Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the overwhelming pressure faced by a high school graduate in choosing a college major, highlighting the conflict between external expectations and personal interests [5][9]. Group 1: External Influences - The student experiences a barrage of opinions from parents, relatives, and a hired counselor, leading to confusion and anxiety about the decision-making process [1][5]. - Parents emphasize the importance of choosing a major based on job market trends and stability, while relatives suggest traditional and popular fields [2][3]. Group 2: Internal Conflict - The student struggles with identifying personal interests and fears making a choice that may lead to dissatisfaction in the future [4][6]. - There is a realization that past decisions were often made to meet others' expectations rather than personal desires, leading to a sense of lost identity [4][9]. Group 3: Decision-Making Strategies - The article suggests exercises to help the student reconnect with their true interests by reflecting on past enjoyable activities and potential career paths without external pressures [5][6]. - It emphasizes the importance of viewing career choices as flexible, allowing for exploration and adjustment rather than a one-time decision [8][9]. Group 4: Communication and Responsibility - The article encourages open communication with parents about the pressure felt from their expectations and the need for personal agency in decision-making [9]. - It highlights the significance of taking responsibility for one's choices, suggesting that true growth comes from navigating discomfort and asserting one's own path [9].

Group 1 - The minimum admission score for the Shanghai Customs College in the physics category in Jiangsu Province for the 2025 college entrance examination is 657, ranking 2618th, which is higher than the 2024 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School's admission rank of 2662, attracting social attention [1] - The Shanghai Customs College has a high probability of students successfully passing civil service examinations, with the admission rate for civil servants significantly exceeding the social average [1] - The choice of candidates to pursue ordinary undergraduate colleges with good employment prospects over prestigious universities is seen as a rational decision, emphasizing the importance of aligning choices with personal interests, abilities, and long-term career development plans [1][2] Group 2 - There is a debate on whether students' choices are pragmatic or overly utilitarian, highlighting the need for students to make their own decisions rather than being influenced by parental expectations [2] - The misalignment of students' educational choices with their career aspirations is noted, with many students pursuing general education when they aim for employment, leading to structural employment difficulties in the job market [3] - A clear understanding of career goals is essential for students when selecting universities and majors, as focusing solely on civil service examinations may limit broader employment opportunities [3]

Core Insights - The survey indicates that engineering (26.9%), economics (14.8%), and science (14.7%) are the most popular fields chosen by students for their college applications [1][3][6] - A significant 32.6% of families with students have a clear career plan when filling out college applications, which influences their choices [1][4][6] Group 1: Popular Fields of Study - Engineering is the most selected major category, followed by economics and science, with law also being a notable choice [3][4] - If given another chance, 30.9% of respondents would still choose engineering, indicating its strong appeal [3] Group 2: Decision-Making Factors - Families consider various factors when selecting majors, including job prospects, personal interests, and academic performance [2][5] - The majority of families (62.2%) refer to school admission websites or provincial examination guides, while 58.0% rely on advice from parents or friends [5] Group 3: Demographics of Respondents - The survey included a diverse demographic, with 36.9% male and 63.1% female respondents, and 25.5% being current high school students [6]

Core Viewpoint - The incident at Jiangxi Ruichang First Middle School highlights the tension between teacher expectations and student autonomy in college application processes, particularly regarding prestigious universities like Peking University and Tsinghua University [2][3]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A teacher at Ruichang First Middle School expressed anger in a WeChat group after three students did not apply to Peking University or Tsinghua University, leading to the dissolution of the group chat [2]. - The school issued a statement acknowledging the teacher's inappropriate comments regarding the students' college applications and initiated an investigation [2][3]. Group 2: School's Response - Following the incident, the school held a meeting where the teacher made a deep self-reflection on her inappropriate behavior and recognized the need for better communication with students and parents [3]. - The school emphasized the importance of respecting students' choices in their college applications and committed to enhancing teacher ethics and professional conduct [3].

