据央视新闻，当地时间17日晚，印度民航总局发表了审查印度航空和印度航空快运运营情况的公告。公 告称，近期对印度航空 波音787机队进行的监察中未发现任何重大安全问题。飞机及相关维护系统均符 合现行安全标准。印度民航总局在公告中对印度航空近期报告的维护相关问题表示担忧。建议该航空公 司加强工程、运营和地面处理部门之间的内部协调，确保备有充足的备件，以减少此类问题造成的乘客 延误，并严格遵守相关规定。建议实施更系统、更实时的缺陷报告机制，以确保运营部门和安全关键部 门及时收到更新信息，增强整体决策能力，并减少后续干扰。 ...

文︱陆弃 印度航空最新的空难事故再次将全球目光聚焦到印度航空业长期存在的安全隐患上。6月中旬的坠机事 故，令人痛心不已。印度航空董事长纳塔拉詹·钱德拉谢卡兰在员工大会上的讲话表达了悲痛，也承诺 将以此次空难为契机，推动公司向更安全的方向转变。然而，这样的承诺能否转化为实质性的变革？印 度航空的安全危机究竟有多深？这场悲剧暴露出的远不止一架飞机的坠毁，而是整个印度航空业管理和 监管体系的严峻挑战。 这起悲剧提醒我们，航空安全是产业发展的生命线，任何为了利益最大化而忽视安全的行为都可能酿成 无法挽回的惨剧。钱德拉谢卡兰所称"最令人心碎的危机"，应当成为推动深层次改革的起点。印度航空 必须迅速落实透明、独立的事故调查，深入剖析事故成因，并全面升级安全管理体系和技术标准。只有 这样，才能真正修复公众对印度航空的信任，保障每一位旅客的生命安全。 印度作为全球增长最快的航空市场之一，航空需求激增带来的挑战不容忽视。印度经济快速扩张，但航 空基础设施建设和人才培养远未跟上。资金多投入到扩张和市场占有率，而非质量和安全，导致安全投 资被边缘化。印度航空业的结构性问题也十分突出，国营与私营企业之间的竞争和博弈使得安全责任和 监 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Indian aviation incident involved a plane that began descending after reaching an altitude of 650 feet, with the flight data recorder already located [1] Group 1 - The Indian aviation authority has introduced details regarding the crash incident [1] - A government team is set to review the crash event and will complete its assessment within three months [1]

以下文章来源于旅界 ，作者关注民航业的 旅界 . 跟踪时代浪潮，讲述文旅商业好故事。 来源｜ 旅界（ID：tourismzonenews） 封面来源 ｜ Boeing官网 当地时间6月12日，印度航空一架波音 787-8"梦想客机"在印度西部城市艾哈迈达巴德机场起飞后不久坠毁，成为波音787机型自2011年投入商业运营以来 的首次全损事故。 根据 Flightradar24 数据显示，事发时飞机刚刚爬升到 625英尺（约190米）高度，起落架仍未收回，便开始失速下坠，最终撞击地面并爆炸起火。 机上载有 242人，其中169名印度公民、53名英国公民、7名葡萄牙公民及1名加拿大公民。除一人外，其余人员全部遇难。 奇迹出现在 11A座位。 这场空难发生在 印度航空正经历转型关键期的第三年。 印度航空座位图，红色为生还者座位 他回忆称，飞机在起飞 30秒后突然传来巨响，机身随即失控坠毁。当他恢复意识时，四周是散落的残骸与遇难者遗体。 "我不知道自己是如何活下来的。"在病床上，他向印度媒体讲述了逃生瞬间："我站起来，看到满地尸体，吓坏了，就开始拼命往外跑。" 现场视频显示，身穿血迹斑斑 T恤的拉梅什，在街道上瘸行，被 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8 marks the first total loss of this aircraft model since its commercial operation began in 2011, occurring during a critical transformation period for Air India following its privatization by Tata Group in 2022 [5][18][30]. Group 1: Incident Details - The crash occurred shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad Airport, with the aircraft reaching an altitude of 625 feet before losing control and crashing [6][5]. - There were 242 people on board, with only one survivor, a British passenger, who recounted the harrowing experience of the crash [7][12][14]. - The aircraft was on a flight from Ahmedabad to London, and the crash site was in a residential area, leading to additional casualties on the ground [14][17]. Group 2: Air India’s Transformation - Air India is undergoing a five-year transformation plan initiated by Tata Group, which includes integrating various airline brands and optimizing fleet structure [20][18]. - The airline has placed orders for over 500 new aircraft in two years, with a significant portion being Airbus and Boeing models, including several 787 Dreamliners [22][20]. - Prior to the crash, Air India was expanding rapidly, becoming the only airline in India to operate long-haul wide-body aircraft on a large scale [23][27]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The crash has raised concerns about the safety governance of the Indian aviation industry, which was previously seen as a model of rapid growth and investment [27][28]. - The incident has drawn comparisons to previous aviation disasters involving Boeing aircraft, which have impacted the company's reputation and stock performance [30][32][40]. - Following the crash, Boeing's stock fell nearly 5%, indicating immediate market reactions to the incident and its implications for the company's trustworthiness [40][41].

