Core Viewpoint - Recent actions by the United States in the Caribbean Sea, described as "anti-drug operations," are viewed by UN human rights experts as extrajudicial killings that violate international law and threaten regional peace and security [1][2]. Group 1: US Actions and International Response - The US has deployed multiple warships in the Caribbean under the pretext of combating drug trafficking, claiming to have sunk seven "drug boats" and killed at least 27 alleged traffickers since September [1]. - UN experts assert that even if the US's drug trafficking allegations are valid, the use of lethal force in international waters without legal justification constitutes extrajudicial killings and violates international maritime law [2]. - The experts emphasize that the US's planned secret operations against Venezuela and threats of military action severely breach the principles of the UN Charter, infringing on Venezuela's sovereignty and contravening the fundamental international obligation of non-interference in the internal affairs of other nations [2]. Group 2: Regional Reactions and Historical Context - Venezuela's Foreign Minister has accused the US of creating a fictitious enemy to justify its actions, labeling the US's operations as a "massacre" in the Caribbean [5]. - Several Latin American countries, including Brazil, Cuba, Mexico, Colombia, and Bolivia, have expressed opposition and condemnation of the US's so-called "anti-drug" operations and its interference in the region [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent authorization by U.S. President Trump for the CIA to conduct covert operations in Venezuela, which has drawn strong condemnation from various Latin American governments and organizations, citing violations of international law and threats to regional stability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Reactions from Latin American Leaders - The Brazilian Labor Party condemned the U.S. actions as a violation of international law and an infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty, emphasizing the historical context of U.S. interference in South America [1]. - Brazilian President Lula stated that Brazil does not accept interference from one country into another, advocating for dialogue and respect to resolve issues in South America [1]. - Cuban President Díaz-Canel expressed support for Maduro and the Venezuelan people, calling for unity [2]. Group 2: Concerns Over Regional Stability - The Bolivian President Arce warned that the CIA's actions pose a blatant threat and could escalate military actions that jeopardize peace in Latin America and the Caribbean [2]. - Mexican President Sinhaum opposed any form of external interference, reinforcing the sentiment of regional autonomy [3]. - The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America stated that the U.S. actions represent a real threat to regional security, asserting that there should be no space for war and interference in the Americas [3]. Group 3: Expert Opinions on U.S. Actions - International relations experts in Brazil noted that the confirmation of CIA operations in Venezuela sets a dangerous precedent, potentially justifying future U.S. military interventions in Latin America [3]. - Experts highlighted that the U.S. aims to regain control over Venezuela due to its critical position in the regional energy landscape, with claims that the U.S. justification of anti-drug operations is merely a pretext [3]. - Recent U.S. military deployments in the Caribbean, under the guise of anti-drug operations, have included sinking alleged drug trafficking boats and killing supposed drug dealers, despite reports indicating that Venezuela is not a major source of drugs entering the U.S. [3].

委内瑞拉：特朗普涉中情局秘密行动声明严重违反国际法 中新网10月16日电 据路透社等媒体报道，当地时间15日，委内瑞拉政府谴责美国总统特朗普授权美国 中央情报局对委内瑞拉开展秘密行动的声明，称其言论"严重违反国际法"。 据报道，委内瑞拉政府发表声明称，特朗普的言论严重违反国际法和《联合国宪章》，并指出美国的行 动旨在为"政权更迭"操作正名，其目的是掠夺委内瑞拉的石油资源。 报道称，委内瑞拉外长伊万·希尔在社交媒体Telegram上公布了委政府的声明。声明称，委内瑞拉常驻 联合国代表团将就此事向联合国安理会和秘书长提出申诉，要求美国政府承担责任。 此前报道，当地时间15日，美国总统特朗普说，他已授权美国中央情报局在委内瑞拉开展秘密行动。特 朗普还称，五角大楼正在考虑对委内瑞拉进行陆路打击，并表示美国已经很好地控制了海路。 近期，美国在加勒比海域部署多艘军舰。9月以来，特朗普政府已宣称在委内瑞拉外海国际水域击沉5艘 所谓"运毒船"并打死27名"毒贩"。委内瑞拉总统马杜罗多次指责美国意图通过军事威胁在委搞政权更 迭，并在拉美进行军事扩张。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：万可义 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容， ...

Core Points - On October 14, U.S. President Trump announced the sinking of a drug trafficking vessel near Venezuela's coast, resulting in the death of six individuals [1][4] - This action marks the fifth military operation against alleged drug trafficking vessels in international waters off Venezuela since September, with a total of five vessels destroyed and 27 alleged traffickers killed [4] - The attack is part of the Trump administration's strategy to increase pressure on the Maduro government, which the U.S. accuses of facilitating drug trafficking and human trafficking [4] Military Actions - The U.S. military conducted the operation under the authorization of the Secretary of Defense, targeting a vessel linked to a terrorist organization involved in drug trafficking [4] - The operation was carried out in international waters, with no U.S. personnel reported injured [4] - The recent military actions may exacerbate tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela, raising questions about the legality of such operations [4] Political Reactions - Some Republican lawmakers are demanding more information from the White House regarding the legal basis for the attack, while certain Democrats argue that these actions violate U.S. and international law [5] - The ongoing military operations could potentially hinder anti-drug efforts in the Caribbean, as they may provoke U.S. allies in the region, such as Colombia [4]

（文章来源：央视新闻） 希尔表示，美国没有任何理由可以为加勒比海地区的军事化行为辩护，并强调此类行动掩盖着对委内瑞 拉资源的觊觎。他强调，委内瑞拉人民在军民警团结的基础上，坚定维护国家主权、政治独立和领土完 整。 15日，委内瑞拉外长希尔表示，近几周以来，美国政府以所谓"打击毒品贩运"为借口，不断加剧对委内 瑞拉的军事威胁，严重违反国际法原则。 ...

