Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent controversial statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Sanae regarding Taiwan, which have sparked protests and criticism within Japan, highlighting the potential risks to regional stability and Japan's own diplomatic relations [3][4][5]. Group 1: Political Context - On November 7, during a budget committee meeting, Kishi stated that a military conflict involving Taiwan could constitute a "survival crisis" for Japan, which could trigger Japan's collective self-defense rights under the new security law [4][6]. - Kishi's remarks have been criticized by various political figures, including former Prime Minister Noda Yoshihiko, who described her statements as reckless and damaging to Japan-China relations [5][6]. Group 2: Historical and Legal Implications - Kishi's statements are seen as a continuation of the right-wing ideology associated with former Prime Minister Abe Shinzo, who advocated for military expansion and constitutional revision [6][7]. - Legal experts argue that Kishi's interpretation of a "survival crisis" lacks a solid legal foundation, as Taiwan is not recognized as a sovereign state by Japan, thus complicating the application of the new security law [9][10]. Group 3: Regional and International Reactions - The article notes that Kishi's comments have provoked strong reactions from regional leaders and experts, who view her statements as a provocation that could escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait [13][14]. - Critics emphasize that Japan's involvement in Taiwan-related military actions would be seen as aggression and could severely damage Japan's international standing and relations with China [11][12]. Group 4: Economic Consequences - The potential deterioration of Japan-China relations could have significant economic repercussions, as China is Japan's largest trading partner, with trade totaling $308.3 billion in 2024 [15][16]. - Experts warn that if relations worsen, the Japanese public will bear the brunt of the consequences, including reduced trade and tourism from China [15][16].

上任不过一个多月，日本首相高市早苗继在台海等问题上大放厥词引发一系列国际纠纷后，又把算盘打 到了"无核三原则"上。 据新华社报道，多名日本政府消息人士11月14日透露，日本首相高市早苗正探讨在修订《国家安全保障 战略》等"安保三文件"时，对"无核三原则"中不引进核武器的原则进行修改。 "无核三原则"指不拥有、不制造、不引进核武器。1967年，时任日本首相佐藤荣作在国会发言时提出 了"无核三原则"，并于1971年在日本众议院全体会议上获得通过，成为日本政府关于核武器的基本政 策。 如果高市早苗强行就此进行修改，无疑将意味着日本战后安保政策的重大转变，也必将引发国内外强烈 批评与反弹。 高市早就不满"无核三原则" 11月14日，据日本内阁消息人士透露，首相高市早苗正在考虑重新审视日本长期以来奉行的无核武器原 则。此举将标志着日本安全政策的重大转变。 作为历史上犯有侵略和法西斯罪责的"二战"战败国，日本战后一直宣称奉行《和平宪法》，但近十几年 来已在所谓的"正常国家化"幌子下大幅放松了战后军备限制。 尽管如此，2022年由岸田文雄内阁推动的《国家安全战略》等三份防务相关重要文件，仍继续强调"无 核三原则"。但高市早 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the backlash against Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Sanae due to her controversial remarks regarding Taiwan, which have led to public protests and criticism from various political figures, suggesting that her actions have plunged Japan into a national crisis [1][9]. Group 1: Political Reactions - Public protests occurred in front of the Prime Minister's residence, with demands for Kishi's resignation and apologies for her statements regarding Taiwan [1]. - Criticism from political figures, including former Prime Minister Noda Yoshihiko, who labeled Kishi's remarks as reckless and damaging to Japan-China relations [2][9]. - The opposition party, led by Okada Katsuya, questioned Kishi on the implications of her statements, indicating a serious political backlash [2]. Group 2: Historical Context and Ideological Background - Kishi's political rise is attributed to former Prime Minister Abe Shinzo, who is known for his right-wing views and military expansionist policies [3]. - Kishi's stance on historical issues and military policy aligns closely with Abe's, including calls for constitutional amendments and increased defense spending [3][5]. - The article highlights Kishi's past actions, such as visiting Taiwan and promoting Japan-Taiwan security cooperation, which reflect her aggressive stance on regional security [3][4]. Group 3: Legal and International Implications - Experts argue that Kishi's remarks lack legal grounding, as Japan's security laws do not support military intervention in Taiwan, which is not recognized as a sovereign state [6][7]. - The article emphasizes that Japan's post-war commitments and international law recognize Taiwan as part of China, warning that military involvement would be seen as aggression [7][8]. - Kishi's statements are viewed as a potential threat to Japan's peace constitution, raising concerns about the future of Japan's military policies [12]. Group 4: Economic Consequences - The article outlines potential negative impacts on Japan-China relations, which could harm trade and economic ties, as China is Japan's largest trading partner [11]. - Concerns are raised about the economic repercussions for Japan, including reduced trade and tourism from China, should relations deteriorate further due to Kishi's remarks [11][12]. - The article suggests that Kishi's aggressive rhetoric could lead to significant economic fallout for Japan, affecting its citizens directly [11].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's extreme remarks regarding China link the Taiwan issue with Japan's new security law, suggesting potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait [1] Group 1: Political Implications - Kishida's provocative statements aim to cater to Japan's right-wing forces and align with the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Strategy," seeking to break through the limitations of Japan's pacifist constitution and accelerate military expansion [1] - The remarks reflect a broader trend of rightward shift and systemic normalization of militarism in Japan [1] Group 2: Economic Impact - Deterioration of Sino-Japanese relations could directly impact Japan's economic lifeline, given the irreplaceable status of the Chinese market for Japan's economy [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that Japan's potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait would lead to disastrous consequences for both the Japanese people and the nation itself, including worsening regional security, the risk of becoming a battlefield, and a return to historical disgrace [1][5][7]. Summary by Sections Japan's Military Posture - Japan's recent military actions and rhetoric indicate a shift towards a more aggressive defense posture, including the potential for military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which contradicts its pacifist constitution [4][5]. - The Japanese government has been enhancing its military capabilities, including the development of offensive weapons and the establishment of military infrastructure across the country [5][6]. Risks of Military Intervention - If Japan pursues military intervention, it would exacerbate its surrounding security environment, leading to increased tensions with China and undermining constructive Sino-Japanese relations [6][7]. - The transformation of numerous airports and ports into dual-use military facilities poses a risk of turning Japan into a battlefield, as demonstrated by recent military exercises involving multiple locations [6][7]. Historical Context and Consequences - The article highlights the historical implications of Japan's military ambitions, warning that such actions could lead to a repeat of past militaristic behaviors that caused suffering in Asia [7]. - Japan's current leadership is criticized for ignoring historical lessons, with a warning that any reckless military engagement could provoke a strong response from China [7].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is reportedly considering a "re-examination" of Japan's long-standing "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," particularly the aspect concerning the non-introduction of nuclear weapons, raising concerns across various sectors in Japan [1][3]. Group 1: Policy Background - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," established by former Prime Minister Eisaku Satō in 1967, state that Japan will not possess, manufacture, or introduce nuclear weapons, forming a cornerstone of Japan's nuclear policy [3]. - The current government, under Kishida, is contemplating revisions to the National Security Strategy in 2026, which may include a reassessment of the non-introduction principle [3]. Group 2: Political Reactions - Opposition leader Yukio Edano criticized Kishida's remarks as "sudden and inappropriate," emphasizing the need for Japan to maintain a non-nuclear stance, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki [3]. - Several atomic bomb survivors expressed their inability to accept Kishida's views, labeling them as "extremely dangerous" and potentially provocative towards war [4]. Group 3: International Concerns - The Chinese Ministry of National Defense has previously warned that Japan's recent military actions, including increased defense spending and the development of long-range offensive capabilities, are moving away from its "peace constitution" and "self-defense" commitments, which raises alarms among nations historically affected by Japanese militarism [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the passing of former Japanese Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama at the age of 101, highlighting his significant contributions to Japanese politics and his stance on peace and historical reflection [3][5]. Group 1: Background and Political Career - Tomiichi Murayama was born in March 1924 in Oita Prefecture, Japan, and was first elected to the House of Representatives in 1972 [5]. - He served as Prime Minister in a coalition government formed by the Liberal Democratic Party, Social Democratic Party, and New Party Sakigake, taking office in June 1994 [5]. Group 2: Peace Advocacy and Historical Reflection - During his tenure, Murayama advocated for "dove politics" and the maintenance of Japan's pacifist constitution, promoting a peaceful national path [5]. - In August 1995, he delivered the "Murayama Statement" on the 50th anniversary of the victory over fascism, expressing deep remorse for Japan's colonial rule and aggression, which caused significant suffering, particularly in Asian countries [7]. - The statement emphasized the need for Japan to reflect on its past, reject self-righteous nationalism, and promote international cooperation, peace, and democracy [8].

