今天，社交平台上不少网友反映，自己的充电宝不允许带上飞机，网友分享的现场图片显示，成筐的旅客 充电宝在机场被拦下，"没有3C标志的都上不了飞机"。 26日，民航局发布紧急通知：禁止旅客携带无3C标识及被召回的充电宝乘坐境内航班。 日前，为切实保障航空运行安全，民航局发布紧急通知， 自6月28日起禁止旅客携带没有3C标识、3C标 识不清晰、被召回型号或批次的充电宝乘坐境内航班。 据悉，今年以来，旅客携带的充电宝等锂电池产品机上起火冒烟事件多发。 近期多个头部品牌充电宝厂 家因电芯存在安全风险对多批次产品实施召回，国家市场监管总局撤销或暂停了多个充电宝及电池芯厂家 3C认证，上述情况表明旅客随身携带的充电宝存在安全质量隐患，给民航安全运行带来的风险持续增 大。 对此，民航局决定在现行政策基础上，按照国际通行的《危险物品安全航空运输技术细则》，进一 步采取严格的管控措施，并要求民航相关单位加强组织、做好宣传告知、严格查验、改进服务、做好应急 准备等工作。 通知要求，各航司及其代理人应加强对充电宝起火冒烟事件的警示宣传，让更多旅客了解相关产品的安全 风险和管控政策，积极引导旅客不携带不合格充电宝乘机。 各机场要充分利 ...

来源：中国航天报 日前，为切实保障航空运行安全，民航局发布紧急通知， 自6月28日起禁止旅客携带没有3C标识、3C标 识不清晰、被召回型号或批次的充电宝乘坐境内航班。 据悉，今年以来，旅客携带的充电宝等锂电池产品机上起火冒烟事件多发。 近期多个头部品牌充电宝厂 家因电芯存在安全风险对多批次产品实施召回，国家市场监管总局撤销或暂停了多个充电宝及电池芯厂家 3C认证，上述情况表明旅客随身携带的充电宝存在安全质量隐患，给民航安全运行带来的风险持续增 大。 对此，民航局决定在现行政策基础上，按照国际通行的《危险物品安全航空运输技术细则》，进一 步采取严格的管控措施，并要求民航相关单位加强组织、做好宣传告知、严格查验、改进服务、做好应急 准备等工作。 通知要求，各航司及其代理人应加强对充电宝起火冒烟事件的警示宣传，让更多旅客了解相关产品的安全 风险和管控政策，积极引导旅客不携带不合格充电宝乘机。 各机场要充分利用广播、动态显示屏等形 式，在安检通道、值机柜台等醒目位置张贴宣传资料或增加提示环节，多场景密集宣传携带充电宝乘机安 全风险及管控政策。 通知强调，各机场安检部门要加强对旅客随身携带充电宝查验，严防旅客携带不合格 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) has issued an emergency notice prohibiting passengers from carrying non-compliant power banks on domestic flights due to safety risks associated with lithium battery products [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Starting June 28, passengers are banned from bringing power banks without 3C certification, unclear 3C labels, or recalled models on domestic flights [1]. - The CAAC has decided to implement stricter control measures based on international guidelines for the safe transport of dangerous goods [1][2]. - Airlines and related entities are required to enhance awareness and communication regarding the safety risks of power banks [2]. Group 2: Safety Incidents - There have been multiple incidents of power banks overheating and causing smoke in-flight, leading to emergency interventions by flight crews [4]. - Notable incidents include a power bank smoking on a flight from Zhoushan to Jieyang on June 13, and another incident involving a camera battery and power bank on a flight from Hangzhou to Shenzhen on May 31 [4]. - The French aviation accident investigation agency linked a fire incident on a flight from Hangzhou to Hong Kong to a power bank overheating, specifically identifying a Romoss brand device [4]. Group 3: Manufacturer Responses - Major brands like Anker Innovations and Romoss have issued recalls due to safety concerns with their power banks, with Anker recalling 710,000 units in China and 1.158 million in the U.S., while Romoss recalled 490,000 units domestically [4].

