记者从1月19日召开的全国检察长会议上了解到，针对环渤海地区入海河流污染、海域非法养殖等损害 公益问题，最高人民检察院直接以公益诉讼立案，推动协同保护治理。 据了解，检察机关坚持用最严密法治保障绿色发展。召开全国生态环境检察工作推进会。2025年1至11 月，起诉破坏生态环境资源犯罪2.95万人，办理公益诉讼4.5万件。与最高人民法院联合发布办理破坏黑 土地资源刑事案件司法解释，起诉非法占用农用地犯罪3842人。组织开展保护鸟类野生动物专项监督， 最高人民检察院会同公安部对4起严重破坏鸟类资源犯罪案件挂牌督办。扎实推进检察公益诉讼服务绿 色低碳发展监督活动。会同生态环境部、水利部等完善执法司法协作机制，加强长江、黄河、珠江等流 域生态环境司法保护。 来源：检察日报社 来源：检察日报正义网 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a public interest litigation action by the Wencheng Procuratorate in Henan Province, focusing on the recognition and maintenance of "Glorious Home" plaques for military families, addressing issues of damaged plaques and gaps in distribution for military school students [1][2]. Group 1 - The Wencheng Procuratorate discovered that many "Glorious Home" plaques were damaged or rusted, affecting the honor associated with military service [1]. - Some military school students' families were not receiving plaques due to administrative issues, leading to feelings of exclusion among these families [1]. - The Procuratorate filed a legal case to ensure that the management and distribution of the plaques were improved, recommending a comprehensive review and maintenance of the plaques [1]. Group 2 - By the end of November 2025, a total of 762 damaged plaques were replaced, and three families of military school students received their overdue plaques [2].

Core Insights - The Wuhan People's Procuratorate reported significant achievements in 2025, handling 73,700 cases and receiving recognition for 30 collectives and 49 individuals at the municipal level [1] Group 1: Economic and Business Environment - The Wuhan procuratorial authority processed 7,962 enterprise-related cases as part of the "Service Guarantee Support Point Construction" initiative, contributing to the establishment of a benchmark business environment in the country [2] - A total of 291 cases related to technological innovation were handled, emphasizing the protection of innovation entities and intellectual property rights, with 270 individuals prosecuted for intellectual property crimes [2] Group 2: Social Stability and Security - In 2025, the procuratorial authority arrested 9,494 individuals and prosecuted 14,448, including 132 for organized crime, demonstrating a commitment to maintaining national security and social stability [3] - The implementation of a leniency system for guilty pleas resulted in 87.1% of suspects voluntarily admitting guilt, with a year-on-year decrease of 24.9% in arrest reviews and 18.3% in prosecution reviews [3] Group 3: Public Welfare and Safety - The authority recovered 10.7 million yuan in unpaid wages, reflecting efforts to protect the rights of specific groups, including women and migrant workers [4][5] - A total of 342 individuals were prosecuted for crimes against minors, with a notable decrease in both the number of prosecutions and reviews for such crimes [5] Group 4: Legal Supervision and Public Interest - The Wuhan procuratorial authority handled 11,858 supervision cases, enhancing the oversight of criminal investigations and judicial processes [6] - A total of 995 public interest litigation cases were filed, with most issues resolved before litigation, showcasing the effectiveness of the public interest litigation system [6]

