全链条监管

Search documents
针对旅拍、沉浸式体验、水上运动等存在的问题 一些地方出台举措 规范文旅业态 让暑期游玩更安心(民生一线)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-08-18 22:12
核心阅读 暑期,文旅市场生机蓬勃,多元文旅业态持续点燃游客的游玩热情。然而在热闹背后,低价套路、占道 经营、监管盲区、安全隐患等问题不仅影响游客体验,还不利于文旅产业的高质量发展。让游玩舒心尽 兴,让期待不落空,是游客的心声,更考验着治理的智慧。 本想用旅拍记录旅途美好,最后成了糟心的维权拉锯战;密室逃脱等沉浸式体验活动拉动文旅消费,同 时"任性发展"给监管带来难题;海上卡丁船、海上飞人、游船出海……水上运动紧张刺激,却存在不少 安全隐患。如何规范文旅业态,让暑期游玩更安心? 旅拍 分区管控与预约限流并行 暑期,浙江杭州市民陈欣蔚被外地景点附近一家旅拍工作室的"299元古城写真套餐"吸引,拍摄过程 中,摄影师不断引导她加钱升级服装和道具。最终高达1800元的账单,让她越想越气。 同时,其他游客旅游体验也被影响——摄影师霸占着绝佳拍照位置让别人"无照可拍",一行人大包小包 挡在路上,影响正常通行…… 旅拍如何规范管理?谁来守护游客的合法权益、保障游客的旅游体验?在浙江,一些景区已经开始探 索。 2023年,杭州西溪湿地景区率先出台《商业拍摄管理须知》,将拍摄区域划分为免费区和收费区,实行 预约制和限流管理。 沉 ...
提升尾气治理成效需全链条“打假”
Zhong Guo Huan Jing Bao· 2025-07-16 00:14
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the importance of strict regulation and accountability in the vehicle exhaust emission testing industry, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to tackle fraudulent practices across all related sectors [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - An environmental department discovered that a vehicle emission testing company issued a false compliance report for a heavy diesel truck lacking a catalytic converter, which is essential for exhaust purification [1]. - The investigation revealed that the truck owner had received a substandard exhaust pipe replacement from a repair shop, which did not contain a catalytic converter [1]. - The environmental authorities took action against the testing company and traced the issue back to the manufacturer of the defective exhaust pipes, leading to investigations and penalties for all involved parties [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Recommendations - The article suggests establishing a robust information-sharing and enforcement mechanism among regulatory bodies to ensure comprehensive oversight of all links in the vehicle exhaust management chain [2]. - It emphasizes the need for coordinated efforts to address multi-link fraudulent activities, ensuring that any violations are thoroughly investigated from all angles [2]. - The use of media for public exposure of fraudulent practices is recommended to deter potential offenders and promote awareness among industry participants about the consequences of engaging in deceitful activities [2].
全链条监管!上半年64家券商收超200张罚单,剑指投行、经纪业务“痼疾”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-07-07 00:05
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the intensified regulatory scrutiny on the brokerage industry in the first half of 2025, with over 200 penalties issued to 64 brokerages, indicating a robust regulatory framework focusing on both institutions and individuals [1][2][3] - The "dual penalty" system, which penalizes both institutions and individuals for violations, has become a norm, aiming to enhance internal management and compliance within brokerages [1][3] - There has been a notable increase in penalties against key executives within brokerage firms, reflecting a shift towards holding senior management accountable for compliance failures [1][2] Group 2 - The regulatory approach has evolved to a comprehensive oversight of the entire investment banking process, with specific focus on due diligence and internal controls, as evidenced by multiple penalties issued for inadequate practices [2][3] - The enforcement of stricter internal control measures is expected to drive the industry towards a healthier development ecosystem, with leading brokerages needing to enhance their compliance and risk management practices [3][4] - The ongoing issues of employee misconduct in brokerage firms, particularly in trading activities, highlight the need for improved internal controls and compliance training [4][5] Group 3 - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has proposed revisions to the classification evaluation regulations for securities companies, emphasizing a "strike hard" approach to major violations, which could impact the market reputation and operational capabilities of non-compliant firms [5] - The adjustments in penalty scoring systems aim to create a clearer distinction between compliant and non-compliant firms, thereby enhancing market fairness and investor confidence [5]
我省在全国首推校园大宗食材电子化追溯管理
Liao Ning Ri Bao· 2025-07-06 01:15
Group 1 - The province has implemented a comprehensive electronic traceability management system for bulk food ingredients in schools, becoming the first in the country to do so [1][2] - As of the spring semester, over 3.023 million traceability records have been generated, with a school cafeteria system application rate of 51.88%, and 82.95% for primary and secondary schools [1] - The traceability management system aims to ensure the safety of food served to students by tracking the source, destination, and quality of food ingredients [1][2] Group 2 - The traceability management system includes four main entities: producers, purchasers, suppliers, and sellers of food products, as well as all school cafeterias and external catering units [2] - Key food products under traceability include vegetables, livestock, aquatic products, and pre-packaged foods like rice, flour, oil, and milk [2] - The system utilizes the "Food Safety Liaoning Code" throughout the procurement process in school cafeterias to ensure compliance and safety [2] Group 3 - All 48 agricultural wholesale markets in the province have adopted the "Food Safety Liaoning - Food Quality Safety Traceability System," achieving 100% electronic records for sellers and safety agreements [3] - The traceability system is supported by a mechanism that combines "certificates of conformity" with traceability to ensure comprehensive management [3] - Electronic documentation for food safety, including inspection reports and certificates, is being implemented to facilitate the traceability of food ingredients [3]
整治车检乱象当“蛇打七寸”
Guang Zhou Ri Bao· 2025-05-27 07:09
