中国经济网北京12月29日讯 京源环保(688096.SH)27日披露关于收到江苏证监局行政监管措施决定 书的公告。 公司于近日收到中国证监会江苏监管局出具的《关于对江苏京源环保股份有限公司采取责令改正措 施并对李武林、季献华、苏海娟、钱烨采取出具警示函措施的决定》（〔2025〕220号），经查，公司 存在以下违规行为。 一是公司存在违规使用募集资金支付非募投项目费用的情况，也未在募集资金专项报告等公告中如 实披露，导致公司信息披露不准确，违反了《上市公司信息披露管理办法》（证监会令第182号）第三 条第一款，《上市公司信息披露管理办法》（证监会令第226号）第三条第一款，《科创板上市公司持 续监管办法（试行）》（证监会令154号）第三十二条，《上市公司监管指引第2号--上市公司募集资金 管理和使用的监管要求》（证监会公告〔2022〕15号）第六条、第十二条第一款，《上市公司募集资金 监管规则》（证监会公告〔2025〕10号）第八条、第十六条的规定。公司董事长兼总经理李武林、副总 经理季献华、董事会秘书苏海娟应当对公司相关违规行为承担主要责任。 二是公司在 2024 年年度报告中披露，公司法人治理的实际状况符 ...

12月26日晚间公告显示，京源环保存在以下违规行为：一是公司存在违规使用募集资金支付非募投项目 费用的情况，也未在募集资金专项报告等公告中如实披露，导致公司信息披露不准确，违反了《上市公 司信息披露管理办法》等相关规定。公司董事长兼总经理李武林、副总经理季献华、董事会秘书苏海娟 应当对公司相关违规行为承担主要责任。 由于存在违规使用募集资金支付非募投项目费用等情况，京源环保(688096)于近日收到江苏证监局出具 的行政监管措施决定书。 京源环保表示，公司及相关人员在收到上述行政监管措施决定书后，高度重视决定书中所指出的问题， 将严格按照江苏证监局的要求，认真总结，积极整改，并将在规定期限内向江苏证监局提交书面整改报 告。京源环保同时称，本次行政监管措施不会对公司的日常经营管理产生影响。 就在同一天，上交所也下发关于对京源环保及有关责任人予以监管警示的决定：对京源环保及时任董事 长兼总经理李武林，时任副总经理季献华，时任董事会秘书苏海娟，时任财务总监钱烨予以监管警示。 上交所要求公司及董事和高级管理人员采取有效措施对相关违规事项进行整改，并就公司信息披露及规 范运作中存在的合规隐患进行深入排查，制定针对性的防 ...

智通财经APP讯，巨力索具(002342.SZ)公告，公司于2025年12月18日收到河北证监局下发的《河北证监 局关于对巨力索具股份有限公司采取责令改正并出具警示函、对相关责任人采取监管谈话的行政监管措 施的决定》。决定书指出公司存在以下违规行为： 二是政府补助披露不及时。公司于2024年4月18日收到职业技能提升培训补贴163.62万元，迟至2024年5 月24日披露。公司上述行为违反了《上市公司信息披露管理办法》(证监会令第182号)第三条第一款、 第二十二条第一款规定。公司董事长杨建国、总经理杨超、董事会秘书张云对上述事项承担主要责任。 三是公司治理不规范。公司薪酬考核委员会、董事会未对第七届董事会聘任的高级管理人员的薪酬分配 方案进行审议并向股东大会说明，董事会、股东会未对个别非独立董事薪酬进行审议，违反了《上市公 司治理准则》(2018年修订)第六十条规定。个别公司高管同时兼任审计委员会成员，违反了《上市公司 独立董事管理办法》(证监会令第220号、证监会令第227号)第五条第二款的规定。 一是应收账款减值计提不准确。公司部分暂估应收账龄未按照业务实际发生月分延续计算，导致2023年 坏账准备少提 ...

