Core Viewpoint - The Chengdu Xindu District Market Supervision Administration has initiated an investigation into Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. regarding the alleged misrepresentation of a product labeled as "99% Pure Antarctic Krill Oil" [1][3]. Group 1: Investigation and Findings - A joint investigation team has been established by provincial and municipal market supervision departments to look into the allegations against the company [1]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission has identified two main fraudulent behaviors by the involved companies: knowingly misrepresenting the product's phospholipid content and misleading marketing practices [4][6]. Group 2: Company Responses - Beijing Tongrentang Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. has ordered the cessation of sales of the disputed product and is conducting a thorough review of the situation [6]. - The company has also announced legal actions against the involved parties for unauthorized use of its brand name, which misled consumers [7]. Group 3: Consumer Protection Actions - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission has urged the company to conduct a self-examination, apologize to consumers, recall the problematic products, and provide compensation [4][6]. - Beijing Tongrentang Group has expressed deep regret over the incident and is committed to ensuring consumer rights are protected [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The investigation into the "Antarctic Krill Oil Gel Candy" by Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. has revealed serious allegations of product misrepresentation and fraud, leading to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal consequences for the involved parties [1][6][7]. Group 1: Investigation and Regulatory Actions - The Chengdu New District Market Supervision Administration has established a joint investigation team to look into the allegations against Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and has initiated a case against the company [1]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee has conducted tests on 15 popular Antarctic krill oil products, finding that one product from Beijing Tongrentang contained no actual krill oil, despite claims of high purity [3]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee has urged the involved companies to conduct self-examinations, apologize to consumers, recall the problematic products, and provide legal compensation [6]. Group 2: Company Responses and Accountability - Beijing Tongrentang Group has issued a public apology, expressing deep concern over the consumer rights violations and committing to a thorough investigation of the involved products [6][7]. - The company has mandated the immediate removal of the implicated products from the market and is pursuing legal action against the responsible parties for trademark infringement and misleading marketing practices [7]. - A special task force will be dispatched by Beijing Tongrentang to conduct a comprehensive review of the situation and hold accountable those responsible for the mismanagement and oversight failures [7].

Core Viewpoint - A product claiming to be "99% pure Antarctic krill oil" from "Beijing Tongrentang" was found to contain "0" krill oil, raising concerns about misleading marketing practices and consumer protection [2][3]. Group 1: Product Misrepresentation - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission tested 15 popular Antarctic krill oil products and discovered that the product in question had no actual krill oil content, despite claims of 43% phospholipid content [3][6]. - The product's marketing included phrases like "high content" and "imported raw materials," misleading consumers about its nutritional benefits [3][6]. - The manufacturer, Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., admitted that the product did not contain the claimed krill oil during discussions with the consumer protection agency [7]. Group 2: Misleading Packaging - The packaging prominently featured "Beijing Tongrentang," which misled consumers into believing it was a product of the well-known brand, while it was actually produced by a different company [8][13]. - The product's branding utilized a design that closely resembled the official Tongrentang logo, further contributing to consumer confusion [13][16]. - The distributor, Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., claimed ignorance of the misleading packaging, despite evidence suggesting they requested the design [16][24]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The issue of misleading products is not isolated; there is a larger trend of "borderline" products using the Tongrentang name to gain consumer trust, with similar products also found on e-commerce platforms [18][22]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission has urged the involved companies to conduct self-examinations and issue apologies to consumers, while also recalling the problematic products [24]. - The parent company of Beijing Tongrentang has initiated legal action against the distributor for unauthorized use of its name, indicating a serious approach to protecting its brand integrity [24].

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee has revealed that "Beijing Tongrentang" krill oil is suspected of being counterfeit, with the manufacturer admitting that the product does not contain the claimed "Antarctic krill oil" [2][3]. Group 1: Company Accountability - Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. stated that the disputed product was custom-ordered by Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at a price significantly below normal levels [2]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee found that the involved companies engaged in deceptive practices, violating consumer rights and market integrity principles [2]. - Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. denied knowledge of the alleged counterfeiting and attempted to evade responsibility during discussions with the committee [2]. Group 2: Consumer Protection Actions - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee urged Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. to conduct a self-examination, apologize to consumers, and recall the problematic products [3]. - The committee has notified relevant regulatory authorities in Sichuan about the situation [3]. - Beijing Tongrentang has ordered the cessation of sales of the disputed product and initiated a full process review and traceability [3].