Core Points - The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) voted to approve the final investigation report on the Boeing door latch incident, highlighting insufficient employee training, guidance, and oversight by Boeing, as well as regulatory failures by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) [2][3] - The incident involved a Boeing 737 MAX 9 operated by Alaska Airlines, where a door latch fell off shortly after takeoff due to missing bolts that should have secured it [2] - The NTSB chair stated that the safety deficiencies leading to the incident were preventable and should have been obvious to both Boeing and the FAA, indicating a systemic failure [2] Summary by Sections Incident Details - On January 5, 2024, a Boeing 737 MAX 9 operated by Alaska Airlines experienced a door latch drop shortly after takeoff, with four bolts missing that were supposed to secure the latch [2] - The aircraft was delivered to Alaska Airlines only about two months prior to the incident [2] Findings on Boeing - The investigation found that Boeing failed to provide adequate training, guidance, and oversight to ensure manufacturing personnel consistently followed proper procedures [2] - The missing bolts likely caused the door latch to loosen during previous flights before ultimately falling off [2] Findings on FAA - The report criticized the FAA for its lack of effective compliance oversight and audit planning, which failed to identify and ensure Boeing addressed issues related to its parts removal processes [3] - The FAA acknowledged the report and stated that it has fundamentally changed its regulatory approach to Boeing since the incident, committing to stronger oversight [3] Company Responses - Boeing expressed regret over the incident and committed to improving safety and quality across all its operations [3]

Core Viewpoint - The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has concluded that both Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) failed in their responsibilities, leading to a door detachment incident involving a Boeing aircraft in January 2024, which could have been avoided [1] Summary by Relevant Categories Company Accountability - Boeing was found to be inactive in addressing unauthorized production operations that had been identified in various internal audits, reports, quality alerts, and regulatory compliance issues [1] - The NTSB Chairman, Jennifer Homendy, emphasized that Boeing should have recognized the safety deficiencies that contributed to the incident [1] Regulatory Oversight - The FAA was also criticized for its inadequate oversight, which allowed the safety issues to persist without proper intervention [1] - The investigation highlighted a lack of effective regulatory measures that could have prevented the accident [1]

Core Points - The crash of an Air India flight shortly after takeoff resulted in 279 fatalities, marking it as the deadliest aviation disaster in the last decade [2][11][27] - The aircraft involved was a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which had been in service for 11.5 years, and this incident represents the first fatal accident for this model since its introduction in 2011 [3][14] - The crash has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and regulatory standards of the Indian aviation industry, which has been experiencing rapid growth [5][27][35] Group 1: Incident Details - The flight, AI171, crashed just one minute after takeoff from Ahmedabad Airport, with the last signal received at 13:39 local time [7][8] - The aircraft was carrying 242 people, including 230 passengers and 12 crew members, with only one survivor [9][12] - The crash site was located 1.2 kilometers from the airport, impacting a densely populated residential area [8][9] Group 2: Investigation and Safety Concerns - Investigations are ongoing, focusing on potential engine failure, flap issues, and landing gear configuration, with the involvement of multiple aviation authorities [20][19] - The aircraft's black boxes have been recovered and will be analyzed in the U.S. for data extraction [22] - The incident has prompted a comprehensive review of the safety protocols and maintenance practices within Air India and the broader Indian aviation sector [33][34][38] Group 3: Impact on Air India and the Aviation Industry - Air India, which has been expanding its fleet and operations, faces scrutiny regarding its safety record and operational practices following the crash [5][27][35] - The airline has canceled over 80 flights in the aftermath of the incident, leading to increased passenger anxiety and operational disruptions [16][17] - Despite recent improvements in financial performance, the crash has cast a shadow over Air India's growth plans and reputation, with ongoing concerns about service quality and operational reliability [30][32][35] Group 4: Broader Implications for Boeing - Boeing's stock price fell significantly following the crash, reflecting investor concerns about the safety of the 787 model and the company's reputation [13][14] - The incident adds to Boeing's challenges, as it has been dealing with ongoing scrutiny over safety practices and previous incidents involving other aircraft models [41][46] - The crash has reignited discussions about the overall safety culture within Boeing and the need for stringent quality control measures [44][46]

Group 1 - The Civil Aviation Northwest Administration held a special safety committee meeting to address recent safety operations in the Northwest aviation sector, focusing on identifying key risk points and enhancing safety measures for the summer season [1][2] - The meeting emphasized the need for all units and departments to elevate their awareness and responsiveness to safety issues, aligning with the speech of the Civil Aviation Administration Director regarding the current complex safety situation [1] - Key risk prevention measures were highlighted, including bird strikes, foreign object damage, and lightning strikes, along with the optimization of response mechanisms for adverse weather conditions [1][2] Group 2 - The meeting called for a thorough understanding and implementation of the Civil Aviation Administration's warning content, with increased oversight on safety risk management in local enterprises [2] - Strategies were to be developed to address risks associated with summer and severe weather conditions, ensuring effective management of various operational risks [2] - The meeting also encouraged the preparation for a skills competition for incident investigation, aiming to enhance the professional capabilities of investigators in the aviation sector [2]

