新华社华盛顿11月3日电题：美联邦政府"停摆"近纪录民众"伤不起" 美国联邦政府"停摆"11月3日进入第34天，距离打破2018年年底至2019年年初"停摆"35天的历史纪录仅"一步之遥"。此次"停摆"造成的破坏性影响 直指民航、食品、医疗等领域并持续扩大，民生与经济双重承压。 民生"耗不起" 除民航交通外，食品救济、医保福利等多个民生领域也在美国联邦政府"停摆"中遭到重创，民众生活负担不断加重。 分析人士指出，此次"停摆"凸显美国党争加剧的现实，共和、民主两党利用"停摆"相互指责并服务自身政治目的，且未见妥协迹象。美国民众不 仅自身利益受到严重损害，还要为不断升级的政治极化买单。 民航"飞不动" 据统计，此次美国联邦政府"停摆"以来，约1.3万名空中交通管制员和约5万名机场安检人员被迫无薪工作，请假人员日渐增多，导致民航业人手 短缺问题突出，多地航班延误情况加剧，航空安全风险增加。 10月31日，在美国纽约拉瓜迪亚机场，乘客排队值机。新华社记者张凤国摄 美国联邦航空局10月31日表示，全美约一半的主要空中交通管制机构存在人员短缺问题，纽约地区近90%的空管人员未能到岗。该部门10月30日 还对华盛顿里根国家 ...

新华社华盛顿11月3日电 美国联邦政府"停摆"11月3日进入第34天，距离打破2018年年底至2019年 年初"停摆"35天的历史纪录仅"一步之遥"。此次"停摆"造成的破坏性影响直指民航、食品、医疗等领域 并持续扩大，民生与经济双重承压。 分析人士指出，此次"停摆"凸显美国党争加剧的现实，共和、民主两党利用"停摆"相互指责并服务 自身政治目的，且未见妥协迹象。美国民众不仅自身利益受到严重损害，还要为不断升级的政治极化买 单。 民航"飞不动" 据统计，此次美国联邦政府"停摆"以来，约1.3万名空中交通管制员和约5万名机场安检人员被迫无 薪工作，请假人员日渐增多，导致民航业人手短缺问题突出，多地航班延误情况加剧，航空安全风险增 加。 美国国会预算办公室日前在一封公开信中说，根据联邦政府"停摆"持续时间的长短，预计今年四季 度美国实际国内生产总值的年增长率将下降一至两个百分点。这意味着"停摆"持续4周，美国经济将损 失70亿美元；持续6周，损失将上升至110亿美元；持续8周，损失则将高达140亿美元。 两党"谈不拢" 分析人士和媒体认为，美国联邦政府"停摆"持续的原因在于两党就医保福利支出问题僵持不下，临 时拨款法 ...

Core Points - The U.S. federal government has been in a shutdown for a week due to budget disagreements, with no signs of compromise between the Democratic and Republican parties [1] - The shutdown is causing significant economic damage, with an estimated loss of $15 billion for each week the government remains closed [1] - Over 2 million government employees are affected, with 750,000 furloughed and essential workers, including military personnel, working without pay [2] Economic Impact - The White House's planned $10 billion subsidy for farmers has been postponed due to the shutdown, exacerbating the financial struggles of farmers affected by trade wars [6] - The shutdown has led to a reduction of air traffic controllers by 50% in some regions, causing significant flight delays and cancellations [4] - A survey indicates that 60% of Americans are avoiding air travel during the shutdown, with 81% believing it will harm the economy [4] Political Dynamics - The Trump administration is using the shutdown to attack Democratic-supported projects and push for federal workforce reductions [5] - White House officials have indicated that layoffs are imminent, attributing the situation to the Democratic party [6] - Public sentiment is increasingly negative, with only 33% of Americans believing the country can resolve its political issues [7]