Core Viewpoint - A product claiming to be "99% pure Antarctic krill oil" from "Beijing Tongrentang" was found to contain "0" krill oil, raising concerns about misleading marketing practices and consumer protection [1][3][12]. Group 1: Product Misrepresentation - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission tested 15 popular Antarctic krill oil products and discovered that the product in question had no actual krill oil content, despite claims of 43% phospholipid content [1][3]. - The manufacturer, Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., admitted that the product was customized by the distributor, Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., and did not contain the claimed krill oil [4][8]. - The product was sold at a price of 60 yuan per bottle, while the manufacturer's cost was only 3 to 3.7 yuan, raising questions about the legitimacy of the pricing and the quality of the ingredients [4][11]. Group 2: Misleading Branding - The packaging prominently featured "Beijing Tongrentang," which misled consumers into believing it was a product directly from the well-known brand, while it was actually from a different company [4][7]. - The product's branding utilized a design that closely resembled the core trademark of Beijing Tongrentang, creating a deceptive impression of authenticity [7][19]. - The distributor claimed that misleading packaging decisions were made by the manufacturer, while the manufacturer stated that the packaging was designed according to the distributor's specifications, indicating a shared responsibility for the misleading marketing [8][11]. Group 3: Broader Industry Implications - The incident is not isolated; there is a larger trend of "borderline" products using the Tongrentang name to mislead consumers, with similar products also found on e-commerce platforms [12][18]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission urged the distributor to conduct a self-examination, apologize to consumers, and recall the problematic products [19][20]. - Beijing Tongrentang Health Pharmaceutical Co. announced that it would stop the distribution of the implicated product and initiate legal action against the responsible parties for unauthorized use of its name [19][20].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the investigation by the Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee into the alleged fraudulent practices of Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. regarding their Antarctic krill oil products, highlighting issues of product misrepresentation and consumer rights violations [3][4]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee held discussions with the distributors and manufacturers of the Antarctic krill oil product, revealing that the manufacturer, Anhui Hab Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., admitted to not adding the claimed "Antarctic krill oil" during production [3]. - The distributor, Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., denied knowledge of the alleged fraudulent activities and attempted to deflect responsibility during the discussions [3][4]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee urged the distributor to conduct a self-examination, provide truthful information to consumers, issue a sincere apology, and recall the problematic products for refunds and compensation [4]. Group 2: Product Pricing and Quality Issues - The products in question were sold at significantly low prices, with one bottle of "99% high-purity Antarctic krill oil" priced as low as 7.5 yuan for 60 capsules, raising concerns about the quality linked to the low procurement costs [3][4]. - The investigation indicated that the companies knowingly misrepresented the product's contents, claiming a phospholipid content of 43% while the actual product did not contain the advertised Antarctic krill oil [4]. Group 3: Legal Implications - Legal experts noted that the low procurement price of the products suggests that quality issues stem from cost-cutting measures, which could lead to significant legal ramifications for the involved companies [4]. - There is ongoing debate regarding a trademark infringement case initiated by Beijing Tongrentang Group against its subsidiary, with potential implications for the legitimacy of the subsidiary's use of the brand name [4].

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding Tong Ren Tang's Antarctic krill oil product involves allegations of ingredient falsification, leading to significant scrutiny from consumer protection authorities and potential legal actions against the involved parties [1][2]. Group 1: Product Allegations - The product labeled as "Beijing Tong Ren Tang 99% High Purity Antarctic Krill Oil" was found to have a phospholipid content of 0, contradicting its claims [1]. - Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. admitted that it did not add the claimed "Antarctic krill oil" during production, raising concerns about intentional deception [2]. Group 2: Company Responses - Beijing Tong Ren Tang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. stated that they are conducting product testing and will take responsibility for consumer purchases [1]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee has urged Beijing Tong Ren Tang (Sichuan) to conduct a self-examination, inform consumers accurately, and issue an apology [2]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Actions - The parent company, Beijing Tong Ren Tang Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., has ordered the cessation of sales of the implicated product and initiated a full investigation [2]. - Legal proceedings have been initiated against the involved companies for unauthorized use of the "Beijing Tong Ren Tang" branding, which is considered illegal [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee has raised concerns regarding the authenticity of Antarctic krill oil products sold by Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., following an investigation that revealed potential false advertising and consumer rights violations [1][4]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee held discussions with both the distributor, Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and the manufacturer, Anhui Hab Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., regarding the issues with the Antarctic krill oil products [1]. - Anhui Hab Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. admitted that the product did not contain the claimed "Antarctic krill oil" during production, while the distributor denied knowledge of any fraudulent activities [1][4]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee has urged the distributor to conduct a self-examination, inform consumers accurately, apologize for the infringement of consumer rights, and collaborate with the manufacturer to recall the problematic products [4]. Group 2: Product Pricing and Market Presence - A bottle of "Beijing Tongrentang 99% High Purity Antarctic Krill Oil" was found on e-commerce platforms priced as low as a few yuan, with one product listed at 7.5 yuan for 60 capsules [3]. - Some related Antarctic krill oil products have been removed from certain e-commerce platforms, while others remain available for sale [3]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Implications - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee's investigation suggests that the involved companies may have engaged in deliberate deception, violating consumer rights and market integrity principles [4]. - Legal experts have indicated that the low procurement price of the products raises concerns about quality issues, linking the problems to the low pricing strategy [4]. - There is ongoing legal ambiguity regarding trademark infringement claims made by Beijing Tongrentang Group against its subsidiary, with potential implications for the use of the "Beijing Tongrentang" name by the subsidiary [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Consumer Rights Protection Committee has identified a product labeled as "99% high-purity Antarctic krill oil" from Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. that falsely claims a phospholipid content of 43%, with actual tests showing a result of 0 [1][5]. Group 1: Company Involvement - Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. stated that the product in question was custom-ordered by Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., which set a procurement price significantly below normal levels [4]. - The production process did not include the claimed "Antarctic krill oil," and the distributor denied knowledge of any fraudulent activities related to the product [4][5]. - Beijing Tongrentang has initiated legal proceedings against the involved companies and has ordered the cessation of sales of the disputed product [6]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Shanghai Consumer Rights Protection Committee has accused the involved companies of intentional fraud, violating consumer rights and market integrity principles [5]. - The committee has urged the distributor to conduct a self-examination, apologize to consumers, and recall the problematic products for refunds or exchanges [5]. - The committee has also notified relevant regulatory authorities in Sichuan to monitor the situation [5].

Group 1 - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission has disclosed that it has interviewed distributors and manufacturers regarding issues related to Antarctic krill oil products [1] - Anhui Hab Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. admitted that the products in question did not contain the claimed "Antarctic krill oil" during the production process [1] - Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. evaded responsibility during the interview, claiming ignorance of the alleged fraudulent behavior [1] Group 2 - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission has urged Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. to conduct a self-examination and inform consumers of the situation [2] - The commission has requested that the company sincerely apologize to consumers for infringing on their rights [2] - The commission has also called for a recall of the problematic products and for the companies involved to process refunds and compensations for consumers [2]