每经编辑｜段炼 据新京报我们视频，6月13日，上海航空FM9449航班飞行过程中有旅客携带的充电宝冒烟，该航班机组人员迅速介入处置，旅客使用矿泉水接力协助扑 救。 旅客王先生说，当时飞机即将降落，有旅客使用充电宝充电，机舱内突然有烟雾弥漫，机组人员和旅客合力进行处置，机舱广播也提醒旅客保持安静，自 己有种劫后余生的感觉，挺后怕。 记者从上海航空客服获悉，该航班放行、落地均正常。 早在2014年民航局就发布了《关于民航旅客携带"充电宝"乘机规定的公告》，对在飞机上携带充电宝和锂电池作出如下规定： 一、充电宝必须是旅客个人自用携带。 二、充电宝只能在手提行李中携带或随身携带，严禁在托运行李中携带。 三、充电宝额定能量不超过100Wh,无需航空公司批准；额定能量超过100Wh但不超过160Wh，经航空公司批准后方可携带，但每名旅客不得携带超过两 个充电宝。 上述规定同时适用于机组人员。 但是到目前为止，充电宝着火事件依旧时有发生。即使有明文规定和机场的管控，但是不少旅客还是抱着侥幸心理会在飞机上使用充电宝或者是带着"三 无"充电宝上飞机，从而造成了一次又一次的航班上出现明火的案例。 值得注意的是，这已并非近期首次发 ...

被寄予厚望的波音787"梦想客机"首次发生坠毁，带走了两百多条生命。 悲剧发生在6月12日，印度航空一趟载有242人的航班在艾哈迈达巴德机场起飞不久后坠毁，全机仅一名 印裔英籍男子幸存。而在地面，一栋医学院宿舍楼被直接撞毁，引发剧烈爆炸与火灾，造成伤亡。 6月13日，多位航空业内人士向南都、N视频记者分析，事故可能因风切变、双发动机故障或飞机本身 故障等导致。 从恰尔基达德里撞机到科泽科德坠机，再到此次"梦想客机"坠毁，印度航空事故史上不乏致命事故。如 今"梦想"坠落，调查还在继续，印度航空又有一架客机在起飞后报告"炸弹威胁"，要求紧急降落。 致命坠机 当地时间6月12日13时38分，艾哈迈达巴德天气晴朗，AI171航班沿跑道缓缓滑行，加速，随后腾空而 起。然而，仅仅不到一分钟，这架承载着不同国籍乘客的客机，在约190米（625英尺）的高度，信号从 雷达上骤然消失。 监控视频画面显示，客机低空飞行后未能顺利爬升，坠落在距机场不远、民房密集的低矮建筑区。伴随 着剧烈的爆炸，一阵火光过后，滚滚烟尘瞬间腾起。 撞击之下，一栋医学院宿舍楼直接被毁，外墙被大火熏得漆黑，玻璃震碎一地，另有多栋建筑被波及。 根据现场画面， ...

