Workflow
洗钱
icon
Search documents
美英韩新之后,中国香港和中国台湾也出手:查封冻结柬埔寨太子集团35亿元资产,涉26辆豪车、11处豪华公寓,还有现金、股票
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-11-05 09:29
每经编辑|程鹏 福建小镇出身的陈志,家世寻常,却在28岁创办柬埔寨最大房地产集团,一跃成为当地首屈一指的富豪。 十年后,他被美国司法部门指控为"跨国网络诈骗帝国幕后主使",价值约150亿美元的比特币被扣留;英国对其实施制裁,冻结伦敦19处房产及所有在英 资产;韩国冻结其910亿韩元资产;新加坡冻结其1.5亿新元资产,查封并扣押其在新加坡的6处房产,一艘游艇、11辆豪车;近日,中国香港、中国台湾 也对"太子集团"出手了。 据红星新闻11月5日报道,中国香港特区警方当地时间周二(4日)宣布,基于从多个渠道掌握的情报和信息,警方已经冻结一个涉嫌参与国际电信诈骗和 洗钱活动的犯罪集团价值27.5亿港元(约合人民币25.2亿元)的资产。据报道,该集团系柬埔寨"太子集团"。 警方在声明中称,被冻结的资产包括其通过犯罪所得的现金、股票、基金等。声明称,当局仍在就此进行调查,但目前暂未逮捕任何人。 同时,4日早些时候,中国台湾检方表示,他们已查封与"太子集团"相关的总价值超45亿新台币(约合人民币10.3亿元)的资产并拘留了25名嫌疑人。声 明称,以陈志为首的"太子集团"在柬埔寨从事诈欺犯罪,并于多地建立庞大企业网络进行洗钱 ...
印度富豪逾8亿美元企业资产遭查封,涉欺诈银行和洗钱
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-05 01:05
Core Points - The Enforcement Directorate of India has seized assets worth over 75 billion rupees (approximately 846 million USD) belonging to Anil Ambani and his associated companies as part of an investigation into allegations of bank fraud and money laundering [1] - The investigation is linked to a criminal complaint filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation in August, which claims that Reliance Communications, one of India's largest telecom operators, misappropriated bank funds, resulting in a loss of 29.29 billion rupees (3.3 million USD) [1] - The Enforcement Directorate's statement indicated that fraudulent transfers of public assets were identified within several companies under the Reliance Group, and efforts will be made to return the illicit funds to legitimate claimants [1] Company Response - Reliance Infrastructure Limited, controlled by Anil Ambani, stated that he has not been part of the board for over three and a half years, asserting that the case will not impact the company's operations, shareholders, employees, or any other stakeholders [2]
涉欺诈银行和洗钱,印度富豪逾8亿美元企业资产遭查封
Xin Hua She· 2025-11-04 16:24
Core Points - The Enforcement Directorate of India has seized assets worth over 75 billion rupees (approximately 846 million USD) belonging to Anil Ambani and his associated companies as part of an investigation into allegations of bank fraud and money laundering [1] - Anil Ambani, born in 1959 in Mumbai, is the chairman of Reliance Group, one of India's largest private enterprises, which was founded by his father, Dhirubhai Ambani [1] - The seized assets include office spaces, residences, and over 53 hectares of land, with the Enforcement Directorate stating that multiple companies under Reliance Group have engaged in fraudulent transfers of public assets [1] Company Overview - Reliance Group was split in 2005 between Anil Ambani and his brother Mukesh Ambani, with Anil receiving sectors such as energy, telecommunications, and finance, while Mukesh took control of petrochemicals and currently serves as the chairman of Reliance Industries [1] - The Enforcement Directorate aims to recover the illicit funds for legitimate claimants [1]
ED attaches RCom's land worth over ₹4,462 crore in money laundering case
MINT· 2025-11-03 16:26
New Delhi: The enforcement directorate (ED) has provisionally attached over 132 acres of land in Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City (DAKC), Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, valued at approximately ₹4,463 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.This brings the total asset seizures to more than ₹7,500 crore in cases involving Reliance Communications Ltd (RCom), Reliance Commercial Finance Ltd, and Reliance Home Finance Ltd, the investigating agency said on Monday.ED, in a statement, said that earlier it had ...
