Group 1 - Japan is planning to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, potentially restoring terms from the old Japanese military, which raises concerns among neighboring countries affected by Japan's colonial history [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasizes that Japan's military security movements are closely watched due to its history of colonialism and invasion, highlighting the shift in Japan's security policy and increased defense budget [1] - The spokesperson warns against the revival of Japanese militarism, stating that historical lessons must not be forgotten or distorted, and asserts that Japan's militaristic tendencies should not be allowed to resurface [1] Group 2 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry responds to comments made by the U.S. Ambassador to Japan, criticizing the remarks as politically motivated and contrary to diplomatic responsibilities [2] - The Ministry asserts that the U.S.-Japan alliance, a product of the Cold War, should not target third parties or interfere in the internal affairs of other nations [2]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent plans to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, including the restoration of terms like "Colonel," have raised concerns about a potential revival of militarism, which could be seen as a provocation to nations affected by Japan's colonial history [3]. Group 1: Japan's Military Policy Changes - Japan's military security movements are under scrutiny due to its colonial and invasion history, with significant adjustments to security policies and an increase in defense budgets noted in recent years [3]. - The country is seeking to develop offensive weapons and is moving away from its "no nuclear" principles, which raises alarms among neighboring countries and the international community [3]. - The resurgence of right-wing forces in Japan is pushing for a departure from the constraints of the "Peace Constitution," indicating a shift towards militarization [3]. Group 2: Territorial Disputes - The Diaoyu Islands, claimed by China, are highlighted as an area of contention, with Chinese Coast Guard vessels conducting lawful patrols in the region, which Japan has protested [3]. - China firmly rejects Japan's diplomatic protests regarding its patrols, asserting its territorial sovereignty and calling for Japan to respect the four-point consensus between China and Japan [3]. Group 3: U.S.-Japan Relations - Comments made by the U.S. Ambassador to Japan regarding China are characterized as politically motivated and contrary to the responsibilities of a diplomat, emphasizing that the U.S.-Japan alliance should not target third parties [4].

Group 1 - Japan is planning to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, potentially restoring terms like "Colonel," which may break the long-standing practice of downplaying military aspects [1] - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to Japan's military security movements, citing historical colonial and invasion issues that concern neighboring countries and the international community [1] - Japan has been significantly adjusting its security policies, increasing defense budgets annually, relaxing weapon export restrictions, and seeking to develop offensive weapons, which raises alarms about abandoning its "no nuclear" principles [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. Ambassador to Japan's comments as politically motivated and contrary to diplomatic responsibilities, emphasizing that the U.S.-Japan alliance should not target third parties or interfere in other nations' internal affairs [2]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is planning to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, which may revive militaristic terminology and provoke concerns among neighboring countries affected by Japan's colonial history [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Japan's Military Policy Changes - Japanese officials are considering restoring old military rank terms like "Colonel," which breaks the long-standing practice of downplaying military aspects in the Self-Defense Forces [1] - This move is seen as a significant shift in Japan's security policy, raising alarms among Asian neighbors and the international community [1] Historical Context and Concerns - The historical context of Japan's militarism and colonial invasions is highlighted, emphasizing the need for remembrance and caution against the revival of militaristic ideologies [1] - The Potsdam Declaration explicitly prohibits Japan from rearming, and the pacifist constitution enshrines the principle of self-defense [1] Security Policy Adjustments - Japan has been increasing its defense budget