Core Viewpoint - The 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was marked by protests against Japan's military expansion policies and calls for adherence to the peace constitution [1][2] Group 1: Protests and Public Sentiment - A large gathering of citizens took place at the Hiroshima bombing site, expressing strong concerns over Japan's ongoing military expansion and the implications of the Japan-U.S. alliance [1] - Protesters held signs with messages such as "The Japan-U.S. alliance is a war alliance" and "Prevent nuclear war," indicating widespread public anxiety regarding military policies [1] Group 2: Government Response - Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio reaffirmed Japan's commitment to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" during the memorial ceremony [1] - Hiroshima Mayor Matsui Kazumi emphasized the importance of remembering the nuclear bombing experience and inheriting the peace philosophy, although both officials did not address the historical context of the bombing [1]

Core Points - The 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was commemorated on August 6, with citizens expressing concerns over Japan's military expansion policies and calling for adherence to the peace constitution [1] - Protesters criticized the Japan-U.S. alliance as a "war alliance" and voiced strong worries about Japan's ongoing military buildup and nuclear sharing discussions [1] - Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Fumio reaffirmed Japan's commitment to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" during the ceremony, while Hiroshima's mayor emphasized the importance of remembering the nuclear bombing experience [1] Group 1 - The commemoration event attracted a large gathering of citizens who raised slogans against military expansion and nuclear warfare [1] - The organizing committee representative highlighted the increasing military budget and joint military exercises with the U.S. as steps away from the peace constitution [1] - The historical context of Japan's wartime actions and the suffering inflicted on other nations during World War II was notably absent from the official speeches [2]

Group 1 - The Japanese government has officially released the 2025 version of its Defense White Paper, labeling China as an "unprecedented largest strategic challenge" and accusing it of unilaterally changing the status quo with military strength [1] - The Chinese defense spokesperson criticized Japan for fabricating false narratives to justify its military expansion and for interfering in China's internal affairs, expressing strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition [1] - Japan's military actions, including significant increases in defense budgets and loosening weapon export restrictions, are seen as a serious violation of its "peace constitution" and pose a major challenge to peace in the Asia-Pacific region, raising concerns among neighboring countries and the international community [1] Group 2 - This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist war, as well as the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's return to China, which is considered a significant outcome of World War II and part of the post-war international order [2] - There is a call for Japan to learn from historical lessons, cease its negative portrayal of China, and adhere to the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan, particularly regarding commitments related to Taiwan, to promote healthy and stable development of bilateral relations [2]