Core Points - China opposes any actions that violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and infringe on the sovereignty and security of other nations [1] - China is against the use or threat of force in international relations [1] - China condemns external forces intervening in Venezuela's internal affairs under any pretext [1] Summary by Categories China's Position - China firmly opposes the recent military deployment by the US in the Caribbean Sea under the guise of combating drug trafficking [1] - The actions of the US are seen as a serious infringement on the sovereignty and legitimate rights of other countries [1] - Such actions are also viewed as a significant violation of international law [1]

新华社联合国10月10日电 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪10日在安理会加勒比海紧张局势紧急公开会上发言 时说，中方对美国引起加勒比海局势紧张深表关切。 傅聪说，美国近期以打击贩毒为由，在加勒比海委内瑞拉附近海域部署军力，宣称击沉委方有关船只、 击毙船员，拦截扣押委方渔船，导致地区形势持续紧张。美方在所谓"国际海域"单方面、超出合理限度 对他国船只进行执法，侵犯相关人员生命权等基本人权，对相关海域的航行自由与安全构成潜在威胁， 并可能影响各国依法享有的公海自由。相关行为严重侵犯他国主权安全和合法权益，严重违反国际法， 威胁地区和平与安全。中方对此深表关切，将密切关注局势发展。 他说，中方反对任何违反《联合国宪章》宗旨和原则、侵犯别国主权安全的行为，反对在国际关系中使 用或威胁使用武力，反对外部势力以任何借口干预委内瑞拉内政。中方敦促美方立即停止有关行动，避 免局势进一步升级，敦促美方不得以打击贩毒为由，损害各国航行安全以及依据国际法享有的自由和权 利。中方一贯支持通过加强国际合作打击跨国犯罪，呼吁美方通过有关双多边法律框架开展正常的执法 司法合作。 傅聪说，近期，多个地区国家对美方行为表示严重关切和强烈谴责，呼吁国际 ...

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the escalating tensions in the Caribbean, particularly due to U.S. military actions near Venezuela under the pretext of combating drug trafficking [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions and Regional Impact - The U.S. has deployed military forces in the Caribbean Sea near Venezuela, claiming to target drug trafficking, which has led to increased regional tensions [1] - U.S. actions include sinking Venezuelan vessels, killing crew members, and intercepting Venezuelan fishing boats, which are seen as violations of international law and threats to regional peace and security [1] Group 2: China's Position - China expressed deep concern over the U.S. actions, emphasizing that they infringe on the sovereignty and rights of other nations and threaten the freedom and safety of navigation in international waters [1] - China opposes any actions that violate the principles of the United Nations Charter and calls for the U.S. to cease its military operations to prevent further escalation of the situation [1] - China advocates for international cooperation to combat transnational crime and urges the U.S. to engage in lawful law enforcement cooperation through relevant bilateral and multilateral legal frameworks [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes its support for international law and justice regarding the ongoing situation in Gaza, urging Israel to cease actions that escalate tensions [1] Group 1: International Law and Justice - China stands firmly on the side of fairness and justice in the Palestinian issue, opposing any actions that violate international law, including international humanitarian law [1] - The Chinese government condemns any harm to civilians and attacks on civilian facilities [1] Group 2: Israeli Settlements - China consistently opposes the construction of new Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories, which has been clearly defined as a violation of international law by the UN Security Council [1] Group 3: Current Situation in Gaza - The situation in Gaza is described as fragile following a recent ceasefire, with a call for Israel to halt any actions that could exacerbate tensions [1]

Core Viewpoint - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde has expressed concerns over the EU's plan to use frozen Russian assets to provide a €140 billion loan to Ukraine, warning that it may violate international law and damage the credibility of the euro [1][10][17]. Group 1: EU's Loan Plan - The EU plans to use approximately €300 billion of frozen Russian state assets, with about €200 billion held by the European Clearing Bank, as collateral for a €140 billion loan to Ukraine [4]. - The strategy involves investing the frozen funds into EU-supported bonds, using the generated interest and returns as "compensation" for Ukraine, thereby avoiding direct legal issues [6][17]. - Some EU member states, like Belgium, have raised concerns about the lack of clear financial responsibility guarantees before proceeding with the plan [8]. Group 2: Lagarde's Warnings - Lagarde emphasized that any plan must strictly adhere to international law, warning of severe consequences if it does not [10][12]. - She highlighted the potential risks to the euro's status as a global reserve currency, noting that investor confidence could be undermined, leading to capital outflows and currency volatility [10][15]. - Lagarde also pointed out that consensus among jurisdictions holding Russian assets, such as the US and UK, is necessary, as unilateral actions by the EU could lead to legal repercussions from Russia [13][15]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The potential financial instability resulting from the EU's actions could have far-reaching effects, including inflation, unemployment, and currency devaluation, impacting the general public [17][18]. - Lagarde's caution serves as a reminder that while the EU's intentions may be noble, the long-term stability of the euro and adherence to international law are paramount [17][18].