Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of cross-strait exchanges and cooperation, highlighting the positive reception of activities led by Taiwanese figures like Ma Ying-jeou, while criticizing the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for obstructing these interactions [1][2]. Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The spokesperson from the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office, Zhu Fenglian, stated that cross-strait compatriots are like family and should enhance understanding and cooperation [1]. - Ma Ying-jeou's participation in the Straits Forum and other exchanges has received widespread approval from various sectors in Taiwan, contrasting with the DPP's negative stance [1][2]. - The DPP's actions are characterized as attempts to sever ties between cross-strait compatriots and reverse historical progress, which is viewed unfavorably by the public [1]. Group 2: Policy Initiatives - Starting from July 1, 2025, to December 31, 2027, the Chinese government will waive the application fee for the Taiwan Compatriot Permit for first-time applicants from Taiwan, aiming to facilitate travel and exchanges [1]. - Various cross-strait cultural, educational, and youth exchange activities are planned for the summer, indicating a robust and ongoing engagement between the two sides [2]. Group 3: Public Sentiment and Engagement - There is a growing trend of Taiwanese individuals, especially the youth, visiting the mainland and sharing their experiences, which is helping to dispel misconceptions propagated by the DPP [3]. - The increasing participation of Taiwanese social figures in mainland activities is seen as a way to challenge the DPP's narrative and promote a more accurate understanding of the mainland [3].

新华社北京6月25日电（记者尚昊、马欣然）国务院台办发言人朱凤莲25日在例行新闻发布会上就赖清 德24日所谓"团结十讲"第二场演讲中涉两岸关系内容评论指出，这一讲话是行"分裂"之实的"台独"自 白，为强化"台独"认同大肆鼓噪。 据报道，赖清德称，今年是故宫博物院建院100周年，届时台北故宫博物院将与美国博物馆合作，不打 算与大陆故宫博物院合作。朱凤莲对此评论指出，故宫博物院和台北故宫博物院同根同源、血脉相连， 珍藏着中华民族历史文化瑰宝，承载着两岸同胞共同记忆，是两岸同胞共同拥有的宝贵财富。两岸同胞 有责任共同传承好、弘扬好中华历史文化遗产。 她指出，赖清德在讲话中重弹"台独"旧调，刻意曲解历史，妄图制造仇恨与不满，加剧岛内社会撕裂， 营造"反中抗中"社会氛围，为其打压在野力量、推动"大罢免"进行政治造势；再次炒作两岸"互不隶 属"等"新两国论"，刻意煽动挑衅，升高两岸紧张；肆意抹黑两岸交流合作，把民众对和平稳定的期 盼、大陆对同胞的善意诚意污蔑为"统战渗透威胁"，极力操弄"抗中保台"，煽动升高两岸对立。台湾民 众对此不认同、不买账。 她强调，民进党当局出于谋"独"本性和政治私利，一方面极力推进"文化台独"" ...

