台湾问题是中国内政，一个中国原则是得到联合国大会第2758号决议权威确认的国际普遍共识。以何种 方式解决台湾问题、实现国家统一，是中国人自己的事，不容他人置喙。没有任何国家会容忍他国领导 人粗暴干涉本国内政，没有任何国家会容忍他国领导人对本国发出武力威胁。今天的中国早已不是当年 的中国，中国政府和人民捍卫国家主权和领土完整的决心和能力坚如磐石、不可阻挡。妄图走历史的回 头路，武力介入台海，将台湾从中国分裂出去，必将遭到迎头痛击。 （原标题：中国驻日本大使发文） 坚决维护一个中国原则和战后国际秩序（大使随笔） 《人民日报》11月30日第03版刊发中国驻日本大使吴江浩署名文章《坚决维护一个中国原则和战后国际 秩序》。 以下为全文： 80年前，中国人民抗日战争取得伟大胜利，日本签署投降书，正式接受《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等 规定台湾归还中国的国际法律文件，遭受日本殖民统治半个世纪的台湾重归祖国怀抱，历史正义终得昭 彰。在中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年之际，日本现职领导人悍然发表涉台露骨挑衅 言论，发出武力威胁与战争叫嚣，迄今拒不认错、拒不收回，严重破坏国际法和国际关系基本准则，严 重破坏战后国际秩 ...

台湾问题是中国内政，一个中国原则是得到联合国大会第2758号决议权威确认的国际普遍共识。以何种 方式解决台湾问题、实现国家统一，是中国人自己的事，不容他人置喙。没有任何国家会容忍他国领导 人粗暴干涉本国内政，没有任何国家会容忍他国领导人对本国发出武力威胁。今天的中国早已不是当年 的中国，中国政府和人民捍卫国家主权和领土完整的决心和能力坚如磐石、不可阻挡。妄图走历史的回 头路，武力介入台海，将台湾从中国分裂出去，必将遭到迎头痛击。 80年前，中国人民抗日战争取得伟大胜利，日本签署投降书，正式接受《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等 规定台湾归还中国的国际法律文件，遭受日本殖民统治半个世纪的台湾重归祖国怀抱，历史正义终得昭 彰。在中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年之际，日本现职领导人悍然发表涉台露骨挑衅 言论，发出武力威胁与战争叫嚣，迄今拒不认错、拒不收回，严重破坏国际法和国际关系基本准则，严 重破坏战后国际秩序，严重破坏中日关系政治基础。 中日关系的稳定发展，只能建立在牢固的政治基础之上。日本现职领导人单方面发起的破坏性行为，误 判形势、悖逆潮流、撞上南墙。日方当前唯一正确做法，就是恪守自身数十年来反复作出 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of adhering to the One China principle and maintaining the post-war international order, particularly in the context of Taiwan's status and Japan's recent provocative statements [2][3]. Summary by Sections Historical Context - The article recalls the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the War of Resistance against Japan, highlighting the return of Taiwan to China as a historical justice recognized by international legal documents [2]. Political Commitments - Japan's government is reminded of its commitments under the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, which acknowledges the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China and respects China's stance on Taiwan [2]. Taiwan Issue - The Taiwan issue is framed as an internal matter for China, with the One China principle being a widely accepted international consensus confirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 [3]. China's Stance - The article asserts that any attempts to interfere in China's internal affairs or threaten its sovereignty will be met with strong resistance, emphasizing China's determination to defend its territorial integrity [3]. Call for Japan's Compliance - Japan is urged to adhere to its long-standing political commitments, cease actions that undermine the post-war international order, and retract its erroneous statements regarding Taiwan [3].

《人民日报》11月30日 刊发 中国驻日本大使 吴江浩署名文章《 坚决维护一个中国原则和战后国际秩序 》。 台湾问题是中国内政， 一个中国原则是得到联合国大会第2758号决议权威确认的国际普遍共识。以何种方式解决台湾问题、实现国家统 一，是中国人自己的事，不容他人置喙。没有任何国家会容忍他国领导人粗暴干涉本国内政，没有任何国家会容忍他国领导人对本国发出 武力威胁。今天的中国早已不是当年的中国，中国政府和人民捍卫国家主权和领土完整的决心和能力坚如磐石、不可阻挡。妄图走历史的 回头路，武力介入台海，将台湾从中国分裂出去，必将遭到迎头痛击。 中日关系的稳定发展，只能建立在牢固的政治基础之上。日本现职领导人单方面发起的破坏性行为，误判形势、悖逆潮流、撞上南墙。日 方当前唯一正确做法，就是恪守自身数十年来反复作出的政治承诺，停止破坏战后国际秩序，立即撤回错误荒谬言论，以实际行动彻底认 错纠错。任何诡辩狡辩的言辞，都是自欺欺人。任何蒙混过关的企图，都不可能得逞。任何错上加错的举动，只会遭致更加严重的后果。 以下为全文： 80年前，中国人民抗日战争取得伟大胜利，日本签署投降书，正式接受《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等规定台湾归 ...