Core Insights - The article discusses the increasing reliance on AI technology in the college admission process in China, particularly for high school students filling out their college applications after the national college entrance examination [1][6][11] - Major internet companies like Quark, Baidu, and Tencent are providing free AI-assisted services to help students and parents navigate the complex college application landscape, emphasizing the importance of information equity [5][13] Group 1: AI in College Admission - AI technology is bridging the information gap in college admissions, providing valuable insights and support to students, especially in rural areas where access to information is limited [6][7] - Quark has significantly increased its computational resources, reportedly by 100 times compared to the previous year, to handle the surge in demand for college application reports [3][4] - The AI tools developed by these companies can analyze vast amounts of data, including student preferences and academic performance, to generate tailored application suggestions [9][10] Group 2: Market Dynamics and User Engagement - Over the past seven years, Quark has served more than 120 million students and parents, with over 50% of users coming from third-tier cities and below, highlighting the demand for quality information in underdeveloped regions [7] - The article notes that AI tools can address 80% of standardized needs in the application process, but human experts remain essential for nuanced decision-making and emotional support [11][12] - The ongoing free services provided by these tech giants reflect a strategic move to build user loyalty and engagement within the young demographic of college applicants [13][14]

面对混乱的高考志愿填报市场，考生和家长需要擦亮双眼。教育部阳光高考信息平台、各省教育考 试院官网等官方平台提供了全面且权威的高校招生信息，包括招生计划、历年录取分数线、专业介绍 等，这些都是考生和家长进行志愿填报的可靠依据。部分地区还成立了专业志愿填报辅导团队，如北京 市组织志愿填报专家进校支招填报技巧、高招网220人专家团队的线上咨询与线下校园活动形成互补， 让高考学子在人生关键时刻作出理性判断。 高考志愿填报虽然涉及方方面面，但最终还是考生对自身特长、兴趣爱好以及生涯规划的综合考 量。所谓"三百六十行，行行出状元"，考生应立足自身兴趣爱好挖掘特长潜质，将个人理想追求与国家 人才需求结合起来，从而作出正确选择。(本文来源：经济日报 作者：李丹) 志愿填报的复杂性在于不仅要考虑分数与院校的录取线匹配，更是个人兴趣、职业与人生规划的综 合考量。很多填报机构多采取流水线式服务，面向不同考生，很难给出有针对性、有价值的指导，不仅 可能浪费考生和家长的时间与金钱，还有可能影响考生的未来发展。 高考志愿填报是学子迈向理想大学的关键一环。选择什么样的专业和学校，影响着学子们未来的人 生发展。然而，一些所谓"填报机构"的套 ...

