来源：新华社 俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃13日表示，欧盟非法冻结俄罗斯资产，俄方将迅速采取回应 举措。 扎哈罗娃在俄外交部官网当天发布的答记者问中表示，未经俄罗斯联邦同意处置俄方主权 资产，无论是无限期冻结、没收，还是试图将事实上的没收包装成某种"赔偿贷款"，都是 绝对非法的行为，严重违反国际法。 "我们的回应不会迟迟到来。"扎哈罗娃说，俄罗斯中央银行已于12日就此事发表详细声 明。具体措施正在实施中。 俄罗斯央行1 2日说，已在莫斯科仲裁法院对存管大量俄被冻结资产的欧洲清算银行提起诉 讼，要求赔偿相关损失。 扎哈罗娃说，欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩及其同僚正不惜一切代价，破坏和平解决乌克兰危 机的努力。因此，欧盟才会如此迅速地作出关于俄罗斯资产的决定，直接打击美国总统特 朗普提出的"和平协议"。 她说，欧盟无力弥补其此类行为造成的损害。这些损害不仅会体现在欧盟自身金融和经济 体系上，也会体现在其曾经作为可靠的贸易和投资伙伴的全球声誉上。此类行为在国际关 系中必将招致后果。 欧盟理事会1 2日发表的一份声明显示，欧盟决定无限期冻结俄罗斯在欧盟的资产。这为欧 盟动用俄被冻结资产资助乌克兰扫除了一大障碍。而在该决定出台 ...

扎哈罗娃说，欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩及其同僚正不惜一切代价，破坏和平解决乌克兰危机的努力。因 此，欧盟才会如此迅速地作出关于俄罗斯资产的决定，直接打击美国总统特朗普提出的"和平协议"。 俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃13日表示，欧盟非法冻结俄罗斯资产，俄方将迅速采取回应举措。 扎哈罗娃在俄外交部官网当天发布的答记者问中表示，未经俄罗斯联邦同意处置俄方主权资产，无论是 无限期冻结、没收，还是试图将事实上的没收包装成某种"赔偿贷款"，都是绝对非法的行为，严重违反 国际法。 "我们的回应不会迟迟到来。"扎哈罗娃说，俄罗斯中央银行已于12日就此事发表详细声明。具体措施正 在实施中。 俄罗斯央行12日说，已在莫斯科仲裁法院对存管大量俄被冻结资产的欧洲清算银行提起诉讼，要求赔偿 相关损失。 她说，欧盟无力弥补其此类行为造成的损害。这些损害不仅会体现在欧盟自身金融和经济体系上，也会 体现在其曾经作为可靠的贸易和投资伙伴的全球声誉上。此类行为在国际关系中必将招致后果。 欧盟理事会12日发表的一份声明显示，欧盟决定无限期冻结俄罗斯在欧盟的资产。这为欧盟动用俄被冻 结资产资助乌克兰扫除了一大障碍。而在该决定出台前，欧盟冻结俄资产的制裁 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Central Bank of Russia has announced a lawsuit against the European Clearing Bank in response to the EU Commission's plan to utilize approximately €200 billion of frozen Russian assets, highlighting a significant legal confrontation over asset management and international law compliance [1][2] Group 1: Legal Actions and Implications - Russia's lawsuit is a strategic move to counter the EU's actions regarding the frozen assets, which are primarily managed by the European Clearing Bank [1] - The legal proceedings initiated in Moscow may pave the way for Russia to seek compensation from the EU and could serve as a basis for retaliatory measures against European assets in Russia, which are estimated to exceed $200 billion [1] - The approach taken by Russia emphasizes a preference for legal resolution over aggressive tactics, indicating a restrained yet firm stance in the geopolitical landscape [1] Group 2: Financial Dynamics and Future Outlook - Analysts view this confrontation as a financial "offensive and defensive battle," where the EU's economic pressure tactics may overlook Russia's capacity to retaliate within legal frameworks [2] - The initiation of the lawsuit marks a new phase in the ongoing conflict, potentially reshaping the financial security landscape in Europe [2] - The significant amount of frozen assets, particularly with Germany holding the largest share, underscores the stakes involved in this legal dispute [2]

