新华社北京11月23日电（记者阚静文 熊茂伶 赵家淞）在埃及首都开罗西南的吉萨金字塔不远处，有一幢名为"米纳饭店"的历史建筑。1943 年11月22日至26日，中国、美国和英国三国政府首脑在这里召开开罗会议，讨论对日作战问题，签署了《开罗宣言》。 《开罗宣言》于1943年12月1日正式发表，是世界反法西斯战争的重大成果，明确确认了中国对台湾的主权，为国际社会确立战后国际秩序奠 定了重要基础。 本月21日和22日，中国外交部发言人连续两天在例行记者会上提及《开罗宣言》，批驳日本首相高市早苗的涉台错误言论以及扩军危险行径。 多国人士指出，高市一系列错误言行践踏《开罗宣言》等"永不可逾越的历史红线"，严重违背国际法和国际关系基本准则，挑战战后国际秩 序，必将走向失败结局。 红线早已划下 《开罗宣言》明确规定，日本将窃取于中国的领土，包括台湾和澎湖列岛归还中国。1945年，中美英三国发表、苏联后来加入的《波茨坦公 告》，重申"开罗宣言之条件必将实施"。同年9月，日本签署《日本投降条款》，承诺"忠诚履行波茨坦公告各项规定之义务"。 国际社会公认，这些具有国际法效力的文件为二战后中国收复被日本军国主义掠夺和窃取的领土提供 ...

坦桑尼亚媒体人 穆巴利：高市的错误言论不仅具有挑衅性，而且标志着日本同支撑中日双边关系半个多世纪的法律政治框架背道而驰。她公然违背了 一个中国原则，而这一原则已是国际社会公认的共识。 意大利法学家 法比奥·马尔切利：高市的错误言论令人不安，非常危险。更广泛地说，它正在威胁以国家间和平共处为基础的《联合国宪章》体系。高 市的错误言论有悖于日本过去立场，非常令人担忧，是完全不可接受的。一方面它违反了国际法，另一方面也违背了包括日本民众在内的所有人对和平的共 同愿望。 南非国会议员 西利兹·孟亚：众所周知，高市发表错误言论不是为了和平，而是进行挑衅并制造不稳定。作为南非执政党非国大成员和国会议员，我们 坚决支持多边主义与和平。 0:00 日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，引发多方批评。国际人士表示，日本首相高市早苗的错误言论不负责任，违反国际法，威胁地区和平，给 全球局势增加不稳定因素，可能引发严重后果。 智利前驻华大使 贺乔治：高市的错误言论无益于当前局势。无论是在亚洲，尤其在东亚，还是在更广泛的全球范围内。世界如今已经处于多重危机之 中，高市此番"突如其来"的错误言论，为本已复杂和令人忧心的局势增添了新的 ...

日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，引发多方批评。国际人士表示，日本首相高市早苗的错误言论不负责任，违反 国际法，威胁地区和平，给全球局势增加不稳定因素，可能引发严重后果。 南非国会议员 西利兹·孟亚：众所周知，高市发表错误言论不是为了和平，而是进行挑衅并制造不稳定。作为南非执政党非 国大成员和国会议员，我们坚决支持多边主义与和平。 坦桑尼亚媒体人 穆巴利：高市的错误言论不仅具有挑衅性，而且标志着日本同支撑中日双边关系半个多世纪的法律政治框 架背道而驰。她公然违背了一个中国原则，而这一原则已是国际社会公认的共识。 西班牙国际政治学家 费尔南多·莫拉贡：首先日本需要采取非军事化的政策，也就是说，需要维持对外的友好往来。因为这 也符合日本的根本利益，日本需要将中国视作重要贸易伙伴，同时也要和韩国和东南亚各国维持和平往来，不再重复历史上 犯过的错误。 智利前驻华大使 贺乔治：高市的错误言论无益于当前局势。无论是在亚洲，尤其在东亚，还是在更广泛的全球范围内。世 界如今已经处于多重危机之中，高市此番"突如其来"的错误言论，为本已复杂和令人忧心的局势增添了新的不稳定因素。 意大利法学家 法比奥·马尔切利：高市的错误言 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a serious violation of international law and a challenge to China's core interests [1]. Group 1 - The letter from China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, addresses Kishida's statements made in the Japanese Diet, marking the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan issues with Japan's collective self-defense [1]. - Fu Cong emphasizes that Kishida's comments represent a dangerous escalation, threatening China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and constitute a blatant provocation against the Chinese people and nations that suffered from Japanese aggression [1]. - The letter asserts that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, and China will firmly exercise its right to self-defense as per the UN Charter and international law [1]. Group 2 - The letter will be distributed as an official document of the UN General Assembly to all member states, highlighting the significance of the issue on an international platform [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that China's permanent representative to the United Nations, Fu Cong, expressed strong opposition to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a challenge to China's core interests [2][3] - Fu Cong emphasized that Kishida's statements represent the first time since Japan's defeat in 1945 that a Japanese leader has openly linked Taiwan issues with Japan's collective self-defense, indicating a dangerous ambition for military intervention [2][3] - The article highlights that Kishida's comments violate international law and the basic principles of international relations, undermining the post-war international order and provoking the Chinese people and nations that suffered from Japanese aggression [3] Group 2 - The article asserts that Taiwan is an integral part of China, and the resolution of the Taiwan issue is a matter for the Chinese people alone, with no external interference tolerated [3] - It warns that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, and China would firmly exercise its right to self-defense as granted by the United Nations Charter and international law [3] - Fu Cong called for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities as a defeated nation in World War II and to adhere to its political commitments regarding Taiwan, urging Japan to cease provocative actions and retract its erroneous statements [3]

