福州上下杭历史文化街区2014年开始实施保护修复工程，十多年来成效显著。图为改造后的俯瞰景色。 （资料图片） 眼前现代化的凤湖社区，很难让人联想到它曾经是建筑密度大、环境治安不佳、基础设施不完善的棚户区。 2007年，洪山镇全力推动乌山西路凤湖片区旧改项目。27.99万平方米的拆迁面积，为城市发展腾出了宝贵空 间。2010年，棚户区改造项目全面完工，凤湖新城5个小区的高楼拔地而起，居民陆续迁入新居。如今，这里 高楼林立、道路宽敞，绿树成荫的社区环境与昔日的棚户区形成了鲜明对比。 凤湖社区党委副书记林琴说，社区创新性地利用住宅楼架空层，打造集长者食堂·学堂、健康小屋、四点钟学 校等功能于一体的"乐享邻里中心"。社区按照"15分钟步行通达"标准，整合周边服务资源，打造了全市首 个"一刻钟幸福圈"。 "现在买菜、看病、孩子上学和放学后的托管问题都解决了，这才是真正的宜居社区。"陈建华说。 同样经历华丽变身的还有台江区华侨新村。这个建于上世纪的老旧小区，曾经因电力设施老化而隐患重重。 2024年，国网福州供电公司成立了华侨新村电力提升改造工作专班，历经6个多月，累计拆除架空线路7.33公 里，敷设电缆6.27公里。该 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the differences in policy positioning and resource allocation between two districts (A and B) in Guangzhou, highlighting how these differences impact community governance and the challenges faced by community workers in both areas [1][2]. Group 1: Policy Positioning and Resource Allocation - District A is designated as a national-level new area and free trade pilot zone, receiving significant policy support and funding, while District B is positioned as an important transportation hub with less favorable resource allocation [1]. - The disparity in policy support leads to different experiences in community funding, with District A's communities reporting budget surpluses, while District B's communities face funding shortages and delays in performance payments [3][4]. Group 2: Community Governance Challenges - Community governance in District A is characterized by a higher number of staff and resources, yet both districts primarily focus on completing tasks assigned by higher authorities, showing no significant difference in governance outcomes despite resource disparities [5][6]. - The lack of motivation for innovation in community governance is attributed to a rigid evaluation mechanism, limited promotion opportunities, and a growing disconnect between community workers and residents [7][8][9]. Group 3: Financial Autonomy and Innovation - The article highlights the challenges of financial autonomy for grassroots communities, where strict regulations limit the flexibility of fund usage, leading to underutilization of available resources [10][12]. - A new community charity fund initiative in District A aims to encourage resource mobilization, but bureaucratic hurdles and complex approval processes hinder effective use of these funds, resulting in a lack of genuine innovation in community governance [11][12][13]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The article suggests that higher authorities should consider granting more autonomy to grassroots communities to stimulate internal motivation and enhance governance capabilities, especially in rapidly changing economic environments [14].

长沙晚报全媒体记者 颜家文 通讯员 栗稳 "老铁，我赞成！"4月26日晚8时，长沙县泉塘街道泉睿社区中国铁建国际城小区党支部会议室内灯火通明，一场 关乎居民切身利益的"老铁议事会"正热烈展开。 "老铁"每月来献智 "难就难在没有最广泛凝聚居民共识。"随着该小区全面实现党支部、业委会、物业公司"三个全覆盖"，泉睿社区 指导该小区结合实际打造"4+4"治理模式：听邻里说事，一群热心"三长"把诉求领明白；聚邻里议事，一个"老铁 议事会"把大事说明白；帮邻里监事，一支廉泉监事队把过程督明白；向邻里亮事，一个云端公众号把结果晒明 白。 "老铁议事会"由此应运而生。"老铁"由社区工作人员、网格员、小区党员、业委会、物业、居民代表组成，名字 来源于中国铁建国际城小区名字中的"铁"，"老铁"更意味着关系亲近、办事牢靠。 位于小区一期的党支部办公室成了"老铁"们的议事场所。议事会明确，每月最后一个周末的周五晚8时准时开 会，特殊情况灵活变动，有时一月三四次。会议由小区党支部书记、业委会主任主持召开，议题主要针对小区的 重点、难点、堵点问题，大家群策群力，推进问题解决。 现场，20余名互称"老铁"的居民围坐在一起，就小区一期南门 ...

现场发布了"先锋上海·宝山旗舰店"首批功能——街区治理赋能平台"慧治宝盒"。宝山区委组织 部、区委社会工作部推出"善治街区二十法"，系统破解基层治理难题，为超大城市精细化治理提供"宝 山样本"。 在脱口秀环节，吴淞街道第三街区党支部副书记肖莉娜以"好声音工作法"为例，分享如何将商户 的"吐槽声"转化为治理的"指南针"，通过"立体化发声—分级响应—资源整合—长效评估"四步，实现问 题从收集到解决的全程管理。 罗店镇美兰湖街区党支部书记许碧丽揭秘"达人挖掘术"，通过"找人要准、练手要狠、搭伙要巧"三 段口诀，将探店博主、骑行达人转化为街区治理的"超级节点"，串联起商户、居民、新就业群体的共治 生态。 在圆桌论坛环节，三位新任街区党支部书记抛出治理痛点："信任危机如何破？""流动党员如何 管？""阵地资源如何活？"资深书记结合"善治街区二十法"现场支招：用好"破冰三件套""三找三亮工作 法""街邻社工作法""阵地转型法"。从痛点到解法再到行动，新老书记在"攻防"之间亮出了治理实招。 《上海支部生活》小红书账号"知不同学"和咪咕视频的直播间里，数万名网友直呼："原来党课还 能这么上！""下期什么时候？求加更！" 宝山 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the active role of retired cadres in community service and governance, highlighting their contributions through various initiatives and programs aimed at enhancing grassroots engagement and addressing local issues [1][3][4]. Group 1: Initiatives and Programs - The Chongchuan Economic Development Zone has established over 10 "Silver Volunteer Lecture Teams" to promote theoretical education and community engagement, reaching over 500 participants through more than 20 events [3]. - The "Silver Age Warm Heart Project" integrates "Party Building + Cultural Elderly Care" to enrich the lives of retired cadres, resulting in over 100 community performances by various artistic teams [6]. - The development zone has created interactive spaces like "Silver Age Book House" and "Golden Autumn Pavilion" to facilitate community activities and enhance the sense of belonging among elderly residents [6]. Group 2: Community Engagement and Governance - Retired cadres are encouraged to join the "Silver Age Red Steward" team to address community concerns, successfully resolving 18 key local issues and fulfilling 5 community wishes [4]. - The initiative includes platforms for discussion and collaboration on local governance, focusing on issues such as dispute mediation and community care [4]. - The development zone has launched 13 volunteer service teams, conducting over 30 activities aimed at poverty alleviation and promoting new social values [4].