最近几年，波音（BA.US）多款机型频繁出现掉舱门、掉轮胎、挡风玻璃破裂等事故，因此喜提脆皮; 之名，对公司的商誉、业绩、股价造成了严重冲击。 而最新消息显示，6月12日（当地时间），印度航空一架载有242人的波音787-8型客机在古吉拉特邦坠 毁。 而根据专家分析，此次飞机在起飞阶段未能正常升空，存在多种可能，比如发动机推力不足、控制面板 失效、飞鸟吸入发动机，或人为误操作等，目前还未有确定的结论。 6月12日（美东时间）盘后，波音的股价并未继续下跌，而是迎来微幅上涨，目前涨幅为0.17%，显示 出经过恐慌性的卖出后，投资者情绪有所修复。 不过，从近年的业绩情况来看，波音本身也是深陷泥潭;，基本面情况很差。 Wind数据显示，波音已经连续亏损多年。今年一季度，波音的业绩有所好转，其营收同比增长18%至 194.96亿美元，归母净利润亏损0.37亿美元，同比收窄89%。 有消息显示，在印度航空失事后，日本运输省已责令国内航空公司检查波音787系列飞机。 此次空难事件的发生是否会对波音的后续业绩造成影响值得投资者留意。 本文源自：财华网 涉事飞机载有近12.5万升燃料，坠机后爆炸和火灾强度大增。根据目前的消息， ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent crash of a Boeing 787 aircraft has shocked the global aviation industry, marking the first incident of its kind for this model, which has approximately 1,100 units in operation worldwide [1][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The crash occurred in western India, resulting in over 240 fatalities, and involved a Boeing 787 aircraft operated by Air India [1]. - The 787 model, known as the "Dreamliner," was first introduced into commercial service in 2011, with over 1,100 units delivered and around 900 outstanding orders, totaling over 2,000 orders [5]. - The aircraft has facilitated the creation of over 425 new direct flight routes globally, making it one of the most popular mid-sized aircraft [9]. Group 2: Investigation and Response - The investigation into the cause of the crash is ongoing, with Air India stating that it will fully support the investigation efforts [2]. - Boeing's CEO has expressed the company's commitment to assist the investigation led by the Indian aviation accident investigation bureau [4]. - GE Aviation, which provided the engines for the aircraft, has also established an emergency response team to support the investigation [4]. Group 3: Implications for Boeing - If the crash is determined to be due to a structural defect, it could severely impact Boeing's ongoing recovery efforts, especially following previous incidents involving the 737 MAX [10]. - The 787 has previously faced issues, including battery fires in 2013 and a production halt due to fuselage defects in 2020 [11]. - Following the crash, Boeing's stock price fell by 6% on June 12, indicating market concerns regarding the incident's implications [12].

Core Viewpoint - The recent Air India flight accident is believed to have resulted from operational errors rather than design or manufacturing defects of the aircraft [2][3][24]. Group 1: Accident Overview - The incident involved Air India Flight 171, which was en route from Ahmedabad to London, with an estimated death toll of around 300 [1][2]. - The aircraft involved was a Boeing 787-8, which has been in service for over 11 years and is a widely used model in commercial aviation [3][4]. - The accident occurred on June 12, 2025, shortly after takeoff, with the aircraft crashing into a hospital building [3][4]. Group 2: Aircraft and Operational Details - The Boeing 787-8 is equipped with two General Electric GEnX engines, which are designed to allow safe flight even if one engine fails [6][24]. - The aircraft's takeoff conditions included a temperature of 37°C, which could have affected performance, requiring a longer runway for takeoff [3][4]. - Monitoring footage indicated that the aircraft maintained a normal flight attitude until it stopped climbing and crashed [4][5]. Group 3: Potential Causes of the Accident - The possibility of simultaneous engine failure is low, and bird strikes were not evident from the footage [6][24]. - Questions have arisen regarding whether the flaps were deployed correctly during takeoff, as they are crucial for generating lift at lower speeds [9][14]. - There are concerns about the aircraft's landing gear not being retracted, which could indicate a malfunction or operational error [21][24]. Group 4: Investigation and Aftermath - The chaotic scene following the accident has raised concerns about the effectiveness of the emergency response and the accuracy of casualty reporting [23][24]. - The investigation will rely heavily on data from the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder to determine the exact causes of the accident [24][25].