Group 1 - The Shijiahe site, a significant prehistoric settlement in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, was included in the first batch of important national archaeological sites in 2025, highlighting its cultural importance [1] - The Hubei Provincial Procuratorate initiated a public interest litigation supervision activity to protect the Shijiahe site, focusing on the preservation of the Yangtze culture [1] - Potential flood risks were identified at the site, prompting the Tianmen City Procuratorate to collaborate with experts for on-site assessments and to issue recommendations for river management to mitigate these risks [1] Group 2 - The Hanjiang City Procuratorate, under the guidance of the Hubei Provincial Procuratorate, has utilized civil, administrative, and public interest litigation functions to address illegal land occupation and other issues related to the Shijiahe site [2] - A cultural heritage protection database was established, including a list of 3 national and 27 provincial key cultural heritage units for dynamic supervision [2] - The newly passed Hubei Provincial Shijiahe Site Protection Regulations empower the procuratorate to propose legal actions against violations that threaten the site, reinforcing the legal framework for cultural heritage protection [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the role of public interest litigation in protecting the rights of workers, particularly focusing on the challenges faced by disabled delivery workers in Beijing and the collaborative efforts of legal and labor organizations to address these issues [1][2][4]. Group 1: Case Studies and Legal Actions - A public interest lawsuit was initiated by the Tongzhou District People's Procuratorate in response to complaints from disabled delivery workers about restrictions preventing them from riding into residential areas, which affected their ability to deliver on time and led to negative reviews [2][3]. - The collaboration between the Tongzhou District People's Procuratorate and the District Housing and Urban-Rural Development Committee resulted in over 460 residential communities allowing disabled riders to use electric bicycles for deliveries, along with the installation of NFC smart access systems for easier entry [3][4]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts and Regulatory Improvements - The article discusses the "Procuratorate + Trade Union" collaborative model, which has been effective in addressing labor rights issues, such as ensuring timely payment of wages and providing necessary protective equipment for workers in various industries [4][5]. - In a separate case, the Changping District People's Procuratorate identified the use of hazardous thermal paper by local businesses, leading to the provision of protective gear for over 8,000 workers and ongoing regulatory efforts to monitor the use of such materials [6]. Group 3: Advantages of Public Interest Litigation - Public interest litigation is positioned as a proactive approach to labor rights protection, focusing on systemic issues rather than individual disputes, thereby safeguarding the collective interests of workers [7][8]. - The use of big data models by the Beijing People's Procuratorate has enabled the identification of systemic risks in labor practices, such as irregularities in the establishment of special accounts for migrant workers' wages, leading to broader regulatory reforms [8].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Sponge City Experience Center in Kunshan serves as a practical educational tool for promoting ecological civilization and legal awareness through public interest litigation [1][2] Group 1: Sponge City Experience Center - The Sponge City Experience Center was officially opened in August, showcasing the achievements of sponge city construction and transforming the effectiveness of public interest litigation into a tangible legal education resource [1] - The center features an interactive area where visitors can experience the restoration of polluted rivers, making the results of legal construction more relatable and less abstract [2] Group 2: Public Interest Litigation Achievements - Kunshan's procuratorate has handled 130 cases of water pollution public interest litigation, recovering over 100 million yuan in ecological damage compensation and promoting the restoration of more than 30 polluted rivers [2] - The center aims to expand the understanding of public interest litigation from merely addressing pollution to promoting urban green development concepts, emphasizing the importance of legal protection and public participation in maintaining a clean environment [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes the importance of "justiciability" in enhancing the precision and standardization of public interest litigation, providing a clear direction for high-quality case handling [2] Group 1: Justiciability and Its Elements - The "justiciability" of public interest litigation is defined by four key elements: eligible litigation subjects, illegal acts, facts of public interest damage, and legal authorization [5][6] - Understanding the necessity of litigation is crucial for the development of public interest protection, reflecting the supervision and restriction of state power [3][4] Group 2: Unique Value of Prosecutorial Supervision - The core of prosecutorial public interest litigation is to protect public interest and the rights of the people, with litigation being a key mechanism for this function [4] - Litigation helps optimize judicial resource allocation by establishing clear procedural standards, allowing for effective resolution of disputes and minimizing waste of judicial resources [4][8] Group 3: Conditions for Litigation - The eligibility of litigation subjects is a critical condition for justiciability, ensuring that lawsuits are initiated legally and appropriately [5][6] - The nature of illegal acts must be accurately defined, focusing on whether administrative agencies have unlawfully exercised their powers or failed to act [6][7] Group 4: Strengthening the Foundation for Case Handling - The quality of public interest litigation is directly influenced by the precision and standardization of procedures, with a focus on thorough investigation and evidence collection [8][9] - Establishing a mechanism for evaluating justiciability can enhance the quality and efficiency of case handling [8][10] Group 5: Professional Empowerment and Capacity Building - The establishment of standards for high-quality public interest litigation cases and the implementation of comprehensive guidance are essential for improving case handling capabilities [10] - A focus on problem-oriented approaches and case-by-case evaluations can help address key issues in litigation requests and evidence integrity [10]

