, focusing on strict review of behaviors that deviate from the decisions of the Central Committee [3] Group 2 - The optimization of work processes is crucial for improving the effectiveness of case trials, emphasizing responsibility and collective review mechanisms [4] - The necessity of a legal framework is underscored, with a call for integrating legal thinking throughout the supervision and enforcement processes [6] - The political nature of disciplinary inspection work must be understood and adhered to, ensuring strict compliance with party discipline [7] Group 3 - The integration of discipline and law is essential, ensuring that both party discipline and legal standards are upheld for public officials [8] - The need for collaboration between inspection and judicial processes is emphasized, aiming for a seamless connection between administrative enforcement and criminal justice [9] - Continuous improvement of the professional capabilities of case trial personnel is necessary to adapt to new supervisory and enforcement requirements [11] Group 4 - Daily supervision and management of case trial personnel are critical, with a focus on maintaining high standards of integrity and discipline [12] - The importance of nurturing young talent within the case trial workforce is highlighted, encouraging their involvement in significant cases and research tasks [13]