Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of the Chinese people's victory in the Anti-Japanese War and is an integral part of the post-war international order, supported by solid legal and historical foundations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - The return of Taiwan to China is framed as a major historical event that restored Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan, which is considered an inseparable part of China [2]. - The article cites that during the Anti-Japanese War, over 35 million Chinese military and civilian casualties occurred, with direct economic losses exceeding 100 billion USD and indirect losses over 500 billion USD [2]. Group 2: Legal and International Framework - A series of international legal documents, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, clearly affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, establishing its return as a historical and legal fact [2]. - The establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949 replaced the Republic of China as the sole legitimate government representing all of China, maintaining the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity, including Taiwan [2]. Group 3: Current Political Dynamics - The article criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party's stance on "Taiwan independence," arguing that it distorts historical facts and undermines the established status of Taiwan as part of China [3]. - It highlights that 183 countries have established diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, supporting its position on the Taiwan issue, indicating broad international consensus against any attempts to separate Taiwan from China [3].

台湾光复是中国政府恢复对台湾行使主权的重大历史事件，是台湾作为中国不可分割一部分法理链条的 重要一环。包括《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》在内的一系列国际法文件，早已无可辩驳地明确了中国对 台湾的主权，明确台湾回归中国的历史和法理事实，其权威性不容质疑和挑战。1949年10月1日，中华 人民共和国中央人民政府宣告成立，取代中华民国政府成为代表全中国的唯一合法政府。这是在中国这 一国际法主体没有发生变化情况下的政权更替，中国的主权和固有领土疆域没有改变，中华人民共和国 政府理所当然地完全享有和行使中国的主权，其中包括对台湾的主权。中国人民大学两岸关系研究中心 主任王英津表示，台湾回归中国是战后国际秩序的一部分，这既是历史事实，也是国际定论，捍卫一个 中国原则是维护战后国际秩序的必然要求。 张 烁 台湾地位问题早在1945年中国人民抗日战争胜利时就已经彻底解决。赖清德及民进党当局顽固坚持"台 独"分裂立场，不仅歪曲历史事实，"只提终战，不提光复"，甚至勾连外部势力鼓噪所谓"台湾地位未 定"的谎言谬论，妄图"倚外谋独""以武谋独"、改变台湾是中国的一部分的地位。鼓吹"台独"就是分裂 国家，支持"台独"就是干涉中国内政，纵 ...

Core Viewpoint - The conference emphasized that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of the Chinese people's victory in the Anti-Japanese War and is an integral part of the post-war international order, supported by solid legal and historical foundations [1][2][3] Group 1: Historical Context - The return of Taiwan to China is viewed as a major historical event that restored Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan, which is considered an inseparable part of China [2] - The Anti-Japanese War resulted in over 35 million casualties and direct economic losses exceeding $100 billion, highlighting the immense sacrifices made by the Chinese people [2] Group 2: Legal and International Framework - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation clearly affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, establishing its return as a historical and legal fact [2] - The establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949 replaced the Republic of China as the sole legitimate government representing all of China, maintaining the country's territorial integrity, including Taiwan [2] Group 3: Current Political Dynamics - The persistence of "Taiwan independence" rhetoric by certain political factions is seen as a distortion of historical facts and a challenge to international order, which is deemed dangerous and unlikely to succeed [3] - The Chinese government aims to promote peaceful development of cross-strait relations and advance national reunification, which is viewed as an inevitable trend supported by the majority of the international community [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent comments made by the Chinese Ministry of National Defense regarding the U.S.-Taiwan defense industrial conference, emphasizing the negative implications of Taiwan's military purchases and the perceived threat of "Taiwan independence" [1] Group 1 - The Chinese government criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for prioritizing its own interests over Taiwan's welfare, accusing it of selling out Taiwan to the U.S. and exacerbating tensions [1] - The article highlights that no amount of weapon purchases by Taiwan can alter the military balance between the two sides, reinforcing the notion that "Taiwan independence" is destined to fail [1] - The Chinese Ministry of National Defense urges the U.S. to recognize the sensitivity of arms sales to Taiwan and to adhere to its commitments against supporting "Taiwan independence" [1] Group 2 - The article states that the Chinese military will enhance its capabilities and means to counter any attempts at "Taiwan independence" and foreign interference, asserting its commitment to safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the negative implications of Taiwan's defense cooperation with the U.S., highlighting the detrimental effects on Taiwan's security and stability, and reiterating China's stance against "Taiwan independence" [2]. Group 1: Defense Cooperation - The U.S. and Taiwan are reportedly discussing joint weapon development and increased arms sales, which raises concerns about regional stability [2]. - The article criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for prioritizing its interests over Taiwan's security, suggesting that such actions lead Taiwan towards disaster [2]. Group 2: Military Balance - The article asserts that no amount of weapon purchases by Taiwan can alter the military balance between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait [2]. - It emphasizes the inevitability of the failure of "Taiwan independence" efforts, regardless of external military support [2]. Group 3: U.S. Role - The article calls on the U.S. to recognize the sensitivity of arms sales to Taiwan and to refrain from actions that could escalate tensions regarding China's core interests [2]. - It urges the U.S. to adhere to its commitments of not supporting "Taiwan independence" [2]. Group 4: Chinese Military Response - The article concludes with a statement about the Chinese military's readiness to counter any attempts at "Taiwan independence" and foreign interference, asserting a commitment to national sovereignty and territorial integrity [2].