Core Points - The letter from China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, addresses provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida regarding Taiwan, marking a significant escalation in rhetoric since Japan's defeat in 1945 [1][2] - Fu Cong emphasizes that Kishida's statements represent a serious violation of international law and threaten the post-war international order, provoking both the Chinese people and nations that suffered from Japanese aggression [2] Group 1 - Fu Cong's letter will be distributed as an official UN document to all member states, highlighting China's strong stance against Japan's remarks [1] - Kishida's comments are described as the first instance of a Japanese leader openly linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's security, indicating a potential military involvement in Taiwan issues [1] - The letter expresses China's firm opposition to Japan's refusal to retract its statements despite multiple protests from China [1] Group 2 - Fu Cong asserts that Taiwan is an integral part of China, and any foreign interference in resolving Taiwan issues is unacceptable [2] - The letter warns that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, and China would exercise its right to self-defense as per the UN Charter and international law [2] - Fu Cong calls for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities as a defeated nation in World War II and to adhere to its political commitments regarding Taiwan [2]

Core Points - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks have faced widespread criticism domestically [1] - Professor Satoshi Fukasaku from Takushoku University described Takaichi's comments as reckless and an interference in the Taiwan issue, highlighting serious concerns [1] Summary by Category Political Implications - Takaichi's statements are seen as inappropriate given her position as the highest leader of the Self-Defense Forces, which raises questions about the rationale behind such remarks [1] - The sudden deviation from Japan's historically cautious stance on sensitive issues has left many perplexed [1] Legal Concerns - From an international law perspective, Takaichi's comments may violate the Japan-China Joint Communiqué, which outlines Japan's position on sensitive matters [1] - The remarks could also contravene the Japan-China Peace and Friendship Treaty, indicating significant legal implications [1] - The involvement in the Taiwan issue is viewed as a breach of bilateral agreements and political documents, leading to understandable criticism from China [1]

日本首相高市早苗的错误言论在日本国内遭到广泛批评。日本拓殖大学的教授富坂聪表示，高市早苗的发言轻率越界，是对台湾问题的干涉，存在严重问 题。 日本拓殖大学海外事情研究所教授 富坂聪：从国际法角度来说，这次发言的问题非常严重，它有可能违背《中日联合声明》中明确写明的日本立场，不仅 是《中日联合声明》，之后的《中日和平友好条约》。从这个意义上来说，中国方面提出质疑完全不奇怪。因为内容明显涉及对台湾问题的干涉，从双边协 议、政治文件的角度评价，此次发言存在相当严重的问题。 责编：秦雅楠、侯兴川 富坂聪表示，从国际法角度上来看，高市早苗的言论存在严重问题。 0:00 日本拓殖大学海外事情研究所教授 富坂聪：高市发言不仅是欠妥的，日本首相同时也是自卫队的最高领导，以这种身份对极为敏感的问题作出如此轻率的 发言，显然是不恰当的。日本历届内阁始终保持谨慎，此次突然越界式的表述，实在是让人无法理解，看不出合理的动机，因此坦率地说令人困惑。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the growing tensions within the EU regarding financial support for Ukraine, particularly the skepticism surrounding Ukraine's ability to repay its debts totaling €160 billion [2][3] - France and Italy have expressed strong opposition to using frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine, raising concerns about the legality and potential financial repercussions for the EU [3][4] - The article emphasizes that while G7 nations publicly support Ukraine, they are reluctant to provide financial assistance, leaving the EU to shoulder the burden alone [3][4] Group 2 - Luxembourg's Prime Minister pointed out the legal impracticality of directly seizing Russian assets, indicating a lack of viable solutions for funding Ukraine's needs [4] - The article discusses the rising discontent among EU citizens regarding financial aid to Ukraine, especially in light of increasing domestic costs, such as heating expenses in Germany [4] - The call for a more unified and actionable response from G7 countries is underscored, suggesting that mere verbal support is insufficient to address the escalating financial crisis in Ukraine [4]

格隆汇11月19日｜据CCTV国际时讯，日本首相高市早苗近期涉台错误言论的恶劣影响仍在持续，日本 龙谷大学教授松岛泰胜表示，高市早苗的言论违反日本宪法以及国际法，日方必须尽早撤回错误发言， 降低恶劣影响。 ...