Core Viewpoint - The current labor dispute resolution mechanism is inadequate to address the complexities and volume of disputes arising from new employment forms, necessitating innovative approaches to protect workers' rights [1][3]. Group 1: Labor Dispute Challenges - The rise of new employment forms, heavily reliant on internet platforms, has led to significant differences in employment methods compared to traditional jobs, with algorithms playing a crucial role in management and performance evaluation [2][3]. - Judicial data indicates a sharp increase in labor disputes, with 648,000 cases accepted by courts from January to September 2025, marking a 37.5% year-on-year increase, reflecting the complexities of labor relations in new employment forms [2][3]. - The proportion of new employment-related disputes has risen from 7% in 2020 to 19% in 2023, highlighting the growing challenges in resolving these disputes effectively [3]. Group 2: Innovative Solutions and Legislative Proposals - The National Federation of Trade Unions and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have initiated various institutional innovations to protect workers' rights, including a multi-faceted dispute resolution mechanism involving unions, courts, and other legal entities [1][3][4]. - A proposal to establish a legal system for public interest litigation to protect workers' rights has been submitted, aiming to enhance the role of procuratorial bodies in addressing labor disputes and ensuring equal protection for all workers [3][4]. - In 2025, over 2,000 public interest litigation cases related to labor rights were handled, demonstrating the effectiveness of collaborative efforts between various legal and labor organizations [4]. Group 3: Policy Developments and Future Directions - The 20th Central Committee emphasized the need to strengthen labor rights protection and create a fair employment environment, leading to legislative discussions on including labor rights in public interest litigation laws [5][6]. - Recent reports indicate that as of October 2025, 2,325,000 new employment form workers have participated in pilot insurance programs, reflecting a significant step towards comprehensive social security for this demographic [6][7]. - The ongoing development of a comprehensive labor rights protection system for new employment forms is seen as a vital aspect of modern governance and a commitment to people-centered development [7].

Core Viewpoint - The newly passed "Hubei Province Shijiahe Site Protection Regulations" introduces a public interest litigation mechanism to protect cultural heritage, highlighting the importance of collaborative efforts in safeguarding historical sites [1] Group 1: Legislative Developments - The "Hubei Province Shijiahe Site Protection Regulations" was approved by the provincial people's congress on November 27, marking a significant step in heritage protection [1] - The regulations allow the prosecution to propose suggestions or initiate public interest lawsuits in cases of serious damage or risk to the Shijiahe site [1] Group 2: Site Significance - The Shijiahe site is recognized as the largest, highest-grade, and most well-preserved prehistoric urban settlement group in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, holding substantial historical, cultural, and archaeological value [1] Group 3: Challenges and Actions - Inspections revealed significant neglect at the site, including unaddressed excavation damage and unauthorized construction in protected areas [1] - The Hanjiang Procuratorate has initiated three administrative public interest litigation cases regarding illegal land occupation and unapproved construction activities at the site [1] Group 4: Collaborative Efforts - The Hanjiang Procuratorate has engaged experts from China University of Geosciences and provincial water conservancy specialists to assess flood risks and provide professional opinions on site protection [1] - The establishment of public interest litigation observation points has been advocated to enhance oversight and protection efforts [1] Group 5: Broader Impact - The Shijiahe site was included in the first national list of important major sites in 2025, becoming the first site in Hubei to receive provincial legislative protection [1] - The Hanjiang Procuratorate's efforts serve as a model for other local procuratorates, promoting the protection of cultural heritage across the region [1]

Group 1 - The core focus of the discussions was on enhancing judicial cooperation between China and ASEAN countries, particularly in criminal justice assistance, information sharing, and evidence collection [3][4]. - The Chinese delegation emphasized the importance of strengthening high-level visits and multilateral cooperation mechanisms to improve the quality and efficiency of criminal justice assistance [3][4]. - Thailand's experience in international judicial cooperation, especially in combating transnational drug and economic crimes, was highlighted as a model for collaboration with ASEAN countries [3][4]. Group 2 - Vietnam plans to initiate civil public interest litigation trials in early 2026, drawing on China's experiences in ecological and resource protection, which were shared during the discussions [5][6]. - The restructuring of Vietnam's prosecutorial system has led to challenges in professional capacity among prosecutors, prompting discussions on China's "general prosecutor" training model to enhance capabilities [6][7]. - Both countries expressed interest in collaborative training programs for prosecutors, with a focus on environmental protection and public interest litigation [7].