当天，一架客机在位于韩国全罗南道的务安机场着陆时，偏离跑道后撞上机场围墙。 韩国警方对15名济州航空空难事故相关责任人立案调查。 韩国全罗南道警察厅济州航空客机事故调查本部21日通报，已对国土交通部、韩国机场公社、混凝土天线墙设 施相关企业人士等15人，以业务过失致死伤嫌疑进行立案调查。 警方将根据过失责任的重大程度决定是否对相关责任人申请拘捕令。 这15人分别是负责机场管制业务、鸟类预防业务、混凝土天线墙设施建设相关业务的人员，他们涉嫌在各自的 职位上没有尽到注意义务。特别是，在务安国际机场跑道尽头设置混凝土结构的天线墙设施，属于严重的违规 行为；鸟类预防业务负责人在事故发生前没有充分观察鸟类的动向和移动路径等，也没有告知事故客机机长。 根据韩国国土交通部的相关规定，如果观察到机场周边有鸟群的动向，管制员至少要向机长提供15分钟以上有 关鸟群规模和移动方向等方面的信息。 此前，已有国土交通部长官、济州航空公司代表、韩国机场公社代表等人被遇难者遗属起诉而立案调查，截至 目前，共有24人因涉空难事故被立案调查。 179人遇难 2人幸存 韩国当地时间2024年12月29日，由泰国曼谷起飞的韩国济州航空7C2216 ...

6月16日，江西航空于RY8821航班及南昌昌北国际机场会客厅开展"人人讲安全个个会应急——查找身 边安全隐患"主题活动，旨在进一步提升广大旅客安全意识，助力旅客平安顺畅出行。 安全知识"看得见" "安全带如何正确扣紧？应急出口的使用方法是什么？"客舱机组现场演示机上安全设备操作，用专业讲 解让旅客直观了解飞行安全要点。旅客们纷纷"前排围观"，这才发现安全演示里藏着这么多"冷知识"。 安全知识"学得会" "今年六月是我国第几个安全生产月？""飞机起飞前为何要调直座椅靠背？"抢答环节中，旅客们举手速 度堪比"职业选手"，答对的幸运旅客收到了来自江西航空的精美礼物。 安全隐患"找得到" 此次活动最精彩的环节非"隐患排查"莫属！旅客们对照《安全须知》和《航空安全知识》手册，在身边 寻找不利于飞行安全的场景或行为。"也许是一个未固定的行李箱，也许是一条搭在应急出口的围巾， 又或是一个充电宝的错误存放位置……"每一个发现，都是对飞行安全的认真守护！回答正确的旅客被 乘务组点赞"安全意识满分"。 安全教育"接地气" 在江西航空机场会客厅内循环播放着安全教育视频，视频内容生动形象、丰富详实，涵盖安全生产政策 法规解读、常见 ...

近日，有网友发布视频称，"此前在搭乘厦航MF8229航班时，发现有乘客多次摘下口罩吸食电子烟。"6 月19日，厦航官方客服向南都记者表示，"飞机上吸食电子烟是被绝对禁止的，这确实是属于非常严重 的安全问题，厦航对该情况非常重视，会交由上级部门去调查核实。"南都记者注意到，曾有乘客在飞 机上吸电子烟被处以治安处罚。 该客服还表示，《民用航空安全保卫条例》《公共航空旅客运输飞行中安全保卫工作规则》等相关法律 明确有规定，在航空器上吸烟（含电子香烟），属于扰乱行为。机上有烟雾探测器，如果触发警报或造 成更严重的后果，航司会追究乘客本人的刑事责任。 南都记者注意到，四川省泸州市公安局曾公布了一个飞机上吸食电子烟的真实案例，在一架从拉萨飞往 泸州的航班上，一位女乘客偷偷拿出电子烟吸食，空乘人员发现后要求其交出电子烟。涉事女乘客被泸 州机场公安处以治安处罚。该局指出，这类行为有可能面临15日以下的治安拘留，5000元以下的罚款， 构成犯罪的将会被依法追究刑事责任。 （文章来源：南方都市报） 网友发布的视频截图。 此前曝光于网络的视频显示，一位坐飞机靠窗座位上的男乘客手拿一支形状似电子烟的物品，回头看了 一眼后，扯下口罩放 ...