Core Insights - The investigation reveals rampant fraud in vehicle emissions testing, with third-party testing agencies engaging in deceptive practices to profit from falsified data [1][2] - The existence of a complete gray industry chain for emissions cheating, involving both hardware and software, allows for easy manipulation of vehicle data [1] - Current anti-cheating technologies are inadequate, and the penalties for violations are insufficient to deter fraudulent activities [2] Group 1: Emissions Testing Fraud - Numerous third-party testing agencies are found to be cheating by providing "guaranteed pass" services, often using OBD spoofing devices to falsify vehicle emissions data [1] - A specific case highlighted involved 13,000 identical OBD codes, indicating a lack of scrutiny in the testing process [1] - The shift of some agencies from merely assisting in fraud to actively profiting from it raises concerns about the integrity of vehicle emissions testing [1] Group 2: Challenges in Regulation - The current OBD system has vulnerabilities, such as inadequate anti-tampering features and a lack of real-time data upload mechanisms, which facilitate cheating [2] - The low cost of illegal gains compared to the penalties for violations leads to a lack of deterrence for fraudulent practices [2] - A multi-regional approach is necessary to combat the widespread nature of emissions testing fraud effectively [2] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Immediate upgrades to testing equipment's anti-tampering capabilities are essential, including the promotion of OBD anti-rewriting features and pollution control device tampering alarms [2] - Establishing a comprehensive regulatory framework that includes stricter qualification standards for testing agencies and a blacklist system for fraudulent entities is crucial [2] - Enhanced collaboration among various departments and the establishment of a joint enforcement mechanism are vital for effective emissions regulation [3]
湖北66条举措全链条守护“舌尖上的安全”
Chang Jiang Shang Bao· 2025-05-12 23:33
Core Viewpoint - The newly passed Hubei Provincial Agricultural Product Quality Safety Regulations aims to enhance the safety and quality of agricultural products, ensuring a comprehensive regulatory framework from production to consumption, effective from October 1, 2025 [1][2]. Regulatory Framework - The regulations consist of 9 chapters and 66 articles, covering aspects such as production, sales, quality promotion, and supervision of agricultural products [1]. - The regulations emphasize the need for collaborative supervision among various departments to ensure food safety and quality [2][4]. Supervision Mechanisms - Hubei's market supervision and agricultural departments have issued notifications to implement a system for market access based on the quality of agricultural products, ensuring that only compliant products enter the market [3]. - A focus on establishing rapid testing laboratories and conducting 580,000 batches of supervisory rapid tests annually aims to identify and prevent unsafe agricultural products from reaching consumers [3]. Responsibility and Accountability - The regulations clarify the responsibilities of producers and operators in ensuring agricultural product quality, with specific obligations outlined for different stakeholders [5][6]. - A tiered responsibility system is established to enhance accountability, with strict penalties for violations related to agricultural inputs and product quality [6][7]. Government Coordination - The regulations mandate that local governments are responsible for agricultural product quality safety, with a requirement to allocate budget for improving regulatory conditions and capabilities [7]. - Collaboration among agricultural, forestry, market supervision, and law enforcement departments is essential to maintain the safety of agricultural products [7].
从农田到餐桌:全链条治理食品添加剂,守护舌尖上的安全
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-05-11 03:30
Core Viewpoint - The misuse of food additives has become a significant concern for consumers, prompting the Chinese government to implement a comprehensive governance plan to address the issue across the entire food supply chain [1][3]. Group 1: Governance Actions - The State Council's food safety office and six other departments have issued a comprehensive governance plan to combat the misuse of food additives [1]. - The plan includes strict enforcement against illegal practices in agricultural production, management of chemical products, and enhanced customs inspections for imported food additives [3]. - Market regulatory authorities will enforce strict supervision over the production, sale, and use of food additives, including penalties for exceeding permissible limits [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Focus Areas - The governance action emphasizes a full-chain and full-process supervision approach, from agricultural production to food consumption [5]. - Inspections will focus on key production areas, including raw material storage and production processes, ensuring compliance with supplier management and ingredient verification [5]. - Specific attention will be given to the food production sector, where certain food categories, such as canned goods and baked products, are prohibited from using preservatives [7]. Group 3: Prohibited Substances - In the food service sector, there are strict prohibitions against the use of certain harmful substances, including industrial oxalic acid, nitrite preservatives, and illegal additives like poppy husk [7]. - Regulatory bodies are actively encouraging food service businesses to verify the safety and compliance of their food additives [7]. Group 4: Proper Use of Additives - Food additives are not inherently harmful; their safety depends on correct usage and adherence to specified limits [9]. - Each food additive is required to indicate its permissible food categories and maximum allowable amounts, with misuse defined as exceeding these limits [9].