新华社马德里/罗马12月12日电（记者孟鼎博 张馨文）据意大利《快报》周刊12日报道，西班牙首 相桑切斯日前在接受该媒体专访时表示，美国在委内瑞拉附近国际水域针对所谓"毒品走私"实施的打击 行动未经过司法程序，对国际法构成挑战。 近期，美国政府以打击毒品走私为由，不断强化在加勒比海及委内瑞拉附近海域实施所谓"执法"行 动，不仅导致美委关系持续紧张，也引发了地区国家和国际社会对主权、安全以及国际法适用问题的关 注。 桑切斯在专访中表示，"美国正在国际水域打着'打击毒品走私'的旗号实施未经司法程序的杀 戮""（美国）这种对国际法的挑战令人担忧"。 桑切斯呼吁通过和平方式和政治手段化解分歧，避免局势进一步升级。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The seizure of the tanker appears to be legal under U.S. federal law due to existing sanctions against it and the Venezuelan government, with implications for future actions against similar vessels [1][2][4]. Group 1: Legal Context and Actions - The tanker had been under sanctions since 2022 for allegedly smuggling oil between Iran and Venezuela, leading to its seizure under a U.S. federal court warrant [2][10]. - The U.S. has a history of seizing oil under sanctions, with proceeds previously allocated to victims of terrorism, indicating a potential similar outcome for this seizure [3][11]. - The legal process will require the government to prove that the oil was illegally smuggled, with the court's decision determining the next steps regarding the seized assets [10][11]. Group 2: Military and Strategic Implications - The seizure coincides with increased military presence near Venezuela, including over 15,000 U.S. armed forces personnel, suggesting a strategic escalation in U.S. actions against the Maduro regime [4][6]. - There is speculation about the possibility of a blockade against Venezuela if tanker seizures continue, which could escalate tensions further [6]. Group 3: International Law and Military Conduct - Concerns have been raised regarding the legality of U.S. military actions against alleged drug smugglers, with arguments that these operations may not align with traditional law enforcement practices [12][16]. - The treatment of individuals involved in these operations has been criticized, with claims that actions taken against them could constitute violations of international law [19][21]. Group 4: Political and Legislative Reactions - Bipartisan pressure is mounting for investigations into the military's actions, with calls for hearings from Senate Armed Services Committee members [24]. - Legislative measures are being proposed that could impact the budget of military officials involved in these operations, emphasizing accountability [25].