美英围剿太子集团,新加坡家办再卷入“洗钱风暴”
3 6 Ke· 2025-11-03 12:57
Core Insights - The joint legal action by the US and UK against Chen Zhi, chairman of the Prince Group, exposes a significant cross-border money laundering network in Southeast Asia, highlighting vulnerabilities in Singapore's financial system [1][2][16]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - On October 14, 2025, the US and UK jointly filed charges against Chen Zhi for leading a large-scale cross-border investment scam and money laundering operation, marking the most extensive coordinated action against Southeast Asian cybercrime to date [2][16]. - The US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned the Prince Group and 146 related individuals and entities, while the New York Eastern District Attorney charged Chen with conspiracy to commit telecommunications fraud and money laundering [2][16]. - The case revealed that the Prince Group, which ostensibly operates in real estate, banking, and hospitality, is actually involved in human trafficking and forced labor within scam operations described as "prison-like" environments [2][4]. Group 2: Chen Zhi's Background and Operations - Chen Zhi, born in 1987 in Fujian, China, acquired Cambodian citizenship through a $250,000 donation and has since built the Prince Group into one of Cambodia's most influential private enterprises, expanding into various sectors [4][16]. - He faces five charges, including forced labor, human trafficking, bribery, corporate money laundering, and international asset concealment, with potential penalties of up to 40 years in prison if convicted [4][16]. Group 3: DW Capital and Money Laundering Mechanisms - DW Capital, established by Chen in Singapore, has been identified as a central hub for laundering operations, utilizing family office structures and shell companies to create a facade of legitimacy [5][20]. - The firm claimed to manage over 60 million SGD and enjoyed tax incentives, but it has been reported that it does not hold the necessary capital markets services license, raising questions about its compliance [5][20]. - Chen's team reportedly established over ten management and holding companies in Singapore, with many registered at the same address, facilitating money laundering activities [6][20]. Group 4: Regulatory Implications and Responses - The case has prompted Singaporean authorities to investigate DW Capital and related entities, with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) indicating that local banks had flagged suspicious transactions as early as 2024 [16][20]. - Following the sanctions, Singapore's police issued a disposal prohibition order against Chen's network, seizing approximately 150 million SGD in assets [16][20]. - The incident has raised concerns about Singapore's reputation as a financial hub, with calls for a reassessment of its regulatory framework to prevent misuse by cross-border criminal organizations [21][24]. Group 5: Future Regulatory Landscape - The Prince Group case serves as a stress test for Singapore's financial system, highlighting the need for a balance between attracting legitimate capital and preventing illicit financial flows [21][24]. - In response to the growing scrutiny, Singapore has begun tightening regulations, including the introduction of a family office regulatory framework and enhanced anti-money laundering measures [21][24]. - The ongoing situation emphasizes the importance of maintaining integrity and transparency in financial operations, as Singapore seeks to uphold its status as a trusted wealth management center [24].
江苏大妈6万枚比特币和陈志的12枚比特币,最终还是没有去中心化
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-02 03:02
Core Insights - Two individuals, Chen Zhi and Qian Zhimin, have emerged as major fraudsters, with significant amounts of Bitcoin confiscated from them, highlighting the challenges of using decentralized currencies for illicit activities [1][3]. Group 1: Fraudulent Activities - Chen Zhi, associated with the Prince Group in Cambodia, had approximately 130,000 Bitcoins seized, valued at around $15 billion, obtained through threats, illegal detention, and fraud [3]. - Qian Zhimin, the actual controller of Tianjin Lantian Ge Rui Electronic Technology Co., had about 61,000 Bitcoins confiscated, worth nearly 50 billion yuan, through high-yield investment schemes that ultimately led to investor losses [3][5]. Group 2: Money Laundering Techniques - Both individuals converted their illicit gains into Bitcoin to launder money, purchasing high-value assets like real estate, yachts, and luxury cars to enjoy material benefits while attempting to legitimize their illegal earnings [3][5]. - The use of non-custodial wallets, which are secure and not subject to freezing by authorities, was intended to protect their assets, but ultimately, the keys to these wallets were compromised [6][9]. Group 3: Legal Consequences and Challenges - The confiscation of their Bitcoins raises questions about how authorities can access the private keys necessary for seizing assets stored in non-custodial wallets, often relying on coercion of associates to reveal these keys [6][9]. - Chen Zhi's current whereabouts are unknown, indicating that he has evaded capture, while Qian Zhimin has admitted guilt in a UK court regarding money laundering activities [9].
电诈头目陈志仍下落不明!新加坡出手:冻结8.2亿元资产,查封扣押6处房产、1艘游艇、11辆豪车
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-10-31 15:52
在英国和美国联合制裁柬埔寨"太子集团"及其创始人陈志后,新加坡也出手了。 据红星新闻报道,新加坡警方10月30日查封并扣押了柬埔寨商人陈志及其"太子集团"在新加坡的6处房产,同时对其他相关金融资产发出禁止处置令,涉 及银行账户、证券账户及现金,总价值超过1.5亿新元(约合8.2亿人民币)。此外,一艘游艇、11辆豪车以及多瓶名酒亦被纳入禁令范围。 被新加坡警局扣押的游艇 每经编辑|何小桃 此前,陈志价值约150亿美元的比特币被美国执法部门扣留;英国也对其实施制裁,冻结伦敦19处房产及所有在英资产。 另外,根据报道,韩国主要反对党国民力量党议员姜民国(音译)20日援引韩国金融监督院的数据称,"太子集团"在五家韩国银行的柬埔寨分行进行了52 次交易,牵扯金额超过1970亿韩元。(1韩元约合0.005元人民币)。 姜民国说,现在"太子集团"还有超910亿韩元的资产仍存放在几家韩国银行的柬埔寨分行。银行界传出消息称,在韩国官方正式决定发起制裁之前,包括 韩国国民银行在内的五家韩国银行已经率先冻结了"太子集团"的资产。一位银行业消息人士解释称,根据国际反洗钱协议,一旦国际社会对某个对象实施 制裁,那涉事银行须立刻冻结受影 ...
