家住苏州的王女士近日向智通财经反映，她在"平安融易（中国平安集团旗下陆金所控股的融资服务品牌）"借款后，5个私人手 机号突然频繁遭遇暴力催收和短信骚扰，有的内容甚至夹带虚构的法院案件信息。王女士怀疑个人信息遭到非法窃取，这5个手 机号是办理宽带时赠送的号段，未曾在"平安融易"提交过。 的骚扰短信 据王女士回忆，其在2017年7月22日通过平安普惠APP（后更名为：平安融易）共借款7200元，第一次借款6000元，第二次借款 600元，最后又分两次各借款300元。王女士的丈夫韩先生向智通财经表示，他曾帮妻子还了各种小额贷款，但记不清当时是否 完全清偿了"平安融易"的本息。被催收后，"平安融易"客服人员告知，目前王女士已偿还6859.61元，自2018年9月份后未再继续 还款，还需偿还9739.02元，不过客服人员又表示，"具体要还多少钱是可以协商的。" 王女士收到的立案告知书 本文均为受访者供图 9月5日，苏州市公安局相城分局高铁新城派出所已就王女士报称的"被发送信息干扰正常生活"一案进行立案。 9月30日上午，智通财经从"平安融易"相关工作人员处了解到，经查，客户王女士在"平安融易"总计借款7200元，已还款 ...

央广网北京9月27日消息（总台中国之声记者管昕）据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻纵横》报 道，9月8日，国家卫生健康委宣布，育儿补贴的申领正式全面开放，按年发放，对3周岁以下婴幼儿按 每孩每年3600元标准发放，可通过支付宝、微信和各省份政务服务平台线上申领，也可线下申领。 申领政策发布后，短短数周内，就有多位新生儿父母在社交平台发帖称，他们刚填表申报没几天， 就陆续接到诈骗电话，对方不仅能准确报出孩子的姓名、出生日期，甚至连申领金额都一清二楚。在层 层诱导中，有人被骗走数千元。是谁泄露了他们的个人信息？ 9月23日，广东深圳的王女士接到一个电话，对方自称是"育儿补贴审核员"，并向王女士核对申领 名字和金额。 王女士说："他说现在已经审核下来了，但是发放有一些问题，让我上支付宝跟客服核对一下金 额，然后就可以给我发放。他看我没有接他的话，就说出了我孩子的出生日期，还报了我的身份证 号。" 王女士疑惑，9月16日她才通过官方指定平台提交了申领材料，诈骗人员是从何处精准掌握了孩子 的基本信息。 广州的董女士也接到了类似的诈骗电话。 董女士表示，她在官方指定平台提交申领资料后，大约过了一个多星期，就接到了诈骗电话， ...

他们的作案流程堪称"精心设计" 第一步，在网络平台发布极具诱惑性的兼职广告。"日薪300，轻松注册App，无任何风险。"这样的广告词吸引了无数渴望轻松 赚钱的人。当这些兼职人员来到工作室后，工作人员以注册App需要为由，收集他们的身份证、手机号等重要个人信息。 在互联网蓬勃发展的浪潮中，各大网络平台如同竞技场上的选手，为了争夺用户资源使出浑身解数。在这样的背景下，充场工 作室应运而生。充场工作室是通过招聘大量兼职人员，利用他们的真实身份信息或其他人员信息，批量完成新用户账号注册、 App下载等任务，帮助网络平台快速提升数据，赚取推广佣金。 第二步，注册实名网络账号。工作人员会拿着兼职人员的手机进行操作，表面上是在为App拉新注册，实际上却是在为贩卖账号 做准备。他们快速地注册各种网络平台账号，而兼职人员还以为这只是普通的兼职任务。 然而，不法分子却将其变成了贩卖实名网络账号的黑灰产温床，"充场"变"卖号"。近日，山东枣庄公安网安部门侦办了一起利 用充场工作室贩卖网民实名网络账号案，摸清了不法分子利用充场工作室为上游输送实名网络账号的全过程。 第三步，账号注册完成后，这些实名网络账号并没有用于正常的App推广， ...