当地时间12月9日，联合国秘书长发言人迪雅里克表示，秘书长对也门胡塞武装持续任意拘押大批国际 机构人员"深感震惊和严重关切"，并强烈谴责其将联合国工作人员移交特别刑事法院的做法。 责编：陈菲扬、卢思宇 他强调，包括也门籍员工在内的联合国工作人员，在履行公务所涉行为方面依法享有司法豁免权。发言 人说，"我们敦促也门胡塞武装撤回相关移交决定，并立即释放所有被拘押的联合国、非政府组织和外 交人员"。 发言人表示，联合国将继续支持也门人民，并坚持向有需要的人提供基于原则的人道主义援助。（央视 记者 徐德智） 发言人称，目前共有59名联合国人员被拘押，另有数十名来自非政府组织、民间社会团体和外交使团的 人员遭到关押。发言人说，"这些人员被长期单独监禁，有些已多年无法与外界取得联系。行动未获得 任何正当法律程序，明显违反国际法"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's recent actions regarding China's Liaoning aircraft carrier group, highlighting that China's military training complies with international law and that Japan has been informed in advance about the training activities [1][2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Military Training Compliance - China's military training is stated to be in accordance with international law and practices, with prior notifications sent to Japanese naval vessels [1][2]. - The training was conducted in the Miyako Strait, with specific details shared with Japan, including the timing and location of the exercises [1][2]. Communication and Notifications - On December 6, the Liaoning carrier group conducted flight training, with notifications sent at 2:10 PM and 2:28 PM, confirming the training would start at 3 PM and last approximately six hours [1][2]. - Japan's "Shirayuki" destroyer confirmed receipt of these notifications, indicating awareness of China's training activities [1][2]. International Law and Freedom of Navigation - According to maritime security experts, China's training in the Miyako Strait is justified under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which grants freedom of navigation and overflight [1][2]. - Japan's acknowledgment of the notifications suggests that they were aware of China's legitimate training operations [1][2]. Japan's Response and Intentions - Japan's actions are characterized as attempts to disrupt China's normal training in the Pacific, reflecting a reluctance to accept China's naval presence in the region [1][2]. - Military experts suggest that Japan's exaggerated reactions aim to draw attention and sympathy, ultimately highlighting its own inadequacies [1][2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's recent actions regarding China's Liaoning aircraft carrier group, highlighting Japan's intrusion into China's training area and the subsequent exaggeration of "radar illumination" incidents as a means to distract from its own provocations [1][11]. Summary by Sections Military Training Compliance - China's military training is stated to be in accordance with international law and practices, with prior notifications sent to nearby Japanese vessels, which were confirmed received [1][13]. - The training was conducted in the Miyako Strait, with specific details shared with Japan, demonstrating transparency and adherence to international maritime laws [4][16]. Timeline of Events - On December 6, the Liaoning carrier group conducted flight training, with notifications sent at 2:10 PM and 2:28 PM detailing the training schedule and area [2][14][15]. - The Japanese destroyer "Shirayuki" confirmed receipt of these notifications, indicating awareness of China's training activities [3][15]. Japanese Response and Provocation - Despite being informed, Japan allegedly approached China's training area, leading to accusations of interference and attempts to portray China as a regional threat [5][17]. - Military experts suggest Japan's overreaction stems from discomfort with China's naval presence in the Pacific, reflecting a broader reluctance to accept China's military advancements [5][17]. Radar Illumination Incident - Japan's claims of "radar illumination" by China's J-15 fighter jets are characterized as an attempt to misrepresent standard military operations, with the article asserting that such radar use is common practice for ensuring flight safety [9][20]. - The article emphasizes that Japan's actions, including entering the designated training area, were provocative and placed both parties in a precarious situation [20]. Historical Context and Future Implications - The article notes that China's naval exercises through the Miyako Strait are not new and have become a regular occurrence, urging Japan to adapt to this reality [10][21]. - It questions whether Japan's focus on the radar incident is a diversion from its own military provocations and calls for introspection regarding its defense policies [11][21].

Core Viewpoint - The "Inheritance and Development of the Murayama Statement" group expresses strong concern over Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi's remarks regarding Taiwan, urging her to retract her statements as they deviate from Japan's post-war peace stance [1][9]. Group 1: Concerns Over Statements - Participants at the emergency press conference emphasize that Taiwan is an internal matter of China, and Takashi's comments are misleading and dangerous [1][7]. - The remarks made by Takashi are seen as a potential threat to the commitments made in the Japan-China Joint Statement during the normalization of diplomatic relations [3]. Group 2: Political and Diplomatic Implications - Political analysts highlight that Takashi's statements could lead to a difficult period in Japan-China relations, with concerns about Japan's increasing military expenditures and defense capabilities [5][7]. - There is a perception that Takashi's government is eager to engage in military actions, which raises alarms about Japan's defense policy direction [7]. Group 3: Historical Context and Legal Concerns - Experts argue that Takashi's comments violate Japan's pacifist constitution and international law, undermining Japan's established international trust [2][9]. - The remarks are interpreted as a potential reversal of Japan's post-war commitments to China, which could have significant diplomatic repercussions [11].

他说特朗普能够并将按其判断采取果断军事行动，维护美国安全。他驳斥了外界对相关打击行动的批 评，称行动旨在保护美国公民，"具有正当性"。他还将当前打击比作2001年"9·11"事件后的反恐战争。 责任编辑：韦子蓉 12月6日，美国国防部长赫格塞思为美方针对疑似贩毒集团船只实施的打击行动进行辩护。 12月6日，美国国防部长赫格塞思为美方针对疑似贩毒集团船只实施的打击行动进行辩护。 他说特朗普能够并将按其判断采取果断军事行动，维护美国安全。他驳斥了外界对相关打击行动的批 评，称行动旨在保护美国公民，"具有正当性"。他还将当前打击比作2001年"9·11"事件后的反恐战争。 连日来美军的打击行动遭到包括国内民主党在内的多方质疑。报道称相关打击行动已造成80余人死亡， 并因可能违反国际法而受到高度关注。 连日来美军的打击行动遭到包括国内民主党在内的多方质疑。报道称相关打击行动已造成80余人死亡， 并因可能违反国际法而受到高度关注。 责任编辑：韦子蓉 ...