最近，台湾地区领导人赖清德开启了一个所谓"团结国家十讲"的演讲，首站在新北市，6月22日演讲，第二站在桃园，6月24日演讲。 笔者将其定义为"台独"十讲。 虽然赖清德的"台独"演讲并无新意，不过是其过往"台独"言论的大杂烩，但是性质恶劣，影响极坏。所以，国台办发言人陈斌华在赖清德 发表第一场演讲之后的6月23日，就以应询答复的形式进行了回应。 陈斌华的回应长达1200字，历数了赖清德的5宗罪，主要内容如下：赖清德的讲话充斥着谎言与欺骗、敌意与挑衅，是一篇赤裸裸煽动两 岸对立对抗的"台独"宣言，是一盘错漏百出的"台独"歪理邪说大杂烩；赖清德否认台湾自古属于中国的事实，是对历史的歪曲和践踏；赖 清德把台湾同胞爱国爱乡爱土的感情与所谓"台独"挂钩，是对台湾人民光荣的爱国主义传统和无数先烈牺牲奉献的背叛和犯罪；赖清德 在讲话中偷换概念，抹杀二战胜利成果，是对国际法权威的公然挑战；赖清德在讲话中操弄"反中抗中"、强化"绿色恐怖"，阻挠两岸交流 交往，完全违背人心民意。 陈斌华表示，赖清德违背历史、现实和法理胡编乱造的种种谬论，只会被扫进历史的垃圾堆。赖清德无论怎样费尽心机，都阻挡不了祖 国终将统一、也必将统一的历史大势 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes Lai Ching-te's recent speech, claiming it distorts historical facts regarding Taiwan's relationship with China and promotes a narrative of Taiwanese independence that lacks academic support [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Historical Context - The article asserts that Taiwan has historically been an inseparable part of China, with evidence from various historical records indicating that the majority of Taiwan's population, including indigenous peoples, migrated from the mainland [4][5]. - It highlights that archaeological findings, such as stone tools and pottery, link Taiwan's prehistoric cultures to those of mainland China, particularly from regions like Fujian and Guangdong [2][3]. Critique of Lai Ching-te's Arguments - Lai's claims about Taiwan's historical independence and unique cultural identity are described as misleading and lacking in scholarly rigor, with references to specific archaeological sites being misrepresented [1][2][3]. - The article emphasizes that Lai's narrative attempts to sever the historical ties between Taiwan and mainland China, particularly regarding the Austronesian language family and its origins [2][3]. National Identity and Sentiment - The article argues that Lai's rhetoric undermines the shared identity and historical consciousness of the Taiwanese people as part of the Chinese nation, suggesting that his approach is a betrayal of national sentiment [5][6]. - It recounts the sacrifices made by Taiwanese people during the Japanese occupation, framing their resistance as a demonstration of their Chinese identity, which Lai allegedly misrepresents [5][6]. Conclusion - The article concludes that Lai's attempts to rewrite history and promote a separatist agenda are ultimately flawed and will not succeed in altering the deep-rooted connections between Taiwan and mainland China [6].

近日，赖清德展开所谓"团结国家十讲"第一场演讲，大肆散布"台独"分裂言论，炒作升级"新两国论"。 其演讲中充斥各种事实错误、历史谬误、歪理邪说，挑衅强、危害大，是一篇赤裸裸煽动两岸对立对抗 的"台独"宣言，再次展现了赖清德的无知与疯狂，再次暴露了其冥顽不化的"台独"本性和丑恶嘴脸，坐 实其为"麻烦制造者""危险制造者""战争制造者"。 自上台以来，赖清德拒不承认"九二共识"，顽固坚持"台独"立场，一面兜售分裂谬论，操弄"反中抗 中"，变本加厉制造"绿色恐怖"；一面向外部势力献媚输诚，妄图"倚外谋独""以武谋独"。忙来忙去， 嘴皮子越练越快、滑跪姿势越练越熟，唯独不关心、不在意台湾民众的生计和死活。图谋两岸经贸"脱 钩"、产业"断链"，狠砸百姓"饭碗"；"奉送"台积电向外部势力表示"忠心"，出卖台湾优势产业和发展前 景……任由赖清德当局消耗、祸害，只会将台湾的经济发展和民生福祉推向悬崖、推入火海。 统一是历史大势，是正道；"台独"是历史逆流，是绝路。一年多来的现实已经反复证明，"台独"挑衅一 日不止，反"独"惩戒一刻不停。无论赖清德之流现在跳得再怎么高、说得再怎么天花乱坠，也改变不了 人心、逆转不了大势，未来等 ...

6月23日，国务院台办发言人陈斌华答记者问。问：台湾地区领导人22日展开所谓"团结国家十讲"第一 场演讲，请问对讲话中涉两岸关系内容有何评论？答：赖清德22日的讲话充斥着谎言与欺骗、敌意与挑 衅，刻意曲解、割裂历史，大肆兜售"台独"分裂谬论，妄图为其建构"台独"论述炮制拼凑依据，为其推 动"大罢免"政治斗争谋取政治私利进行文宣造势，是一篇赤裸裸煽动两岸对立对抗的"台独"宣言，是一 盘错漏百出的"台独"歪理邪说大杂烩，充分暴露其冥顽不化的"台独"本性。(央视新闻) ...