巨力索具（002342）(002342.SZ)公告，公司于2025年12月18日收到河北证监局下发的《河北证监局关 于对巨力索具股份有限公司采取责令改正并出具警示函、对相关责任人采取监管谈话的行政监管措施的 决定》。决定书指出公司存在以下违规行为： 三是公司治理不规范。公司薪酬考核委员会、董事会未对第七届董事会聘任的高级管理人员的薪酬分配 方案进行审议并向股东大会说明，董事会、股东会未对个别非独立董事薪酬进行审议，违反了《上市公 司治理准则》(2018年修订)第六十条规定。个别公司高管同时兼任审计委员会成员，违反了《上市公司 独立董事管理办法》(证监会令第220号、证监会令第227号)第五条第二款的规定。 二是政府补助披露不及时。公司于2024年4月18日收到职业技能提升培训补贴163.62万元，迟至2024年5 月24日披露。公司上述行为违反了《上市公司信息披露管理办法》(证监会令第182号)第三条第一款、 第二十二条第一款规定。公司董事长杨建国、总经理杨超、董事会秘书张云对上述事项承担主要责任。 一是应收账款减值计提不准确。公司部分暂估应收账龄未按照业务实际发生月分延续计算，导致2023年 坏账准备少提2 ...

截至发稿，ST诺泰市值为122亿元。 每经头条（nbdtoutiao）——海南封关政策红利全解析：零关税、低个税、投资准入放宽、跨境资金自 由、创业扶持…… （记者 曾健辉） 每经AI快讯，2025年12月17日，上交所对江苏诺泰澳赛诺生物制药股份有限公司及有关责任人予以纪 律处分：经查明，诺泰生物披露的2021年年度报告存在虚假记载、在可转换公司债券公开发行文件中编 造重大虚假内容，上述行为严重违反了《证券法》第五条、第十九条第一款、第七十八条第二款，《公 司债券发行与交易管理办法》（证监会令第222号）第四条、《上市公司证券发行注册管理办法》（证 监会令第206号）第五条第一款、第九条第四项、第三十八条第一款，《上海证券交易所科创板股票上 市规则》（以下简称《科创板股票上市规则》）第1.4条、第5.1.2条、第5.1.3条,《上海证券交易所上市 公司证券发行上市审核规则（2023年）》（以下简称《上市审核规则》）第十五条等有关规定。鉴于相 关违规事实和情节，经本所纪律处分委员会审核通过，根据《科创板股票上市规则》第14.2.3条、第 14.2.4条、第14.2.5条，《上市审核规则》第四十条、第四十二条、 ...

Core Points - The company Koresys (301314.SZ) received an administrative regulatory decision from the Guangdong Securities Regulatory Bureau due to several violations [1][4] Group 1: Violations Identified - Koresys had issues with the calculation of accounts receivable aging, failing to continuously calculate and assess expected credit losses after converting accounts receivable to commercial acceptance bills [2] - The company did not properly disclose related party transactions, including failing to disclose a lease agreement with a related party and inconsistencies in reported sales figures [2][5] - There were irregularities in the management and use of raised funds, with costs for two fundraising projects improperly allocated, leading to discrepancies in reported project progress [3] - The management of insider information was found to be non-compliant, with incomplete records of insider registries and lack of timely documentation for stock incentive plans [4] Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The company was ordered to rectify its violations, and key executives, including the chairman and financial director, received warning letters for their responsibilities in these issues [4][5] - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued a regulatory letter to Koresys and the responsible individuals, highlighting the breaches of the listing rules [4][5] Group 3: Company Background - Koresys went public on March 28, 2023, issuing 10,625,000 shares at a price of 63.78 yuan per share, raising a total of approximately 67.77 million yuan [6] - The company experienced a significant drop in stock price after its initial public offering, currently trading below its issue price [6] - In 2022, Koresys announced a dividend distribution plan, distributing 14 yuan per 10 shares and increasing its total share capital from 42.5 million to 55.25 million shares [7]

Core Viewpoint - The company Jieqiang Equipment (300875.SZ) faces significant operational challenges and regulatory scrutiny despite its stock price performing well in the market. The company has been ordered to rectify internal control deficiencies and has experienced ongoing financial losses since its IPO in 2020 [2][3][4]. Regulatory Issues - Jieqiang Equipment received an administrative regulatory decision from the Tianjin Securities Regulatory Bureau due to internal control deficiencies, leading to warnings issued to four senior executives, including the chairman and general manager [2][5][6]. - The company has been found to have significant issues in financial and contract management, including improper use of employee personal bank accounts for transactions and signing of fictitious contracts [5][6]. Financial Performance - The company reported a loss of 0.23 billion yuan in the first three quarters of 2025, with cumulative losses of 3.86 billion yuan since 2022 [3][14]. - Since its IPO, Jieqiang Equipment has accumulated a net profit loss of 2.56 billion yuan, with a notable decline in profitability since 2021 [4][14]. Stock Market Performance - Despite the financial struggles, Jieqiang Equipment's stock has seen a significant increase, rising over 70% since the beginning of 2025, with a remarkable 2.2 times increase in stock price from April 9 to August 8 [4][15]. Company Background - Established in November 2005, Jieqiang Equipment focuses on the research, production, and sales of nuclear and biochemical safety equipment, aiming to provide integrated solutions in public safety and environmental protection [11].

