Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to analyze Taiwan's society through the lens of "official" (庙堂) and "civil" (民间) rather than the traditional divisions of pro-unification and pro-independence, highlighting that both sides are part of an established interest group [1][3]. Group 1: Civil Response to Military Events - The public reaction in Taiwan to the military parade on September 3 can be summarized as "civilian excitement, official silence" [2]. - Media outlets like China Times and CTi News provided extensive coverage of the military parade, reflecting a detailed and engaged public discourse [5]. - Prominent figures advocating for cross-strait communication and unification expressed strong emotional responses, with political commentator Qiu Yi describing the parade as the most spectacular and moving he has ever seen [6][7]. Group 2: Official Response and Criticism - In contrast to the public's enthusiasm, the official response from Taiwan's leadership was notably muted, with only a few statements from Lai Ching-te drawing attention [9]. - Lai's comments included a controversial reference to the victory in the Second Sino-Japanese War as a "ceasefire," which drew criticism from the opposition for being overly accommodating to Japan and ceding narrative control to mainland China [10]. - The lack of vocal support from the opposition party (蓝营) indicates a complex political landscape where few are willing to openly engage with the sentiments expressed by the public [10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the contrasting reactions between the Taiwanese public and the political elite regarding the recent military parade in mainland China, with the public showing enthusiasm while the political leaders remain largely silent [2][8] - The Taiwanese public is increasingly open to the future development of cross-strait relations, moving beyond traditional divisions of pro-unification and pro-independence [3][4] - Media outlets such as China Times and CTi News provided extensive coverage of the military parade, reflecting a strong interest in the event among the public [5] Group 2 - Prominent figures advocating for cross-strait exchanges expressed strong emotions about the parade, with political commentator Qiu Yi describing it as a deeply moving experience that instilled pride in being Chinese [6] - Expert opinions highlighted the military capabilities showcased during the parade, with notable features including advancements in unmanned and AI technology, improved stealth capabilities, and enhanced nuclear strike capabilities [7] - In stark contrast, the political elite in Taiwan, particularly the leadership, exhibited minimal response, with only notable comments from Lai Ching-te, who faced criticism for his remarks regarding Japan and the lack of direct commentary on the parade [9][10]

Group 1 - The next chairman of the Kuomintang (KMT) should be a "pure blue" individual, free from impurities, to lead the party out of its current predicament [2][4][8] - The KMT is facing a leadership election on October 18, with several candidates expressing interest, including Zheng Liwen and Luo Zhichang [2][10] - The concept of a "pure blue" person is inspired by Taiwan's political landscape, particularly the remarks of Lai Ching-te regarding eliminating impurities from politics [4][5] Group 2 - A core requirement for the next KMT chairman is a steadfast political stance, particularly in recognizing the "One China" principle and the "1992 Consensus" [9] - Zheng Liwen is the only candidate who has publicly identified as Chinese, stating she would respond as "I am Chinese from Taiwan" when asked about her nationality [10] - The KMT has historically struggled with internal inconsistencies, with past leaders deviating from core principles, contributing to the party's decline [9] Group 3 - The next chairman should possess a pure and selfless character, avoiding the "sauce jar culture" that has plagued the KMT, which leads to internal conflicts and undermines unity [11][12] - Luo Zhichang has made a public commitment to not run in the 2028 elections if elected chairman, demonstrating a selfless approach [12][13] - The KMT's internal culture has stifled talent development, and a strong chairman is essential to overcome this issue and enhance the party's effectiveness [13]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the U.S. prioritizing its own interests under the guise of "security guarantees," which leads to Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) relying on external support [3] - The spokesperson emphasizes that the DPP's attempts to collaborate with external forces will not change the fact that Taiwan is part of China, nor will it alter the international community's adherence to the One China principle [3] Group 2 - The article mentions that the DPP's actions are ultimately leading to a situation where they will be abandoned, referred to as "abandoning the pawn" [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent "Great Recall" vote in Taiwan indicates a rejection of pro-independence political maneuvers, suggesting that such actions lack public support and are destined to fail [1] Group 1: Political Context - The failure of the "Great Recall" is linked to the dissatisfaction with Lai Ching-te's administration, exacerbated by stalled US tariff negotiations and heightened tensions in the Taiwan Strait [1] - The spokesperson emphasized that the root cause of cross-strait tensions is the Democratic Progressive Party's refusal to acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" and its collaboration with external forces to provoke independence [1] Group 2: Future Relations - The spokesperson asserted that only by adhering to the "1992 Consensus" and recognizing that both sides belong to one China can dialogue and cooperation be fostered, leading to improved cross-strait relations [1]

Group 1 - The Taiwan industry is concerned that potential U.S. investment in TSMC could undermine Taiwan's industrial foundation, reflecting a broader anxiety about U.S. influence [1][3] - The spokesperson criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for compromising Taiwan's interests by aligning too closely with the U.S., suggesting that this could harm local businesses and the public [3][5] - Recent polling indicates a significant increase in negative perceptions of the U.S. among Taiwanese citizens, with 40.5% expressing unfavorable views, a rise of 16.3 percentage points since July 2024 [10] Group 2 - The spokesperson emphasized that the future and welfare of Taiwan depend on peaceful cross-strait relations and national unification, highlighting the economic resilience and potential of mainland China as a favorable investment environment for Taiwanese businesses [10] - The DPP's actions against Taiwanese artists engaging with the mainland are seen as detrimental to cross-strait cultural exchanges, with the spokesperson asserting that such measures do not reflect the will of the Taiwanese people [12]

