Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][14]. Summary by Sections Definition of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "existential crisis situation" was created by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense in cases where a closely related foreign country is attacked, threatening Japan's survival [4][6]. - This concept is seen as a legal loophole to bypass the restrictions imposed by Japan's pacifist constitution, particularly Article 9, which prohibits military actions [4][6]. Takaichi's Ambitions and Policy Shifts - Takaichi, identifying as a successor to Abe's policies, has linked the Taiwan issue to Japan's "existential crisis," suggesting that Taiwan's situation threatens Japan's survival [5][6]. - The Japanese government is reportedly planning a significant shift in defense policy, including increasing military spending and potentially revising the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [9][10]. Domestic Reactions and Criticism - Takaichi's remarks have sparked widespread criticism within Japan, with former Prime Ministers and political figures expressing shock and urging her to retract her statements [14][16]. - Public protests have emerged, with citizens demanding Takaichi's resignation and expressing concerns over her provocative rhetoric towards China [17]. Historical Context and Implications - Analysts warn that Japan's historical pattern of military expansion often begins with a narrative of "crisis," which has been used to justify past aggressions [5][6]. - The current political climate reflects a resurgence of right-wing sentiments in Japan, aiming to reshape the post-war pacifist narrative and challenge the established international order [17].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][12] Group 1: Concept of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "existential crisis situation" was introduced by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under specific conditions [1][2] - This concept defines a situation where an armed attack on a closely related foreign country poses a clear danger to Japan's survival, fundamentally threatening the rights of its citizens [1][2] Group 2: Political Implications - Takaichi's remarks link Taiwan to Japan's "existential crisis situation," which has sparked significant domestic backlash, with critics arguing that Taiwan is part of China and not a threat to Japan's survival [5][12] - Analysts warn that Japan's historical narrative of "crisis" has often been used to justify military expansion and aggression, suggesting Takaichi's rhetoric may serve similar purposes [5][12] Group 3: Defense Policy Shift - Takaichi has proposed aggressive military expansion policies, including a significant increase in defense spending and the potential development of nuclear capabilities [6][8] - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party is set to discuss amendments to key security documents, aiming to raise defense spending to 2% of GDP and reconsider the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [8][11] Group 4: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's statements have led to widespread criticism from former prime ministers and political figures, emphasizing that Japan should not interfere in Taiwan's internal affairs [12][13] - Public protests have erupted, with citizens demanding Takaichi's resignation and a retraction of her statements, reflecting a strong opposition to her militaristic rhetoric [14][15]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][10] Summary by Sections Concept of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "Existential Crisis Situation" was created by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under specific conditions [3] - This situation is defined as a clear and imminent danger that threatens Japan's survival due to military attacks on closely related foreign nations [3][5] Takaichi's Statements and Domestic Reactions - Takaichi linked the Taiwan issue to Japan's "Existential Crisis Situation," suggesting that Taiwan's situation threatens Japan's survival [5][10] - Her comments have sparked significant backlash within Japan, with former Prime Ministers and political leaders criticizing her statements as illogical and provocative [11][12] Defense Policy Shift - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party plans to discuss amendments to Japan's National Security Strategy and related documents, aiming to increase defense spending and potentially revise the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [7][9] - Takaichi's administration is pushing for aggressive military policies, including a substantial increase in defense spending and the possibility of acquiring nuclear capabilities [7][9] Public Protests and Political Pressure - Following Takaichi's remarks, public protests erupted in Tokyo, with citizens demanding her resignation and a retraction of her statements [12][13] - Various political figures and civil groups have expressed concerns over the implications of her comments for Japan's national security and international relations, particularly with China [10][12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements made by Japan's new Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, regarding Taiwan have sparked significant controversy in the international community, indicating a potential shift in Japan's political stance towards China and Taiwan [1][15][42]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's comments suggest that a situation in Taiwan could be considered a "survival crisis" for Japan, implying possible military intervention [1][5]. - This marks a departure from previous Japanese leaders who refrained from linking Taiwan's situation directly to Japan's national security [7][17]. - The term "survival crisis" was originally introduced by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under certain conditions [5][27]. Group 2: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's remarks have faced backlash from various political figures in Japan, including former Prime Ministers who emphasize that Taiwan is a domestic issue for China and Japan should not interfere [17][19]. - Despite the criticism, Takaichi has refused to retract her statements, indicating a firm stance aligned with the current government's views [19][25]. - The political climate in Japan appears to be shifting towards a more right-leaning approach, with Takaichi's comments reflecting a broader trend among the ruling coalition [27][38]. Group 3: International Implications - The Chinese government has expressed strong discontent with Takaichi's statements, viewing them as a violation of China's sovereignty and a potential threat to regional stability [13][41]. - Experts warn that Japan's rightward political shift could lead to increased tensions in East Asia, reminiscent of historical militaristic tendencies [27][38]. - The situation raises concerns about Japan's adherence to its pacifist constitution and its implications for international law and relations [38][41].