Core Points - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has initiated an investigation against *ST Muban and its actual controller, Liao Zhiyuan, for failing to disclose non-operating fund transactions as required [2][5] - *ST Muban's stock has experienced a significant increase, with four consecutive trading days of price limits, raising concerns about a potential decline due to disconnection from its fundamentals [2][14] - The company reported a total market value of 4.085 billion yuan and a closing price of 9.42 yuan per share as of September 29, with a 5.02% increase [2] Regulatory Actions - Liao Zhiyuan received a notice from the CSRC regarding the investigation for not disclosing non-operating fund transactions [5] - The Shanghai Stock Exchange has publicly criticized *ST Muban and Liao Zhiyuan for multiple violations related to information disclosure and operational compliance [7][12] - The company has been found to have provided significant non-operating funds to its controlling shareholder and other related parties, amounting to 1.68 billion yuan in 2024 [11][12] Financial Performance - For the first half of 2025, *ST Muban reported an operating income of 141 million yuan, a decrease of 33.85% compared to the previous year [17] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was -212 million yuan, indicating ongoing financial distress [16][17] - The company faces delisting risks if its 2025 annual revenue falls below 300 million yuan and if it receives a negative audit opinion [18]

Core Viewpoint - Oriental Yuhong received a warning letter from the Beijing Securities Regulatory Bureau due to issues related to non-operating fund occupation by related parties and irregular financial accounting [1][2] Group 1: Regulatory Issues - The warning letter indicated that from February 2023 to May 2024, Oriental Yuhong provided 69.5 million yuan to its actual controller, Li Weiguo, through various means, with 20 million yuan in 2023 and 49.5 million yuan in 2024, constituting non-operating fund occupation [1] - The company failed to disclose these matters in a timely manner, which is a violation of relevant regulations [2] Group 2: Financial Reporting Irregularities - The company inaccurately recognized revenue from some photovoltaic component sales using the total amount method, and there were inaccuracies in the timing of revenue recognition for certain engineering projects [1] - Other financial reporting issues included improper accounting for intermediary fees, inaccurate debt restructuring accounting for certain assets, and incorrect aging classification for some other receivables [1] Group 3: Management Accountability - Key executives, including Li Weiguo (Chairman), Zhang Zhiping (General Manager), Zhang Bei (Board Secretary), and Xu Wei (CFO), were held primarily responsible for the company's violations [2] - The company plans to strengthen its internal control systems and improve compliance with laws and regulations to prevent similar issues in the future [2] Group 4: Company Performance - In the first half of the year, Oriental Yuhong reported revenue of 13.569 billion yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 10.84%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 560 million yuan, down 40.16% year-on-year [4] - As of August 11, the company's stock price rose by 1.94% to 12.64 yuan per share, with a market capitalization of 30.2 billion yuan, significantly down from its peak market value of 140 billion yuan in June 2021 [4]

Group 1 - The core business of *ST Panda is heavily reliant on fireworks products, which account for 99.99% of its revenue, while the small loan segment contributes only 0.01% [1] - On July 30, 2025, the Shanghai Stock Exchange criticized *ST Panda and its responsible individuals for discrepancies between the company's performance forecasts and actual results, which could significantly impact stock prices and investor decisions [3] - The company failed to timely disclose corrections to its performance announcements, violating multiple provisions of the Shanghai Stock Exchange's listing rules [3] Group 2 - The disciplinary actions taken against *ST Panda include a public reprimand for the then Chairman and acting General Manager Xu Jinhwan, the then Chief Financial Officer Huang Yuhan, and the then Board Secretary Luo Chunyan [3]