国务院台办发言人张晗表示，只要承认一个中国原则和"九二共识"，两岸就能恢复接触商谈。民进党当 局一面大肆鼓吹"两国论"，公然进行"台独"挑衅；一面奢谈所谓接触商谈，完全是欺骗舆论，欺骗民 众。 经济观察网 据央视新闻客户端消息，11月5日，国务院台办举行新闻发布会，有记者问，台行政机构负 责人卓荣泰日前抛出两岸高层交流"四个前提"，声称只要大陆"不设前提、不扣帽子、不坚持台湾是其 一部分"，并以"'中华民国'和中华人民共和国互不隶属"为立场对谈，台湾便愿意两岸接触。对此有何评 论？ ...

【免责声明】本文仅代表作者本人观点，与和讯网无关。和讯网站对文中陈述、观点判断保持中立，不对所包含内容 的准确性、可靠性或完整性提供任何明示或暗示的保证。请读者仅作参考，并请自行承担全部责任。邮箱： news_center@staff.hexun.com 格隆汇11月5日｜据央视，国务院台办5日上午举行例行新闻发布会，国台办发言人张晗表示，法网恢 恢，疏而不漏。凡是以身试法的"台独"顽固分子，无论身在何处，我们都将对其采取一切必要的惩治措 施，依法终身追责。张晗表示，台湾是中国的一部分，"台独"是分裂国家、背叛民族的犯罪行为。公安 机关对"台独"顽固分子沈伯洋涉嫌分裂国家犯罪立案侦查，依法追究其刑事责任，合理合法，是落实 《关于依法惩治"台独"顽固分子分裂国家、煽动分裂国家犯罪的意见》的具体行动，是反对"台独"分 裂、维护国家统一的正义必要之举。相关司法执法行为，只针对极少数涉"独"言行恶劣、谋"独"活动猖 獗的"台独"顽固分子及其实施的分裂国家、煽动分裂国家犯罪，不针对、不涉及广大台湾同胞。民进党 当局故意将广大台湾民众与极少数"台独"顽固分子混为一谈，目的是恐吓民众，暴露的是其心虚胆颤。 (责任编辑：宋政 ...

国务院台办5日举行例行新闻发布会。有记者问：公安机关日前对"台独"顽固分子沈伯洋立案侦查。民 进党当局称，大陆持续发布惩"独"名单、制裁措施及立案调查等举措，未来可能将名单通报国际刑警组 织，发布红色通报进行全球通缉并要求引渡服刑。对此有何评论？大陆方面是否会这样做？ 国务院台办发言人张晗答问表示，法网恢恢，疏而不漏。凡是以身试法的"台独"顽固分子，无论身在何 处，我们都将对其采取一切必要的惩治措施，依法终身追责。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of the Chinese people's victory in the Anti-Japanese War and is an integral part of the post-war international order, supported by solid legal and historical foundations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - The return of Taiwan to China is framed as a major historical event that restored Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan, which is considered an inseparable part of China [2]. - The article cites that during the Anti-Japanese War, over 35 million Chinese military and civilian casualties occurred, with direct economic losses exceeding 100 billion USD and indirect losses over 500 billion USD [2]. Group 2: Legal and International Framework - A series of international legal documents, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, clearly affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, establishing its return as a historical and legal fact [2]. - The establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949 replaced the Republic of China as the sole legitimate government representing all of China, maintaining the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity, including Taiwan [2]. Group 3: Current Political Dynamics - The article criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party's stance on "Taiwan independence," arguing that it distorts historical facts and undermines the established status of Taiwan as part of China [3]. - It highlights that 183 countries have established diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China, supporting its position on the Taiwan issue, indicating broad international consensus against any attempts to separate Taiwan from China [3].

台湾光复是中国政府恢复对台湾行使主权的重大历史事件，是台湾作为中国不可分割一部分法理链条的 重要一环。包括《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》在内的一系列国际法文件，早已无可辩驳地明确了中国对 台湾的主权，明确台湾回归中国的历史和法理事实，其权威性不容质疑和挑战。1949年10月1日，中华 人民共和国中央人民政府宣告成立，取代中华民国政府成为代表全中国的唯一合法政府。这是在中国这 一国际法主体没有发生变化情况下的政权更替，中国的主权和固有领土疆域没有改变，中华人民共和国 政府理所当然地完全享有和行使中国的主权，其中包括对台湾的主权。中国人民大学两岸关系研究中心 主任王英津表示，台湾回归中国是战后国际秩序的一部分，这既是历史事实，也是国际定论，捍卫一个 中国原则是维护战后国际秩序的必然要求。 张 烁 台湾地位问题早在1945年中国人民抗日战争胜利时就已经彻底解决。赖清德及民进党当局顽固坚持"台 独"分裂立场，不仅歪曲历史事实，"只提终战，不提光复"，甚至勾连外部势力鼓噪所谓"台湾地位未 定"的谎言谬论，妄图"倚外谋独""以武谋独"、改变台湾是中国的一部分的地位。鼓吹"台独"就是分裂 国家，支持"台独"就是干涉中国内政，纵 ...