转自：北京日报客户端 据报道，台当局近日更新"出口管制名单"，将华为和中芯国际列入。如岛内厂商想"出口"给管制名单中 的实体，须先取得台"国贸署"许可。不难看出，此举是台当局对美国遏华政策的又一次跟进。 谁都能看出，对美国，台湾只是一张"牌"；但对中国而言，台湾事关核心利益。我们具有坚定意志解决 台湾问题、实现国家统一，维护国家主权和领土完整的能力坚不可摧，反对"台独"分裂和外来干涉的行 动坚决有力。无论是谁、无论如何折腾，挑衅愈甚，反制也将愈烈。 众所周知，将华为和中芯国际列入"黑名单"，是美国泛化国家安全概念，滥用出口管制和长臂管辖的产 物。此前，台湾也禁止了向大陆"出口"光刻机等关键芯片制造设备，但基于岛内产业结构和发展所需， 并未将大陆主要科技企业或芯片制造商统统禁掉。据统计，2024年台湾第一大"出口"市场为大陆及香 港，占整体比重的31.7%，出口额为1506.19亿美元，其中约六成是电子产品。联系如此紧密，却在此刻 切断，有专家分析，不排除是台当局希望抓住这一轮中美贸易谈判的当口，发布"出口禁令"，"显示出 与美国的协作性"。 然而，这些年，台独的"投名状"一直没断过，美国真买账吗？在美国利益面 ...

一来，台湾科技产业与大陆本就联系紧密，通过与华为等企业的合作，台企能够参与更广泛的全球科技 产业分工，获取技术支持和市场资源。而此次"断链"使得台湾科技企业失去了与大陆优秀企业合作的机 会，限制了台湾企业自身技术创新和产业升级的空间。 二来，华为和中芯国际在台湾有着众多的合作伙伴和供应商，将它们列入黑名单会导致这些合作关系破 裂，使得台湾相关企业的订单减少，生产经营面临困境。这不仅会影响企业的经济效益，还可能导致企 业裁员，增加台湾的失业率，造成不良的社会影响。 以上绝非孤立现象，而是民进党当局一系列阻断两岸交流举措实施的一部分。赖清德上台后，为实现 其"台独"目标，以各种借口不断设限，阻碍两岸交流。在旅游业领域，民进党当局拒不解除赴大陆旅游 的"禁团令"，使得众多台湾民众难以前往大陆旅游。在教育交流领域，民进党当局同样动作不断，例如 将北京理工大学等7所大陆理工科名校列入禁止交流清单，并借口"统战渗透威胁"宣布不承认暨南大学 等3所大陆高校的学历。今年3月13日，又以"捍卫安全"为由，抛出所谓"17 项因应策略"。目前，民进 党当局进一步提出研修10项法案、12项法规命令及近百项措施计划，企图全面阻断两岸交 ...

6月13日下午，国防部新闻局副局长、国防部新闻发言人蒋斌大校就近期涉军问题发布消息。蒋斌：台 湾问题纯属中国内政，不容任何外来干涉。任何怂恿支持"台独"分子搞分裂的行径，都只会破坏台海和 地区和平稳定，也必将引火烧身、自食苦果。我们敦促有关国家切实恪守一个中国原则，停止向"台 独"分裂势力发出任何错误信号。在祖国终将统一、必将统一的历史大势面前，任何"倚外谋独"、"以台 制华"的图谋都注定失败。(国防部发布) ...

Group 1 - The core argument is that the actions of Lai Ching-te and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are seen as a facade for promoting "Taiwan independence" under the guise of "democracy and freedom," misleading both the international community and the Taiwanese public [1][2][3] - The DPP is accused of distorting the concept of "one China" and using it to label legitimate governance as "authoritarian," while framing their separatist actions as a defense of democracy [2][3] - The DPP's policies are characterized as a form of "green terror," suppressing dissent and limiting freedom of expression through political persecution and media manipulation [3][4] Group 2 - The DPP's military budget has reached historical highs, and they are implementing policies aimed at creating a wartime society, which is seen as a provocation that undermines cross-strait relations [4] - Public dissatisfaction with Lai Ching-te's governance is highlighted, with over 53% of the population expressing discontent, marking the highest dissatisfaction rate for a leader's first anniversary in nearly 30 years [4] - The DPP's economic policies are criticized for exacerbating wealth inequality and failing to address the low wage crisis faced by the younger generation in Taiwan [4][5] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that the essence of democracy is to ensure that the people's will is reflected in governance, contrasting this with the DPP's approach [5] - It argues that only under the framework of national unity can the democratic rights and welfare of Taiwanese people be genuinely safeguarded [5][6] - The narrative concludes that any separatist actions disguised as "democracy" are a betrayal of historical justice and national integrity, with a warning that those who persist in such actions will be condemned by history [6]