Core Viewpoint - Recent articles from American think tanks and media criticize Taiwan's leader Lai Ching-te for his reckless behavior and suggest a "gradual unification" approach, raising significant attention and interpretation within Taiwan [1][2][3]. Group 1: Criticism of Lai Ching-te - Lai Ching-te is labeled as a "troublemaker" and "peace destroyer" by Chinese officials, with accusations of provoking tensions through his refusal to acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" and promoting "Taiwan independence" [1]. - The U.S. think tank RAND Corporation's report emphasizes the need for Taiwan to act with restraint to avoid escalating tensions with mainland China, highlighting Lai's provocative statements as a contributing factor to instability [2][3]. Group 2: Shift in U.S. Perspective - Articles from U.S. media indicate a shift from hawkish to more restrained views regarding Taiwan, suggesting that while Taiwan is important to U.S. interests, it is not a critical survival issue [4]. - The term "troublemaker 2.0" is used to describe Lai Ching-te, reflecting a growing distrust in his leadership due to his emphasis on "new two-state theory" and ideological rigidity [8]. Group 3: Implications for Taiwan's Future - Analysts warn that Lai's continued provocative stance could lead to adverse consequences for Taiwan, as the U.S. may not provide the expected support in the event of a conflict [5][7]. - The collective anxiety among the Taiwanese public regarding U.S. defense commitments is rising, with increasing skepticism about the reliability of American support [8].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan advocates for peace, development, communication, and cooperation, while criticizing the current administration for ignoring public sentiment and worsening cross-strait relations [1][2]. Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The spokesperson stated that the "1992 Consensus" is the political foundation for cross-strait dialogue and stability, and its denial leads to tension and harm to the interests of Taiwanese people [2]. - The current administration's push for legislative amendments is seen as an attempt to create a "green terror" and escalate cross-strait tensions, which is contrary to the interests of the Taiwanese populace [1][2]. Group 2: Public Sentiment and Governance - Polls indicate that the approval rating for the current administration remains low, reflecting public dissatisfaction with its handling of cross-strait relations and economic policies [1]. - The spokesperson criticized the administration for prioritizing "Taiwan independence" over the welfare of Taiwanese citizens and businesses, which has led to increased public resentment [1]. Group 3: Religious and Social Issues - The spokesperson defended the policy of religious freedom and criticized the current administration for suppressing religious exchanges with the mainland, labeling it as a form of "green terror" [4]. - The establishment of a social media account by the Taiwan Affairs Office has received positive feedback from Taiwanese citizens, indicating a desire for better communication and connection with the mainland [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights concerns regarding Taiwan's current political situation, emphasizing that Lai Ching-te's actions have made Taiwan a "global flashpoint" due to his provocative stance on independence [1] Group 1: Political Context - The article notes that increasing international concern and criticism have emerged regarding the Taiwan Strait situation, particularly directed at Lai Ching-te's pro-independence rhetoric [1] - It is stated that the root cause of the complex and severe situation in the Taiwan Strait is Lai Ching-te's refusal to acknowledge the "1992 Consensus," which embodies the one-China principle [1] - Lai Ching-te is labeled as a "peace destroyer" and a "crisis creator" in the Taiwan Strait, indicating a significant shift in regional stability [1] Group 2: Call for Unity - The spokesperson emphasizes that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China, asserting that the resolution should be handled by the Chinese people on both sides of the Strait [1] - There is a call for Taiwanese compatriots to recognize the extreme dangers and destructive nature of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) persistent pro-independence stance [1] - The article advocates for a collective effort to return cross-strait relations to a path of peaceful development, aiming to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [1]

10月29日国务院台办举行新闻发布会，有记者问，赖清德称，各政党应支持民进党所谓"国安十法"修 法，台行政部门称为因应错假讯息等认知作战，已规划21部法律修正案，预计年底前完成修正草案。发 言人有何评论？ 对此，国务院台办发言人彭庆恩表示，赖清德当局顽固坚持"台独"分裂立场，急于推动所谓"修法"，就 是企图仗恶"法"施恶行，进一步制造"绿色恐怖""寒蝉效应"、升高两岸对立对抗，为图谋"台独专制"打 开方便之门。要和平、要发展、要交流、要合作是台湾社会的主流民意。赖清德当局无视岛内民生、民 意，不断撕裂台湾社会，严重破坏两岸关系，导致台海紧张动荡。种种倒行逆施必遭反对，注定失败。 （总台央视记者 张雪松 黄惠馨） 责编：张青津、姚凯红 ...

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a Facebook account by the spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office has garnered attention from Taiwanese netizens, reflecting their concerns about cross-strait relations and the desire for accurate information [1] Group 1 - The spokesperson, Peng Qing'en, noted that the new Facebook account received numerous messages of support and well-wishes from Taiwanese netizens, as well as requests for assistance in locating relatives in mainland China [1] - The Taiwan authorities, particularly the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), have reacted strongly, warning citizens against cooperating with mainland authorities, which they claim could lead to severe legal consequences [1] - The spokesperson criticized the DPP for its actions, describing them as a violation of the basic rights of Taiwanese citizens and highlighting the hypocrisy of their claims regarding "freedom of speech" [1] Group 2 - The spokesperson emphasized the importance of the new communication platform for addressing the needs of Taiwanese compatriots and pledged to continue using it to provide assistance and resolve issues [1] - The DPP's stance is characterized as a historical regression and a source of harm to cross-strait relations, with a call for cross-strait compatriots to report illegal activities while ensuring the protection of whistleblowers' rights [1]