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements made by Japan's new Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, regarding Taiwan have sparked significant controversy in the international community, indicating a potential shift in Japan's political stance towards China and Taiwan [1][15][40]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's comments suggest that a situation in Taiwan could be considered a "survival crisis" for Japan, implying possible military intervention [1][5]. - This marks a departure from previous Japanese leaders who refrained from linking Taiwan's situation directly to Japan's national security [7][19]. - The term "survival crisis" was originally introduced by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under certain conditions [5][27]. Group 2: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's remarks have faced backlash from various political figures in Japan, including former Prime Ministers who emphasize that Taiwan is a domestic issue for China and should not involve Japan [17][19]. - Critics within Japan have labeled Takaichi's statements as reckless and dangerous, raising concerns about the implications for Japan's military posture and regional stability [9][21][25]. Group 3: International Implications - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to Takaichi's comments, viewing them as a violation of Japan's previous political commitments and an interference in China's internal affairs [13][41]. - Experts warn that Japan's rightward political shift, as evidenced by Takaichi's statements, could lead to increased tensions in East Asia and a potential escalation of military conflicts [27][36][39].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi's recent remarks regarding Taiwan have raised significant concerns, suggesting that a "Taiwan crisis" could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights, indicating a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait and a blatant interference in China's internal affairs [1][2][3] Group 1: Domestic Reactions - Many Japanese politicians, media, and scholars have criticized Takashi's statements, emphasizing that they violate the One China principle and could jeopardize the peaceful development that Japan and China have maintained for 80 years [1][2][3] - Former Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba criticized Takashi's comments as reckless, arguing that they imply "a Taiwan crisis equals a Japan crisis," which has never been defined by previous governments [2][3] - Concerns have been raised about the vagueness of the "survival crisis situation" concept, which could allow for arbitrary interpretations by the current government, potentially leading to military action [6][7] Group 2: Historical Context and Legal Implications - The concept of "survival crisis situation" was established in 2015, and since then, Japan has made legislative preparations for potential involvement in Taiwan-related issues [3][4] - Historically, Japanese cabinets have adhered to a "defensive-only" principle, and Takashi's statements represent a significant departure from this stance, raising alarms about the potential for military escalation [4][5] Group 3: Concerns About Regional Stability - Analysts express fears that Takashi's remarks could exacerbate tensions in the region and undermine Japan's security by entangling it in external geopolitical conflicts that do not align with its national interests [8][10] - There is a growing apprehension about the potential for Japan to revert to militaristic policies under the guise of external threats, reflecting a deep-seated awareness of historical lessons [8][10] Group 4: Future Implications for Japan-China Relations - The current political landscape in Japan, where the ruling party lacks a majority, may lead to further hardline stances against China, complicating diplomatic relations [10][11] - Experts warn that Takashi's comments have severely damaged the political foundation of Japan-China relations, indicating a period of high friction and risk ahead [10][11]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of Japanese politician Takashi Saito's provocative statements linking Taiwan to Japan's "survival crisis situation," suggesting potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which raises concerns about Japan's military expansion and constitutional violations [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative Context - In July 2015, Japan's National Diet passed a controversial security law allowing collective self-defense, which many constitutional scholars argue violates Japan's constitution [1]. - The new security law defines a "survival crisis situation" as a scenario where an allied nation faces military aggression that threatens Japan's existence and the rights of its citizens [1]. Group 2: Political Reactions - Saito's remarks have sparked significant backlash within Japan, with critics arguing that they provoke China unnecessarily and jeopardize Japan's national interests [2]. - Some voices in Japan express concern that Saito's statements limit future policy options and could lead to a more aggressive military posture [2]. Group 3: Military Expansion Concerns - Since taking office, Saito has proposed various military expansion measures, including significant increases in defense spending and easing restrictions on arms exports [2]. - There are fears that Japan is abandoning its post-war pacifism and returning to militaristic policies, raising questions about the true motivations behind Saito's rhetoric [2].