转账“刷流水”领取“扶贫金”?警惕掉入“洗钱”陷阱
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-10-29 18:15
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a recent case of a scam involving "poverty alleviation funds" where individuals are tricked into providing their bank account information to strangers, leading to potential involvement in money laundering activities [1][11]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A woman in Hubei attempted to withdraw 300,000 yuan from her bank account shortly after the funds were transferred, raising suspicions among bank staff [2][4]. - The bank staff contacted the sender of the funds to verify the transaction, which revealed inconsistencies in the reasons provided by the woman for the withdrawal [4][8]. Group 2: Police Investigation - The police were alerted to the suspicious transaction and began investigating the source of the funds, leading to the discovery that the money was part of a scam [6][12]. - The investigation revealed that the funds were fraudulently obtained from a victim in Yanji City, who was misled into transferring money to the woman's account [14]. Group 3: Scam Mechanism - The woman was contacted by someone claiming to be a government official, who instructed her to provide her bank account for receiving "poverty alleviation funds" and promised a reward for her assistance [16][18]. - The police emphasized the importance of not lending or renting personal bank accounts to others, as it could lead to becoming an unwitting accomplice in fraudulent activities [18].
男子进金店豪购黄金,店员当场报警,民警一查发现……
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-29 13:11
Core Points - A suspicious individual purchased 82.5 grams of gold worth 88,000 yuan in a jewelry store, raising alarms among staff who reported the incident to the police [1] - The individual was found to be from another province with no prior activity in Changsha, and his identification information did not match the purchase details, indicating potential fraud [1][3] - The police discovered that the suspect was involved in a money laundering scheme for a telecom fraud gang, using a shopping card to buy large amounts of gold to "clean" the illicit funds [3] Summary by Sections - **Incident Description** - A man purchased 82.5 grams of gold for 88,000 yuan, which triggered suspicion among the jewelry store staff [1] - The police were alerted and found discrepancies in the suspect's identity and behavior during the purchase [1] - **Investigation Findings** - The suspect had no previous records in Changsha and exhibited unusual behavior during the transaction [1] - Upon further investigation, 150 grams of gold were recovered from the suspect's location [3] - **Criminal Activity** - The suspect was aiding a telecom fraud gang by transferring funds and concealing criminal proceeds [3] - The police issued a warning to the public about the risks of large cash withdrawals or gold purchases directed by others, emphasizing the legal implications of assisting in money laundering [3]
电诈帝国坍塌:陈志的千亿黑金谜局与全球围猎
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-28 03:55
导语:从"网吧网管"到"柬埔寨公爵",陈志缔造的太子帝国一度横跨地产、金融与博彩。如今,随着多国执法机构介入调查,这场"东南亚黑金神话"正在 迅速崩塌。 在东南亚电诈版图的灰色地带,有一个名字曾让各国执法机构头疼多年——陈志。 这位出身福建连江小镇的男子,从网吧网管一路攀升为柬埔寨"太子集团"掌门人,曾被外界称为当地"影子政府"。 在柬埔寨商界,陈志最擅长的,是模糊合法与非法的边界。 他通过政商关系稳固地位——据公开资料,陈志与柬埔寨副首相苏庆之子苏速卡共同成立"金贝公司",后者持有多家赌场与园区资产;同时,他还借助洪 森家族人脉,为旗下太子银行获取金融牌照。 他甚至参与首相洪森出访古巴的官方代表团,并在会谈期间入股哈瓦那雪茄公司。此后,陈志捐赠疫苗、设立奖学金,被授予"公爵"头衔。 然而,2025年10月,一场由美英联合发起的跨国执法行动,让他的千亿黑金帝国瞬间瓦解:12.7万枚比特币(市值逾150亿美元)被没收,伦敦、新加坡 等地豪宅被冻结,伪装成合法投资机构的家族办公室也被揭穿。 这场行动不仅终结了陈志的"公爵神话",也揭开了东南亚电诈产业与全球金融系统之间盘根错节的隐秘联系。 01 从网吧少年到"太子 ...