Core Insights - The rise of online services for college entrance exam application guidance has led to a proliferation of both legitimate and dubious service providers, resulting in a chaotic market where many students and parents are dissatisfied with the services received [1][2] - The lack of long-term vision in some services promotes short-term, utilitarian choices, which can detract from students' deeper reflections on life values and career significance [1] - There is a pressing need for a more open data service platform to bridge the information gap between students, majors, industries, and employment opportunities, as current paid consulting services are often unreliable [2] Market Dynamics - The market for college application consulting services is characterized by a lack of regulation and industry standards, leading to a situation where low-quality services are prevalent and high-quality services are scarce and expensive [2] - The focus on employment outcomes has made information about schools, majors, and industry trends increasingly important, creating a natural market demand for consulting services [1] Proposed Solutions - The establishment of a comprehensive database that consolidates publicly available data on college admissions, employment rates, and research findings could significantly enhance the reliability of information available to families [2] - Utilizing AI tools to facilitate the gathering and integration of data on a new platform could provide a more reliable, professional, and user-friendly service at a lower cost compared to existing chaotic offerings [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the dilemma faced by families with children who are on the borderline of university admission, weighing the options between attending a public university in a smaller city versus a private university in a larger city, ultimately advocating for the latter if financial conditions allow [4][6][68]. Economic Cost: Big City vs. Small City - Attending a private university in a big city can be expensive, with tuition fees often exceeding 28,000 yuan per year, leading to a total cost of around 200,000 yuan over four years [10][11]. - In contrast, a public university in a smaller city may only cost about 8,000 yuan for the same duration, presenting a significant short-term savings of 120,000 yuan [10][11]. - However, the long-term benefits of attending a big city university include better job opportunities and higher starting salaries, with graduates from private universities in big cities earning an average starting salary of 5,000 to 6,000 yuan compared to 3,000 yuan for those from smaller cities [12][13]. Employment Opportunities: Big City vs. Small City - The article emphasizes that the employment opportunities in big cities are not just about quantity but also about quality and diversity, particularly in industries like finance where 70% of listed companies are located in major cities [30][31]. - Students from private universities in big cities have better access to internships and job placements with major companies, enhancing their employability [22][44]. - The article illustrates this with examples of students who secured high-paying jobs due to their internships in big cities, contrasting them with peers from smaller cities who struggle to find relevant opportunities [34][38]. Life Start Point: Big City vs. Small City - The article notes that big cities offer more resources for further education, such as access to better preparatory courses for exams like the civil service exam, and opportunities to attend lectures at prestigious public universities [47][51]. - Graduates from big cities also benefit from more favorable policies regarding residency and job opportunities, as many new first-tier cities have relaxed their residency requirements for graduates [52][55]. - The article concludes that choosing a university is akin to making an investment, where attending a private university in a big city may have higher upfront costs but offers greater long-term returns in terms of career opportunities and personal development [62].

这几天，全国各地高考分数线陆续发布，千万考生正式进入志愿填报的关键阶段。如何填报高考志愿成 为许多家长的热议话题，选择背后也反映出部分家长的焦虑情绪。 有的家长依赖AI工具。当前，AI技术凭借信息整合与数据分析优势，一定程度上打破了高考志愿填报 中的信息壁垒，为考生及家长系统梳理专业沿革、就业前景等信息提供便利。不过，需要提醒的是，市 场上的"AI志愿填报软件"质量良莠不齐，部分平台数据更新滞后、算法逻辑单一，大家对其实际参考价 值要谨慎考量。AI并非"万能钥匙"，大家切莫夸大和迷信它的作用，更不要被一些虚假的AI高考志愿填 报服务忽悠。 "国家、社会、企业需要的"，能让人更好地实现社会价值和个人价值。大学生最终都要走向社会，奔赴 职场。自己的专业能力、实践能力，是不是符合国家、社会、企业的需求，不仅关乎个人职业发展的规 划，更决定着能否在时代浪潮中为推动社会进步发光发热。从课堂理论到职业实践，从专业知识到跨界 思维，唯有在不断对标需求的过程中完善自己，才能让所学所悟更好地转化为服务国家、奉献社会、助 力企业的真实效能，书写出优异的奋斗答卷。 选专业，没有完美答案，但有属于自己的最优答案。思考完以上三个维度， ...

Group 1 - The 2025 college entrance examination (Gaokao) has introduced new changes and requirements for filling out application forms, with a focus on the new examination model adopted by 29 provinces and regions in China [1][4] - Students should pay attention to the grouping of majors, ensuring that all majors within a group are acceptable to avoid being assigned to an undesired major, and should design their choices based on a "reach, steady, and safety" strategy to prevent clustering in popular groups [3][6] - The Ministry of Education has approved 29 new undergraduate majors for the 2025 admissions cycle, signaling a shift in educational offerings, and students should be aware of both new majors and newly established universities [4][6] Group 2 - The upgraded "Sunshine Volunteer" information service system now offers personalized filtering services for college applications based on students' exam scores, historical admission data, and employment statistics [6][8] - Experts recommend that students align their major choices with personal abilities, interests, career planning, and societal needs, emphasizing the importance of understanding social trends and emerging industries [8]