annually and relaxing restrictions on arms exports, indicating a shift towards developing offensive military capabilities [1] - There is a growing concern that right-wing forces in Japan are pushing to break free from the constraints of the pacifist constitution, moving further down the path of military expansion [1] Call for Vigilance - The statement underscores the importance of remembering the lessons of history, warning against the dangers of militarism and the potential for destabilizing the post-war international order [1] - The emphasis is placed on not allowing the resurgence of Japanese militarism or any challenges to global peace and stability [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is planning to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, potentially restoring terms like "Colonel," which raises concerns about the resurgence of militarism and challenges to post-war international order [1] Group 1: Japan's Military Developments - Recent statements from multiple Japanese officials indicate a move towards revising military rank terminology, reflecting a shift in Japan's defense posture [1] - The proposed changes are seen as part of a broader trend of Japan's right-wing forces pushing against the constraints of its pacifist constitution [1] Group 2: Historical Context and Concerns - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson emphasized the historical consequences of Japanese militarism, which caused significant suffering in Asia and worldwide [1] - There is a strong warning against forgetting the lessons of history, highlighting that a return to militarism could lead to dangerous outcomes [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's military security movements are under scrutiny due to its colonial and invasion history, raising concerns among Asian neighbors and the international community [3] Summary by Relevant Sections Security Policy Adjustments - Japan has significantly adjusted its security policies in recent years, increasing its defense budget annually and relaxing restrictions on arms exports [3] - There is a pursuit to develop offensive weapons and a potential abandonment of the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [3] Historical Context - The resurgence of militarism in Japan is alarming, as it echoes the militaristic aggression that caused severe suffering in Asia and worldwide 80 years ago [3] - The lessons from history emphasize the dangers of forgetting past conflicts and the need to prevent the revival of Japanese militarism [3] International Order - There is a strong stance against any challenges to the post-war international order and a commitment to maintaining global peace and stability [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's recent plans to modify its Self-Defense Forces' military rank terminology, which raises concerns among neighboring countries due to Japan's historical military aggression and colonialism [1]. Summary by Sections - **Japan's Military Rank Changes** - Japan is planning to restore old military rank terms such as "Colonel," which breaks the long-standing practice of downplaying military aspects in the Self-Defense Forces [1]. - **Historical Context and Concerns** - The historical context of Japan's militarism and colonial invasions is highlighted, emphasizing that these changes are alarming to Asian neighbors and the international community [1]. - The Potsdam Declaration explicitly prohibits Japan from rearming, and Japan's pacifist constitution establishes a principle of self-defense [1]. - **Recent Security Policy Adjustments** - Japan has been significantly adjusting its security policies, increasing defense budgets annually, relaxing weapon export restrictions, and seeking to develop offensive weapons [1]. - There is a growing trend among Japanese right-wing forces to challenge the constraints of the pacifist constitution, moving further towards militarization [1]. - **Warnings Against Militarism** - The article warns against the revival of Japanese militarism, stating that the lessons of history must not be forgotten or distorted [1]. - It emphasizes the importance of maintaining international order and preventing any threats to global peace and stability [1].

【环球时报-环球网报道 记者 邢晓婧】18日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者提问称，近期 多名日本官员表示，日方正计划修改自卫队军衔名称，拟恢复"大佐"等旧日本军队的军阶用语。媒体评 称，这将打破日本自卫队长期以来淡化军事色彩的惯例，对曾遭受日本殖民侵略的国家人民而言，如同 在历史伤口上撒盐，请问发言人对此有何评论？ 毛宁对此表示，由于殖民和侵略历史，日本的军事安全动向一直备受亚洲邻国和国际社会的关注。《波 茨坦公告》明确规定日本"禁止重新武装"，日本"和平宪法"也确立"专守防卫"原则。然而令人警惕的 是，日本近年来大幅调整安保政策，逐年增加防卫预算，放宽武器出口限制，谋求发展进攻性武器，图 谋放弃"无核三原则"。日本右翼势力正极力突破"和平宪法"束缚，在强军扩武的道路上越走越远。 毛宁称，80年前，日本军国主义发动侵略战争，给亚洲和世界带来深重灾难。忘战必危，好战必亡。历 史的教训不能忘却、不可歪曲，更不容抹杀。80年后的今天，我们绝不允许日本军国主义复活，绝不允 许任何人挑战战后国际秩序，绝不允许世界和平稳定再遭破坏。 ...