Group 1 - The article discusses the invitation extended to Kuomintang (KMT) veterans to participate in the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, emphasizing the importance of historical recognition and respect for their contributions [1][2] - The spokesperson from the Taiwan Affairs Office criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for labeling the commemoration as a "united front tactic," revealing their opposition to historical truth and shared values [1][2] - The article highlights the cooperation between the Chinese Communist Party and the KMT during the Anti-Japanese War, framing the invitation to veterans as a recognition of their sacrifices [2] Group 2 - The article addresses the planned transit of Lai Ching-te through the United States, with the Taiwan Affairs Office firmly opposing any form of official interaction between the U.S. and Taiwan, reiterating the importance of the One China principle [3][4] - Lai Ching-te's remarks are criticized as filled with lies and provocations, aimed at promoting "Taiwan independence" and inciting conflict across the Taiwan Strait [4][5] - The article emphasizes that the current tensions in the Taiwan Strait stem from the DPP's persistent "Taiwan independence" stance and provocations [5][6] Group 3 - The article reports on the Taiwan Affairs Office's response to the DPP's actions against "Taiwan independence" figures, highlighting the legal repercussions for those who support separatist activities while profiting from cross-strait trade [6][7] - The article condemns the DPP's educational materials that portray a "China threat," accusing them of distorting history and poisoning the minds of Taiwanese youth [7][9] - The spokesperson emphasizes the shared identity of people across the Taiwan Strait and the cultural heritage that unites them, countering the DPP's narrative [7] Group 4 - The article mentions the ban on several mainland applications in Taiwan, with the Taiwan Affairs Office criticizing the DPP for restricting access to information and fostering an "information bubble" [9][10] - The spokesperson argues that the popularity of these applications among Taiwanese youth reflects a desire for better access to information and services, countering the DPP's claims of security risks [9]