Incident Overview - The incident began on July 22, 2025, when a dispute occurred between two drivers, Li and Hou, over a narrow village road in Fangchenggang [1] - Li recorded the encounter and later uploaded the video online on July 31, which sparked widespread public attention [1] Investigation Findings - Hou, the female driver of the black Mercedes, is a 28-year-old employee of a private company and not a public official [2] - The document shown by Hou was a personal administrative law enforcement certificate belonging to her husband, which was used to intimidate Li [2] - The use of the certificate was deemed improper, leading to an investigation into the husband for violating document management regulations [2] Personal Information Concerns - Li's personal information was allegedly disclosed during the incident, but investigations confirmed that neither Hou nor her father had access to any police systems to obtain such information [3] - There were no records of any queries made about Li or his family in police databases since July 2025 [3] Police Response - Li reported the incident to the local police on July 24, but the officers deemed it a minor dispute and suggested mediation [4] - On July 31, police attempted to mediate between Li and Hou after receiving complaints about Li's video, but Li refused to delete the video or apologize [4][5] Communication Issues - The police's communication with Li was found to be lacking in professionalism, leading to internal criticism and a call for improvement in handling such cases [5][6] Future Actions - The local government acknowledged the incident as a reflection of inadequate management and response to public concerns, promising to implement corrective measures and improve the handling of similar disputes in the future [7]

Core Insights - The investigation reveals that despite e-commerce platforms implementing privacy measures, there are numerous intermediaries offering "decryption" services for personal information at a low cost, indicating a significant gap in personal data protection [1] Group 1: Causes of Personal Information Leakage - The primary reason for personal information leakage is the existence of a substantial marketing profit chain that relies on personal data, with underground markets for personal information trading remaining active [2] - Weak regulatory oversight in the multiple stages of personal information handling during online shopping contributes to the leakage, as data may have been exposed before encryption measures were implemented [2] - Incomplete legislation and management loopholes in internet platform real-name authentication are major factors leading to ongoing personal information leaks [2] Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - It is essential to identify the channels through which personal information is leaked, whether through technical means or internal breaches, and to enhance regulatory oversight accordingly [3] - Regulatory bodies should increase compliance monitoring of personal information usage by logistics and courier companies, which typically do not need to retain extensive user data [3] - There should be an increase in administrative penalties for violations of personal information rights, including warnings, detention, or fines, and a clear definition of civil liabilities for offenders to enhance the cost of violations [3]

Core Viewpoint - The rise of fraudulent packages in the express delivery industry, particularly involving Yunda Express, is attributed to the financial struggles of delivery points, leading them to accept such packages for additional income [12][13][14]. Summary by Sections Fraudulent Packages and Consumer Experiences - Increasing cases of consumers receiving unsolicited packages, often containing low-value items and fraudulent promotional materials, have been reported [1][8]. - Consumers express frustration over the inability to stop these deliveries despite reporting them to customer service [8][11]. Regulatory Response - The State Post Bureau has initiated an investigation into Yunda Express for significant management lapses that allowed fraudulent materials to enter the delivery system [3][4]. - Yunda Express has committed to rectifying these issues by enhancing management and training at franchise locations [5][19]. Industry-Wide Issues - The problem of fraudulent packages is not isolated to Yunda Express; other delivery services are also implicated, indicating a broader industry issue [11][12]. - A former employee noted a significant increase in fraudulent packages over the past two years, suggesting a systemic problem within the logistics sector [11]. Financial Pressures on Delivery Points - Delivery points are increasingly willing to accept fraudulent packages due to financial pressures and the need to meet volume-based revenue targets [13][14][15]. - The competitive nature of the express delivery market, where low shipping costs are prioritized, contributes to this issue [14]. Personal Information Leakage - Concerns about personal information leakage from delivery points have been raised, with potential implications for the rise in fraudulent packages [17][18]. - The ability of delivery points to export customer information may facilitate the distribution of fraudulent materials [17]. Company Response and Future Measures - Yunda Express has acknowledged the issue and is conducting internal reviews to address management shortcomings [19][20]. - The company has not yet implemented specific measures to reduce the workload on frontline employees, which could help improve package verification processes [20].