Group 1 - The Kuomintang (KMT) is set to hold a new party chair election on October 18, with several candidates announced, including Zheng Liwen, Luo Zhichang, Zhang Yachung, Zhuo Boyuan, Zhang Yaping, and Sun Jianping, while current chairman Zhu Lilun has called for Taichung Mayor Lu Xiuyan to run but has been publicly rejected [2] - The next KMT chairman is expected to be a "pure blue" individual, a concept inspired by Taiwan's leader Lai Qingde, who aims to eliminate "impurities" from the political landscape [3][4] - The KMT is perceived as a mixed party, and there is a pressing need for a leader who can guide the party out of its current predicament [6][7] Group 2 - A core issue for the KMT chairman is the adherence to the "One China" principle and recognition of the "1992 Consensus," as past chairmen have shown inconsistency, contributing to the party's decline [8] - Among the candidates, Zheng Liwen has publicly identified as Chinese, stating she would respond as "I am Chinese from Taiwan" when asked about her nationality [8] - The KMT's internal culture, referred to as "jar culture," has led to a lack of genuine leadership and has stifled talent development, which needs to be addressed for the party's revival [9][12] Group 3 - The next KMT chairman should possess strong combativeness, as a weak leader has historically been a common issue for the party [12] - Luo Zhichang has made a public commitment that if elected, he will not run in the 2028 elections and will support Lu Xiuyan, demonstrating a selfless and pure approach [10][11]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that the recent "mass recall" efforts initiated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have failed, reflecting public dissatisfaction with the DPP's governance and its focus on political maneuvering rather than economic issues [1][2][3] - The failure of the recall votes is seen as a clear expression of the Taiwanese public's desire for improved economic conditions and cross-strait cooperation, rather than the DPP's "anti-China" rhetoric [1][2][3] - Analysts suggest that the DPP's approach, particularly under Lai Ching-te, has increasingly alienated mainstream public opinion, leading to a growing backlash against the party and its policies [2][3] Group 2 - The articles highlight that the DPP's attempts to frame the recall efforts as a reflection of public sentiment have backfired, with the actual results showing a rejection of the party's agenda [3] - There is a consensus among commentators that if the DPP continues to ignore the core demands of the Taiwanese people, it risks further political isolation and potential electoral consequences in the future [2][3] - The sentiment among the public is shifting towards a preference for stability and prosperity, with a clear rejection of divisive political tactics [2][3]

Group 1 - The Taiwanese government faces a significant increase in tariffs, with a new 20% tariff on top of existing rates, leading to a potentially disastrous "20%+N" tax burden on local industries [1][2] - Key sectors such as textiles, petrochemicals, steel, and machine tools are expected to be severely impacted, with the machine tool industry facing a combined tax rate of 24.7%, exacerbating competitive disadvantages against South Korean and Japanese products [2][3] - The Taiwanese government's response includes a commitment to increase investment in the U.S. by $400 billion, which is equivalent to half of Taiwan's annual GDP, indicating a willingness to spend taxpayer money to appease U.S. demands [2][3] Group 2 - The Taiwanese administration's approach of yielding to U.S. demands has not resulted in favorable outcomes, instead leading to increased pressure and unfavorable treatment compared to other trade partners [1][3] - The lack of transparency in negotiations, with claims of confidentiality, raises concerns about the effectiveness of the talks and the potential negative implications for Taiwan's economy [2] - The ongoing reliance on U.S. support while neglecting to strengthen cross-strait relations may lead to further economic challenges for Taiwan, as the government continues to pursue a confrontational stance against mainland China [3]

Economic Impact on Taiwan - The United States has imposed a 20% tariff on Taiwan, which is expected to increase to "20+N," significantly affecting Taiwan's economy [1] - Taiwan's economy is heavily reliant on exports, with the U.S. being the largest buyer, particularly for semiconductors and electronic components [1][4] - The semiconductor industry, a key pillar of Taiwan's economy, faces increased export costs, leading to reduced competitiveness and potential order declines [6] Agricultural Sector Challenges - Taiwan's agricultural products, including fruits and seafood, are also impacted by the new tariffs, resulting in decreased orders from U.S. importers [6] - Farmers and fishermen in Taiwan are struggling to sell their products, leading to significant economic distress [6] Political Context - The Taiwanese government, under Lai Ching-te, has been pursuing closer ties with the U.S. while facing backlash from the tariffs imposed [4][6] - The U.S. is perceived as prioritizing its own interests over Taiwan's, viewing Taiwan merely as a strategic asset against China [6] Military and Political Tensions - The Chinese government has expressed a strong stance against Taiwan's independence movements, emphasizing military readiness to counter any separatist actions [3][7] - The combination of military threats from China and economic pressures from the U.S. creates a precarious situation for Taiwan's independence aspirations [4][6]