Core Viewpoint - Japan is attempting to break free from the constraints of international law as a defeated nation in World War II, leading to a potential resurgence of militarism, which poses a serious threat to peace and stability in Asia and the world [1][4]. Group 1: Japan's Recent Actions - Japan has made several dangerous moves, including the first export of lethal weapons since easing restrictions in 2023, discussions within the ruling party to revise security documents, and plans to deploy offensive weapons on islands near Taiwan [1][3]. - These actions are seen as a blatant disregard for international obligations and a significant challenge to the post-war order recognized by the international community [1][2]. Group 2: International Legal Framework - Key international documents, such as the UN Charter and the Potsdam Declaration, clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including the complete disarmament and prohibition of maintaining industries that could lead to rearmament [2][3]. - Japan's commitment to peace is further reinforced by the Japan-China Joint Statement and Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which emphasizes a path of peaceful development and the renunciation of war [2][3]. Group 3: Domestic and International Reactions - There is growing concern from the international community regarding Japan's right-wing movements that challenge fundamental principles of peace, including calls for military intervention in Taiwan and discussions to abandon the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [3][4]. - Scholars and officials from other countries, including Malaysia and Russia, have criticized Japan's leadership for its historical misconceptions, while domestic protests have emerged against the Prime Minister's controversial statements [3][4]. Group 4: Historical Context and Responsibility - The historical context emphasizes the importance of acknowledging past mistakes to avoid repeating tragedies, with a call for Japan to adhere to international law and its own peace constitution [4]. - The international community has a responsibility to uphold the post-war order and ensure that Japan's militaristic tendencies do not resurface, with a warning that any unilateral actions by Japan could lead to a reevaluation of its historical transgressions [4].

富士新闻网：日本首相高市早苗将于25日上午与美国总统特朗普进行电话会谈。据多位政府消息人士透露，特朗普提出此次通话，预计会说明自己与习近平的通话情况。各方关注的焦点将会是特朗普将就台湾问题向高市早苗表达何种观点。 https://t.co/EJhAXFHhmi外汇交易员 (@myfxtrader):11月24日晚，习近平同美国总统特朗普通电话，习近平强调台湾回归中国是战后国际秩序重要组成部分。特朗普表示，中国当年为二战胜利发挥了重要作用，美方理解台湾问题对于中国的重要性。 ...

11月24日晚，习近平同美国总统特朗普通电话，习近平强调台湾回归中国是战后国际秩序重要组成部分。特朗普表示，中国当年为二战胜利发挥了重要作用，美方理解台湾问题对于中国的重要性。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks on Taiwan continues, revealing a contradictory stance from Japan amid rising tensions with China [1][3]. Group 1: Diplomatic Relations - During the G20 summit, there was no meeting arranged between Chinese and Japanese leaders, despite Takaichi expressing a willingness to engage in dialogue with China [1]. - China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, clarified China's position regarding Takaichi's remarks, while Japanese officials dismissed China's statements as unfounded [3]. Group 2: Historical Context - The article emphasizes Japan's historical obligations regarding Taiwan, referencing the aftermath of the First Sino-Japanese War and Japan's colonial actions [3][4]. - It asserts that Japan, as a defeated nation, must adhere to international obligations concerning Taiwan, with no room for ambiguity or compromise [4]. Group 3: International Order - The post-war international order is based on legal agreements and commitments made by Japan regarding Taiwan, which the current Japanese government is accused of undermining [4]. - The article argues that Japan's lack of credibility and commitment to dialogue raises concerns about its intentions [4]. Group 4: Regional Stability - China's response to Japan's remarks is framed as a defense of national sovereignty and regional peace, countering any resurgence of Japanese militarism [5]. - The article warns that if Japan continues its current trajectory, it may face renewed scrutiny and accountability for its historical actions [5].

每经编辑｜程鹏 潘海福 11月24日，综合第一财经、智通财经报道，航班管家DAST数据显示，截至11月24日10点，已有12条中日航线取消所有航班，涉及名古屋、福冈、札幌、 大阪等地。 | | 未来 | | 周赴日航班取消航线 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 出发地 | 目的地 | 目前已取消 | 总计划 | 未来一周赴日航班取消率 | | 杭州萧山 | 中部国际机场 | 7 | 7 | 100.0% | | 南京禄口 | 福冈机场 | 7 | 7 | 100.0% | | 运城盐湖 | 中部国际机场 | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | | 南京禄口 | 中部国际机场 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | | 北京大兴 | 新干岁机场 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | | 深圳宝安 | 中部国际机场 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | | 成都天府 | 新干岁机场 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | | 扬州泰州 | 关西国际机场 | 3 | | 100.0% | | 福州长乐 | 那霸机场 | 2 स्ट | 2 | 100.0% | | 上海浦东 | ...