据日本TBS电视台10日报道，立宪民主党众议院议员大串博志在国会称，"认定'存亡危机事态'绝非易 事。一旦认定，就意味着防卫出动，也就是日本作为国家将卷入战争。你难道不打算撤回、取消相关发 言吗？" 对这番言论，日本政坛出现质疑声音。立宪民主党党首野田佳彦8日已对媒体表示，他对高市早苗的发 言感到"非常惊讶，感受到了（她）独自贸然前行的危险性"，并表示打算在国会就此展开追问。野田佳 彦还称，"历任首相都对这类话题保持着一定克制，（首相的此番发言）会对国内外产生影响。"他强 调，该发言"分量极重"，"难道不应该格外谨慎吗？" 日本前首相鸠山由纪夫8日在社交平台X上发帖表示，过去也有人提出"台湾有事即日本有事"，而高市 首相则称，（台湾有事）可能构成可行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，目的恐怕是煽动危机，进而为 增强军事力量找借口，但日本本应尊重台湾是中国的一部分这一事实。"归根结底，台湾问题是中国的 内政，日本绝不应插手。"他写道。 【环球时报报道 记者 邢晓婧】日本首相高市早苗日前在回应国会质询时，宣称"台湾有事"恐构成可行 使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，引发争议。10日，日本在野党方面要求其撤回相关答辩内 ...

日本首相高市早苗 高市早苗11月10日就此前的言论表示，当时"设想了最坏的情况，并做出了略微有些具体的回答"，同时 解释称"今后将避免这种做法"，但强调："这样的言论符合日本政府的一贯立场，并不打算收回和取 消"…… 日本历届政府始终仅在私下进行相关讨论，在国会等公开场合对具体情景的提及则持谨慎态度。即便被 问及"台湾有事"是否属于"存亡危机事态"，政府也始终以模糊表述回应。 关于是否收回台湾发生紧急情况可能触发"存亡危机事态"的回答，高市早苗对此予以否定。她强 调："这样的言论符合日本政府的一贯立场，并不打算收回和取消"。同时表示："不打算将这种说法视 为日本政府的统一立场来发表"。 针对增至国内生产总值（GDP）比重2％的防卫费的资金来源问题，高市早苗表示："希望在大力进行支 出改革的同时，妥善确保相关资金"。同时称："希望采取无需提高税率就能增加税收的应对措施"。 版权声明：日本经济新闻社版权所有，未经授权不得转载或部分复制，违者必究。 在11月10日的众议院预算委员会会议上，日本首相高市早苗提及台湾发生紧急情况可能会触发日本能够 行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"一事。她表示，针对事态的界定具体列举特定 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida stated that the possibility of a "survival crisis situation" being triggered if Taiwan suffers a military attack is high, aiming to clarify Japan's response measures in emergencies and enhance deterrence against China [2][4]. Group 1: Japan's Response to Taiwan's Situation - Kishida emphasized the need for comprehensive judgment based on various scenarios if an emergency occurs in Taiwan, indicating that not all situations would constitute a "survival crisis" [4][5]. - The concept of "survival crisis situation" was introduced in Japan's 2015 security legislation, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense even if it has not been directly attacked, provided that its national survival is threatened [5][6]. - Japan's Self-Defense Forces (SDF) could engage in joint operations with U.S. forces if the government perceives a threat to Japan's survival, addressing previous concerns from the U.S. regarding SDF's involvement without direct attacks [5][6]. Group 2: Political Reactions and Concerns - There are concerns that discussing specific scenarios in public could escalate tensions, as historically, Japanese governments have been cautious in addressing such topics openly [6][7]. - Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi opposed the idea of discussing specific cases related to Taiwan, arguing that it could expose Japan's strategies and make it more vulnerable to attacks [7]. - Criticism arose from opposition members regarding the potential implications of openly discussing military responses, suggesting it could be seen as an escalation of tensions with China [6][7].