Group 1 - Over 50 Democratic lawmakers in Texas staged a "walkout" on April 4, leading to a lack of quorum in the Republican-controlled state House, preventing any legislative progress, including redistricting [1][2] - The Texas House, dominated by Republicans with 88 seats compared to 62 for Democrats, requires at least 100 members present to conduct legislative business, prompting the Democratic lawmakers to leave the state [1][2] - The Republican response included a vote to authorize the arrest of absent Democratic lawmakers, although this was largely seen as a symbolic gesture due to Texas's lack of jurisdiction over out-of-state actions [1][2] Group 2 - The push for redistricting in Texas comes less than five years after the last redistricting, which was heavily influenced by Republicans, resulting in a significant advantage for them in congressional seats [2] - The motivation for the new redistricting effort is linked to pressure from the White House, with President Trump urging Texas Republicans to redraw district lines to secure more seats in the upcoming 2026 midterm elections [2] - The proposed changes aim to alter districts in Democratic strongholds like Austin, Houston, and Dallas, potentially adding five Republican seats in the House [2] Group 3 - The ongoing political conflict in Texas reflects broader issues within the U.S. electoral system, where parties manipulate district boundaries to maintain power, leading to increased political polarization [3][4] - The tactics of "cracking" and "packing" are employed to dilute opposition party votes or concentrate them, respectively, which has been criticized as politicians choosing their voters rather than voters choosing their representatives [3] - The Democratic National Committee Chair warned that if Texas Republicans proceed with redistricting, Democratic states would retaliate with similar actions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the political maneuvering surrounding the redistricting of congressional seats in Texas, highlighting the conflict between the Republican and Democratic parties as they prepare for the 2026 midterm elections [1][11]. Group 1: Redistricting and Political Strategy - Trump claims that the Republican Party has the right to gain five additional seats in Texas, emphasizing his historical vote count in the state [2][8]. - The Texas legislature, dominated by Republicans (88 seats to 62 for Democrats), is pushing for redistricting to convert Democratic strongholds into Republican advantages ahead of the midterms [3][7]. - The current congressional districts in Texas were redrawn in 2021, favoring Republicans, and the party is seeking to redraw them again within five years, a move driven by pressure from the White House [8][11]. Group 2: Democratic Response and Legislative Tactics - Over 50 Democratic lawmakers staged a walkout to protest the redistricting efforts, aiming to delay legislative proceedings and draw national attention to their cause [3][10]. - The Texas House voted to authorize the arrest of absent Democratic lawmakers, although this action is largely seen as symbolic due to Texas's lack of jurisdiction over out-of-state lawmakers [5][7]. - The Democratic Party has previously used similar tactics to block Republican redistricting efforts, indicating a pattern of escalating partisan conflict [4][10]. Group 3: Broader Implications and Political Polarization - The redistricting conflict in Texas reflects a broader issue in the U.S. electoral system, where parties manipulate district boundaries to secure electoral advantages, contributing to political polarization [11]. - Democratic leaders have warned that if Republicans proceed with redistricting, they will retaliate in Democratic-controlled states, indicating a potential cycle of partisan retribution [11].

Core Viewpoint - The recent deployment of the National Guard in Los Angeles by President Trump has escalated tensions between federal authorities and local governments, particularly in response to increased immigration enforcement actions [1][3]. Group 1: Government Actions and Responses - President Trump signed a memorandum to deploy 2,000 National Guard personnel to Los Angeles to address ongoing protests related to immigration enforcement [1]. - California Governor Newsom announced plans to sue the federal government over the deployment of the National Guard, indicating a significant conflict between state and federal authorities [1]. - Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass described the federal government's actions as a "dangerous escalation" that instills fear among local residents [1]. Group 2: Political Context and Implications - The conflicts in Los Angeles and other major cities are seen as a direct consequence of Trump's administration's aggressive immigration policies, which have intensified under his leadership [2][4]. - California, a stronghold for the Democratic Party, has historically opposed many of Trump's policies, making it a focal point for his administration's enforcement actions [3]. - The use of the National Guard and potential future deployment of federal military forces represent a significant shift in the relationship between state and federal governments, raising concerns about the implications for federalism in the U.S. [3]. Group 3: Societal Impact - The ongoing immigration enforcement actions are contributing to societal divisions, particularly as they disproportionately affect areas with high immigrant populations, such as Los Angeles [2][4]. - The Republican Party's stance on immigration reflects a broader concern about the declining status and influence of the white demographic in the U.S., leading to heightened tensions and conflicts within society [4].