新华社北京11月23日电（记者阚静文 熊茂伶 赵家淞）在埃及首都开罗西南的吉萨金字塔不远处，有一幢名为"米纳饭店"的历史建筑。1943 年11月22日至26日，中国、美国和英国三国政府首脑在这里召开开罗会议，讨论对日作战问题，签署了《开罗宣言》。 《开罗宣言》于1943年12月1日正式发表，是世界反法西斯战争的重大成果，明确确认了中国对台湾的主权，为国际社会确立战后国际秩序奠 定了重要基础。 本月21日和22日，中国外交部发言人连续两天在例行记者会上提及《开罗宣言》，批驳日本首相高市早苗的涉台错误言论以及扩军危险行径。 多国人士指出，高市一系列错误言行践踏《开罗宣言》等"永不可逾越的历史红线"，严重违背国际法和国际关系基本准则，挑战战后国际秩 序，必将走向失败结局。 红线早已划下 《开罗宣言》明确规定，日本将窃取于中国的领土，包括台湾和澎湖列岛归还中国。1945年，中美英三国发表、苏联后来加入的《波茨坦公 告》，重申"开罗宣言之条件必将实施"。同年9月，日本签署《日本投降条款》，承诺"忠诚履行波茨坦公告各项规定之义务"。 国际社会公认，这些具有国际法效力的文件为二战后中国收复被日本军国主义掠夺和窃取的领土提供 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the significance of the Cairo Declaration as a historical document that confirms China's sovereignty over Taiwan and serves as a foundation for post-war international order, while criticizing recent statements by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida as a challenge to this established order [2][3][4]. Summary by Sections Historical Context - The Cairo Declaration, signed during the Cairo Conference in 1943, confirmed that territories stolen by Japan, including Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, would be returned to China [3]. - The Potsdam Declaration reiterated the conditions of the Cairo Declaration, affirming its implementation [3]. Recent Developments - Chinese officials have recently referenced the Cairo Declaration to counter Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a violation of international law and a challenge to the post-war order [2][4]. - Kishida's comments suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which contradicts the obligations set forth in the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration [4]. International Reactions - Various international figures have condemned Kishida's statements as a blatant disregard for historical agreements and international law, warning that such actions threaten global peace [5][6]. - Concerns have been raised about Japan's militarization and its implications for regional stability, with calls for Japan to reflect on its historical actions and adopt a responsible stance [6][7]. Economic Implications - The tensions arising from Kishida's remarks have led to public protests in Japan, with citizens demanding a retraction and apology, indicating potential domestic unrest [6][7]. - The deterioration of Sino-Japanese relations is feared to impact Japan's economy, which is already under pressure, as trade and development have been key to its post-war prosperity [6][7].

德国媒体人士托马斯·凯福：高市的危险言论代表了其战争政策，历史上日本就曾在中国、朝鲜半 岛以及亚洲其他地区犯下罪行。如果日本军国主义死灰复燃，将给整个地区带来严重破坏，我们必须警 惕！ 央广网北京11月23日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，国际人士表 示，日本首相高市早苗的错误言论挑战战后国际秩序，威胁地区和平。 意大利法学家法比奥·马尔切利：我根本无法理解台湾问题与日本国家安全之间有什么关联。台湾 是中国的一部分，高市的言论非常令人不安而且具有危险性，它正在威胁《联合国宪章》体系，动摇战 后国际秩序的法理基础，同时也违背了包括日本人民在内的所有人民对和平的共同愿望。 日本第一生命经济研究所首席经济分析师熊野英生：如果这样的中日关系持续1年以上，即使没有 2.6万亿日元，也将减少2万亿日元以上的中国游客消费，对于日本的旅游产业，特别是地方经济将造成 巨大冲击。 日本首相高市早苗的涉台错误言论破坏中日关系政治基础，严重恶化中日人员交流氛围。有日本经 济专家表示，若中国游客数量出现锐减，日本将出现2万亿日元以上的损失。 ...

Group 1 - Japanese citizens held a rally in front of the Prime Minister's residence in Tokyo on the evening of the 21st, demanding Prime Minister Fumio Kishida to retract his erroneous statements [1] - International figures indicated that Kishida's erroneous remarks challenge the post-war international order [2] - Myanmar's National Security and Peace Council official reiterated the government's adherence to the One China policy, emphasizing respect for China's sovereignty and territorial integrity [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the revival of Japanese militarism and any challenges to the post-war international order, emphasizing the importance of remembering historical lessons to maintain global peace and stability [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Military Developments - Recent statements from multiple Japanese officials indicate plans to restore military rank terminology such as "Colonel," which could break the long-standing practice of downplaying military aspects within Japan's Self-Defense Forces [1]. - The shift in military terminology is viewed as a potential aggravation for countries that suffered from Japanese colonial aggression, likened to "salting historical wounds" [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and Concerns - The Chinese spokesperson highlighted that Japan's militaristic past has caused significant suffering in Asia and worldwide, stressing that historical lessons must not be forgotten or distorted [2]. - The Potsdam Declaration explicitly prohibits Japan from rearming, and Japan's pacifist constitution establishes a principle of "defensive defense" [1]. - There is growing concern over Japan's recent security policy adjustments, including increased defense budgets, relaxed weapon export restrictions, and ambitions to develop offensive weaponry, which may lead to a departure from the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [1].