Core Points - The article emphasizes the historical significance of Taiwan's return to China after World War II, highlighting Japan's failure to acknowledge this and its provocative statements regarding Taiwan [1][2] - It asserts that Taiwan has always been an inseparable part of China and that Japan must adhere to the One China principle as a political commitment and international legal obligation [1][2] - The article stresses that the resolution of the Taiwan issue is an internal matter for China, and any foreign interference or military threats are unacceptable [2] Summary by Sections Historical Context - The article recalls the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, marking Taiwan's return to China as a fulfillment of historical justice [1] - It references international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation that affirm Taiwan's status [1] Political Commitments - Japan's government, through the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Communiqué, recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China and acknowledged Taiwan as part of China [1] - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between China and Japan reiterated the importance of adhering to the principles established in the Joint Communiqué [1] Current Relations - The article criticizes the current Japanese leadership for making provocative statements and failing to recognize historical commitments, which undermines the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations [2] - It calls for Japan to retract its erroneous statements and adhere to its long-standing political commitments to maintain stability in bilateral relations [2]

三是将撕裂亚洲稳定的安全架构。高市的涉台言论向"台独"势力释放错误信号，台当局近期频繁与 日方勾连，这种纵容分裂、火中取栗的行为，极大地推高了台海爆发军事冲突的风险。这种以邻为壑的 做法，正将亚洲推向"越扩军越不安全"的恶性循环，不仅破坏中日关系，更可能让亚洲失去数十年积累 的和平发展红利。 中日关系在当前已然被推向高度紧张、战略互信极低的严峻时期。这种由日方少数极端势力制造的 摩擦和对抗，不符合中日两国人民的根本利益，更不符合亚洲和平发展的历史潮流。国际社会对日本的 危险动向保持高度关切，普遍呼吁日方恪守和平承诺。日本国内的理性力量和经济界也担忧国家被少数 政客的极端思想拖入战争边缘。这充分说明，这种逆时代潮流而动的错误立场是不得人心的。 历史的教训历历在目，战后国际秩序容不得肆意篡改。日方若继续执迷不悟，在军国主义的道路上 狂奔，终将重蹈历史覆辙。国际社会应认清这一危险动向，共同捍卫二战胜利成果。日本国内的理性力 量更需站出来，阻止右翼将国家拖入灾难。只有真正深刻反思侵略历史，以负责任的态度维护战后国际 秩序，珍惜中日之间来之不易的合作关系，聚焦于和平合作与共同发展，才是真正符合日本国家利益、 符合人类和 ...

Core Points - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan suggest a potential military intervention, which has been met with stern objections from China [1][2] - The comments are seen as a serious challenge to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, violating international principles and agreements [1][2] - The remarks have sparked widespread criticism within Japan, indicating a disconnect between the government and public sentiment [3][4] Group 1: Provocation and Sovereignty - Kishi Nobuo's statements represent the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense, signaling a dangerous ambition for military involvement [1] - The remarks challenge China's sovereignty as established by historical documents and international resolutions, emphasizing that Taiwan is a core interest of China [1][2] Group 2: Historical Context and Public Reaction - The year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's liberation, highlighting the historical grievances against Japan's past actions [2] - There is significant domestic backlash in Japan, with public protests against Kishi Nobuo's comments, reflecting a strong sentiment against militaristic rhetoric [3][4] Group 3: International Relations and Stability - Kishi Nobuo's comments threaten regional peace and stability, drawing condemnation from various international figures and organizations [4] - The remarks undermine Japan's post-war international standing and could lead to Japan's isolation on the global stage due to perceived unreliability in foreign policy [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent provocative remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions, suggesting potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which has been met with strong opposition from China [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Provocation and Sovereignty - Takaichi's statements are seen as a serious provocation against China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, marking the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense [1]. - The remarks contradict established international agreements that affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and National Sentiment - This year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the recovery of Taiwan, highlighting the historical grievances stemming from Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan [2]. - Takaichi's comments are viewed as an affront to the collective memory of the suffering caused by Japan's wartime actions, which included significant atrocities against Chinese and Asian peoples [2]. Group 3: Military Expansion and International Relations - Takaichi's linkage of Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense is perceived as a pretext for military expansion, raising concerns about a resurgence of militarism in Japan [2][3]. - The remarks have drawn widespread criticism within Japan, with public protests indicating a significant portion of the population opposes Takaichi's stance [3]. Group 4: International Order and Legal Principles - Takaichi's statements challenge the post-World War II international order and Japan's pacifist constitution, which restricts military actions [3][4]. - The inconsistency in Japan's foreign policy regarding Taiwan undermines its credibility on the international stage, potentially isolating Japan diplomatically [3][4]. Group 5: Regional Stability and Global Reactions - The assertion that "Taiwan's issues are Japan's issues" poses a threat to regional peace and stability, with international figures expressing concern over the implications of Takaichi's remarks [4]. - The potential for Japan to become a destabilizing factor in the region is highlighted by reactions from other countries, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its historical actions [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry criticizes Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida for emphasizing the "San Francisco Peace Treaty," which is deemed illegal and invalid, while neglecting the "Cairo Declaration" and "Potsdam Proclamation," which have established international legal standing and are highlighted in bilateral agreements [1] Group 1 - The Chinese government asserts that Kishida's remarks undermine the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations as established in four key political documents [1] - The statement indicates that Kishida's actions reflect a lack of remorse and a continued challenge to the post-war international order and basic principles of international law [1] - The Chinese side calls for the international community to remain vigilant against such provocations and urges Japan to reflect on its statements and fulfill its commitments to China [1]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guo Jia Kun, emphasized that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of World War II and an essential part of the post-war international order, supported by various international legal documents [1][2]. Group 1 - The status of Taiwan was resolved in 1945 with the victory of the Chinese people in the Anti-Japanese War, and the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) on October 1, 1949, reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Taiwan [1]. - The PRC is recognized as the sole legitimate government of China, as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, which Japan acknowledges and respects [1]. - Guo criticized the San Francisco Peace Treaty for being illegal and ineffective regarding Taiwan's sovereignty, as it was made without the participation of key WWII parties and violated international agreements [2]. Group 2 - Guo highlighted that the current Japanese Prime Minister's focus on the San Francisco Peace Treaty, while ignoring the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, undermines the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations and challenges the post-war international order [2]. - The Chinese government urges Japan to reflect on its statements and take corrective actions to fulfill its obligations as a UN member state [2].