Core Viewpoint - The conference emphasized that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of the Chinese people's victory in the Anti-Japanese War and is an integral part of the post-war international order, supported by solid legal and historical foundations [1][2][3] Group 1: Historical Context - The return of Taiwan to China is viewed as a major historical event that restored Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan, which is considered an inseparable part of China [2] - The Anti-Japanese War resulted in over 35 million casualties and direct economic losses exceeding $100 billion, highlighting the immense sacrifices made by the Chinese people [2] Group 2: Legal and International Framework - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation clearly affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, establishing its return as a historical and legal fact [2] - The establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949 replaced the Republic of China as the sole legitimate government representing all of China, maintaining the country's territorial integrity, including Taiwan [2] Group 3: Current Political Dynamics - The persistence of "Taiwan independence" rhetoric by certain political factions is seen as a distortion of historical facts and a challenge to international order, which is deemed dangerous and unlikely to succeed [3] - The Chinese government aims to promote peaceful development of cross-strait relations and advance national reunification, which is viewed as an inevitable trend supported by the majority of the international community [3]

张晓刚： 民进党当局为一党私利，无底线媚美卖台，穷兵黩武掏空台湾，加速把台湾老百姓推向灾 难深渊。民进党当局买再多的武器也改变不了两岸军事力量对比态势，改变不了"台独"必亡的宿 命。美方应充分认清售台武器问题的高度敏感性和严重危害性，停止在涉及中国核心利益的问题上玩 火，切实将不支持"台独"的承诺落到实处。解放军将以更强大的能力、更可靠的手段，坚决粉碎任 何"台独"图谋和外来干涉，捍卫国家主权和领土完整。 据央视新闻，10月30日下午，国防部举行例行记者会，国防部新闻发言人张晓刚大校答记者问。 记者： 据报道，美台所谓"国防工业会议"近期在美举行，讨论共同研发生产武器、加强对台军售等 议题。请问发言人有何评论？ ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the negative implications of Taiwan's defense cooperation with the U.S., highlighting the detrimental effects on Taiwan's security and stability, and reiterating China's stance against "Taiwan independence" [2]. Group 1: Defense Cooperation - The U.S. and Taiwan are reportedly discussing joint weapon development and increased arms sales, which raises concerns about regional stability [2]. - The article criticizes the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for prioritizing its interests over Taiwan's security, suggesting that such actions lead Taiwan towards disaster [2]. Group 2: Military Balance - The article asserts that no amount of weapon purchases by Taiwan can alter the military balance between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait [2]. - It emphasizes the inevitability of the failure of "Taiwan independence" efforts, regardless of external military support [2]. Group 3: U.S. Role - The article calls on the U.S. to recognize the sensitivity of arms sales to Taiwan and to refrain from actions that could escalate tensions regarding China's core interests [2]. - It urges the U.S. to adhere to its commitments of not supporting "Taiwan independence" [2]. Group 4: Chinese Military Response - The article concludes with a statement about the Chinese military's readiness to counter any attempts at "Taiwan independence" and foreign interference, asserting a commitment to national sovereignty and territorial integrity [2].

Core Viewpoint - Recent articles from American think tanks and media criticize Taiwan's leader Lai Ching-te for his reckless behavior and suggest a "gradual unification" approach, raising significant attention and interpretation within Taiwan [1][2][3]. Group 1: Criticism of Lai Ching-te - Lai Ching-te is labeled as a "troublemaker" and "peace destroyer" by Chinese officials, with accusations of provoking tensions through his refusal to acknowledge the "1992 Consensus" and promoting "Taiwan independence" [1]. - The U.S. think tank RAND Corporation's report emphasizes the need for Taiwan to act with restraint to avoid escalating tensions with mainland China, highlighting Lai's provocative statements as a contributing factor to instability [2][3]. Group 2: Shift in U.S. Perspective - Articles from U.S. media indicate a shift from hawkish to more restrained views regarding Taiwan, suggesting that while Taiwan is important to U.S. interests, it is not a critical survival issue [4]. - The term "troublemaker 2.0" is used to describe Lai Ching-te, reflecting a growing distrust in his leadership due to his emphasis on "new two-state theory" and ideological rigidity [8]. Group 3: Implications for Taiwan's Future - Analysts warn that Lai's continued provocative stance could lead to adverse consequences for Taiwan, as the U.S. may not provide the expected support in the event of a conflict [5][7]. - The collective anxiety among the Taiwanese public regarding U.S. defense commitments is rising, with increasing skepticism about the reliability of American support [8].

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office emphasized that the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan advocates for peace, development, communication, and cooperation, while criticizing the current administration for ignoring public sentiment and worsening cross-strait relations [1][2]. Group 1: Cross-Strait Relations - The spokesperson stated that the "1992 Consensus" is the political foundation for cross-strait dialogue and stability, and its denial leads to tension and harm to the interests of Taiwanese people [2]. - The current administration's push for legislative amendments is seen as an attempt to create a "green terror" and escalate cross-strait tensions, which is contrary to the interests of the Taiwanese populace [1][2]. Group 2: Public Sentiment and Governance - Polls indicate that the approval rating for the current administration remains low, reflecting public dissatisfaction with its handling of cross-strait relations and economic policies [1]. - The spokesperson criticized the administration for prioritizing "Taiwan independence" over the welfare of Taiwanese citizens and businesses, which has led to increased public resentment [1]. Group 3: Religious and Social Issues - The spokesperson defended the policy of religious freedom and criticized the current administration for suppressing religious exchanges with the mainland, labeling it as a form of "green terror" [4]. - The establishment of a social media account by the Taiwan Affairs Office has received positive feedback from Taiwanese citizens, indicating a desire for better communication and connection with the mainland [3].